A SCHOOL HAS stopped disciplinary proceedings against a teacher who claimed she was falsely identified as the so-called “GAA Catfish” in a popular Irish podcast series.

The High Court in Dublin heard today that disciplinary proceedings have ended and a report that identified the secondary school teacher as the person the podcast relates to has been withdrawn.

Niamh Farrell, of The Spires, Portadown, Co Armagh, had been granted a temporary injunction against the board of management of the school at which she works in Rathfarnham, Dublin, preventing Coláiste Eanna CBS from progressing disciplinary proceedings against her which could have resulted in her dismissal.

The hugely-popular episodes of the 2 Johnnies Podcast discussed a woman, referred to as “Nikki”, who came to be known as the “GAA Catfish”.

In her sworn affidavit submitted to the court, Farrell denied she is the so-called “GAA Catfish” whose alleged behaviour was documented in the podcast episodes.

The music teacher said speculation online had claimed she was the “GAA Catfish” and the accusations became known among parents and the student body at the school in 2022.

She said she informed the principal the allegations were completely false.

She said in March she was shocked to receive a report into her conduct, and said it purported to be compiled under revised procedures for suspension and dismissal of teachers and principals.

She also denied a claim she said was in the report, that she had confirmed she is the person the podcast relates to, and stated that “at no time” did she accept this.

The board of management of Coláiste Eanna CBS was due to submit a replying affidavit, where it could set out its position on the dispute in open court.

Today, senior counsel for Farrell, Conor Power, said the matter has been “fully resolved” and proceedings are to be struck out with an order made for Farrell’s costs.

He told the court the school has agreed to withdraw the report which claimed Farrell is the person referred to in the podcast.

Barra Faughnan SC, for the board, said “that is correct” and confirmed the process is “at an end”.

Asked by judge Brian Cregan if his client had been wrongly identified, Power told the court the disciplinary process had been stopped, which is what he and Farrell had sought to achieve.

“I take it from that the school has ceased the disciplinary process, that’s what I sought to achieve and that was what the plaintiff has achieved,” he said.