Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
The cost of construction and installation was €322,282.78.
Speaking today, Chambers said the shelter is ”a complete waste of public money”.
“I think people are rightly annoyed at this, and there needs to be full accountability for whoever signed off on it and they should explain why it cost what it has cost,” he said.
“I think there is a need within the wider system for those who are responsible for capital projects to be cognisant of value engineering, value for money, and ensuring that whenever projects are advanced, and that they’re at the lowest cost in terms of the taxpayer.”
It comes after a Galway engineering firm said it could build the bike shed for less than a tenth of the fee paid by the Office of Public Works.
However, street furniture company Larkin Engineering said that while its “competitors” charge over €322,000, it could build and install a similar one for €19,995.
Get Your Own #LeinsterHouse#BikeShelter! 🚴♀️ Don’t miss this deal! 💸 Competitor's Price: €322,282 🔥 #LarkinEngineering: €19,995 (Supplied & Installed) Or, go for our Cycle Shelter Type 1 (fits 18 bikes) for just €7,000 Give your bikes a best home without breaking the bank! pic.twitter.com/1xXahEc6Ww
The company added that an even cheaper alternative can be provided for €7,000.
Stephen Larkin, the general manager of Larkin Engineering, told The Journal that he doesn’t think “there’s anyone that’s going to be able to stand over the costing” of the Leinster House bike shed.
“Something has gone very wrong in the pricing,” said Larkin.
He added: “Going into a building like Leinster House, you’re always going to put a bit of a premium on it, because it’s a protected building.
“You’ll add on maybe 15% due to unforeseen things that might come up, but from chatting to people, the estimation that most people are coming up with for all the work is around €60,000.”
Advertisement
While Larkin said these estimations do not include the granite flooring of the bike shed, he added: “If you go over the top and add on another €50,000 for granite, you’re still only in the region of €110,000.”
Asked about the social media post, Larkin said: “We were just making a joke of the whole situation.
“The situation is a joke already, but we were just jumping on it and making a joke of it as well.”
The shelter, which was hailed by Transport Minister Eamon Ryan as a good example of public sector climate action, also required archaeological advice to make sure it fit in at the parliamentary complex.
While he said the bike shed is on a “sensitive site”, he added that he was “shocked when I saw the price”.
In July, it emerged that Labour leader Ivana Bacik had pushed for new bike shelters at Leinster House.
However, the Ceann Comhairle Seán Ó Fearghaíl replied to say it was “extremely unlikely” that planning permission would be provided and that the existing facilities were underused.
Asked about the costs involved, a spokeswoman for the OPW said: “The bicycle shelter is a new structure located within the setting of Leinster House, a protected structure of national importance.
“In response to the character of the historic setting a well-designed structure with an appropriate use of high-quality materials and finish were required.”
Meanwhile, there have been examples in recent years of Government funded projects which include bike sheds coming in at a fraction of the price paid for the Leinster House one.
In 2022, €50,000 worth of funding provided to a Co Kerry GAA club by the Department of Rural and Community Development was used to develop a walkway, car parking, a picnic area and a bike shed.
Under the same funding tranche, €50,000 was given to a Co Cork sporting club to develop a fountain for a lake, to upgrade a walking surface, develop a car parking area, install seating, and develop a bike shed.
With additional reporting from Ken Foxe and Jane Moore
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
181 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@john o neill: it’s a constant in this country. We need someone that will come in and seriously crack down on this kind of behaviour. There should be zero incentive for government/Council officials to do shady backhanded deals like this. We all know that’s all this was. A nice payday for someone and their mates
@john o neill: the reason Eamon Ryan is so outraged is that he knows that extravagant spending on a bicycle shed will be blamed on the Green Party as wasting hard earned taxes. I wonder if whoever signed off on it intended the political blame to fall on the greens. At its most charitable it reveals gross incompetence in some group within the OPW and Dept of Public Enterprise and Reform.
@Patrick MC Dermott: your right there. Bike shed needed to keep bikes dry. No side walls on it, so I’d guess no one took into consideration that the rain falls as the wind blows. I guess the hot air rising from the dail probably causes a micro climate keeping the clouds and wind at bay.
Someone signed off on this. They need to be held accountable. This is the first time I’ve seen a picture of it. Outrageous cost but will we ever find out who is to blame?
@ecrowley ecrowley: It’s the civil service, they are never held accountable for anything, if the name of the person who signed off on it is ever leaked they’ll either get a golden handshake and big pension or be watted to another department on a higher salary. As bad as corrupt politicians are, we can only blame fellow voters for not ensuring they pay a price (looking at you Tipperary). The civil service and unions have a lot to answer for when it comes to the huge waste of taxpayers money in Ireland.
@Tom McDonnell: A complaint to the police will not ruffle ANY feathers. Just think of what they COULDN’T do last week when they witnessed thugs driving around on a stolen motorbike which was burned out when it ran out of petrol. You or I break a speed limit, haven’t hurt anyone physically or financially and we pay on the double with fines and increased insurance premia. Try and explain that to a teenager heading into the real world.
@ecrowley ecrowley: Exactly. No need for reviews or enquiries. The paper trail must be there….. follow the tender process….who quoted for the job and who got the job. Materials must be itemised and costed and labour per hour should be included. After that it’s only about who gave the go ahead. Its fairly simple stuff really.
@Sean Buckley: The crazy figure is due to public/private partnerships. This did happen in the private sector. Just like the Children’s Hospital and BAM. Or the concept of the private developer entering the Housing market a few decades ago coinciding with the start of the Housing crisis. It’s the selling off of industries like energy, waste, water etc. to the private sector where there’s no competition that has resulted to nobody being able to afford anything.
@matthew dempsey: Does anyone? There are plenty of cowboys about ready to grab easy money. As my dad used to say, “Fools and our money are easily parted.” My questions are 1. who signed off on it ?
2. Was there a tender process ?
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: there are 3 prices to any job, the real price, the irish price and the irish governments price. The wining tender was 2euro to cover the cost of the stamp, everything else was an add on
@Ollie Fitzpatrick: I’m not sure but I don’t think there was a tender for this specific build, I think the OPW have a contractor on hand for ‘smaller’ (!!!) jobs like this
@matthew dempsey: of this work was charged from agreed framework rates then someone needs to identify what other work they have been awarded under this framework and the charges for same.
Next someone needs to look at the office for government procurement to see how such rates qualified this supplier to be on the framework and also what sanity checks were or weren’t in place for the award of this piece of work at such an exorbitant price. Someone signed off on it and needs to accept responsibility.
@Shimo F: purchased off a framework so probably went to tender so we need to see the tender documents and how it was evaluated the 338k wasbest offer and represented value for m0ney. They need to look at OGP for documents and answers
I presume when Eamon Ryan is awake and shopping he must not look at the price of anything when he’s spending his own money. Just expresses dismay at the price when he’s leaving the shop, baffled at how it costs that much and how he got his shoes on that morning.
@Bryan: 1. ,He is not the minister responsible for the OPW. 2. This type of project would be signed off by a civil servant, do you think every bus shelter built is signed off by a minister ?
@mark sheehan: It’s a bike shelter. And the man who cycles bikes and is the leader of the green party who are in government, was surely pushing for a bike shelter for government buildings. His colleague was asked about it on virgin media last night and she said more bike shelters should be installed by places of work around the country before addressing the extortionate cost of it. It’s the green party who were pushing for it.
@Bryan: You still don’t see or better, don’t want to see the difference?
“The green party” might well be pushing for more bike shelters, which is fair enough – I believe.
“The green party” is not the one putting out the tender, select it and approve the – in this case – enormous price tag.
It’s not really that hard to understand?
@Wolfgang Bonow: I have a badger and a wolf attacking me over my comments about the green party….Im not directing the blame at him personally. I’m directing the blame at the government he has been a part of over the last 4.5 years who have treated the taxpayers money with neglect which has created a culture inside government buildings. Whether it’s children hospitals, useless bike lanes, bailing out RTÉ etc + when he’s asked about a bike shelter costing over €300k he grins back at the camera saying “It is rather expensive isn’t it”. Obviously it’s not just him but he was at the top table running the show. Matt Cooper asked him why this kind of expenditure has been allowed to continue over the years, following yer logic he shouldn’t have dared ask him as it has nothing to do with him?
@Bryan: I understand, i believe. But, do you really think the smallest party in government has that much power to influence all kind of decisions?
Or is it just used as scapegoat?
I believe it’s mostly the later and the greens are simply not good enough to make it clear.
Or they keep quiet to keep the peace in the coalition and then they deserve everything they will get in the next GE.
@Wolfgang Bonow: Actually, many, along with myself, do believe that the Green Party are the ones calling the shots in government at the moment. They have a hold on the larger 2 parties, using the threat of collapsing the government and forcing a GE. One where SF will most likely get a majority, and that has FF and FG running scared. Why else would they have gone into coalition with each other, and why else do the Green party get everything they want, from the DRS to the thr Galway city bypass being turned down. Now, how do you think they are being scapegoated ….they are getting what they want, aren’t they?
When it comes to gross incompetence and the inexcusable waste of tax payers money the bike shed is just another added to a long list – E voting machines that end up being sold as scrap
Thornton Hall site bought to build a prison that was never built.
A large printer that couldn’t fit into the building. Ventilators during Covid-19 that couldn’t be used. The list is an endless story of incompetence.
Nobody ever held responsible.
Corruption at its finest , as a contract engineer, I wouldnt be working onsite for long if I presented a bike shed for over 300k to my client , how anyone could justify this spend is beyond me … they will never change 100 years of Corruption built into that masterpiece
@Larry Betts: these replies have me feeling deflated. Everyone needs to get a grip. But I’ll just carry on acting a basket case. You will have to lock me up to get me to yield
@paul ruddell: I will try and carrier through this. Even though it could be a bumpy road ahead,a stiff upper lip and a well groomed handlebar moustache could just be the job
Why has no good journalist asked for an interview with Kieran O’Donnell he is the Minister responsible for the opw. (Or do we have any good journalists)
Have no lessons been learned after the children’s hospital fiasco, or was it a case of one hundred and fifty grand for you and a hundred and fifty grand for me and get someone to do the job for thirty six grand,.how many quotes did they get, obviously Larkins or anyone else didn’t get a chance to quote for the job,
who got the job and who are they related to?
Nobody will be sacked, those responsible will go out sick, refuse to attend the PAC or answer any questions. They will then text the OPW rep at the PAC telling them what to say. The OPW will then give them a massive Exit Package with a Non Disclosure Agreement & Pension, telling the public their hands are tied & the WRC ruled that those responsible must be rewarded. The Govt will then install an ex OPW insider to run the Organization who won’t be able to answer what his salary is & receive a Billion Dollar Bailout to continue the Largesse, this is how the country operates now & just continue struggling at work & hand over your Tax to them, so that they can continue to screw you.
Fat chance that an investigation team will arrive at the door of whoever is responsible for this debacle. In contrast to the unfortunate Garda Sergeant who was suspended for 3 years for lending a bike to an elderly man in his community during Covid. Golden Circles come to mind .
This outrage is a joke, this kind of waste and alternative brown envelope is rife in every part of the public sector, go look at what the HSE pays for meals to be provided for staff from Delicatessens round the country , or what The Lourdes Hosp in drogheda paid for a bird specialist to deal with birds of prey on the Hospital roof only to discover they were plastic birds of prey put there the year before to frighten sea gulls away, dail printers, buses that can’t be charged, it’s rife everywhere. As for anything procured from the construction sector, vaseline time, I know I worked in it. It’s a joke, it’s a big part of the greed and rampant inflation in this country. For all those who say it’s not the govts fault, well your very naive, behaviour always emanates from the top down, always, and with so many politicians with little or no real life experience it’s going to continue, keep voting for celebs, teachers, estate agents and don’t try something different, the bogeyman will get you if you do l.
That’s what happen when ffg know that a large section of the irish voting population are terrified of change ,And just keep voting the same entitled wasters ove and over again
What sickens me about this is that it is just a big joke to many people. Instead of being up in arms there is just an acceptence that this is the way things are done here. Little wonder these piigs in government are still in power. People who support them are just as culpible as the TDs themselves.
Simple question. Who signed off on this and what else have they signed off on in the past. As a taxpayer I want the name of that individual and what sanctions they will face. More that likely early retirement with a lump sum and pension. No accountability with taxpayers money
If you were a Government Minister or the Taoiseach and you didn’t already know exactly who signed off on the Leinster House bike shed, you could find that out in ten minutes or less with one phone call.
@Dvsespaña: 100 per cent.. more codology and can kicking. It’s quite simple .. whoever signed off on this needs to be sacked. They’re either grossly incompetent or hold tax payers in disdain. Either way they should not be left next nor near the taxpayers money.
They don’t care how people feel, they certainly don’t care about how much money they spend… Why.. Because we keep allowing them to get away with it, I just wonder what it will take for us all to say no that’s it enough is enough and take it to the dail and protest, because they are laughing at you, me and everyone else, they look at us as pathetic fools.
Three contractors a Mayo, Kildare & Kerry tendered for the bike shelter at Leinster house.
They were interviewed by an OPW officer.
The Mayo man quoted €100,000 the OPW officer asked for a breakdown in the figures the Mayo man said “€33,000 for parts €33,000 for labour & €34,000 profit”.
The Kildare man quoted €150,000 and his breakdown was €50,000 for parts €50,000 for labour & €50,000 profit.
The Kerry man quoted €300,000, the officer was shocked at the price & asked for his breakdown the Kerry man said “well it’s €100,000 for me, €100,000 for you & we give the job to the Mayo man
Scale it up and you have the children’s hospital fiasco. And Simon Harris was the health minister when that all broke. I’m reminded of the dáil printer as well that couldn’t fit into the room it was supposed to go into so they had to start knocking down walls. That all came to over €1m. That was only a few years ago. Jack Chambers wants someone to explain why it costs what it did. They can’t. Because it’s an obvious astronomical rip off and to actually explain it they will have to incriminate themselves. Like everything the government spends money on. There is no point in taking in all of this extra tax as we get zero value for money. I mean 335k for that. It shows there is no accountability or even vague attempt to get any value for tax payers money. We’ll blow the money that the country is taking in and will be back to square one.
Arrah shure I could make it meself for around 200 quid. Few shates of galvanized and couple of lengths of 2×4. I’d even throw ya back a tenner for the luck.
Ryan tubridy owes 350 thousand and there’s nobody in government saying a word not a vote catcher the shed is a shed and no tax payer will ever see or use it get rid of free parking in dail grounds
Everyone look over here – forget the hospital – forget housing crisis – forget emmm ohh I’ve even forgotten what I need you to forget —- grrrrrr it’s all because of the bike shed, let’s be angry together on that issue and get to the bottom of it and take all our pain out on that civil servant!!!
@Ben F: I used to like The Cure. But then another band appeared on the scene that were amazing,called The Prevention. Everyone said at the time that The Prevention were better than The Cure.
Just wait for the excuses to come that will give the money spent a nice brush over or under the carpet.a bloody disgrace people should call for an end to this government.childrens hospital now this what money has been outrageously that we don’t know about
People blame politicians for most things and rightly so! But politicians get voted in and out of office every so many years, the one constant is the civil service. They are the mechanism by which all this bòllǒx happens. This whole system needs to be reformed before any real change can happen in this country.
Thousands of clock watchers with no motivation to do a good job, churning around in a broken bureaucratic hell hole of a system with no desire for change.
It’s about time that somebody looked at all the projects the OPW are involved with. Just imagine Sinn Féin’s idea of a national building company to provide housing, that would be some fiasco. Bring in a couple of Chinese companies and they would get all of these major projects done at a fraction of the cost.
If the 325k is only for the structure sitting above ground, it expensive. The glass method used isn’t cheap, and one option is tinted glass called Evergreen. Anyway it looks to be a top class finish by the various trades. We don’t know what went on underground, yet, nor the logistics involved for lorries entering the site. Health & safety given its slap bang in the middle of government would have been onerous or most likely OTT. Not to mention the TMP. The professionals involved are likely pros at their job, and if their boss looked for an cost update, an update spreadsheet could be mustered lightening fast, as could the spec., BoQ etc.
And don’t forget the time cost spec triangle…
Who ever signed off on this one needs to do a RTE special and stick a pair of underpants on their head two pencils up their nose keep saying “wobble” and get a doctors note.
“there is a need within the wider system for those who are responsible for capital projects to be cognisant of value engineering, value for money, and ensuring that whenever projects are advanced, and that they’re at the lowest cost in terms of the taxpayer.”
The greatest work of fiction since the French marriage vows.
@maha freeman: it’s not, no Minister micro manages the OPW. But they are accountable and I’m sure the comptroller and auditor general will be looking at their spending.
How can they think that we think they’re serious when they ‘care’ and want someone to be held accountable. It’s a load of BS that they want to be seen to be outraged. It’s a joke, they’re all having a joke and as always it’s on us because we bloody pay for it every damn time. They play us for fools and no one, NO ONE will be held accountable…ever…really. Stop insulting us with these afterthoughts. The thing is built, it was probably approved a year or two ago, that’s when it should have been raised and stopped and something been done. Stop pretending to give a damn.
While you’re at it, hold the people responsible for the children’s hospital to account. The electorate deserve to know who is squandering the tax payers money and getting away with it!
@dave moran:
There is also the matter of sub contractors when invited to tender for state work getting together before hand and agreeing between themselves not the go below a certain price.
Accountability, does this mean demotion or some other sanction, or will we ever know the outcome of this costly scenario as the individual involved will be protected by the GDPR regulation.
Why isn’t the contractor who done the work not asked to account for their exorbitant pricing for a fairly ordinary looking lean to??? They are equally culpable in this and should be publicly named.
The people need to take a stand against this government. We have the power in numbers, we’re the ones running the country. Hospitality staff should refuse them service, drivers should refuse them travel, binmen should stop collecting their waste, cut them out of society one way or another until there is real change.
As with the nch the job would have been tendered and the cheapest INITIAL submission would have been excepted. Once the work begins then the builder starts loading on extras. The civil servant has ticked all the boxes knowing full well they are about to get rode and the tax payer get it crouching tiger style. Basically just a massive piss take from start to finish.
Someone had to agree the price and sign off on the job.
We may never know, who or why. That’s the way the system works, when it’s the tax payer paying.
Tánaiste warns EU retaliation on US tech firms would be 'nuclear option' and 'extraordinary escalation'
Updated
2 hrs ago
11.3k
56
District Court
Assault case against barrister Diarmuid Phelan adjourned until June
6 mins ago
0
Wildfire
Man arrested in connection with 'deliberate ignition' of major fire in Mourne Mountains
Updated
18 hrs ago
37.5k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 164 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 111 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 146 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 116 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 136 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 76 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 47 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 93 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 100 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 55 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 91 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say