Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Potential risk of differential tariff rates to all-island economy averted for now, Cabinet to hear
Water safety boss calls for new measures after teens' deaths in Buncrana
CCTV from petrol station captured clear images of crash that killed Garda Kevin Flatley
InvestigatesResidents at Risk
Revealed: Widespread breaches of basic care standards at residential disability centres
The Journal Investigates analysed 900 inspection reports to reveal that two large providers failed to meet Hiqa standards in over 85% of inspections last year.
STAFF SHORTAGES ARE significantly impacting charitable and nonprofit residential disability service providers, with centres across the country failing to meet care standards.
The Journal Investigates reveals the pressure placed on staff — with some working up to 60-70 hours a week to plug gaps in the system — leading to burnout, low morale and retention issues.
A family of a former resident told us that a constant change of staff had a “huge knock-on effect” on the standard of care received by their relative.
Our investigative unit examined more than 900 inspection reports from the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) in 2023. We found that charitable-run disability centres were significantly less compliant than those managed directly by the HSE.
According to the Regulation Handbook published by Hiqa, “a judgement of not compliant means the provider or person in charge has failed to comply with a regulation and that considerable action is required” to improve standards at the centre.
These regulations, set out under the Health Act 2007, cover a wide range of areas, including governance, staffing, health and safety as well as individualised support and care of residents.
We can reveal that 92% of inspections of residential centres run by Ability West found breaches in at least one regulation in 2023 – the highest of any provider. A similarly high number (86%) was recorded in inspections of COPE Foundation centres.
A spokesperson for the COPE Foundation said the organisation acknowledges the findings of Hiqa inspections from 2023 and is working to address them “as a matter of urgency”.
Ability West also acknowledged “a range of significant challenges facing the organisation in 2023” and that there has been a “marked positive turnaround in 2024” following a “comprehensive review of operations in consultation with Hiqa and the HSE”.
Providers struggling to meet obligations
There are approximately 1,600 residential disability centres in Ireland, with only 168 of these directly managed by the HSE. The rest are run by charitable or nonprofit organisations.
However, as our investigation exposes, many of these providers struggle to meet their obligations under the regulations to maintain safe and effective residential disability services.
Hiqa is responsible for monitoring, inspecting and maintaining the registration of these centres, ensuring that providers meet the national standards for residential service for people with disabilities.
Concerns over slipping standards of care were raised by Hiqa in their 2022 annual report, with the regulator stating “there was a notable deterioration in the levels of compliance across services”.
A spokesperson for Hiqa said “it is the providers’ legal responsibility” to ensure services are delivered in-line with the assessed needs of residents and that it is “the responsibility of the Chief Inspector of Social Services within Hiqa to monitor this”.
A HSE spokesperson also added that “the vast majority of the voluntary entities are compliant or substantially compliant with regulations and deliver services to a standard at least comparable to HSE’s directly delivered services”.
The HSE also acknowledged that “voluntary organisations are an essential and valued element of Ireland’s public health and social care system.”
Hiqa offices in Dublin Sam Boal
Sam Boal
Investigations like this don’t happen without your support… Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you.
Our investigation shows how a lack of staff is contributing to these poor standards and impacting the delivery of care and quality of life received by residents.
The staff that worked at all of these centres were often praised by inspectors, saying they displayed care and kindness towards residents.
However, inspectors were also sharply critical of the providers for not allocating enough staff and resources to run these centres.
At one Ability West centre, inspectors found that staff were working up to 60 and 70 hours a week and that they sometimes had to work full days following being on duty during the night.
Agency staff from four different external agencies were being used to cover other gaps at this centre, but inspectors found that some of these agency staff did not have adequate training to deal with the complex care of some residents.
At another centre run by the COPE Foundation, one or two staff members regularly supported 11 or more residents, significantly elevating the risk at the centre.
A spokesperson for the COPE Foundation said it is working within its limits of funding when it comes to staffing, and added:
The recruitment of staff is an issue affecting organisations right around the country.
A spokesperson for Ability West told The Journal Investigates that staff shortages have created “protracted challenges” that are “difficult to overcome” but are “constantly being worked on”.
Staff ‘burnt out’ due to immense pressure
The Journal Investigates spoke to current and former staff at these providers about the pressures faced due to a lack of staff.
They told us it was putting current staff under immense pressure, leading to burnout and high turnover.
One staff member at the COPE Foundation with more than 10 years experience said retention of staff has always been an issue, with low morale prevalent across different sectors of the organisation.
They said the lack of staff numbers sometimes meant they were unable to provide adequate care to residents that had more specialised needs and that their ability to take residents out for activities was hampered by a lack of resources.
The staff member told us that while there was an acknowledgement from management of the lack of staff, they were told “there was always an area that was worse off than us, there was always an area that had less staff” when requests were made for more staff.
“Everybody there wants to give the best care to the residents,” they continued, adding that the frustration at not being able to provide this care due to staffing constraints led to low morale among staff and a high turnover rate.
A spokesperson for the COPE Foundation said that “staff welfare is always a key priority” for the organisation, and encouraged staff experiencing difficulties to contact HR. They also added that staff wellbeing teams have been put in place to assist staff.
We also heard from staff working at Ability West who said the lack of staff was leading to a feeling of pressure to take on extra shifts. One staff member said they had heard of staff covering each other’s annual leave.
This reliance on staff taking on extra shifts has led to low morale, higher stress and burnout, with resentment also creeping in when “some are seen as helping out more than others”.
A spokesperson for Ability West said “resourcing issues are being actively managed, and any related discussions are with employees and not through the media”. They added:
“If any employee has a particular issue, they know we have robust and fair processes in place, to address such issues as they are presented to us.”
‘Huge knock-on effect’ on residents
The lack of continuity of staff, as well as the carousel of agency staff used to plug gaps in the system also has a substantial knock-on effect on the care received by residents.
One family told The Journal Investigates the constant change of staff at a centre run by the COPE Foundation had a “huge knock-on effect” on the standard of care received by their relative, as waking up to a new face every morning caused distress.
They told us their relative had always been very independent, but “in later years, they got older, their needs got greater”, and this variety in staff was a huge issue.
Whenever agency staff were brought in, the family told us, residents would have to build trust over the day, expecting the same staff member to be there the next day but when they were greeted by someone different, the whole trust process had to start again.
There was also a decline in the number of activities and trips residents were taken on due to the lack of staff, which significantly reduced the quality of care provided.
Advertisement
The family told us residents used to take trips to Killarney or Dublin but these outings were substantially cut back with management saying there wasn’t sufficient staff available.
We asked the COPE Foundation about this family’s experience, but it did not respond to these specific questions having already indicated that they are working to address concerns raised by Hiqa “as a matter of urgency”.
Staff at Ability West also told us that the use of agency staff was leading to increased anxiety among residents.
The inconsistency in staff numbers meant “service users sometimes miss out on outings and appointments due to staff shortages”. This was having a “detrimental effect” on trust between staff and residents “as they are unsure if staff will turn up to facilitate their appointments or outings”.
Ability West has said they have had a “marked positive turnaround in 2024” in consultation with Hiqa and the HSE.
Most centres breaching set standards of care
Over half of all inspections (474) of residential centres in 2023 failed to meet the standards set by Hiqa and while the vast majority of these recorded minor or limited breaches of the regulations, significant breaches were found at some centres.
Almost 200 centres were found to be in breach of three or more regulations and 28 inspections recorded breaches with seven or more regulations last year.
A COPE Foundation centre in Cork City had 12 breaches of health and safety regulations, the highest number of any centre.
A spokesperson for the COPE Foundation did not provide any further response when we put this to them. They did say that the organisation is addressing the findings of Hiqa inspections “as a matter of urgency”.
By far the most common breach by providers last year was in relation to Regulation 23: Governance and Management.
This regulation ensures that sufficient resources, such as staff, have been provided by the service provider so that the centre is able to provide safe and quality care for residents.
It also covers the leadership structures of residential centres and looks for evidence of improvements made following previous inspections.
Over 170 breaches of this regulation were recorded by Hiqa last year.
Staffing was also identified as a significant issue across residential disability centres, with over 100 breaches recorded.
There were also issues surrounding the premises residents live in, fire safety precautions and notification of incidents to the Chief Inspector of Social Services.
These five regulations made up almost half (48%) of all breaches recorded with the other 24 regulations making up the remainder.
Charitable providers in Galway and Cork least compliant
Our investigation also exposes how some charitable and nonprofit providers are failing to maintain centres to the required standard.
We did this by combing through each inspection that took place last year and calculating how many found at least one breach in the required regulations. Our team focused on large disability service providers – those with 15 or more centres inspected in 2023.
Ability West in Galway and the COPE Foundation in Cork came out highest in our analysis, with 92% and 86% of the inspections at their centres, respectively, failing to meet at least one Hiqa requirement.
In response to a query from The Journal Investigates a spokesperson for the COPE Foundation said it “has in place a Quality and Continuous Improvement Programme to improve quality in several designated centres and assist in improving compliance with regulations and standards”.
Ability West also said that it now “has an evidence-based Hiqa compliance rating of 90%”.
This compliance rating measures the total number of regulations complied with but does not show the number of inspections that found regulation breaches.
However, they were not the only providers that didn’t meet Hiqa standards. The Brothers of Charity (70%), Aurora (75%) and Sunbeam House Services (79%) were also found to have a significant number of inspections that found at least one regulation breach last year.
A Sunbeam House Services spokesperson said, “staff and management continually strive to improve on our levels of compliance”. They added that there have been some recent challenges with recruitment, but that they “are continually striving to address vacancies as they arise”.
A spokesperson for the Brothers of Charity pointed to the organisation’s compliance rate of 85% with the regulations last year and said “where a non-compliance is identified we put in place a compliance plan and monitor the implementation of the plan closely”.
Aurora CEO Annette Ryan told The Journal Investigates that compliance with the regulations this year was high, with 108 regulations inspected at over 95% compliance.
These findings are in contrast to centres managed directly by the HSE, where just 27% of inspections of centres found regulations were breached in some way, despite the second-highest number of inspections of any provider last year.
In response to a query from The Journal Investigates, a spokesperson for the HSE said “there is an interdependence between the state and voluntary sectors in providing health and social care services”. They added:
Voluntary organisations are an essential and valued element of Ireland’s public health and social care system.
A different approach to care
Disabled people should be supported to live outside of these residential centres or congregated settings, according to many advocates.
The HSE has implemented a policy to move away from congregated settings – where 10 or more people live together. Many of the centres inspected last year did have smaller numbers living there. However, Hiqa recently told the Joint Committee on Disability Matters that the pace of this transition was disappointing.
Shelly Gaynor, a disability rights activist and peer mentor with Independent Living Movement Ireland (ILMI) told The Journal Investigates “with the appropriate support any disabled person can live a life of their own choosing”.
Shelly lives in her own home with the support of a personal assistant and says there should be more awareness of the services available so that at the very least, people have a choice on how they want to live.
She said that it’s sad so many people are living in residential centres in 2024, and added:
I think everyone should be looked at as an individual and given the same opportunities as their non-disabled peers.
“The amount of people that don’t know about independent living in the way that I live is shocking.”
Shelly said one of the problems with the lack of awareness of personal assistants is that parents of young disabled adults assume that there aren’t any other options out there.
“If you’re not aware of this, how do you know where to go and get it,” she added.
The ILMI told the Joint Committee that disabled people should “have the right to a personal assistant over residential care”. The Committee has since recommended the government establish “a needs-based Personal Assistance Service on a national statutory basis”.
Shelly Gaynor believes all disabled people should have to opportunity to live independently Shelly Gaynor
Shelly Gaynor
Persistent staffing issues leading to poor inspection results
For now, the need for more staff to care for those who continue to live in residential centres was highlighted in numerous inspections.
In 2023 both Ability West and the COPE Foundation were placed on targeted inspection programmes by Hiqa due to repeated poor inspection results.
Our investigation shows how these poor results continued through much of last year, with staffing highlighted as a major issue at both providers.
Sign up
The Journal Investigates is dedicated to lifting the lid on how Ireland works. Our newsletter gives you an inside look at how we do this. Sign up here...
You are now signed up
A spokesperson for Hiqa said “the Chief Inspector continues to monitor and inspect Cope Foundation services. The provider has demonstrated their commitment to meeting the needs of residents through their compliance plan responses.”
“With regard to Ability West designated centres,” the spokesperson continued, “the compliance levels for 2024 show that the provider has made steady progress in addressing the areas of non-compliance and continues to implement changes and improvements.”
However, they added that “the Chief Inspector continues to monitor and inspect Ability West services with an emphasis on ensuring that the provider is in compliance with the regulations and that the progress made is sustained and embedded across all centres.”
According to the HSE’s 2023 Annual Financial Report, Ability West received just over €32m in funding, while the COPE Foundation received close to €79m.
While this was roughly in line with other disability service providers, some larger organisations received significantly more.
Registration of Ability West centre cancelled
Macotar Lodge Services, a centre run by Ability West located in a village in Galway, was inspected four times last year with inspectors finding “significant failings” by the provider.
The registration for this centre was ultimately cancelled by Hiqa and the HSE took over the management of the centre.
The first inspection under new management took place in late 2023 and it was found to be in complete compliance with all regulations inspected, with “significant improvements” noted in relation to staffing, risk management and residents’ social care.
Other issues at Ability West centres included one person managing ten centres, which inspectors said significantly impacted their ability to oversee the inspected centre. Another worked overtime as, in addition to their management duties, they were working 36 hours a week as a social care worker due to the lack of staff.
Ability West did not reply to specific questions about these centres saying “we are not going to further engage on questions in respect of 2023 Hiqa inspections”, citing the organisation’s “great progress” this year in compliance with Hiqa regulations.
Staffing issues were also evident in a number of centres run by the COPE Foundation in Cork, with concerns raised over their ability to evacuate residents in an emergency.
There was also regular use of agency staff, with one inspection finding that an average of 10 agency staff were required at a COPE Foundation centre to cover gaps in the roster each week.
A COPE Foundation spokesperson did not reply to questions about these centres, beyond indicating that all Hiqa concerns are being addressed.
Five centres breached 10 or more regulations
Centres run by Ability West and the COPE Foundation were also among the top five centres with the most breaches during a Hiqa inspection in 2023.
The highest, a COPE Foundation centre in Cork City had 12 breaches of the regulations, with Hiqa inspectors finding “poor oversight in many areas of the service” including residents’ rights, fire safety, risk management procedures and safeguarding.
One resident had been living temporarily at the centre since 2016, with no plan in place to move them to a permanent living arrangement.
When asked about this resident, the COPE Foundation said it does not comment on individual cases but indicated that it is addressing the HIQA concerns.
Another COPE Foundation centre with a large number of breaches, again located in Cork City, was found to have significant staffing issues, with one or two staff regularly supporting 11 or more residents.
This severely impacted the care they received, with inspectors finding their opportunities to participate in everyday experiences were severely limited.
A spokesperson for the COPE Foundation did not respond to questions relating to these centres, beyond indicating that all Hiqa concerns were being addressed.
A centre in Waterford run by the Brothers of Charity had the second-highest number of regulation breaches (11), with inspectors finding it failed to meet standings in every regulation inspected.
“Very poor practices in relation to residents’ rights” were reported by inspectors, with decisions and choices of residents dependent on the number of staff in the centre, which was also found to be inadequate.
A spokesperson for the Brothers of Charity said “we acknowledged the shortcomings in the quality of service provided to the individuals residing in the centre”.
They added that “a subsequent report in January 2024 found that, while some areas still required improvement, there had been improvements in a number of areas”.
Riverside Services, a centre located in a town in Galway and run by Ability West, failed to meet a large number of Hiqa standards with 10 breaches recorded.
Living arrangements for one resident were found to be unsuitable due to their changing needs and prevented them from using shower facilities within their own apartment.
Inspectors said that the centre had failed to address these changing needs, which had been ongoing for over a year and was harming residents’ rights and quality of life.
Ability West did not reply to specific questions about this centre.
A fifth centre, Tús Nua, located in an urban area of Kilkenny and managed by nonprofit Aurora, was the final centre to have ten or more breaches recorded upon inspection.
Hiqa inspectors found management was unable to ensure residents were safe at all times and regular use of agency staff had an impact on the continuity of care received by residents.
A second inspection of the centre in 2023 found significant improvements had been made, but some issues remained, particularly around residents’ access to their own finances.
Having told The Journal Investigates that compliance with the regulations this year was high, with 108 regulations inspected at over 95% compliance, Aurora said it had no further comment to make when asked about this centre.
Years of lower pay impacting staff retention
Staff at some providers, like Ability West, are not classified as public servants, despite the vast majority of funding for these providers coming from the HSE.
Historically, their pay was linked to HSE staff, but during the economic crash, these organisations, known as Section 39 organisations in legislation, were instructed to impose pay cuts in line with those made on HSE staff.
However, during the recovery, HSE staff pay was restored, but additional funding to restore the pay of Section 39 organisation staff was not provided. This meant workers often left to work directly with the HSE.
Not all disability organisations fall into this category, however, with some, such as the COPE Foundation classified as a Section 38 organisation, meaning its workers are considered public workers.
Unions representing Section 39 organisations have campaigned to realign pay with HSE staff and on the eve of strike action last year, were awarded an 8% pay rise at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).
Despite the government acknowledging that the lack of funding had led to a significant recruitment and retention challenge in the sector, a binding realignment of pay was not agreed, leaving some still worse off than their HSE counterparts.
Further discussions at the WRC this year have not resulted in an agreement, with Fórsa’s health and welfare division head Ashley Connolly telling The Journal Investigates the union is consulting with its members.
In response to a query from The Journal Investigates, a spokesperson for the Department of Equality said it was committed to overcoming the “workforce challenges in the disability sector” and that it remains optimistic that a deal can be reached to “appropriately benefit workers, service users and families”.
The Journal Investigates
Reporter: Conor O’Carroll • Editor: Maria Delaney • Social Media: Sadbh Cox • Main Image Design: Lorcan O’Reilly
Investigations like this don’t happen without your support...
Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Over 5,000 readers have already supported our mission with a monthly or one-off payment. Join them here:
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
25 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Been going on decades. For anyone old enough to remember the Eastern Health Board; I worked in many of their facilities when I was fresh out of school over 30 years ago. Some of the things I saw & witnessed still wakes me up in the dead of night. Journal; follow the money, it’s all about the money, always has been, always will be.
@ItWasLikeThatWhenIGotHere: Nearly all non-HSE facilities are funded by the HSE/department of Health and are called section 39 charities and section 38 are HSE workers. Section 38 receives a higher rate of pay than a worker in section 39 for the same job, they all work under the same rules and bad procedures and conduct is unacceptable in any one of these organisations, they are dealing with the most vulnerable people in society and must be held to the highest standards anything else in criminal.
Anyone is surprised? When the company managing this type of center and also the care homes are so greedy and won’t pay their staff a decent wage it’s bond to happen.
Wow, that’s a terrible report to read, despairing & depressing. Looking at things in the ” round”, the constant theme, the pesistant problems all seem to be staffing related ( as in numbers, working patterns, shift rostering, morale etc) — mainly related to job ‘ attractiveness ‘ & renumeration. Perhaps some of these operators ( providers) shouldn’t be at the table…..’ staffing shortages’ is used as a coverall excuse a lot lately….. if working conditions are OK. Career progression is OK & YES, renumeration is OK people will stay at their choosen Career….. simple as that
@Frank Mc Carthy: my daughter is in the process of getting out of this line of work. Staff shortages, lack of English speaking staff for dealing with residents. English is supposed to be the language spoken in work at all times, for both staff and residents. But as soon as the managers are gone there is no English spoken. My daughter has gone 12 hour shifts without speaking a word to anyone except the brain injury residents. She can’t wait to get out of it, even tho she loves the job itself.
@Tony Murphy: if they paid them a descent wage they may attract more people into the industry, it’s not an easy job and the pay is poor for what they do, very sad
Government will investigate. Lessons will be learned. Minister will apologise. And the lemmings will vote FF and FG again. We really do get what we deserve.
@Paul Gorry: exactly Paul, can you imagine being on ‘ X’ per hour & knowing that your peer up the road in a HSE facility is getting ‘X +30%’ for same hours, same job. Anyone who’s ever visited any care facility knows these people really are the unsung heros in our society….they don’t want clapping or back slapping….just well deserved recognition
@Paul Gorry: That is such sensationalist nonsense. I’m a care worker (non HSE) and my average annual earnings are €51000, which is more than the average teacher/nurse/guard. There is no 16 year old working Mcdonald earning that kind of salary. Maybe do some research before posting opinions that have no basis in reality.
All budgets are being squandered, everyone will face a time when they will need proper care, and will be in the vulnerable category. Disability is a word thrown around by gov when they want to push through a policy but yet can’t seem to provide oversight on anything. People in authority who treat the most vulnerable in such a demeaning manner should be an eye opener for the rest of society. There is no dignity for the most vulnerable. Shocking as usual.
Well done Journal. Hopefully conditions will improve for the residents in these ‘care’ homes as a result of the horrific shortcomings highlighted in this article. I won’t hold my breath though, I’m sure that nobody will be held accountable as is usually the case in Ireland, and that ‘lessons will be learned’…. An exposè on the earnings of those in charge would be welcome; the least that can be done to these monsters is to name and shame
That bishop Martin should just mind his own buisness about assisted dying. It’s not ur concern. Pay up u for redress u .and close down all ur established places and give to redress
I am not surprised. The pay and conditions of employment are dreadful. I was completely burnt out, and my organisation listed above cared less about my mental or physical well-being. Seven years worked 60 plus hrs a week. I dreaded leaving the people I cared for, but I had to leave because of bad management and lack of respect for staff. Unless staff are treated better with pay and conditions, nothing will change.
Nursing homes are nothing more than tarted up prisons at the end of the day.Another shocking scandal about to unfold that will require another public inquiry is the huge number of covid deaths in nursing homes. HIQA another useless body allowed this to happen on there watch.Why is there not the same resources invested in community care as the” fair deal scheme” which is just another gravy train for the private operators.
This is so sad and disturbing for our older generation, these organizations once they are outside the remit of the HSE are basically are a smoking gun, with staff not them all I may say, but totally untrained and badly supervised. The figures show that, but the HSE are happy once they do not have to look after the people who rightly reach old age and or sick or frail, we all to face this fact now, I feel the idea of people staying in their own homes if they semi mobile should stay and not face these terrible thoughts that they may have to go there.
I also heard when these folk pass, the institutions including HSE if they have a substantial amount of money, these organizations can take money for the care that was provided for them during their time there.So sad they are ending up like thi
@Phillip Smyth: this is not about nursing homes or end of life care, although that too should be adressed. It’s about services for the physically and mentally disabled in Ireland ansd it’s absolutely dreadful.
Potential risk of differential tariff rates to all-island economy averted for now, Cabinet to hear
28 mins ago
278
3
The Morning Lead
Water safety boss calls for new measures after teens' deaths in Buncrana
Eimer McAuley
6 hrs ago
1.9k
Road Safety
CCTV from petrol station captured clear images of crash that killed Garda Kevin Flatley
Updated
17 hrs ago
112k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 187 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 126 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 165 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 129 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 92 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 150 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 88 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 95 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 111 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 100 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 83 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say