Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The incident happened in February 2020.
Court

Joyrider who killed three people while making Snapchat videos fails to have jail time cut

Keith Lennon, of Dromintee, Co Armagh, previously admitted to three counts of manslaughter.

A DRIVER WHO claimed the lives of three people when he ploughed into the back of another car as he made Snapchat videos while driving at 225kmh has failed in his bid to have his nine-year jail sentence reduced.  

Keith Lennon (23) killed mother and son Mary (82) and Kevin (58) Faxton, from Bessbrook, Co Armagh, and Bryan Magill (24) from Newry, Co Down, when the 3-litre Audi he was driving at 105kmh above the speed limit hit the Faxton’s Peugeot 108 on the northbound carriageway of the N1.  

Magill had been a passenger in Lennon’s vehicle when the two-car collision occurred at Carrickarnon, Ravensdale, Dundalk, Co Louth, on February 29, 2020.  

Lennon later pleaded guilty to three counts of manslaughter at Dundalk Circuit Criminal Court.  

Sentencing him in February 2021, Judge Marina Baxter said Lennon had turned his car into a “weapon” on the night in question. She also banned him from driving for 20 years.  

Lennon, of Forest Park, Dromintee, Co Armagh, later appealed the severity of his jail sentence.  

But in an ex tempore judgement delivered today (Friday) in the Court of Appeal by Court President Justice George Birmingham, sitting with Justice Patrick McCarthy and Justice Isobel Kennedy, Lennon’s bid to have the time he must serve behind bars reduced was rejected.  

Dismissing the appeal, Justice Birmingham said: “Clearly this was a case where a substantial custodial sentence was inevitable.”  

He said Judge Baxter could have even placed the offending in the upper range for sentencing , “given the damage done and degree of recklessness involved”.   

Noting that prior to the fatal collision “a powerful car was driven for long periods at very high speed”, he added that what had “set the case apart” was the Snapchat videos the accused had been making on his phone while driving at excessive speeds.  

“It is difficult to find the language to describe how reckless that was,” Justice Birmingham said.  

Earlier hearing

At a previous hearing (March 25), Patrick Gageby SC, for Lennon, told the court that there were “not very many cases in the law books concerning motor manslaughter”.  

“There wasn’t any real comparator we could lay before the court and in those circumstances we submit there has been an error [in sentencing],” Gageby added.  

“This was not a crime of intention,” he continued, adding that the headline sentence of 14 years identified by Judge Baxter had been “too high, even when you consider the egregious circumstances of the case, which resulted in the deaths of three human beings”.  

With relatives of the crash victims sitting in the public benches, Gageby said his client wanted to once again apologise for his actions.  

“At sentencing, he directed that an apology be made publicly, and he expresses the same sentiment today,” counsel said. 

Anne-Marie Lawlor SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, said the sentence handed down was fair and within the judge’s discretion.  

Lawlor explained to the court that not only had the appellant used his phone to video the speedometer of the Audi while he was driving, he had also sent the recordings to others while still behind the wheel and driving at excessive speeds.  

Lawlor said Lennon had made two Snapchat videos in the car before it crashed into the other vehicle, and that both clips lasted a total of 14 seconds.  

This was the “pivotal factor in the case”, counsel said.   

“The car [Lennon was driving] was high-powered and he was not insured to drive it,” counsel continued.   

In passing sentence, Judge Baxter “had carried out a correct and proper assessment of the gravity of the crime and the appellant’s culpability”, Lawlor concluded.  

Your Voice
Readers Comments
26
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel