We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

O'Callaghan believes the register would protect people from those convicted of serious assaults. Alamy

Justice Minister defends proposed sex-offender register, claiming information should be public

Jim O’Callaghan also wants to introduce measures that require agencies to name people convicted of serious offences.

MINISTER FOR JUSTICE Jim O’Callaghan has defended proposals to introduce a so-called sex-offender register, claiming the information should be made public and that the purpose of it would be to protect people from those previously convicted of assault.

O’Callaghan said last month that he was not opposed to the idea, which has become known as ‘Jennie’s Law’ in memory of Jennifer Poole who was killed by her former partner. He later told reporters he was committed to introducing it.

Asked about concerns that the register may be used by ‘vigilantes’ to carry out harmful acts against those who appear on it yesterday, the minister said he would share the worries of some on the issue.

However, he added: “That’s not the purpose of it. The purpose of it is to try to protect people, particularly women, who find themselves in a relationship with somebody, whom they don’t know, that previously had convictions for serious assault or serious sexual assault.”

He defended the introduction of the register, when speaking to reporters outside the Garda College in Templemore, Co Tipperary yesterday, stating that the judicial process is public and individuals “should be aware” of its decisions.

“I’m going to try and see if we can put in place a scheme, legislative or otherwise, which will provide that information to people concerned,” he said.

The legislative proposal is currently before officials within the Department of Justice, O’Callaghan said, who will draft measures and advice, along with the Attorney General, about the introduction of the scheme.

He added that he discussed the issue during the first Ireland-UK summit in Liverpool this week with British Home Affairs Minister Yvette Cooper, who has sought to introduce similar measures there.

“It’s a public event, and people are informed if [journalists] are in court. If you’re (reporters) not in court, the public don’t get to hear about it. It’s an important issue and it’s a public event,” he said.

O’Callaghan said he would be seeking to address that issue more broadly, seeking to introduce measures that require An Garda Síochána or the Courts Service to name those who have been charged with a crime, whether or not journalists are in the courtroom.

“There is something, I think, lacking in the system where people who are convicted of serious criminal offenses only get publicised if journalists are in court,” he added.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds