Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
GE2024rentersLABOUR OR SOCIAL Democrats? Which party is promising a three-year rent freeze, a ban on no-fault evictions and a clearer, more transparent rental market?
It’s both of them, actually.
Both parties were out in Dublin city centre today to announced their plans to provide renters with better rights in the wake of a damning report from Daft.ie.
Average rents are dramatically increasing all over the country and, with a dwindling supply, the expected price to pay for a property is almost €2,000 per month, according to today’s Rental Price Report.
Both parties said because the government has failed to get the private rental market under control, State intervention is needed.
Speaking to reports outside the building of real estate investor Kennedy Wilson, Social Democrats candidate for Dublin North-Central Rory Hearne said some institutional investors are taking part in “profit gouging” and that those rents are unfair.
Hearne, who is a lecturer in housing policy at Maynooth University, said many institutional investors see Ireland as a good place to do business and that the Social Democrats want them to invest in affordable housing instead.
Sinn Féin has also proposed a three-year rent freeze and a ban on no-fault evictions.
When it comes to how to regulate institutional investors in the housing market, Labour and the Social Democrats differ.
The Social Democrats are proposing an all-out ban on the bulk purchase of existing homes, claiming that the practice “locks out” first-time buyers. Hearne said the party also wants to increase the level of tax that the firms also pay on their rental income.
Meanwhile, Labour is proposing an increase on the stamp duty for the bulk-purchase of houses or apartments.
Labour’s Dublin South-Central candidate Darragh Moriarty said more landlords need to respect renters’ rights: “On [RTÉ] the other night, Paschal Donohoe said we need more landlords - I don’t disagree with that but we don’t need slumlords.
“We have to stop slumlords for being able to ride roughshod all over renters’ rights. And that’s why we think strong renters’ protection has to be front and center of any next government, whether we’re in it or not,” he added.
Both parties are promising to reinstate the no-fault eviction ban and try to incentivise the increase usage of the tenant-in-situ scheme, so that a resident can remain in the property while it is being sold to a new owner or the local authority.
Hearne said: “An introduction of a no-fault ban on evictions would mean that, as a renter, if you’re paying your rent, if you’re doing nothing wrong, you can stay in that home, and a landlord cannot evict you.
“This is a common measure across Europe, and we should meet our European countries and introduce this protection for renters.”
Both parties agree that the answer to the problem of high rents is in building up supply and Labour and the Social Democrats are promising to build 30,000 and 25,000 affordable homes over five years, respectively.
But controlling skyrocketing rents by disallowing increases and making the rental market more transparent in the short term must also be completed. Moriarty said that the sector needs to be professionalised.
“If you have a relationship with a tenant, it is a professional relationship and we need to have the standards professionalised,” Moriarty told journalists.
Moriarty said that the professionalisation of a tenant-landlord relationship will be further complemented by Labour’s new idea to introduce a Rent Register – which will detail the previous costs of leasing a property for better transparency.
The Social Democrats, similarly, propose a ‘Reference Rent’ system – where the price of properties in the same area and of the similar size and quality are publically listed on a database that pegs rent to the baseline price.
Both parties are also proposing tougher regulations on short-term lets.
The Social Democrats says this can be done by empowering local authorities to enforce planning rules while Labour wants tourist levies and a separate property register for holiday homes, under the control of Fáilte Ireland.
Today’s Daft.ie Rent Price Report found that the average rent around Ireland now stands at €1955 per month and that there is an urgent need to address the lack of supply in the private market.
Ronan Lyons, author of the report and an economist at Trinity College, said the government’s attention has been focused on owner-occupied homes and social housing and that the upswing in construction of rental accommodation in Dublin is “over”.
He said, if not addressed urgently, construction trends in the rest of Ireland are likely to mirror Dublin.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
And who decides who gets a key? I’ve an invisible disability and you get some looks from people whose disability is visible sometimes.
@Alan OConnor: my understanding of these toilets is that they’re designed for people with a physical disability, who use a wheelchair. That’s why wider doorway and more space to move around.
@NoelDublin: kind of what I’m getting at. Sometimes you can have a disability that needs privacy. Something many people don’t take into consideration sometimes.
@Alan OConnor: many of these toilets also double up as child changing facilities so the question of who gets the key is quite valid. A permanent attendant would work but no where is going to employ a person just for this. Just waiting for the wrc to issue a fine
@Alan OConnor: It’s a ridiculous idea. I have often used disabled persons toilets and never once was another person waiting to use it It’s not the same as taking a disabled parking space. There is absolutely no need for this bureaucracy.
@Alan OConnor: you probably get issues with a code the same way you get a car park tag
they are designed for anyone with a disability not every disability is visible, and people that don’t require a disabled bathroom shouldn’t use them.
@Alan OConnor: I think word here is organised use and just like coin toilet no key no use, set up purchasing of key with disability site with broad application if you want key you apply and PURCHASE if your borderline. you won’t spend the money,and yes Alan I’m user in the hidden disability section,
I don’t see any reason why the toilets shouldn’t be used by anyone in a queue? If someone with a disability comes in they can be prioritised but why leave them empty?
@Patricia Dunne: because they are meant for a person with a disability not someone just because they are standing in a queue. How would you feel if you have blocked the toiled and someone with a disability needs the used of the bathroom designed for them urgently and cannot use another one, some disability bathrooms have changing areas for disabled people that cannot use a toilet, don’t use a disabled bathroom just because it’s unoccupied
@silvery moon: what do you call a disability, someone with an enlarged prostate and has to pee frequently imo is just as entitled to use these toilets as someone with a mental or physical disability.
@Patricia Dunne: That’s like saying you can use a disabled parking space because it’s empty. Accessible Disabled toilets are for those who truly need them.
@Reply Address Removed: that is absolutely not the same
@silvery moon: who are you the toilet police. You know there could be an opening soon for some one like you.
Every one gets caught short and if it’s empty use it . Not moving in and squaring in it just spending a penny.
@silvery moon: that’s ridiculous!I already said you could prioritise a person with a disability. Anyone can be caught short, disability or not. They are designed so that a person with a disability can use them. No reason why they should be exclusively used by them
@Reply Address Removed: not the same at all. If you take a parking space, you deprive the person with a disability of it. . You’re not depriving anyone by having a quick p**
@silvery moon: Your point is valid, but so is the OP. There are many people with incontinence issues and whilst this is not a disability, it is not reasonable to expect someone to suffer serious discomfort whilst an disabled toilet sits vacant. Absolutely, a person with a physical disability should have first refusal, but if there is nobody with a disability in the vicinity, what harm is it doing?
Jesus Christ a key with everything going on fg love the distraction politics
@Darragh Mcnamara: They are digital. Imagine something like a small wheelchair parking card with a chip. You ‘tap’ to unlock the door.
I have a hidden disability and often use disability toilets, how do I explain to someone in a public place that I need the key??
@Clare Power: you would have bought the key beforehand. No explaining to do
@Clare Power: if you read the full article you’ll see that you won’t need to
@Ian McDonald: You’re right, I glanced though…silly me.
Why is this needed?
@Keyser Söze: Exactly. When the toilet is not in use by a disabled person then why should it not being used by a able person. Otherwise it could be not used for days.
@hans vos: because they are meant for a person with a disability not someone just because they are standing in a queue. How would you feel if you have blocked the toiled and someone with a disability needs the used of the bathroom designed for them urgently and cannot use another one, some disability bathrooms have changing areas for disabled people that cannot use a toilet, don’t use a disabled bathroom just because it’s unoccupied
@Keyser Söze: It will also cause more problems than it will solve. Whether it is a physical key, an app or a code, the key can be shared with able bodied friends of those with a disability. Also, what if you forget you key or lose it? Have a think about the number of times you have had to wait to use a disabled toilet or the number of times you have seen someone waiting? For me the answer is never (but I do not have a disability). The efforts of government would be better served upgrading and enforcing DAC regulations and making more facilities available.
I think she means that every person who needs one will get one of these universal keys – a bit like a blue badge….however, these toilets should be available to everyone, not just those who need them for a specific reason, that’s discrimination
@Ben dover: They’re toilets specifically for disabled people.. why should they be available for everyone? I think, speaking as a disabled person, she’s trying to highlight this exact attitude..and the abuse of these toilets by people like yourself it would seem. If you genuinely think the provision of specialist facilities for people with disabilities in society in our public infrastructure is discrimination(parking spaces, toilets, spaces on buses etc..) then you’ve got a serious problem.
@Brian: Say you have 500 people in a pub and 3 cubicles in each of the men’s and women’s and 1 disabled toilet is it an issue. There are two people in the pub with physical disabilities who can only use the disabled toilet. Does it make sense to make everyone else queue I’d there is a perfectly good toilet not in use. Can the person in the wheelchair not join a queue if necessary?
@Brian: equality. Simple concept really… because someones a wheelchair user doesn’t render their bladder control redundant.
@Brian: a toilet is for pissing and shitting in. How is using it for it’s designed function abuse?
@Ben dover: fk me.. what a prck.
@Brian: Why shouldn’t they be available if noone is using them. Disabled people can wait a few minutes if they are occupied Their bodily functions are similar to a key bodies people. They don’t wet or soil themselves at the drop if a hat or no more so than an able bodied person.
@helen mary fitzsimons: Stay classy Helen..
@Brian: jesus, what a thread
@Brian: anyone can sit in a seat assigned for the disabled on a bus as long as they vacate it if a disabled person needs it. The same goes for disabled toilets, as far as I am concerned. Why should it be exclusively for the disabled?
@Ben dover: Disabled people are a cohort that are discriminated against so I would have issues with your point of view.
@silvery moon: thats ok pet, everyone has a point of view and we can’t all be right
@SYaxJ2Ts: incredible!!!
Wow! What a contribution, right up there with another senator’s insistence on swing doors to alcohol display areas.
What do you need to be a senator, an IQ of 50+?
@Padraig O’Brien: 50+? That’s aiming very high.
Probably spend an hour looking for who has the key, and where is it kept..
Vrry bizarre issue to drag up
My understanding is that these are toilets for everyone, including those who are disabled.
Invisible disabilities are real disabilities. Autistic adults. People with EDS. Hip replacements colostomy bags etc
Minority rules.
I’d agree with the poster who said of the disabled toilet is not in use then why should it not be used by an able bodied person. Slightly discriminatory if they forbid able bodied people from access to disabled toilets when not in use. Might have to reconsider my health and safety cert which says in the event of a fire I am to help a disabled person. Basically, I will consider my safety first.
Bad idea
On a related topic; last week I was sitting in my car in Tesco Galway’s carpark listening to the radio for 20 mins. During that time a total of 4 cars used the disabled driver spots. All drivers (only 1 person in each car) appeared healthy as they walked in & out in a smart enough fashion. When they were leaving I could see their windscreens and none had the blue badge. Spoke with security man who said they don’t “really” use the large white stickers, with heavy red print, in such cases but they do use them for cars on yellow boxes. I left it at that.
@Patrice Ahern: People who do that have no brains & no respect for others especially the disabled driver.
And are they going to employ people to be in charge of these keys and be in the area at all times policing it or will it be a trek for the disabled person to try and find a needle in the haystack every time. Ireland must be a truely shocking country to live in with a severe disability.The amount of times you read a business paying out to them in the courts for having their rights discriminated against is nothing short of disgraceful. Between people refusing to give up public transport seats for them or security refusing their guide dogs entry to stores.
@Dan The Man: Disabled people will fill out a form with their local council and those who meet the criteria will be provided with their own key. Thats how it works in the UK. There’s no wandering about looking for people with a key..
It is astounding that somebody suggests that when a disabled toilet is not in use by a disabled person it should be used by anybody. Do they apply the same logic to disabled parking spots too?
The nonsense people spout in their incessant need to be outraged at the Government.
@Sun Rise: So, a small caffe, business premises, petrol station, clubhouse, etc, may have a single toilet for customers. It was initially overlooked to make it suitable for disabled people, but the management has now renovated it and made it suitable for disabled people. By your batty logic, it can not now be used by any able bodied people.
@Sun Rise: difference there love sitting on a loo for a few mins to do business if it’s empty & Using a parking space in carpark to do shopping is no comparison.
I think the key issue should relate specifically to changing places disability toilets which might be what is being referred to in the article. I think any of these toilets should be key only. These toilets are equipped with ceiling hoists and changing beds for adults. Some also have showers. These particular toilets should be radar key only for a number of reasons including to protect the equipment. I think the bog standard (excuse the pun) disabled toilets are absolutely useless for a large portion of the disabled community. I need a changing bed for my daughter. She is way too heavy for baby changing unit and I’m often stuck when our for somewhere to change her.
So the premise of this special access keys is, we need to stop discrimination against people with disabilities by discriminating against everyone else?
Disabled toilets are designed to make them accessible for people with disabilities, not to make them inaccessible to people without disabilities.
I’ve never seen a person with a disability needing the disabled toilet when I am using one. Mind you, I could never see through the locked door, so I am making a complete assumption, which is informing my opinion.
There is already a scheme where you have to buy the key in the Greater Dublin area in order to use public disabled toilets unfortunately there is a cost to the user of 35 euro this is discrimination against disabled people as normal body people are not required to pay to 35 euro in order to use a public toilet.
As someone with that’s needs a shit and our government wants Notting to do with us ,it’s lies more lies and more lies ,ffg wants to sell us all for their benefits if you want something built it
Reading all of the ‘but sure it’s empty, and I’ll only be a minute’ comments on here, it’s obvious why Senator Bradley is pushing for a key system. Some people need to try looking at things from others’ point of view more often.
Please include people without disabilities parking in disability parking spots.
Going by some of the Comments, you can tell who has a Disabled Relative, or Friend, and those that don’t.
And those that are trying to separate the Issue of the Toilets, and the Parking Spaces either don’t see, or want to see the connection.
My Ex is in a Wheelchair, and yes; we’ve had to wait, for the ones, in the Train Stations; “Heuston”, and “Connolly”, or the Shopping Centers; “Jervis”, “The Ilac, “The Fairgreen” or the Pubs, Restaurants, or had to deal, with the tiny space that was available; “”Heuston”, AGAIN, and Pubs, Restaurants. Add to that the fact that there is a difference, between the number Cubicles, or Urinals that Toilets, that those of us without Disabilities have, as opposed to the one Cubicle, for those with Disabilities.
Why should those of us, that don’t have Disabilities be allowed to use the Toilets, but not the Parking Spaces, when a Disabled Person doesn’t need the Toilet?
No surprise that Thomas Sheridan jumps in to whinge and moan. No mattercehat the topic is he must be anti-government. Thomas, you are just another one of life’s failures. Your situation is all of your own making. Own it rather than blaming governments that the vast majority have prospered under. You are the failure.
@Sun Rise: your comment highlights the dangers of late night consumption of mind altering substances.
If you see a flaw in the logic of my argument, then please point it out, but making personal attacks is uncalled for and only demeans yourself.
The whole article highlights how řidiĉùlous politics has become if the first priority of a newly appointed and highly paid politician is who can take a pișș where. It says even more about for attacking me over a very logical comment that I made.
On your other point, certainly plenty of Layabouts have prospered under recent goverments. Less so for a whole generation of workers that are have become rent slaves and tax slaves to the present policies.
Now, try getting to sleep earlier and getting a proper job.
It sounds like a good idea, but there’s practical elements that would need to be looked at. I was in a museum last week on the continent, and the disabled toilet was within the gents rather than being a separate loo. (I’m presuming the ladies had a similar layout) Where that’s the case, it can’t be exclusive.
If thats the case then they should also allow pensioners to have access keys. Quite a lot of that age group go out practically dehydrated for fear they have to use the toilets.The disabled parking and parent parking situation is a complete joke in Kerry. Most of the spots all over the place are parked in by people with no blue stickers and no children.
have your say