We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Michael Flatley at a press conference announcing details of the 30th anniversary celebrations of Lord of the Dance last September. Leon Farrell/Photocall Ireland

Lord of the Dance shows could 'fall apart' over injunction against Michael Flatley, court told

The Irish dancer and choreographer has been sued by Switzer Consulting for alleged breach of contract.

UPCOMING LORD OF the Dance shows are in “grave danger of falling apart” if Michael Flatley is not permitted to engage with performers, a court in Belfast has heard.

The production’s 30th anniversary tour is due to play in Dublin’s 3Arena on 5 February, continuing in 2026 in a number of countries including the UK, Germany, Croatia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic.

But Switzer Consulting is taking legal action in a civil case against Flatley for alleged breach of contract, relating to an agreement the firm says was reached to allow it to run the dance shows.

Switzer has already secured a temporary injunction to stop Flatley from interfering with the shows.

The case was mentioned at The Chancery Court in the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast yesterday, during which legal representatives for Flatley responded to an earlier affidavit submitted on behalf of Switzer Consulting.

Flatley’s barrister John Coyle told the court there are shows coming up in two weeks that are in “grave danger of falling apart” if the Irish dancer and choreographer can’t speak to the dancers on the tour.

He said the company is solvent and the “economic havoc” the move would inflict on Flatley would be “substantial”.

Coyle went on to tell the judge that unless Flatley can participate in the show, losses will inevitably be incurred because his “artistic direction” is a vital component.

He also highlighted recent press coverage of the case, producing a copy of a newspaper report, stating its printing would be “libellous” if it was not a court document.

The judge clarified that the affidavit was presented before the court and is therefore in the public domain, adding that he hadn’t read the piece and the case is not being heard in front of a jury.

Coyle said Flatley is currently not in the jurisdiction but an affidavit from him would be submitted by next Wednesday.

The case is scheduled for another hearing on 27 January.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds