#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 14°C Wednesday 28 July 2021
Advertisement

Man challenges Government's decision to stop his Covid-19 PUP after he temporarily left Ireland

Chef Mihai Adrian Hofman left Ireland temporarily in late June due to a family emergency.

Image: Sam Boal via RollingNews.ie

A ROMANIAN MAN living in Ireland for many years has brought a High Court challenge against the State’s decision to stop paying him the Covid-19 Pandemic Unemployment Payment (PUP) after he temporarily left the State for family reasons.

The action has been taken by Mihai Adrian Hofman who has resided in Ireland since 2010.

Like many thousands of workers, Hofman, who works as a chef, began to receive the PUP payments in late March of this year.

In late June, he had to return to Romania due to a family emergency. Arising out of him leaving the State, his PUP payment was unilaterally ceased.

He returned to Ireland on 21 July. He had intended to return a week earlier but was prevented from doing so due to a flight cancellation.

He claims that the decision was unreasonable and flew in the face of common sense and was wrong in law.

As an Irish resident, he was entitled to the PUP payment, it is claimed.

In addition, he claims the decision was unlawful because he was not given notice of nor an opportunity to address the issues as to why his PUP was being stopped.

He attempted to have his PUP payment restored, and his arrears discharged. However, the Minister for Social Protection has refused to do that.

As a result, Hofman, with an address at Willowbrook Lodge, Celbridge Co Kildare has brought proceedings against the Minister for Social Protection, Ireland and the Attorney General.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

In his action, Hofman seeks orders quashing the Minister’s decision to refuse to reinstate his PUP payments and make back payments to him.

He also seeks declarations including that the Minister erred in law in ceasing Hofman’s PUP payment, and that he was entitled to notice, and an opportunity to address issues raised by the Minister before the payment was stopped.

Counsel for Hofman, Derek Shortall SC, with Brendan Hennessy Bl, told the court that a similar action had come before the courts in recent weeks, but that action had been resolved.

The matter came before Mr Justice Charles Meenan today, who on an ex-parte basis granted Hofman permission to bring his challenge.

The judge made the matter returnable to a date in January.

About the author:

Aodhan O Faolain

Read next:

COMMENTS (29)