Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

openDemocracy via Flickr
Your Say

Poll: Is 'chivalrous' behaviour actually just sexism?

A study in Germany and the US has found that polite behaviour is actually veiled sexism. Do you agree?

AN ACADEMIC STUDY carried out in the United States and Germany has claimed that behaviour traditionally considered ‘chivalrous’ is actually a veiled form of sexism.

The study said that holding a door open for a woman, carrying her shopping bags, or offering to take over driving duties on a long journey is actually an indication that a man doesn’t think a woman can do the tasks herself.

What do you think – is the study missing the point that men are just trying to be polite by helping out in tasks like this? Or does the study underine a more fundamental sexism that many people have simply grown to accept?

Is chivalrous behaviour actually a form of sexism?


Poll Results:

No (1323)
Yes (195)
I don't know (48)

“Romantic Ireland’s dead and gone”: chivalry is just ‘benevolent sexism’, study finds >

Your Voice
Readers Comments
66
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.