Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IN THE FACE of growing global demand for energy, there are serious economic and geopolitical implications from energy dependence, as we have seen in recent weeks with a very high proportion of Europe’s gas requirements coming from Russia via Ukraine. Currently 85 per cent of Ireland’s energy is imported, over 90 per cent of which is fossil fuels. It is essential that Ireland, along with other EU countries, becomes both more energy efficient and energy independent. Unconventional shale gas extraction, often referred to as ‘fracking’, is an option that requires serious discussion in this context.
Fracking consists of drilling and the injection of large volumes of fracking fluids at high pressure to create fractures in layers of impermeable rock to release the shale gas contained within. As a result, it has a considerably larger environmental footprint and uses greater volumes of water than conventional gas drilling and extraction methods.
In terms of benefits, various reports conclude that fracking can have positive impacts in terms of jobs and economic activity, and also that fracking can assist with the transition towards a low carbon economy. For there to be any climate benefits, however, two conditions must be met. Firstly, naturally occurring methane must be captured during the process, as methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Secondly, the gas produced must replace imported coal and gas, not lower carbon, renewable options such as onshore and offshore wind and biomass, or domestic gas supplies.
While unconventional gas has reduced gas prices in the US, it is unlikely to have as much of an impact on gas prices in Ireland and across the rest of the EU. The most significant potential economic benefit of fracking from an Irish perspective is security of energy supply.
For many, the jury is out when it comes to developing and extracting our shale gas reserves through fracking. There are a number of gaps in the Irish and EU regulatory framework at present which will need to be addressed before Ireland takes any further steps in the direction of fracking.
The EU Commission had promised a Directive on Unconventional Gas Exploration and Extraction, but at the end of January it published a Recommendation and Communication which will act as a guide to regulators and decision-makers, but is not binding legislation. The Commission has promised to keep the situation under review and introduce legislation after 18 months if it becomes necessary for the protection of the environment and human health. On 12 March 2014 the European Parliament formally dropped the requirement for mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment for all unconventional gas exploration and extraction activities, under pressure from countries such as the UK and Poland.
Domestically, Ireland has quite strict standards with regard to the requirements for Environmental Impact Assessment and Appropriate Assessment of projects which may have a significant effect on the environment and on protected habitats and species, but it is probably fair to say that the system for granting exploration licences and leases for the extraction of gas is not fit for purpose when it comes to fracking, and there are also gaps in the planning and environmental licensing processes.
For example, the Petroleum and Minerals Development Act 1960 has been subject to a number of amendments, but none of those amendments envisaged fracking. The impact on local landowners from fracking is far more significant than it would be under conventional methods of extraction. Rights of access to privately owned lands on the grant of a petroleum lease may be deemed unconstitutional if exercised in the manner envisaged under the 1960 Act in relation to large areas of land in private ownership. The regulatory system for the abstraction of surface and ground waters must also be updated, and must provide for charges which reflect the full economic and environmental cost of the water use.
The Environmental Protection Agency, on behalf of the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government, the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources and the Northern Ireland Environment Agency are commissioning an extensive research programme on the environmental impacts of unconventional gas exploration and extraction, including identification of regulatory gaps and best environmental practices. In the meantime, a number of companies have expressed interest in securing permission to carry out exploratory drilling and extraction, assuming shale gas reserves prove commercially viable.
One of the difficulties is that, to date, there has been a lack of coherent national energy plan in which the various energy options, from oil and gas, nuclear, wind energy and other renewables, interconnection and energy efficiency are identified, described and assessed in an integrated manner against key objectives, to include security of supply, sustainability, affordability, decarbonisation, competitiveness, environmental protection and human health.
According to a new report ‘Saving water with wind energy’ published by the European Wind Energy Association in March 2014, the use of water must be factored into energy planning, with wind energy having the least impact on valuable water resources when compared with nuclear and thermal electricity generation. Energy planning must also take into account the concept of intergenerational equity, ie the impact on today’s population as well as future generations, as required under the Aarhus Convention.
The lack of a plan-led approach has led to ad hoc decision-making at a national and local level, and a lack of Strategic Environmental Assessment of the various options, in line with EU law. This in turn can lead to an information vacuum, loss of trust and anxiety on the part of the public and uncertainty for investors. The focus naturally turns to local issues, local politics, nimbyism and a lack of vision in terms of national interest.
There are a myriad of issues to be investigated and resolved before fracking could be developed in Ireland, but at some point in the very near future a choice must be made on Ireland’s energy mix. Unless we have an open and honest discussion on the limited number of choices available to us and the risks and rewards of each option, we will remain entirely at the mercy of global forces for almost all of our energy requirements.
Alice Whittaker is a partner in Philip Lee Solicitors, and head of the firm’s Environment and Climate Group. Clients include the SEAI, Irish Offshore Operators Association (oil and gas), offshore and onshore wind farm developers, biomass companies and local authorities. Follow her on Twitter @WhittakerAlice
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Exciting technology but please don’t call these passengers “astronauts”!
@John Flood: Space cadets
@John Flood: pretty sure anyone that leaves earth’s atmosphere is an astronaut.
@Sean Kirwan: That’s what the discussion is about – both went above the original Karman line where aeronautics stop working (wing lift) and astronautics kick in (speed is needed), but way before a stable orbit. Like calling yourself an aeronaut because you took a flight to Spain, these guys were all exactly what passive human cargo always – passengers in an Astroplane/Rocket.
To the left of the ‘s’ and the right of the ‘e’?
@William Tallon: orbit further than that
@Larry Betts: A pretty sharpish reply there! Your definitely keen on these puns. Sharp as well, sharper than a newly sharpened edge even…
@William Tallon: Sharper than a sharpened talon I would suggest
@Larry Betts: They don’t come much sharper…
@William Tallon: I can categorically state that no one on the journal is as sharp as Larry betts lol. Him excellent.
@Paul Gorry: Thanks for your recommendation. PG tips are always welcome
@Larry Betts: ye see this is what I mean! The proof is in the pudding ha ha.
Perhaps in order to reach space you need to risk burning up in the earth’s atmosphere in order to return, and if this is the case then neither Branson nor Bezos pulled it off, and likely it’s Elon Musk who’s biding his time, to eventually put people into a one-round orbit to claim the ultimate and perhaps only fair prize of the first real tourist space trip.
@Mick Tobin: and if an orbit is what’s required, then you’d have to rewrite the history books (Shepard and Glenn didn’t make it)
@Mick Tobin: Mark my words, Musk intends to orbit the moon on his first flight. He won’t land or anything, that’s been sold to NASA for 2024, but I strongly suspect he’ll go up in one of the earlier orbital missions.
@Tony Gordon: Well maybe we can distinguish between different classes of astronauts, e.g. class N (Nasa 80km line – Brandon), class K (Karman 100km line – Bezos), and class O (completing at least one orbit).
@John Considine: from such humble beginnings in apartheid South Africa. A true embodiment of the American dream
@John Considine: what do you mean by sold?
Anyone know what the Edge of Earth is?
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: Leitrim
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: near Bono usually
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: Longford is outer space
@Dave O’Keeffe: aha..good one..
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: 10:45.. ISS flying over head
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: technically falling not flying
@Vincent Bickerstaffe: It’s round. It doesn’t have an edge or am I not allowed say that in case I offend some flat earth nutcase
Who cares its not relevant
@Matt: Not relevant to what? It’s obviously relevant to your online presence since you cared to comment.
Down the back of the sofa?
Bezos comes across as an as hole compared t Branson
Your about two weeks too late, this debate was had when Branson blasted off to space,
@David Dineen: pretty sure the edge of space existed before July 2021. It does in fact exist but its hard to define. That’s why there’s a 20km discrepancy, huge if you’re going point to point on a map but when you’re going up 20km is almost literally nothing
I cannot help but post this:
It’s wherever the Lord JB says it is I suppose.
Regardless of where you put the arbitrary line I would say that you need to achieve orbit to be anything other than an over extended vomit comet flight. This is no more access to space than pole vaulting is access to high places.
Two billionaires comparing the length of their rockets and how far they reach
Just outside Ballyhaunis.
have your say