Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

wavebreakmedia via Shutterstock

Column Banning the word 'bossy' won't help women

Getting rid of the word won’t get rid of the problem of too few women in leadership – instead, let’s just get used to being “bossed” by a woman, writes Lorraine Courtney.

THERE’S A NEW campaign calling for an end to the use of the word “bossy” on the grounds that it stops little girls from being ambitious. The Ban Bossy campaign is the brainchild of Lean In, the non-profit organisation set up by Sheryl Sandberg – Facebook’s chief operating officer. “Words like ‘bossy’ send a message: don’t raise your hand or speak up,” reads the introduction on its website. “By the age of 12, girls are less interested in leading than boys, a trend that continues into adulthood.”

As with most campaigns these days, it comes with the backing of a troop of celebrities. In the one-minute video, Diane von Furstenberg, Jennifer Garner and Condoleezza Rice all wax lyrical about the pejorative use of the word “bossy, and claim how banning the word would encourage young girls to step into leadership roles. Victoria Beckham adds: “It is thought-provoking that a man in charge can be described as commanding, however a woman in the same position may be called bossy.”

“By middle school,” declares an authoritative-sounding voiceover, “girls are less interested in leadership than boys, and that’s because they worry about being called bossy.” I’m not sure if there are studies to back that one up? Beyoncé finishes off the film with the catchy, “I’m not bossy; I’m the boss.” So basically we have lots of bossy women, bossing us around, telling us we’re not allowed to call bossy women bossy.

Are women falling behind in leadership? Yes.

No doubt we women are falling behind in leadership. The CSO’s Women and Men in Ireland study in 2010 found that Irish women work fewer hours, earn less and are under-represented in the Oireachtais as well as in local and regional authorities. In 2011, only 15.1 per cent of TDs were women, while they accounted for just over a third of members of State Boards, less than a fifth of members of local authorities and just over a third of the membership of Vocational Education Committees.

Women are not well-represented at senior level positions: only 36 per cent of medical and dental consultants are women, 53 per cent of primary school managers, and 41 per cent of second-level school managers. The report also shows that women’s income in 2009 was around 73 per cent of men’s income. After adjusting for the longer hours worked by men, women’s hourly earnings were shockingly only around 94 per cent of men’s.

Still, banning a fairly benign word is hardly a problem big enough to warrant such a campaign of combined star power. Besides, the whole thing smells too much of feminist thought police, like the early days of radical feminism that always sought to ban and restrict stuff rather than trying to create compelling alternatives. Banning things and enforcing speech codes that prohibit normal language is only going to be damaging to female empowerment. You are never going to open up a girl’s options by restricting the way we can talk about them. It’s counterintuitive.

Getting rid of the word won’t get rid of the problem

Most reactions have been fairly negative. Twitter ranged from the tepid to the hostile. Jessica Roy at Time Magazine wrote: “I am bossy. And I don’t give a *$&% if you call me that,” Slate’s Katy Waldman said: “I don’t intend to stop using it, even if the feminist super-team tells me to.”

You see, getting rid of the word won’t get rid of the actual problem. Instead, let’s get used to being “bossed” by a woman. The discomfort will fade and the word will be flipped to a positive thing. Being called bossy doesn’t bother me. Maybe because I’m a well-adjusted, grown up but “bossy” doesn’t bother me in the way that other hate words do. This b-word isn’t what’s stopping us reaching our potentials.

Looking to ban a word is about as bossy as you can get. Besides, we’re very rarely bossy anyway, we’ve mastered the art of passive aggressive bitchiness. It’s just far more socially tolerable. There’s something else these very powerful ambitious women could do: reclaim the word. Embrace it. Stand together and say, “We’re bossy — so what?” Because it’s true, and it’s not always a bad thing, and actually, it is already happening around us every single day.

Lorraine Courtney is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter @lorrainecath.

Column: If you’d like to work in an industry, don’t be discouraged by negative perceptions

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
49 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieran Dunne
    Favourite Kieran Dunne
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:34 PM

    More of this please Journal folk. Great read.

    61
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pádraig O'hEidhin
    Favourite Pádraig O'hEidhin
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:56 PM

    And Intellegent articles mean less food for trolls.

    21
    Gar.
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gar.
    Favourite Gar.
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 9:07 PM

    I agree but it’s spelt “intelligent”. Sorry I couldn’t resist it. ;)

    61
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute zeitgeist
    Favourite zeitgeist
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 10:14 PM

    I graduated with a masters in nanobioscience… and I find this article a bit strange.. why?

    Well for most graduates like me, its still very very difficult to get work especially in nanoscience or related fields – in fact I’m returning to australia where I will find work.

    Also because of the government cuts, its really difficult to get funding unless of course you are a professor…

    I actually made attempts at growing human finger bones in the lab in the last 12 months, it worked. But I can’t get funding even though I have been asked to continue.

    Instead of calling my thesis “An investiagtion into osteoblast adhesion…” I was going to call it “scientist gives ireland the finger…”

    anyways, regarding nanoparticles, yes they can be dangerous, the particles can get into your lungs (potentially) and cause gradual respiratory deterioration. I’m quite concerned that there seems to be an “unhealthy” obsession with faster processors and non stick coatings but no ones asking what are the environmental/ health ramifications for producing these “products” . It just seems to be all about making a quick buck for some at the expense of everyone.

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Aidan
    Favourite Aidan
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 10:47 PM

    I know this feeling

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Richard James
    Favourite Richard James
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 10:00 PM

    The policy decisions of the Government with regard to Crann might be paying dividends for the Irish economy but in another centre for nanoscience in Ireland and the largest ICT research institute in Ireland, Tyndall in UCC, the government have refused to correct an anomaly between the pay and conditions of Tyndall-based UCC staff and that of the rest of the University. Tyndall-based UCC staff are paid up to 40% less than their peers in the same roles in UCC. Tyndall staff have not received any increments for more than 4 years as Tyndall-based UCC staff are not to be found on any of the pay scales which exist in the rest of the University and yet have received the same pay cuts as everyone else in the public sector.
    This situation is now having a critically negative impact through:

    o Failure to retain world class researchers
    o Loss of research income
    o Damage to UCC’s reputation
    o An inability to attract key personnel
    o Total destruction of Staff morale

    The failure (and point blank refusal) of the government to rectify this anomaly that is affecting the 450 people in Tyndall does not sound like a government who view national research credentials as being extremely attractive and crucial to the economy.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute richardmccarthy
    Favourite richardmccarthy
    Report
    May 28th 2013, 1:18 AM

    I hope it gets sorted soon for the sake of the country,we cant afford not to,a class act like the Tyndall institute has always been to the fore in research.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Daithi G.
    Favourite Daithi G.
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 7:52 PM

    Invest now, I heard Nano sciences are going to be huge!!! (“,) *I’ll get me coat.

    18
    Gar.
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gar.
    Favourite Gar.
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:31 PM

    1 nanometre = 1billionth of a metre.
    1 hair is about 100,000 nanometres wide.
    A six foot man is 1,828,800,000 nanometres tall.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Elizabeth Gibson
    Favourite Elizabeth Gibson
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:05 PM

    Good luck cutting that cake, baggsy first slice. :D

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute The Green Monkey
    Favourite The Green Monkey
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:25 PM

    My peepers are going, at first glance I saw a Storm Trooper……….

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Johnny
    Favourite Johnny
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 8:26 PM

    Working with nano particles will be very dangerous. It could be the new asbestos.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Johnny
    Favourite Johnny
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 9:46 PM

    Think about it, there is no protective gear out there that these nano particles can’t get through, masks etc far as I know these particles can penetrate through your skin.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute FutureTech
    Favourite FutureTech
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 10:07 PM

    Excellent article. More like this m the journal please.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Ward
    Favourite Paul Ward
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 10:44 PM

    Fascinating

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brendan
    Favourite Brendan
    Report
    May 27th 2013, 9:52 PM

    This is a good video explanation: http://youtu.be/70ba1DByUmM

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Al S Macthomais
    Favourite Al S Macthomais
    Report
    May 28th 2013, 2:25 AM

    Used in making medicines to suit an individuals medicine requirements if a family has a defective gene that may cause some life threatening illness to be eradicated. also with the human genome already mapped out could be used to wipe out certain races or groups that other people may find an impediment to their world view. Great news but also worrying as well.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute simontuohy
    Favourite simontuohy
    Report
    May 28th 2013, 12:57 PM

    Great to see science getting coverage.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds