We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
BAR THE FINAL European seats, we know how the parties and the candidates fared in the local and European elections.
But how did the media do?
Here are eight things we learned about how the Irish media handles modern elections, politicians and political coverage.
Whether on radio or TV, set piece debates where candidates face off and try to score points against each other are anachronistic, unenlightening, and poor entertainment. Of course, the situation isn’t helped by vast European constituencies, large numbers of candidates, many of whom had a tenuous understanding of what an MEP actually does.
Most of the MEP debates saw candidates trade focus-group-tested talking points, with the occasional incomprehensible squabble over agricultural policies.
The only memorable quote from any European debate was Barry Andrew’s line that Clare Daly should pay more attention to Crumlin and not the Kremlin. But such zingers were few and far between.
I had the misfortune to listen to back-to-back radio debates on RTÉ’s Drive Time one afternoon a week before polling. By the end of the ordeal the only person who sounded credible, likeable and well-informed was RTÉ’s Sarah McInerney.
Miriam and I have done the draw for tonight’s Prime Time EU Dublin debate @MiriamOCal @rtenews @RTEOne pic.twitter.com/A2O2j8KUV8
— Sarah McInerney (@SarahAMcInerney) June 4, 2024
What’s the point of these debates? Some candidates are excluded. The ones that do make it into studio, often come across as shrill, dull and unlikeable. Sometimes all three.
Surely a more informative or more entertaining format is possible? At least in America there’s a financial windfall for this sort of thing – the networks take in good advertising money. And lots of it. Here, no one wins. Democracy dies in dullness.
Whatever you think of Kevin Bakhurst, barter accounts and hushed up payments to Ryan Tubridy, RTÉ is a damn fine public service broadcaster when it comes to elections. This should not be taken for granted.
There was constant rolling coverage from Saturday morning onwards on screen, over the airwaves and online. It’s a massive logistical feat to place reporters at almost all count centres, produce hours of TV and radio and bring it all together without technical glitches or dead air. Sure, at times it was repetitive and slow. But that’s down to the complexity of the count, not the professionalism of the broadcaster.
All media outlets did a good job, but RTÉ deserves credit for the depth and breadth of its output. Only the fake news media brigade can complain that their TV license money was wasted.
For the rest of us, RTÉ’s biggest failing was that their ‘elections hub’ looked a little ramshackle on TV. There were wires on the floor, phones ringing in the background, cheap perspex lecterns and the the big touch screen that was occasionally unresponsive to Katie Hannon’s prods and jabs. But hey, this is kind of what count centres are like too: I’ll take verisimilitude over glossiness any day.
“This is the fount of all knowledge for Elections 2024.”
— RTÉ News (@rtenews) June 9, 2024
Katie Hannon takes us behind the scenes to look at the RTÉ Results Centre touchscreen - where the election counts from all around Ireland are collated. #Elections2024 pic.twitter.com/Y7QhpEB0lY
The broadcast moratorium kicks in from 2pm the day before polling. It’s supposed to give us time to think and reflect before casting our votes. This sort of thinking dates from a bygone era when radio and television were powerful media. But in an era when online news is freely available and misinformation can spread while the responsible media is gagged, the moratorium isn’t just outdated, it’s dangerous.
Thankfully, Coimisiún na Meán has indicated it will review the moratorium before the end of the year. Given that there may be a general election soon after the budget, they may want to get their skates on.
If politics is showbiz for ugly people, then it belongs on a medium where we don’t have to see any faces.
National and local radio can accommodate a plethora of different voices that TV can’t match, and a conversational immediacy that the written word can’t capture. This was very evident over the weekend after the election. Sure, there were a few strange scheduling quirks, both Newstalk and RTÉ had to fill a few hours of commentary on Saturday morning before there were any tallies in the local elections. But things got going later in the day.
On Newstalk, for example, Andrea Gilligan helmed a dynamic show with a great panel – including a very relaxed sounding Leo Varadkar – and party leaders dialling in from count centres. It was great radio. Unvarnished and immediate.
Twitter has gone to hell. But when it comes to political set pieces, it’s still got it. Since the voting stopped it’s been a reliable source of breaking news, screenshots of tallies, videos of line dancing in count centres and hot takes from the literati and the twitterati. Political news still breaks on Twitter and then migrates to radio and news sites.
There is no shortage of great commentators in Irish political journalism. And an election brings these voices to the fore. There’s Fionnan Sheehan’s encyclopaedic knowledge, coupled with the wit to come up with ideas like ‘Shinnerfreude’: the pleasure derived by every other party from Sinn Féin’s misfortune.
There’s Virgin Media’s Gavan Reilly’s smart sharing of data and tallies on Twitter and ability to explain proportional representation and the single transferable vote using a pack of Smarties.
🗳️ Have you ever been bamboozled by Ireland’s electoral system, or how election counts work under the PR-STV system?
— Gavan Reilly (@gavreilly) June 7, 2024
Fear not: I can explain… 🔴 using 🟠 a 🟡 well-known 🟢 chocolate 🔵 sweet 🟣 snack 🟤.
(Other tasty confections are available. #notspon.) pic.twitter.com/kMHooliKRK
There’s Miriam Lord’s sketches in the Irish Times, which recently included quips about a potential Labour/Social Democrats merger being called LSD, and wondering if it were done tastefully would Richard Bruton leave his shirt on for an election.
And for the purest of political wonks, who revel in grassroots skullduggery, insider information and shit-stirring, Matt Cooper and Ivan Yates’ Path to Power podcast is a great listen. They are the Waldorf and Stadler of Irish Political commentary.
For all the wit and insightful commentary, almost all media outlets are one step away from clichés and lazy thinking. Independent’s Day, please! The bad puns on America’s national holiday – and Roland Emmerich’s sci-fi flick – have been invoked in every election since 2011.
The media still hasn’t got its head around the fact that political parties are not the behemoths they once were and independent representatives are here for the long haul. Independents are still often viewed as some sort of alien invasion by the media.
Similarly, ‘the centre is holding’ is a lazy line that only serves the larger political parties. The truth is that the centre is eroding, but slowly. And as Gerard Howlin pointed out earlier this week, ‘the centre’ is far more left of centre than it once was if you look at how social transfers and state spending has evolved in the past 20 years.
As a final point, any political or media outlet that uses the phrase ‘Harris Hop’ should be fined. Stop that.
Turnout is a problem for democracy. And it’s a problem for the media too. Half of the population responded to the campaigning and wall-to-wall postering with a shrug. Turnout in Dublin for the local and European elections averaged at 38%.
This means there’s a disconnect between the around-the-clock political output of our media and the interests many citizens. No doubt, more viewers were annoyed that RTÉ didn’t broadcast the European Championships on Friday night than the small number who bemoaned the lack of exit polls.
There is a challenge for media to make politics relevant and interesting – without degenerating to a Punch and Judy show. Not an easy ask for local and European elections. The good news is that it’s likely that the media will have another chance to do it all again before the end of the year.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
The ” Indo” coverage of the election was a disgrace. Balanced and unbiased it wasn’t.
Govt have no need to control the media when they have bootlickers like the editor of the “indo” doing their bidding.
During the referendum the journal ran 19 articles in favour with only 1 against.
For the local council the journal ran links to most candidates in each region. The questionaire section remained blank for independents and fully filled out for any main party candidates. Authers could not stay away from slandering some candidates instead of leaving it to the public. So overall very biased coverage to support their advertisers in my opinion.
Gavan Reilly has set the standard. Ask around about his coverage.
Also, delighted to see Chris MacManus getting eliminated. Airdropped chancer who abstained on over 1200 votes. Hopefully Wallace will follow him into the dustbin of obscurity.
This person calls themselves a media expert and goes on to congratulate the status quo.
The only ones doing proper journalism, appears to be ontheditch.
They have broken a story on the current Mayor of Limerick, which if any of the current shower were doing proper journalism would have ferreted out. It might have changed the outcome of his election. Not saying he is not the right person, but people deserve to know the truth.
A proper journalist would have started asking questions, considering he was in cahoots with Michael Noonan, who laid the groundwork for a lot of the structural problems we have. He also invited in the big private equity companies.
I found Allison O Connor so biased against Sinn Fein. I think the European elections should be first past the post. Do the people who are elected really fight for Ireland. They are more concerned about what group they will join. Very disrespectful of Pat Rabbite to describe some candidates as fruitcases.
@rory Mcgovern: Yes: fruitcakes or nutcases would have been better.
I think SF did more than enough ‘fighting for Ireland’ back in the day.
Bored the feckin life out of me, reporting on a week long count.
@Sean Money: if it bored you so much I suggest that you spend less time on The Journal. Just a thought. You might just make yourself, and a lot of other people, very happy
@SYaxJ2Ts: you seem to enjoy the long count. I hope you enjoy all your money received.
Probably spent more time on Twitter over the last week than the previous six months combined. I love a good debate but the TV format can be pretty crap with people shouting over each other, would love to see more podcast content for the next election where people can share their policies or debate in smaller groups so it doesn’t just become a shouting battle.
Does any off it matter?! You all gona put FFG back in.. And then write your little comments. At least Russia is upfront about not being upfront…
It was great that only 5 racists out of 900 got elected, a good weekend for democracy.
@Jacintha Dumbrell: You’re missing the bigger picture, though.
First, the established parties moved to the left in order to hover up SF votes, but they don’t need to any longer because SF have betrayed their supporters and the country.
FFG are now moving back to their natural centre right position to get the support of anti-emmigrat movements (who are generally not far right).
@Thomas Sheridan: The big picture is that many SF voters hadn’t been left-wing at all: they had been ethnonationalist, and transferred easily to the far right over what they perceived as SF’s betrayal of ethnonationalism.
The centre-right parties (FG/FF) remained centre-right and were unaffected.
@Thomas Sheridan: yes FFG needed all 0.9% of far-right support!!!!!! 0.9% pushed them from centre-right to centre-right!!! Keep pushing the farther right to a capitalist utopia where we can have complete privatisation of housing and total landlordism! The mental gymnastics of these extreme-right Nativists!!!!
@Jacintha Dumbrell: ah buy the seeds are now sown
The media coverage was appalling. It was so biased on all mediums. Newer candidates and parties were never given a chance to get their point across or a chance to challenge the status quo parties. We need a strong opposition, Sinn Fein, labour and social democrats are not that.
The so called “far right” were labelled by the media and politicians.
When people used to spout about mainstream media etc I used to roll my eyes, I know realise that people were right.
A proper head to head debate with new voices and faces is what was missed in this election coverage . Rte and tv3 trot out the same faces time and time again for sound bites. Let’s get some new voices, the new Irish immigrants, the far right, the far left. Let them speak and challenge those currently in power
Sf didn’t have the election they expected but still increased their seats greens had a train wreck of an election lost 2 meps and over half their council seats yet this hasn’t been said its not even on the papers rte and all media were bious against sf I expect every party to get equal coverage independents weren’t even invited in full to debates independent ireland for a new party did very well not even mentioned
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say