Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A number of opposition TDs rounded on the minister today accusing the government of losing the public confidence. Oireachtas.ie
covid restrictions
'Common sense has broken down': Government slammed for 'bonkers' measures and 'mixed messaging'
Health Minister Stephen Donnelly called for political solidarity.
6.07pm, 9 Sep 2020
82.0k
55
OPPOSITION TDS HAVE slammed the government for giving “inconsistent” and “mixed messaging” in relation to public health measures in the last number of weeks.
During a Dáil debate on the Rural Independent Group’s motion to annul last week’s regulations which require pubs to keep a record of all meals ordered, a number of TDs said the government has lost the support of the public as some of the measures do not make sense to them.
Galway Independent TD and Leas Ceann Comhairle Catherine Connolly said the poor communications of the government is “greatly damaging”.
“A complete shambles” is how she described the government’s approach to the handling of the pandemic.
“We are not in this together,” she said, stating that the meat factories, direct provision and nursing homes, where many clusters have been recorded, were never in it with everyone else.
She agreed to back “draconian” legislation on the basis that there would be “full and frank disclosure” which Connolly said has never been forthcoming from the government.
Donegal Independent TD Thomas Pringle was the first of many TDs to state that people don’t understand the reasoning behind many of the measures being introduced in relation to pubs, social and mass gatherings.
He said many of the measures “don’t make sense, and people know they don’t make sense”.
His constituents are questioning why they can’t go to a football match with people, but can watch it with people in a pub when they are eating.
“No one is buying into it,” said Pringle. “You are losing the argument in terms of public safety and public health,” he added.
Advertisement
‘Anger and frustration’ of the public
Rounding on Health Minister Stephen Donnelly, Labour’s Sean Sherlock said the minister “needs to get out and start meeting real people, because I feel that he’s been cocooned to use that unfortunate phrase himself”.
“I feel that he hasn’t gone out and met the people. And if he met the people he would probably sense that the anger and the frustration of people who are living in this country at this point in time, who want to abide by the regulations, who want to obey the rules, but they also want some degree of normality to be restored to their lives, and to allow them to be able to do the things that they always did.
“Not just say you can do it one minute and then just stop it in its tracks the next. We need to have a degree of humanity, a degree of sympathy, a degree of emotional intelligence about how we conduct our affairs in this parliament,” said Sherlock.
“Common sense has broken down, and common sense needs to be restored,” he added.
Sinn Féin’s David Cullinane said his party has tried to follow a “common sense approach” throughout the pandemic, which he claimed is in “stark contrast” with that of the government’s which has had “bonkers” ideas and “mixed-messaging”.
“I think that when you have mixed messages, and when you have solutions on the table that don’t make sense to people, people then start to lose confidence in the authority of the government and the messages that the government are delivering,” he said, citing the confusion over the €9 meal when in the pub.
Poor communications
Cullinane was also critical of the minister for health in his communicating of the measures.
“The problem is that you have become part of the problem, and your government has become part of the problem in terms of how you, as a minister and other ministers have badly communicated many of the measures in which you have put in place,” he said.
“You, for example proposed criminalising people for having friends over. You, for example proposed giving gardaí more powers to enter into people’s homes, and your presentation of those arguments minister, and your presentation of those issues, were contradicted by the Taoiseach and other government ministers, minutes, and days after you made them,” said Cullinane.
He also hit out against the minister for “fear-mongering” about the possibility of a second lockdown.
Read Next
Related Reads
Public health experts must justify any proposed restrictions for Dublin if they're more 'drastic' than other EU cities
People Before Profit TD Richard Boyd Barrett said people do not understand why you can do one thing, and not another. Many of the measures “don’t make sense for people”, he said. The Dun Laoghaire TD said they need to clearly explain their rationale.
He said the Covid data hub does not have enough information and criticised the minutes of NPHET’s meetings have not been updated since 12 August. Boyd Barrett said the health experts are telling government that the rising cases are originating in households.
“Is it coming through the walls,” he asked, stating that it is coming from workplaces, yet there is no data showing what sectors or workplaces.
Kerry TD Michael Healy Rae urged health minister to admit that the government was wrong in rolling out the rule that you had to order a €9 substantial meal when drinking in a pub. He said they should all have been opened together.
TDs spoke about he need to fight the spread of misinformation and the need to promote the wearing of face masks and social distancing.
Donnelly said the year has been tough for many people. He said the pandemic meant severe restrictions being imposed on people.
He said now the country must suppress the virus “in order to protect our civil liberties” and to keep the country open for business.
The public need to be confident in the measures that are being recommended by the health experts, said Donnelly.
The minister said political solidarity matters when it comes to public confidence, but added that the Oireachtas might not be doing quite so well anymore.
Donnelly said he wasn’t looking for a free pass, stating it can be “tiring” living with the virus in our community, but he asked for more support from his Dáil colleagues.
While he said cases are rising, the number of people in hospital and ICU is far from where it was earlier this year.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Vicky Phelan has been a true hero in all of this, but I think now it’s time to leave her & her family alone & leave them in peace give them privacy & let Vicky get the best possible treatment ,plenty of rest & relaxation. Wishing them lots of love x
Dr. Anthony O’Connor this is the first article I have ever read in any Irish Newspaper since my return to Ireland 2 years ago that has struck me as totally sincere and provides for a reader a precise view of the real issues and obstacles that Health Care in Ireland face. Intentions and Plans seem good but Implementation is poor as you say, I see it every day as a cancer patient myself Brillant Staff but not enough of them and rushed off their feet working in antiquated facilities in corridors less than 1meter wide and only 50% of the beds needed for the chemo patients in the waiting room that day.
Your comments on the media 100% correct
Your comments on the seemingly outraged politicians 100% correct and struck me over the last days also as totally IMMORAL have they worked in Heath Care any of them what gives them the right to call for heads to roll they are themselves totally unaccountable to anyone.
Only outrage of interest to me and I believe many others in Ireland is the outrage of the victims thank you for expressing this view and all others and for your work in Health Care Ireland.
@Teresa: I have to agree, if i could applaud I would. A few months ago my family an I were in our local A&E Department with my elderly mother, the curse of aging, while there we had the privilige of meeting a young nurse who basically advocated for my mother. We were, frankly out of our depth and comfort zone while she knew how to navigate the mine field that is a modern hospital.
On the night we came in she came to check my mother and, for no reason, was obviously upset and crying. She apologised profusely and explained that they’d just diagnosed a young man with some sort of advanced brain cancer, he was terminal and had little time left. She was both hurt and angry that he would have to be diagnosed with such a condition in an A&E Department, and he was the fourth that week.
I can’t help but feel this may be the tip of the iceberg, what happens if the same thing occurs with colorectal cancer, breast cancer, etc. If major cancer diagnoses are being made in A&E Departments it should have been a warning signal that we already had a significant problem. Either nobody was listening or this was ignored. We’re at a crossroads now, we can decide to blunder on, doing as we’ve always done, or we can listen to experts, leave the politics aside and invest in our healthcare.
@Teresa: yes he nailed the real Ireland and absolutely lack of talent our politicians contain all they have done in the past week is to out do each other in shock and horror responses.
@Nick Caffrey: I think Nick proper accountability is most important. These people should know before they are appointed that they will be held accountable for their actions or lack of. We cannot have a system where those responsible can wash their hands of the outcome & walk away into the west with a huge pension & golden handshake
I have yet to see a response from the HSE (or, indeed, any government agency) that outlines in clear language, what happened, who was in charge when it did, and what action was taken.
Poor FFG political elite outraged :-(
Penny pinching to pay a debt not ours for a mega Europe is essentially to blame.
Yet not another cent is outraged..
Not the first time he gave an incisive look and informed comment on the health service and its failings.
He sounds like he should either be the minister for health, or the head of the HSE.
My mother died of cervical cancer in 2016, looking back through her records she was previously diagnosed with an abnormal smear at cin3 stage and it was noted that invasion could not be ruled out. She was given the all clear 6 months later but continued to have all the symptoms of cervical cancer. She was in hospital and seeing doctors with her symptoms almost on a weekly basis, I can’t for the life of me understand how all those hospital visits could not pick up on this cancer until it was too late, given her history.
@Michael Lang: he’s a gastroenterologist not an obstetrician/gynaecologist, expecting specific recommendations from him is like asking an electrician to fix a persistently clogged toilet, both in a house but totally different specialties. What I believe he is trying to express is having finite control/regulations over doctors and nurses isn’t going to change anything unless they work in a system that functions and that there is accountability in management, not the usual ‘god that’s awful, how did that ever happen? I was never made aware of that’ comments that seem to be on an endless loop these days
@Michael Lang:I’m sure he does know Micheal but chose to concentrate on what he did focus on in order for it to have maximum effect. And it worked.It’s called the art of essay writing. He stripped to the bare essentials the reasons this problem keeps happening. In my opinion the main point he was making was until people start genuinely putting health care high on the totem pole of why to vote for which candidate health care will be ignored. The economy and taxes or immigration being priorities in peoples minds when it comes to polling day does not this mess fix. Politicians and civil servants tend to get their arse in to gear when their power is threatened. The specifics of solutions is a different essay that would have made the key points of this essay obscured.
Overpopulated management levels in H.S.E, huge civil service , who you know ,not what you know promotions leading to incompetence ,when all these salaries have been paid not a lot left for actual services.
Dr O’Connor – at long last, a voice which transcends the accepted societal norm of political points scoring and truly elevates this, and other tragedies, to questioning what we need or want our health service, or indeed any other public service to be, is it actually achievable and how are expectations managed. Society has changed immensely in such a short time. Time to reinvent the wheel ? – perhaps, or look at what works well in other countries, why and how. If we continue to patch up and focus on our own failings, we’ll achieve nothing except distraction.
Brilliant clear article. We need a national health system with national standards and regular audit of those systems. Unfortunately we have no national standards just local ad-hoc arrangements where the organisation is responsible but no individual person stands ultimately accountable.
CEOs of companies are accountable; so should the head of the HSE and the minister be.
@Kevin Slater: I have a relative who runs a very expensive and exclusive creche, it’s audited and inspected severaltimes per year, for the slightest infraction they get a warning. If this isn’t corrected tot he satisfaction of whoever happens to be carrying out the relevant inspection they’ll be closed.
However while the HSE carry out such inspections and have the power to close premises, and have done, they themselves aren’t subject to the same rules, standards and accountability the hold others to.
The outrage expressed by F.G. and supported by F.F. under whose tenure the testing of cervical cancer was farmed out to the lowest bidder is beyond belief. History repeating itself..Who remembers Michael Noonan dragging sick and terminally ill people though the courts concerning the blood transfusion scandal. Not making a political point as I usually would do, but how long before the next scandal props up.
Ivan Yates was even telling harris what to do yesterday. Ie: put a board in place for the HSE and set up a redress scheme. Problem is amateur harris has no experience or qualification in running a large organization.
@Robert Harris: you learn from your mistakes and I would say yates is imminently more competent than all gov ministers at this stage. Harris is calling for SMITs, and scoping exercises and commissions of enquiry and talking about memos and whatever buzz words he can think of, but behind it all, he’s showing himself up to be very amateurish, incompetent and clueless in dealing with the issue. (Just as lost as creed was weeks ago with the fodder crisis)
Anthony o connor ,we need to get everyone round the table ,unions ,consultants ,management ,ministers and of course the legal profession .we need a transparent code of practice which will be open to public scrutiny and an independent outside assessment …we can talk to the cows come home and not much will change .i have even heard through the grapevine that other screenings related to other medical issues may well need to be examined ,this may well be political dynamite .we have some of the best paid politicians in the world ,best paid consultants and best paid management and the legal profession are out on their own .its time they all stood up for the citizens of Ireland or get out of the way .radical change is needed and it NOW
Great article. I too feel frustrated and angry about the ‘posturing’ of politicians. being indignant, disgusted, angry is not what we need. we need a root & branch cultural change about how the medical profession perceive women. As a woman, sick and disabled, in Irish hospitals I’ve been shouted at, dismissed, with male doctors walking out of the room if I question, challenge or ask for more tests. I’ve had my medical files slammed on the table, I’ve had frosty cold angry stares and have had diagnosis dismissed.
Hey ho; what do I do? I get myself to the UK under the E112, get the tests I needed, get a proper diagnosis (a very rare neuro-muscular degenerative disease) after muscles biopsies, various neuro-muscular electrical/scientific tests, Highly sophisticated technology at the disposal of these (two) high powered centres of neurological excellence, not available in Ireland, not even Beaumont, and I get DIAGNOSED. Return to Ireland and the doctors dismiss it. I kid you not.
Now I’m telling you its arrogance, misogyny , disrespect, and women seen as ‘hysterical’, with ‘somatoform’ written on the files, and the utter arrogance of dismissing women’s concerns medically that’s killing us.
This scandal has roots, the roots are ‘women’s health is not priority’. The medical culture towards female patients is sometimes little more than disguised contempt. Even female hatred. Because women who challenge, complain, argue, or ask of consultants are not LIKED. why?
Because many of our male consultants still think they know everything, are Gods, experts & are as arrogant as hell. They operate under “if I don’t know it/ understand it – it doesn’t exist”.
This scandal was not ‘picked up’ by the medical profession – it was exposed by a woman who was , lets not beat about the bush – let die to save institutions, medics and vested powerful interests. She and all the others who have died were sacrificed to ‘cover-up’ the institutions negligence.
Varadkar & Harris can ‘posture’ to kingdom come but as men do they really LISTEN to women.
As a ‘failed’ woman medically I’ve asked to meet Simon Harris, my constituency TD, (Greystones) no reply, no meeting, no nothing…Aaaaahhhhh This woman is very angry indeed.
My solution, a hospital for women, run by & for women. Get me away from misogyny in the medical profession. toxic and killing women.
Even the usual fake pro gov profiles are unusually quiet on this one. If it wasn’t for Vicky Philanthropy how many more women would Vradkar and Co let die? They should hang their heads in shame, better still,there should be a criminal investigation.
HSE condemns 'racist abuse and assaults' targeting Indian community in Ireland
31 mins ago
871
rich coming from you
Michael O'Leary has written to the Irish Times for 'slagging off' his Metrolink opinions
51 mins ago
4.0k
35
Shooting Stars
Meteor shower and rare 'double planet' to light up Irish skies tonight - here's how to spot them
Updated
17 hrs ago
53.2k
27
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 220 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Social Media Cookies
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 154 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 201 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 163 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 124 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 125 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 52 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 49 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 181 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 79 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 113 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 119 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 52 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 67 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 38 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 126 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 128 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 96 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 69 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 120 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 108 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say