We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
OVER HALF OF local councils queried will need to substantially increase their farm inspections of slurry spreading and management in order to meet targets set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this year.
This investigation by Noteworthy also found that most councils only inspect a tiny proportion of farms in their area, while two councils included on the EPA’s list did not conduct any planned inspections of farms last year.
Fifteen councils will have to more than double their farm inspections in 2024, with the increase required to meet EPA targets in some areas surpassing 600%. Two local authorities will also have to increase their inspections tenfold if they are to reach targets.
We can also reveal that some local authorities are falling far behind in 2024 and will struggle to meet their targets before year end. Several councils that provided partial data to us for 2024 have completed less than 20% of their inspection targets more than halfway through the year.
Slurry is an organic manure made of livestock animal refuse. It is high in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and ammonia – and close to 40 m tonnes of it is spread across almost 90,000 farms in Ireland.
However, while essential to farm productivity, it contributes significantly to ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions, and irresponsible spreading of slurry has led to considerable water pollution and biodiversity loss.
Noteworthy sent Access to Information on the Environment (AIE) requests and press queries relating to the management of farm waste, including slurry and manure, to all local authorities, with the exception of Galway City and Dublin City Council, who weren’t included in the EPA’s targets.
In addition to low inspection levels, Noteworthy found that close to two dozen counties don’t hold key information around fertiliser spreading.
That includes the fact that most councils do not know the number of farmers in their catchment area that spread slurry.
Noteworthy, the crowdfunded community-led investigative platform from The Journal, supports independent and impactful public interest journalism.
The EPA told Noteworthy that “agriculture is the primary source of nitrate losses to water and contributes a significant proportion of phosphate losses”.
The European Union, to mitigate the effects of agriculture on water quality, introduced the Nitrates Directive in 1991 which regulates the storage and spreading of slurry. The regulation also mandates how and when this liquid manure can be spread and managed.
The Directive led to the establishment of good agricultural practices (GAP), a set of regulations that provide a “basic set of measures to ensure the protection of waters”.
In Ireland, these regulations are monitored and enforced by local councils, Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI), the EPA and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine (DAFM).
The EPA assessed how councils performed inspections in 2022 and found that only four county councils, Carlow, Meath, Fingal and Kildare, achieved the standard set by the National Enforcement Priorities (NEP).
“More local authority farm inspections and follow-up enforcement is needed to reduce the impact of agricultural activities on water quality,” the agency stated in a report released late last year.
It told Noteworthy, “while the number of local authority farm inspections increased during 2022, the number was still too low”. In 2022, only 943 initial inspections were conducted by local authorities.
Data obtained from local authorities showed that over 2,700 farm inspections took place in 2023, though this figure also includes follow-up inspections and investigations undertaken off the back of complaints so the number of initial, or planned, inspections was lower.
Roughly half of these inspections were also carried out by just two councils, Cork County (932 inspections) and Limerick (404 inspections), meaning that there were low inspection rates across many local authorities.
For example, just eight inspections were carried out in Offaly last year, while in Carlow there were just 14. Both counties have been set targets of over 100 inspections by the EPA this year.
Two county councils, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown and Waterford, did not undertake any planned inspections of farms in 2023, with the latter telling Noteworthy it “had no dedicated resource to carry out farm inspections prior to 2024. Inspections were carried out following complaints depending on staff availability.”
This year, the EPA requires Waterford to carry out 136 inspections, while Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown will only have to conduct 27 inspections, due to its largely urban environment.
Our investigations also found that only a few councils inspected compliance with the Low Emission Slurry Spreading (LESS) scheme last year. This scheme provides grantees aid to purchase modern, less polluting machinery to spread liquid manure.
We also asked all local authorities, except the three city councils, for statistics on farms that spread slurry.
20 out of the 28 councils we reached out to told us that they did not know the number of farms within their area that fell under the Nitrates Directive derogation.
The data, they said, is held by the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine (DAFM).
When asked by Noteworthy for this information, a spokesperson for DAFM said that across Ireland in 2022, “6,393 farmers were approved for a Nitrates Derogation” and that data for 2023 was “not yet fully finalised”.
They added that the number of farmers in a county “are not essential pieces of data that would be required in advance in order to properly conduct an on-farm inspection. Local Authority and DAFM inspectors make their assessment of compliance when they go out on inspection.”
Our investigation also found that for many councils, only farms that are found to have committed a serious breach in compliance are cross-reported to DAFM.
When this occurs, financial penalties can be imposed, or farmers may lose their nitrate derogation and be ineligible to apply in subsequent years.
Data provided to Noteworthy from several councils showed that some cross-reported all of the non-compliances to the DAFM, while other councils cross-reported as little as less than 10% of non-compliant farms.
From this, it was not clear what level of breaches were being cross-reported by each council.
When we asked DAFM if there was a standardised system to record the scale of non-compliance on farms, a spokesperson said “the Department has in place a comprehensive set of inspection procedure manuals.”
They also added that local authority inspectors are provided with training “ensuring that all Inspectors are kept up to date with the latest procedures and requirements under the GAP Regulations.”
Dr Elaine McGoff, head of advocacy with An Taisce said these regulations are not strong enough.
“The Good Agricultural Practice regulations are not fit for purpose. Even if they were properly enforced, they’re still not going to achieve what needs to be achieved.”
McGoff said that the regulations address phosphorus pollution, doing little for nitrogen.
“Ireland has a nitrogen problem with a phosphorus solution,” she added.
However, Teagasc research officer Shaun Connolly, who specialises in manure management, said that the GAP works “relatively well”.
“It strikes a good balance between reducing emissions, reducing water quality issues, but also getting the results that farmers want as well.”
For the first time, the EPA has set local authority targets for initial farm inspections.
These targets are decided on a “risk-based methodology and ensures that inspections are focussed in water bodies that are not achieving their Water Framework Directive status and where agriculture is the significant pressure,” a spokesperson said.
The Government’s recent Water Action Plan 2024 states “agriculture is the most common significant pressure impacting 1,023 water bodies” and proposes these new inspection targets as a measure to improve water quality.
The EPA told Noteworthy that its rollout of the National Agricultural Inspection Programme “will increase the number of inspections carried out, with the 2025 target representing more than a four-fold increase from the number of farms inspected in 2022″.
However, these new targets still amount to less than 4% of the total farms reported to use slurry in 2024 and increase to just over 5% in 2025.
Some argue that this is not enough.
Sinéad O’Brien, a co-ordinator with the Sustainable Water Network (SWAN) – an umbrella organisation of twenty-five national and local environmental groups – said “even if they take a risk-based approach to the inspections, at such a paltry inspection rate they’re just not going to inspect the number of farms that need to be”.
Furthermore, just six councils surpassed or met their 2024 targets in 2023, meaning most local authorities will have to see vast improvements in the number of farm inspections this year if they are to meet the targets set.
Westmeath and Offaly will have to increase their farm inspections by 1,750% (from 2 to 37) and 1,238% (from 8 to 107) respectively in order to meet the targets set by the EPA.
Both Carlow and South Dublin County Council will also have to inspect over 600% more farms this year.
The sharp rise in the number of inspections required is partly due to the lack of staffing resources available to councils to conduct inspections before this year.
In 2022, the County and City Management Association (CCMA) undertook a review of local authority resources available for agricultural inspections and found that just 11 full-time equivalent (FTEs) inspectors were available nationally.
The report recommended that 57 additional inspectors needed to be recruited to undertake the 4,500 farm inspection target set by the EPA.
In response to a query from Noteworthy, the Department of Local Government said it had “allocated funding for 21 Local Authority staff in 2023 and a further 36 staff in 2024, to work specifically on the National Agricultural Inspection Programme”.
“It is now the responsibility of each Local Authority to ensure the resources are in place to ensure that the EPA targets are being met,” a spokesperson added.
While local authorities are hiring more support dedicated to conducting farm inspections, data provided to Noteworthy of farm inspections so far this year show that some councils are falling far behind and will struggle to meet their targets before the end of the year.
Several councils that provided partial data to us for 2024 have completed less than 20% of their inspection targets more than halfway through the year.
This includes Westmeath County Council, who required the largest increase over 2023 and has yet to inspect any farms so far this year.
A spokesperson told Noteworthy this was “due to a lack of resources” and that “preparations are underway to complete our target of 37 inspections by the end of 2024″.
Leitrim County Council are also lagging behind, with just 4 of their 46 inspections completed so far.
A spokesperson for the council said there are “a number of vacant posts in our Environment Department” adding “a full internal review of the overall inspection schedule of the Environment Department and targets will take place in the coming weeks, with a view to meeting the set targets by year-end”.
They also said the vacant posts will be filled “in the coming weeks” and on the appointment of these additional staff resources “inspection numbers will increase significantly from current levels”.
When asked whether the EPA was concerned that local authorities will fail to meet their inspection targets for this year, a spokesperson said “it would be premature for the EPA to comment at this stage”, adding that the recruitment process for local authority inspectors was still ongoing.
The EPA also did not respond to a query relating to consequences for non-compliance with the targets, such as fines or sanctions.
Some, however, believe that inspections might not be the right solution.
Maurice Deasy, a Teagasc researcher and farmer said “I’m a farmer, and the amount of inspections and red tape and hassle is unbelievable,” adding: “I don’t know what benefit it would have for water quality.”
He said constant water quality monitoring is a better solution, “rather than just inspecting and causing time and hassle for farmers and for councils and cost”.
Deasy said that slurry is not the issue. The issue is how it is being spread.
“It’s not the cow, it’s the how,” he said.
“I think if we were to monitor the water, we could have a much better and more progressive discussion with farmers about when exactly we should use this manure.”
However, ecologist and environmental campaigner Pádraic Fogarty said that the volume of slurry in Ireland is cause for concern.
“The climate is changing much faster than our policies,” he said.
According to the Central Statistics Office (CSO), Ireland has over 7.3 m cows, 5.9 m sheep and 1.6 m pigs. While Teagasc lists that Ireland has over 70 m chickens.
This, Fogarty said, is the issue.
“That is a constant stream of waste that the lands just can’t cope with. It’s just too much… The overriding problem is the number of farm animals.”
He also said that Low Emission Slurry Spreading (LESS) farming is worse for water “because it’s putting more slurry straight into the ground”.
“It’s very good for reducing the emissions of ammonia gas. But it’s worse for water quality,” he added.
O’Brien added that increased enforcement, while welcomed by SWAN, does not address the core issue.
She argued that some areas, such as the Boyne, the Barrow and the Blackwater require such a reduction in nutrients that even with “all the enforcement officers in the world doing all of the farm inspections with all of the farmers coming out squeaky clean, that reduction would not be achieved”.
Instead, dairy farmers should be supported to de-intensify, O’Brien said and environmental risk assessments to be undertaken on all intensive farms with “intensification only permitted if it can be demonstrated that it won’t impact water quality”.
Recent data shows that water bodies including the Cork Harbour, New Ross Port in Wexford and the Boyne Estuary in Louth have shown an increase in phosphate levels.
In response to a query by Noteworthy, Inland Fisheries Ireland shared data which showed that since 2020, thousands of fish deaths could be directly or partially linked to “discharge or effluent arising from agricultural activities”.
Grassroots community-led groups are trying to help mitigate water pollution in their areas.
The Boyne River Trust is a not-for-profit organisation based in Meath. Muireann Lyons, a part-time development officer with the group said that the Boyne’s “water quality has declined in recent years, rather than improved”.
A recent report from the EPA shows that 34% of the river and 10% of the groundwater from the Boyne catchment is ‘poor’ quality. Agriculture was listed as one of the reasons for this.
The Trust is working along with farmers in the area to address issues. “We’re at the talking stages with local farmers. There’s a lot of interest there,” Lyons said.
“We’re talking with farmers about things like fencing off their land so that the cattle aren’t encroaching on waters, installing some fencing around ponds or wetland areas to maximise water replenishment… [checking ] their irrigation systems are fit for purpose.”
More resources for farm inspections are being allocated. Many councils that shared information with Noteworthy said that the number of farm inspectors employed has increased in the last four years.
Noteworthy reached out to the Department of Local Government to understand why it had taken until 2024 for vital resources to be put in place for farm inspections.
A spokesperson for the department told us a local authority inspection programme was in place for years, but over the course of the Covid period, inspection numbers decreased.
Following this, they added, the “EPA was given an oversight role and the current National Agricultural Inspection Programme was established”.
What toll is slurry spreading taking on our health and nature?
By Conor O’Carroll & Suhasini Srinivasaragavan of Noteworthy
Noteworthy is the crowdfunded investigative journalism platform from The Journal. This project was proposed and funded by our readers.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Of course a tenfold increase in farm inspections.
Why?
Because the purpose is to make farming as an industry impossible, drive farmers off their land and force them to sell the land to the state for buttons.
And if anyone objects, the weight of the apparatus of the State will be unleashed on them.
You think I’m wrong, ask Enoch Burke, the same playbook is being rolled out.
@Garry Coll: and if all that fails they are racists…………
@Garry Coll: wow ! There must be more to this story. Those farmers have to be complaining for some reason. I think the truth needs to be revealed.
@Oh Mammy:
Wouldn’t be able to say that, but they are definitely Communist traitors.
@offside again:
Didn’t realise the Journal paid their trolls overtime.
@Oh Mammy: don’t forget your comments this time …
@Garry Coll: what time is it Garry ? 04:54am where I am. How much do you get paid Garry ? Do you get paid overtime ? Your boss is not getting value for money at this hour of the morning.
@offside again: if I do I will count on your photographic to remind me. Thank you!
@Oh Mammy: *memory
@Garry Coll: not the farmers I know. You should go meet one some day. You would learn a lot. (FYI, food does not come from Tesco)
@Garry Coll: and risk having multiple Thomas Reid cases..
@Garry Coll: I was with ya until you mentioned Mr Potato head and his bible thumping nut job family in the end…..Farmers we need, religious attention seeking nutters like the burkes who just wanna be a pain for attention and have beliefs akin to places like Alabama back in 1800′s is not
@Garry Coll: ‘Communist traitors’?
You need professional help for your paranoia. If you were any further to the right you’d fall off the edge.
@Garry Coll: You actually *want* badly polluted and toxic waterways? Is clean water communist?
@Brendan O’Brien: could he already be off the edge?
@Garry Coll: I wouldn’t ask Enoch Burke the fkn time!
@Brendan O’Brien: The state is far and away the largest polluter of our waterways and our air through Co.councils third world water treatment and the ESB, but inconvenient truths seldom get published or reported on, and the state will never take the blame for being the country’s biggest polluter
I support our farmers. Thank you
@Oh Mammy: if they want to pollute our rivers that is their human rights.
@Sal Paradise: Money is far more important than human rights (probably to every commenter here too).
@Sal Paradise: most of the pollution in rivers isn’t from farmers it’s from irish water ironically enough. The last few fish kills were due to sewage and chemicals released into rivers. This still happens and the fines are tiny. People will always blame the farmers. They are a easy target.
The bird population in our area has been decimated. Haven’t seen frog spawn, dragonflies or other marsh dwelling creatures in decades. The water is toxic.
@Don Johnson: Bird populations are also affected by Wind Turbines , high mortality rates around them & also by the Mink population which has exploded around Ireland, I have witnessed entire populations of ducks on lakes wiped out by Mink, so it’s not just farming, waste water treatment plants around us & septic tanks are the biggest culprits, Farmers are just the easy targets all the time, particularly for the Green Party & it’s members.
@SV3tN8M4: I would wager the impact of septic tanks on slobland wildlife is fairly negligible. All evidence points to farmers as the highest culprit in polluting the waterways. But as usual they’ll play the tiresome victim card instead of taking responsibility for a change.
@SV3tN8M4: But you agree that slurry should be properly managed, right?
@Don Johnson: show me your evidence. The last number of fish kills were irish water. Irish water has also been pumping sewage into the sea….
@Brendan O’Brien: Yes, so too should Waste Water treatment plants, whose record is been covered up by the EPA. Many factors in the decline of bird population, solely not the reserve of Farmers. Farmers are No. 1 target for the Green Party, but Aviation, Cement Plants & Data Centres are exempt in their eyes. The Greens will make Ireland food dependent very quickly & destroy our Agricultural export market,costing thousands of jobs in rural communities.
Thank-you for such an informative article! Have to say I’m with Fogarty on this one. It’s down to basic maths – more farm animals, more slurry spreading results in poorer water quality. Perhaps more frequent farm inspections will highlight this issue further. But what will be done then? Of course we need excellent produce, especially for our export market but at the end of the day, is the bigger profit margin worth such a decline in our water quality? Is it??
A straight to the comments article for sure. Excuse my ignorance..
@Paul Gorry: It was a long one for sure.
They should clean the roads after they move cattle or when they are spreading slurry. In my experience most do not. When it rains it is treacherous on these roads, They put down matting across a road to move cattle and this is totally illegal and dangerous. I can only imagine what the EPA inspections find on the inside of the farms.
Scientists and active farmers need to have relationships of mutual trust.
Good to see how well Limerick and Cork are doing
As long as beef can be exported right? To feed the world our environment for the profit of who?
@Chutes: you do realize that in ireland we have the perfect climate to grow grass. It’s not really suited to growing fruit or wheat for bread as we don’t get enough sun light. We could trade our surplus of beef for those items. That’s how it’s always worked here. Also you know that a field full of grass has healthy soils full of nutrients and carbon is locked up in it. We can’t eat the grass but the cows can. Meaning our Milk and butter is among the best in the world.
@Washpenrebel: While it’s true that Ireland’s climate is ideal for growing grass, stating that the country cannot effectively produce fruit or wheat due to insufficient sunlight isn’t entirely accurate. Advances in agricultural techniques and the use of resilient crop varieties have enabled Irish farmers to successfully cultivate a variety of fruits and cereals. For example, Ireland has a growing apple industry, and grains like barley and oats are commonly produced for both domestic use and export.
Relying heavily on beef production raises significant environmental concerns. Livestock farming, particularly cattle, is a major source of methane—a greenhouse gas that is over 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide in trapping heat in the atmosphere over a 100-year period, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Ireland reports that agriculture accounts for about one-third of the country’s total greenhouse gas emissions, with methane from enteric fermentation in ruminant animals being a primary contributor.
While grasslands do sequester carbon in the soil, the methane emissions from cattle often offset these benefits. Additionally, overgrazing can lead to soil degradation and a loss of biodiversity. Diversifying agricultural practices to include more crop cultivation can improve soil health through crop rotation and reduce dependency on a single industry.
Trading surplus beef for essential items like fruit and wheat may not be sustainable in the long term. It exposes the country to global market fluctuations and potential trade disruptions, which can affect food security. Producing a wider range of crops domestically can reduce the carbon footprint associated with importing goods and promote a more resilient local food system.
Moreover, while Irish dairy products like milk and butter are highly regarded, it’s important to balance production with environmental sustainability. Implementing practices that reduce emissions, such as improving feed efficiency and manure management, can help mitigate the environmental impact.
In summary, Ireland has the potential to broaden its agricultural outputs beyond livestock, which can lead to environmental benefits and enhanced food security without compromising the quality of its renowned dairy products.
@Chutes: irish grasslands sequestration of carbon have been found to be 4.5 times higher than what is currently being allowed. This data is from the dept of agriculture own study in johnstown castle Co wexford. This means their are many farms in ireland that are carbon sinks and do not produce excess carbon. Cows are not the problem here.
A dry day in the counrtyside now accompanied by the smell of shit, the tourists must love it! I fkn hate it, I’m old enough to remember when we had a countryside, ya know, one with wildlife back before it was an industrial farm, the young’ns won’t remember.
@Chutes: The place is full of wild life. Hedgehogs eating the cats food, the cats drop dead shrews, mice, rats and birds at the back door every couple of days. A bumper crop of swallows nests on the house. Dead badgers and foxes on the roads, buzzards in sky picking off young pheasants, lurchers chasing hares in the distance, wasps nest in the compost heap, herrings in the river picking off the fish. Horseflies, midges and daddy longlegs everywhere.
@P. V. Aglue: While it may appear that the area is abundant with wildlife, several factual considerations suggest otherwise. Hedgehog populations, for instance, have been declining significantly in many regions due to habitat loss and road fatalities, making frequent sightings less common than implied. Similarly, swallows have experienced population decreases attributed to changes in agricultural practices and loss of nesting sites, so a “bumper crop” of nests is unlikely without conservation efforts in place.
Buzzards primarily feed on carrion and small rodents rather than young pheasants, and their hunting patterns don’t typically involve preying extensively on game birds. The mention of dead badgers and foxes on roads highlights human impact on wildlife rather than a thriving ecosystem; roadkill incidents are a leading cause of mortality for these animals.
Furthermore, herons (likely what was meant by “herrings”) are affected by water pollution and habitat destruction, which can limit their ability to feed on fish in rivers. The prevalence of pests like wasps, horseflies, midges, and daddy longlegs is often influenced by environmental imbalances, sometimes caused by reduced numbers of their natural predators.
Overall, while individual encounters with wildlife can give the impression of abundance, many species are facing challenges that reduce their populations. Human activities have significantly altered habitats, and the presence of certain animals may be more indicative of ecological imbalance than of a healthy, wildlife-rich environment.
@Chutes: The weather has the biggest impact on ecology imbalances. The cold wet spring this year was bad for the bumble bee. The beast from the east freeze of 2018 and 2010 and 12 killed thousands of birds, big and small. A bad flood will drowned out the fox, badger,and rabbit population in an area.In the next few years ash dieback will really take hold and 10s of thousands of trees will be cut down, fireblight will start effecting the hedge rows country wide, killing miles and miles of habit. All imported diseases by a government scheme jumping to the eco lobby groups. What seems like the right thing to do, can do more harm in the long run.
@P. V. Aglue: Your degree in ecologigal studies is from where? Forgive me if I think your opinion ill-informed and ignore.
All these pimps should be run from the farm gates , the Agri. Dept . Haven’t a clue about what goes on or how a farm is run.
Our council should retrain the dog and litter wardens as they seem to do f all dog and litter inspections!
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say