Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Leah Farrell/Rollingnews.ie
shameful decision

'Immoral and repulsive': Fury at Zappone's refusal for redress for mother and baby home survivors

The Coalition of Mother and Baby Home Survivors called it a “shameful decision”.

Updated 3:46pm

THE COALITION OF Mother and Baby Home Survivors (CMABS) has said that it “utterly rejects” Minister Katherine Zappone’s refusal to offer redress to survivors of these homes.

Measures of redress were recommended in the second interim report by the Commission on Mother and Baby Homes, published yesterday.

In a statement, the government said it had “carefully examined the Commission’s recommendation regarding redress, and has concluded that it is not possible to implement it”.

Minister Zappone said that she had “consulted in great detail with the Taoiseach, the Attorney General and other Ministers” before this conclusion was reached.

CMABS said this failure to provide redress was “immoral, repulsive and cold-hearted” and all it does is “kick the can down the road waiting for more and more elderly survivors to die”.

The report, which can be read in full here, says that it is “clear that children who were resident” at the mother and baby homes under its investigation “have a real cause for grievance” at being left out of any redress scheme.

While the report does not assert that abuse occurred at these institutions, “as its investigation is still far from complete”, it does say that children who were resident at these homes were in the same position as the children in industrial schools and orphanages covered by previous redress schemes.

Logically, children who were resident in the named mother and baby homes and all county homes should be eligible to apply for redress in the same way and under the same conditions.

Speaking today, Zappone said that the survivors would have to “go through a process of proving abuse in order to access that [redress] scheme” because the Commission has not yet provided findings that abuse occurred at these homes.

“If they do suggest that there are findings of abuse and make recommendations in terms of redress, then we will deal with that then,” she said.

Previous redress schemes have cost the government billions but Zappone did not rule out the possibility of redress once the Commission completes its full report.

“It is true that the other redress scheme was extremely costly,” she said.

If there are various bodies responsible other than the State, it’s important to ensure that whoever is liable and responsible shares the cost.

Sinn Féin TD Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire said that it was “deeply disappointing” and “insulting to survivors” that a redress scheme wasn’t being pursued by government at this time.

The report is dated 16 September 2016, and CMABS was also critical of the time it took for the government to publish the report, calling it a “national disgrace” and a “shameful decision”.

Fianna Fáil spokesperson on children and youth affairs, Anne Rabbitte, also expressed “grave concerns about the length of time it has taken to see this report published”.

Zappone concluded that space and time must be given to the Commission to complete its full investigation, and that she would “take whatever action” she could to address the issues raised in the meantime.

With additional reporting from Christina Finn

Read: ‘Urgent action is needed’: Letters reveal shock at discovery of human remains at mother and baby home

Read: Watch: ‘We took their babies and gifted them, sold them, trafficked them and starved them’

Your Voice
Readers Comments
54
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.