TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

45 per cent of parents have made no provision for their children’s education

Over two thirds of parents believe they will have to borrow their children’s third level education.

Image: Images_of_Money via Flickr/Creative Commons

MORE THAN TWO thirds of parents believe they will have to borrow to fund their children’s third level education - yet 45 per cent have made no provision for such costs, according to research published today.

The research published by Bank of Ireland Life, in association with online parent resource Schooldays.ie, found that almost 50 per cent of respondents were not aware of the actual cost of third level education, but over half believed it would cost in the region of €6,873 per year.

Of the families who experienced financial difficulty, 56 per cent said sought financial assistance from family while 23 per cent sought financial assistance from the government to fund education.

“Seventy-five per cent of parents believe that the best time to start saving for their children’s education is when their child is between 0-4 years old. However of those parents, 52 per cent started when their child was between 5-11 years old and almost a quarter of them are doing so with the children’s allowance,” said Damian Smith, Head of Investments at Bank of Ireland Life.

The research found that almost two thirds of parents surveyed were earning less over the past three years, and that approximately one family in five had suffered a job loss. Despite this, almost 70 per cent of families have made no change to the amount of pocket money they give their children in the last year while just over 12 per cent increased the allowance per child.

Pocket money for secondary school children ranged from €2 to €60 per week, while secondary school students that were engaged on employment of some kind earned an average of €19.42 per week. Meanwhile, pocket money for third level students ranged from €10 to €120 per week, while third level students that work were shown to earn an average of €43.50 per week.

Nearly half of parents surveyed said they have maintained the same spend for extra-curricular activities and 38 per cent of them have invested more in this type of activities than in the previous year before.

Some 63 per cent of the parents of primary school children spend between €100 and €500 on extra curricular activities per child each year, while almost one third of parents are spending over €500 per child on extra curricular activities per year.

When looking for savings in household finances, over 46 per cent of the families do so through a reduced spend on childcare.

Meanwhile, a further 36 per cent of parents would be prepared to pay for private secondary school education to improve exam results.

Read: CAO offers – the main points>

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • ECP 20/08/12 #

    The government have cut the college grant by up to almost 5000. This means that people from a more disadvantaged background will not attend college no matter how able or interested they are. This is a disgraceful power play and if we want to keep a smidgen of our dignity as an island we should put policy in place that see’s access to education be based on acedemic merit.

    Reply
    • ACP, I agree, the one thing we cannot afford to throw away in this country is access to education. We have a small population and we need to make sure that anyone who wants to be education at third level has that chance. There is a need for reform though.

      Reply
    • ECP when I was in college there wasn’t a single person who was genuinely in need of a grant receiving one and plenty who had absolutely no need who were receiving one! It seems your parents must be farmers/self employed in this country to receive a grant! I never applied for or required a grant but just something that was very evident in my college!

      Reply
    • Actually the disadvantaged still have access to grants, its the working who just miss out on the cut off for grants who miss out the most. The parents earn too much to qualify for a grant, but can’t afford to pay for college either. Seems like things are pretty much back to where twenty years ago before free fees.

      Reply
  • Never mind college, just getting them to leaving cert costs a small fortune

    Reply
    • Don’t aspire to anything just watch Vincent browne and listen to Constantine and understand that after paying tax for 33 years that it’s rather pointed when we are paying extra levys same time as banks being bailed out to prop up the European experiment .

      Reply
    • Reg 20/08/12 #

      Eilish it is not that simple. Even if the banks were never bailed out we would have these additional taxes. Fianna Fail doubled public spending over a ten year period using taxes largely sourced from a property ponzi scheme. Once the bubble burst…..we know the rest.

      Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      @ Eilish – to clarify this; you have no aspirations to political life. So you are not the same Eilish Deegan who was one of the first members of Sli Nios Fearr and who is very active in campaigning for them on this very website? I think that could be justifiably classed as having “political aspirations”. And, as another commenter mentioned above, please, please, please reply to comments in that comment thread, and not in a different comment thread. It tends to annoy and make it more difficult to take part in a discussion with you.

      Reply
  • Are P.R.D not deductions going towards your own pension? Genuine question

    Reply
    • Nix 20/08/12 #

      That’s money that the people paying PRD will never see again. Whatever your feelings on public sector pensions (and I know they can vary widely), the pension related deduction does not lead to an increased pension on retirement.

      Reply
    • Jthm am not the only annoying one.what amazes me is how many people complain about the state of the country but do absolutely nothing to actively change things .well martin critten started sli nios fearr as a reaction to this and I think he s doing a great job and so do a lot of other people as he is getting a lot of support.but I don’t think supporting a cause makes u an aspiring politico.we need things to b turned around and go right in this country and endless talk with no action does not get us anyplace.if u want to do something other than talk get involved,bring ur thoughts and experience to the table and let’s all get on with it.

      Reply
    • Yeah reg.but they (the gov) have to look to themselves to cut the waste.this country cannot afford the gov..regular people have no money to put into the economy so it’s at a stand still

      Reply
  • The USC is 7% of your earnings which means if you are paying ?500 a month you make around ?7000 a month not taking into consideration the other taxes. That’s around ?84000 a year!

    Reply
  • John F 20/08/12 #

    Maybe because 45% of parents are assured that they will be looked after by our generous welfare system!

    Reply
    • Ted, I see no reason to bring farmers and self employed into this . Just because you are either does not mean you are “rich” (a word I have never seen described by lunatics who throw the word around like snuff at a wake). Many a farmer and many of the self employed cannot afford to pay bills or pay for College. In the majority of cases the self employed are ,in turn , providing employment to others. You are well balanced with a chip on both shoulders. Climb don, boy.

      Reply
  • Seems this thread has been hijacked by a few people.

    Reply
  • The gov.have taken 500 to 600 out of my pay every month to pay bond holders so I have to take that much out of my savings to pay mortgage etc . Schools asking for fees which constitutionally should b free.property investment which were for children’s future well we won’t even go there.but Dennis u can’t see that any of this is caused by a pillaging government.

    Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      No they haven’t. You have been misinformed.

      Reply
    • Reg 20/08/12 #

      You stated on a previous thread Eilish that you paid 500 to 600 Euros in USC each month. Anyone paying that much in USC each month is earning about 100k per year gross. Do you think the well paid shouldn’t pay tax? Those earning 100k in Ireland loose approximately 40% of their gross amount in income tax, USC and PRSI. Not that bad compared to many countries.

      Reply
    • What do schools asking for contributions have to do with the government? That is a matter for their school boards.

      As for the PERSONAL financial risks of investing in property (in a bubble BTW) well why on earth should the state be covering you? I don’t agree that they should be covering investments made by large financial institutes (“bond holders”) so why would I agree about them paying you back for bad investments as well?

      500-600 extra coming out of your pay since the crisis struck? You must we well off… but either way a lot of that money is being used to fund public services that we can no longer afford, and which we cannot support on the open funds market. Some of it is definitely going to bond-holders but not all for sure.

      Eilish, I don’t doubt that you have legitimate reasons to be p’ed off at the government, but it seems like you have taken everything and lumped it into together in a big jumble.

      Reply
  • Maybe savings and investments were in place but they got robbed by the gov.to pay the bond holders.oh and don’t dream of going near the banks for a loan ESP.ulster bank as u won’t get it .

    Reply
  • Reg I pay 500 euro on prd and USC and earning about40 k . So don’t know who s mis informed or who s got the figures wrong .

    Reply
  • Jthm I paid my tax to support those things but now pay an extra 500 for the bond holders

    Reply
    • Eilish.. .Whatever about the merits of your argument you should use the “Reply” button (under the original post) to reply to replies. Creating a brand new post everytime you want to reply to someone is polluting the comments section.
      So to reply to this you should hit the reply under your comment
      “Jthm I paid my tax to support those things but now pay an extra 500 for the bond holders”

      That will add your reply under this one :-)

      Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      No you don’t.

      Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      If you don’t like paying tax just say you don’t like paying tax. If you want to justify your not liking paying tax by saying you don’t agree with where your money goes, then please provide evidence to show that every month €500 of your money goes directly to bond holders. Unless you can show this objectively, I won’t believe you.

      Reply
  • Jthm this is jus stupid where do u think the money is going and the household charge money..all into the same ole

    Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      Everything must be paid for, including the services that you use and the services that you don’t use but have the option to use them. You’re taking for granted many things that you assume are free but are not in many EU countries, e.g. Public galleries and museums. The vast majority of tax does not leave Ireland, it remains here to pay for social services and the public sector. You may not agree with how the money is spent, but only a small percentage will ever be passed onto the evil, shadowy sharp-toothed blood-swilling bond holders.

      Reply
  • JTHM 20/08/12 #

    Meh.

    Reply
  • U are so wrong.. Your figures not even close .500 nothing to do with tax prsi etc.

    Reply
  • Jtml believe what u like but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that when the banks are bailed out ,and then u see 500 extra being taken off u each month on top of ur tax and prsi ,that its obviously paying them.

    Reply
    • JTHM 20/08/12 #

      You are simply repeating your argument, you are not advancing it. You’ve made a claim but you haven’t as yet back it up with objective information. Not good for an aspiring politico.

      Reply
    • Reg . Another tax what else.pay related deduction.they like to call it pension related but it’s not .

      Reply
    • Reg 20/08/12 #

      So the PRD is the public sector pension levy, thanks for the clarification. Yes this was a pay cut by another name but at least you are still guaranted a defined benefit pension. Something most of us in the private sector can only dream of.

      Reply

Add New Comment