TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Accountants cite bad spelling, formatting and grammar as worst CV offences

A survey of accountants has found that the majority rate CVs as average with 80 per cent of recruiters in the industry dismissing a candidate’s chances immediately due to a badly prepared curriculum vitae.

Image: the italian voice via Flickr

SPELLING, FORMATTING, AND grammar have been cited as some of the worst errors on CVs according to a survey of over 200 accountants involved in recruitment.

The survey by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland (CPA) shows that only 11 per cent of CVs are rated as “very good” with the majority rated as average.

More than 80 per cent of those surveyed said they dismissed candidates entirely from the selection process due to badly prepared CVs with 40 per cent of respondents citing spelling as the worst offence followed by formatting (26 per cent) and grammar (25 per cent).

The accountants involved in recruitment were also critical of interview skills with only 1 per cent of those surveyed saying that the overall quality of candidates’ interview skills was “excellent”.

The majority said that interview skills were “good”, 40 per cent said they were “average” with only 7 per cent of respondents saying candidates’ interview skills were “very good”.

The survey’s respondents said that communication skills were vital with nearly a quarter of respondents identifying good communication skills as the most impressive attribute a candidate can present at an interview.

This was followed by preparation, knowledge of the company and role, and the ability to sell themselves.

Fifty-eight per cent of respondents said that punctuality for a job interview was “very important” with ability to answer questions and being prepared identified as “very important” by 57 per cent and 56 per cent of the over 200 respondents respectively.

Ciara Murphy, a marketing executive with the CPA Institute, said that it was important that job seekers get the basic parts of an application right.

“At a minimum a CV needs to be clear, concise, accurate and well written or the candidate simply won’t progress to the next stage in the application process,” she said.

“If a candidate secures an interview, it is essential that they can communicate well, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the role offered and an interest in the company.

“A candidate should also be able to articulate why they, with their unique experience and skill set, are the person for the job.”

The CPA is currently running a series of seminars on ways to enhance your interview skills in association with Morgan McKinley, the next of which will take place at the Clarion Hotel on Lapps Quay in Cork on Thursday, 7 June at 6pm. More information is available here.

Poll: Have you ever lied on your CV?

Read: 24 ways to ruin your chances during a job interview

Read: What recruiters look at during the 6 seconds they spend on your CV

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (31 Comments)

  • mattoid 30/05/12 #

    Newsflash – “The majority of CV’s are rated as average” :)

    That aside, the point is well made about spelling – you only have to read the comments section on TJ to realise the number of people who don’t know the difference between “there”, “their” and “they’re”!

    Reply
  • i dnt kno wot al d fuzs abt. me cv i tink i gud bu i kno dat me eng is xcelent :)

    Reply
  • The number of people who can’t spell, punctuate, or construct proper sentences has become more apparent in recent years, with the advent of written media via the Internet. What are they teaching in primary schools? Has the emphasis or the curriculum changed, or are children simply not paying attention. It appals me to see the drop in standards. I understand that the language is evolving, but it seems that communication skills are devolving. I wouldn’t even consider a job application or applicant that didn’t present themselves well grammatically. I would consider that lack of ability, an insight into how they would perform on the job. We used to have the reputation as having one of the best education systems in the world. That reputation has been shattered.

    Reply
  • There has been a general fall in standards of spelling, diction and pronunciation. Listen to Martina Fitzgerald the RTE reporter on the news every night reporting about another’ two hundretttt jobs created in Carlow.

    Reply
  • This seems like the appropriate thread to ask the following: how, when and why did it become acceptable to use “should of” instead of “should’ve”?

    Reply
    • What really gets me is the amount of Americanised (and yes I used an s in Americanised to make the point) English that has crept into European English! It makes me fume to see Irish people omitting the ‘u’ in the likes of colour, etc. Also why do they replace the ‘s’ with a ‘z’ alot of the time? is it because it looks cooler and will make you more popular with your peers when you go to Dundrum Mall!?

      -No dear friends, it’s not Mall…it’s called a Shopping Centre! (Centre spelled ‘re’ not ‘er’)-

      Reply
    • Hahaha none of that has become acceptable! Grammar and spelling just aren’t everyone’s strong point!

      I don’t think people have got worse: it’s just more obvious these days with everyone writing comments on the same website so people of different abilities and educations are interacting.

      As for Americanised spellings and words; people are influenced by the things they see, read and hear. In one or two generation’s time we will probably have just one system of English, rather than the British and American styles we have today. I don’t think this is avoidable.

      Reply
  • This article is, of course, a pedant’s dream.

    I shall spend the day correcting people’s grammar.

    :laughs maniacally.

    http://wp.me/p1aRUP-7S

    Reply
    • Ha! Nice blog by the way, although I have to say the English can be fairly brutal when it comes to using language. I lived there for six years and one day I caught myself saying “I was sat there”. I moved home immediately out of fear I might start saying “innit” and “bruv”. :)
      PS: Lay off the poor commas, you’re working them too hard!

      Reply
    • Damocles 30/05/12 #

      Cheers Niall, you’re a gent.

      Reply
  • I’m darn sure that most companies site spelling, formatting, and grammar as some of the worst errors on CVs. Accounts aren’t any different then any other business.

    Reply
  • Damn those insubordinate clauses.

    Reply
  • Guaranteed to NOT get you an interview is a cv addressed to me as Dear Sir……Look up the website of the organisation and check the gender of the manager or whoever the application is to be submitted to (or even to whomever the application is to be submitted), though I would have thought ‘Helen’ gives it away….

    Reply
  • That’s great but a few things: firstly, accountants are the most boring individuals in the world so I’m hardly moved that they’re peeved about formatting or grammar. Secondly, it would be nice if they actually ‘said’ what they were looking for – if someone’s applying for a job and they read this without any kind of direction, they’re likely to be as worried as I was and I have a job! Lastly, what exactly did the boring individuals not like about ‘formatting’? Was it the Times New Roman or not indenting or just the overall ‘where’s the other page’ craic?

    Reply
    • “At a minimum a CV needs to be clear, concise, accurate and well written or the candidate simply won’t progress to the next stage in the application process,” she said.

      Reply
    • I suppose, judging by the comment, they’re looking for a lack of errors.
      It may be easier to take someone’s application seriously if they show that they can get the basics right

      Reply
    • For me, poor spelling falls under the category of ‘attention to detail’. The amount of times I’ve seen a candiate’s CV with ‘Attention to detail’ listed as one of their work-related strengths, while their CV is littered with spelling mistakes is ridiculous.
      Bafflingly, a lot of these are sent in Microsoft Word format, where the incorrect spellings are clearly shown with the red line underneath!

      Reply
  • An assessment from Accountants who do not work out that the rule books of Ireland have been falsified.

    Any Accountant coercing, manipulating, defrauding their clients with invalid rule books is still liable for their clients losses.

    Maybe they should look closer to home first.

    Reply

Add New Comment