TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Catholic priests group accuses RTÉ of insincerity over Fr Reynolds apology

The Association of Catholic Priests has accused sections of the media of “anti-Catholic and anti-priest bias”.

Updated 1.35pm

THE ASSOCIATION OF Catholic Priests has issued a statement accusing sections of the media of  ”anti-Catholic and anti-priest bias” in the wake of the Fr. Kevin Reynolds case.

RTÉ was forced to apologise to the priest after he was accused in the Prime Time programme of raping a teenage girl while he worked as a missionary in Africa in the eighties, and of fathering a child with the girl.

RTÉ accepted that the allegations were baseless, without any foundation and were untrue. The broadcaster also paid undisclosed damages to Fr Reynolds.

The Association of Catholic Priests has said that the Primetime incident, along with results of a survey commissioned by the Iona Institute points towards media bias among sections of the media, “including some in the national broadcaster”.

The group has also said that it was disappointed by the way RTÉ’s statement and apology was broadcast on television and radio, citing “poor quality delivery” which “seemed to imply a lack of sincerity about the content”.

The treatment of Catholic issues in general by the media are also criticised in the statement, which details that critics of the Church are allowed free reign, while Church representatives are aggressively questioned and harassed. Church protocols in dealing with the handling of allegations about priests are also under scrutiny by the group:

If RTÉ can be criticised for not waiting a few weeks until such time as Kevin Reynolds had a chance to clear his name by taking the paternity test, as he had offered to do, surely the Church authorities should have been equally circumspect about any action that could be seen to imply guilt on his part.

Robert Dore, the solicitor who represented Fr Reynolds spoke to RTÉ today and said he was very interested to know who the “reliable independent third party source” was, who allegedly provided information about the case. He said that Fr Reynold has a right to know who it is.

Dore also said that the premise of journalistic confidentiality is flawed in this case, and also said that once RTÉ had realised that they were wrong they behaved very well, but behaved appallingly before that. He cited their decision to broadcast the material despite the offer of a paternity test and repeated denials.

RTÉ apologises over false allegations made against Fr Kevin Reynolds

RTÉ apology to priest in High Court “a wake-up call”

Read next:

Comments (80 Comments)

  • …I have no love for the Catholic Church, but RTE should be appropriately and significantly penalized for such an outrageous defamation. It showed a total lack of ethical, professional discernment and judgement. In my opinion some of RTE’s programs while disguised as investigative journalism are nothing more than sensationalism. It is obvious from this event that RTE can not be trusted to provide the public with intelligently researched, and unbiased News. In other countries heads would have rolled for such an event. shame on you RTE!

    Reply
    • What heads rolled after all the reports Murphy, Ryan, Cloyne, were published ,and they confirmed that not only did priests know of the child abuse but Bishops knew too and did nothing ….. DOUBLE STANDARDS!

      Reply
  • Well although I’m not a catholic I think that when journalists slander anyone they should be duly punished its part of a free society where if you accuse someone you should provide sufficient evidence. Not this guilty till proven innocent ( and yes the church has being responsible for hideous crimes globally ) I do think journalists cross a threshold of populist accusations, ya they are right sometimes but when they are wrong, this kind of thing happens that has destroyed an individuals life.

    Reply
    • …you are absolutely correct, everyone is entitled to their opinion of the Catholic Church, just as the public is entitled to professional, ethical and unbiased Journalism which obviously RTE can not be trusted to provide.

      Reply
  • Their probably right. The RTE set out to destroy that man.

    Reply
  • The original apology aired back a few months ago sounded very different to the one played on Thursday night which was delivered at breathtaking speed, almost sounded like it was on fast forward.

    What annoys me so much is that RTÉ were so keen to get the story out there they failed to wait for the results of a DNA test which would have saved them (and us!) €1m+. There clearly was an agenda there.

    Reply
  • Hang on a minute……… the real victim here is truth/justice! Bankers, the body politic, the legal profession, bishops, RTE have all lied for their own sectional interests. Is there something seriously wrong with the Irish psyche enabling the rise of such disingenuous people and practices? We moan about the loss of fiscal sovereignty, and all that entails, but what about the loss of integrity, the dignity of our collective Irish soul/psyche being drained for the right price?
    I’m happy Fr. Reynolds has had his good name restored; the fact he wears the uniform of Rome is irrelevant, he’s a citizen of Ireland! The mindset of RTE in this broadcasting catastrophy: populist, shallow, judgemental and worst of all lacking any real inclination towards the truth! This particular mindset is prevalent throughout the higher echelons of Irish society……. sadly. Thank goodness the 30th. amendment was not delivered!

    Reply
    • William think your right. Im sure rte just hoped that the (rightly so) hatred for the catholic church at the moment would mean that they get away with the false claims. Rte and prime time in general are at this for years and only now getting caught out.

      Reply
  • I don’t believe anyone thinks that what happened to this priest is ok. What happened to this man is a total disgrace. I just wonder if the association will be as quick to question the sincerity of any apologies that may arise from the long overdue report into Raphoe for instance. Open to correction but I don’t recall hearing much from them in the aftermath of Cloyne.
    Time will tell but I won’t be holding my breath.

    Reply
  • Gary 20/11/11 #

    Catholic church making complaints that an apology was insincere.

    The ironing is delicious.

    Reply
  • I’ve never seen the CC so annoyed. I’d love to see them get so annoyed regarding the survivors of clerical abuse. I’ve seen them look ashamed and sorrowful but I’d prefer them to get impassioned and angry about the abuse and coverup

    What happened to Kevin Reynolds was awful but his name has been cleared after 6 months of horror. But he knew during those 6 months he was innocent. The children that survived sexual abuse, and those that didn’t survive, have had to serve a much longer sentence.

    This stance makes me feel sick.

    Reply
    • BJ 20/11/11 #

      He had NOTHING to do with the horror any children suffered as a result of the CC so why use it as a ground for comparison? Seem like a very weak, and lazy, equation to make.

      Reply
    • BJ. Why are you asking all these questions? Have you not noticed how hurt the Irish nation is and how let down we feel? Read my comment again. I feel sorry for him but just think the Priests’ Association should have got outraged and angry loudly long before this case.

      Reply
    • You have rightly spoken Reada! As the RYAN, MURPHY, FERN, and CLOYNE REPORTS confirm in Ireland the abuse of children in Catholic-run institutions was endemic and systematic! The response by the Catholic Church and the Association of Catholic Priests in the wake of these reports was one of shock and disbelief . . undoubtedly because they were found out. Few spoke out and the apologies the Roman Catholic church offered were far too late and reckoned by the victims as disengeuous! Across the globe that story has been accurately reported in country after country with similar harrowing accounts of institutional abuse exposed in Australia, Canada & the US. These children were the victims of so-called “men and women of God” who abused their power and preyed upon those who were entrusted to their care, and those who had no power to resist them, nor anyone to turn to for a sympathetic ear. Their tears were ignored; their cries were muffled, their pain was unrelenting, and they suffered in silence. No one would believe them. No one would listen. No one cared. No one comforted them. No one consoled them. No one would intervene. Some were threatened with HELL if they would tell! Many of their abusers have long since gone to the grave and thus their victims will never have their day in court. Many of the victims out of despair took their own lives when they could no longer live with the shame, the guilt, and the pain! They too have gone to their grave and for them justice has been denied. For their pain and suffering no restitution was made, no apologies received, nor COMPENSATION given. Who knows what horrors the long-awaited RAPHOE REPORT will disclose? ?

      Reply
    • But Fr. Reynolds wasn’t responsible.

      Reply
  • The priest was innocent, fair enough, but making a huge deal out of this one case is, in a sense, an affront to the many, MANY, victims of clerical abuse and their families who are looking for sincere apologies and compensation for the damage that was done to them. The Vatican should have no political or legal power whatsoever and should do what is right, for once.

    Reply
  • The Vatican should live by their New Testament and the teachings therein. So give their wealth to the poor. As for corporate greed check the moneylenders in the temple story for guidance and as for paedophiles I recall something about millstones, necks and large bodies of water,…

    Reply
  • The priest in this case was wrongly accused , RTE came out and apologised and a sum of money was awarded to the victim. What more do the Priest Association want ??? Double standards me thinks .

    Reply
  • Shouldn’t they forgive according to the book?

    Reply
  • I wonder have the Catholic Priests Association ever heard the expression “people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones” ? RTE rightly apologized for “untrue” reports on the matter. Fr Reynolds has accepted it. Would that the Catholic Church were so repentant in their wrong doings.

    Reply
    • This has nothing to do with the issue. A priest just happened to be the subject of the Prime Time investigates. RTE undertook and broadcast a current affairs investigation that was completely untrue. Yet, there were red flags thrown up all along the way that were ignored. Now this is costing the licence payer (or taxpayer as sone people like to call them here) a fortune and would you believe anything else broadcast by the Prime Time Investigates team? I wouldn’t.

      Bear in mind that this programme accused a man of rape and fathering a child. It beggars belief. Not only that making false rape allegations undermines the position of other victims and those undertaking valid investigations – particularly in the area of Clerical Sex Abuse.

      To be frank there should be high profile resignations in RTE as a result of this debacle. What’s their response on the matter?

      “It is very difficult for a rolled head to learn anything.”

      “the best way to learn is to see how we would avert such errors in the future”.

      How out of touch is their head of corporate affairs to come out with those statements? I’m sure politicians are practicing does lines already.

      It’s a disgrace.

      Reply
    • BJ 20/11/11 #

      Carmel, there are enough decent, hard working priests out there, who are entitled to a good name despite the failings of their hierarchy. Is there any reason why they shouldn’t stand up for the rights of this innocent man?

      Reply
    • Brian, I appreciate what you are saying in your reply, I absolutely agree that RTE were way out of order and that of course somebody should be held responsible. It must have been very traumatic for Fr Reynolds to have experienced the ignominy of being accused when he is obviously innocent. PrimeTime were wrong and they have wholeheartedly apologised for that. Fr Reynolds has rightly received compensation. I just feel that in the light of all that has gone on in the Catholic Church that it is a bit rich to say that the apology wasn’t as heartfelt as it could have been. I mean it it difficult to hear that. I fully realise that they are different issues. I do admire the way Fr Reynolds responed with total dignity and forgiveness. However I believe PrimeTime is an excellent and informative program which has highlighted many wrongdoings ie: Leas Cross etc. I will continue to watch it and for what it’s worth I am sure they have learned from this very expensive lesson.

      Reply
    • BJ, You’re right there are plenty of hardworking honest, decent, kind and wonderful Priests (@frpaddybyrne) out there and Fr Reynolds was totally vindicated and completely innocent. My comments were made with the thoughts of all the abused children out there who never had a voice (and some never will) with which to speak of their innocence. I realise that this is a different matter but I felt that the Catholic Priests Association were a bit quick off the blocks to say the apology was not apologetic enough.

      Reply
  • One of the main agents of mind control used by every tyrannical regieme is to introduce paranoia and use it to rally its people against their perceived enemy. In Nazi Germany it was the Jews, In the arab world it is the Jews along with their sponsor the great Satan America. In evangelical America it is Atheists, gays and abortion doctors. The Catholic institution is a corrupt, paranoid and delusional outfit and its actions accross the world will lead to its destruction. While RTE did libel an innocent man and should face the consequences, the idea that RTE is anti Catholic for simply reporting the news is just Catholic paranoia. When anyone spouts ideas that are stupid in the public domain they deserve to be mocked and ridiculed not to do so would be the abuse of free speech.

    Reply
  • The problem with this case is that it will allow the church to push the idea that the child abuse alligations are unfair. Very bad journalism.

    Reply
  • Their point is proven by some of the idiotic comments on here. Same small minded people on the usual catholic church witch hunt.

    Reply
  • I can’t believe what am reading above this society is sick. When an organization like rte defame some innocent man and will use our tax payers money to pay compensation. Some people thinks its ok because it’s the catholic church priest…… God help us. The editor and all those who put together that program should be sacked with immediate effect.

    Reply
  • Derry 20/11/11 #

    Of course RTE acted disgracefully and heads should roll over this but this moral grandstanding by the Catholic Church is extremely hypocritical and annoying

    Reply
  • For over 25 years, Ratzinger was personally in charge of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the part of the Vatican responsible for enforcing Catholic canonical law across the world, including on sexual abuse. He is a notorious micro-manager who, it is said, insisted every salient document cross his desk. Hans Küng, a former friend of Ratzinger’s, says: “No one in the whole of the Catholic Church knew as much about abuse cases as this Pope.” Until that organisation elects a leader who hasn’t condoned child rape by inaction, then it deserves everything it gets.

    Reply
  • NEWS FLASH!!! – The Pot Calls Kettle Black!

    Are they for real? Insincerity?
    The Catholic church wouldn’t know what it looks like if it was slapped in the face by buckets of it!

    Reply
  • Best really for people in glass houses to not throw stones.

    Reply
  • The poor Catholic Church, crying discrimination now are we, considering the intolerance your organisation preaches I don’t have much sympathy.

    Reply
    • The church are using this publicity to make the catholic public feel sorry for them . What happened was appalling and a huge mistake but the church has a short memory and their seems to be no shortage of catholic leaders to mouth off right now . Where were they when report after report was produced with the hundreds of victims that were abused over the years . They are hoping this stream of negative media publicity will take media reporting off their disgusting acts of abuse and cronyism that have shattered the country over the last twenty years . They want to take the media back 20 years in reporting what they know about the church .

      I read two more reports from two different priests slating the media handling of this awful case , today . They seems to be no end of statements available . I wish it was that easy anytime I was reseaching the reports over the last 15 years !

      Today another statement came out that they were not happy with apology and also questioned the fact that the journalist was still working with RTE and asking why she had not resigned as they were asked to when they were found guilty of abuse or covering up their buddy’s . Need we remind them the girl made a mistake and has paid for that in her career and RTE have paid for it in compensation . I’m not belittling the crime but it’s hardly the same as the awful crimes we read about in reports from in the parishes across the country .

      Hopefully the man will recover from this awful defamation of his character but as the church itself tells it’s followers over and over ” let he who has not sinned , cast the first stone ” or what about forgiveness . I’m sure the girl has repented . Oh but I forgot the brainwashing only works in one direction and that’s theirs .

      I wish the priest in question the best of luck in the future and hope he recovers from his loss but I also wish the journalist the best of luck and hope she recovers and learns from the mistake she made ..

      Reply
  • Unbelievable, obnoxious arrogance! Think the Catholic Church and their priests should keep a low profile for a while.

    Reply
    • Why they didn’t do anything wrong why should they be targeted in this unfair way with no proof of allocation that was false. Why should Priests Association be quiet the Association has done nothing wrong, covering up nothing and it’s time that people learn to respect I instead of throwing false allegations without proof

      Reply
    • RTE’s treatment of Fr. Reynolds was absolutely unfair and totally unacceptable. RTE are not, however ,responsible for the ‘anti-Catholic, anti- priest’ sentiment that is felt by the thousands of people that have been disgusted by actions and the arrogance of the Church.

      Reply
    • BJ 20/11/11 #

      Catherine, when the largest media organisation in the country publishes TOTALLY fabricated claims about an innocent Priest then yes, they do contribute to an anti-Priest sentiment within the Public. You obviously have no concept or appreciation of the power of the media to sway public opinion and the responsibility that entails!

      Reply
    • The catholic church is a body of people, some of whom abused children but individuals should not be picked and accused in the wrong and it is fitting that the perpetrators pay for this and be expected to give a very sincere apology and it would also be fitting for people who hate the church or who are anti-catholic to stop using abused children as their reason for this.

      Reply
  • The priests involved in this group should be able to show themselves as all being above reproach in their dealings with other pedophiles priests but that will not be the case. even now after years of exposure of child abuse by the catholic church they are still in denial and try to avoid paying the bill for compensating their thousands of victims.

    bishops and priests of the catholic church and opus dei etc are the most unholy ungodly league of bastards that ever walked the earth!

    Reply
  • For the most part Roman Catholic apologists and defenders have denounced the VICTIMS of Clergy Abuse as greedy for seeking compensation for the irreparable harm that was done to their bodies and souls by Roman Catholic priests who abused children with impunity and immunity. They are continually told they must FORGIVE. So where is the FORGIVENESS on the part of this priest and those who are rallying around him? Why did he feel it necessary to sue for damages? This case is a stunning example of their blatant hypocrisy and demonstrates so vividly their failure to practice what they preach! SHAME ON THEM!

    Reply
  • Rich!!!

    Reply
    • BJ 20/11/11 #

      Thomas, it was the association of Catholic Priests in Ireland, not the Catholic Church… There’s a huge difference.

      This innocent Priest had his name dragged through the mud and was put through hell. We shouldn’t tar all Priests with the same brush.

      btw, it’s YOUR taxes that will pay for this due to RTE’s negligence!

      Reply
  • Ah well! I wouldn’t worry too much! The church in this coy try will have died out in a few decades! Young men aren’t going to Maynooth anymore, they’re going to the George and have a great time!

    Reply
  • Its none of their business from what I can tell.

    Reply
    • ehh? They’re the association of Catholic priests, so something tells me it might just.

      Reply
    • The priest in question seems quite capable of fighting his own battles. Unless he asked the association to speak on his behalf, they should say nothing. If he did ask them to speak on his behalf then thats fair enough but they should make that clear. Don’t confuse my opinion on the association with that of the priest or RTE. I think what RTE done to this priest is abhorrent and although I haven’t seen the apology, it sounds like it was a pathetic attempt. However any association of Catholic priests should be aware of the significance of what they are say and how it would resonate with the Irish people. They should choose their words carefully or choose to say nothing when their words only serve to muddy waters and raise anger.

      Reply
  • What interest me most in this whole discussion is not so much the case of fr Reynolds or of rte. for me the most fascinating is the logic that is behind most of the comments.
    Just a couple of comments to illustrate what I mean:

    “Of course RTE acted disgracefully and heads should roll over this but this moral grandstanding by the Catholic Church is extremely hypocritical and annoying.”
    “RTE’s treatment of Fr. Reynolds was absolutely unfair and totally unacceptable. RTE are not, however ,responsible for the ‘anti-Catholic, anti- priest’ sentiment that is felt by the thousands of people that have been disgusted by actions and the arrogance of the Church.”
    “The poor Catholic Church, crying discrimination now are we, considering the intolerance your organisation preaches I don’t have much sympathy.”

    So, the logic that emerges from above comments is as follows: the catholic church is evil, it deserves to be hated and done away with because some priests committed horrible crimes. To make it more simple we can say: some catholic priests committed crimes = the whole catholic church is evil and deserves to be condemned.

    I’m not going to argue with this logic. Rather I’d suggest to be very consistent with this logic and to apply it to other cases. For example psychologists, psychotherapists and those involved in investigation of child abuse in Ireland say that more that 50% of child abuse cases took place in families. The abusers were some Irish fathers, irish uncles, Irish cousins, Irish mothers and so on. So following the above presented logic we should say: some Irish fathers, mothers uncles, cousins committed horrible crimes of child abuse=the whole country is evil and deserves to be condemned. We are included. Are we happy with that?

    Reply
  • Absolutely.

    Reply
  • But we can also revers that logic. In the church there were and there are such people as Mother Teresa of Calcutta, Jean Vanier – the founder of L’Arche community looking after the handicapped, or Hugh O’Flaherty who during World War II with his colleagues saved over 6,500 lives, to mention just a few. If the catholic church produces such people then it has to be good.
    Mother Teresa of Calcutta, Jean Vanier, Hugh O’Flaherty are very good Catholics=the catholic church is very good and worthy of trust.
    Why should we see only the negative examples and overlook the positive ones?
    If we want to have the reputation of just, fair and objective people we should consider both positive and negative sides of the matter. But above all we should consider what the church teaches, aims at, where she comes from and who is her founder if we want to pass any judgment on the church as a whole.

    Reply
    • I beg to differ when it comes to Mother Theresa. While she has done some good most of her emphasis was on suffering. As Christopher Hitchens put it, she was a friend of suffering rather than those who suffer. Her charity receives millions yet patients in her hospitals live in inhumane conditions while money from her organisition goes to Rome and the building of Churches. Then there is her association with political tyrants such as the Duvalier family etc. But aside from that just cos an organisation does some good doesnt justify its existance. Scientology bought aid to victims of hurricane Kathrina. The Nazi party had an ambitious plan for road and bridge building. Communists in Soviet Russia built a world class underground system etc. This does not justify these ideologies. The Nordic countries are not religious but do not suffer from inadequete infrastructure. Money given to secular charities such as medicin sans frontier would all go to where it is needed and not po promoting delusion and social division that is religion.

      Reply
    • Cyril, I think that one has to be very well educated, well read and be a holder of PhD and coming from the rich west so as not to see the obvious. Go to India and talk to the simple and ordinary hindu, not Catholics, and you will see what they have to say about mother Teresa, her work and sisters who still live and work there. I don’t know how much money has been sent to Mother Teresa. But from many testimonies you can see that dying and abandoned people taken from streets, gutters … felt recognised, accepted, treated as humans and so on. Many charitable organisations went to India after mother Teresa became popular. She didn’t make herself popular, she was made popular. As i understand her work, her lite motive was not to do away with poverty but to do away with indifference, egoism, greed, lack of forgiveness or hatred. She wished to bring back the sense of lost dignity but above all to bring Christ by loving them and remaining poor with the poor. Again if we don’t look into the origin of her mission, herher inspiration, motivations and purpose we will make wrong judgment. Some people wanted her to be somebody else than she meant for her self. Simply she didn’t fit into their schemes.

      Reply
    • Molly if showing solidarity with the poor could bring about world peace I would give her full marks. Peace and progress is bought about by a number of essential ingredients. 1 the emancipation of women 2 the reduction of poverty by lasting and sustainable means. 3 Cultures that respect free speech and that base their societal structures on evidence based models. As for ego there is no bigger egotistical belief that us humans will live forever. All of these reasons show that religion is not compatible with peace or progress. The countries that are more likely to turn the other cheek have rejected the idea of religion.

      Reply

Add New Comment