Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Rare one month old Hen Harrier chicks PA Archive/PA Images
Angry Birds

Environmental groups enraged by protected sites plan for endangered hen harrier

The groups claim that the Culture Minister’s threat response plan would see large-scale commercial conifer forestry in hen harrier protected areas.

SEVERAL ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS have come together to condemn the Minister for Culture’s new conservation proposal to protect the endangered hen harrier.

An Taisce, the Irish Raptor Study Group (IRSG) and the Irish Wildlife Trust (IWT) are calling on Minister Josepha Madigan to retract the draft threat response plan being developed by the National Parks and Wildlife Service to save the hen harrier from regional extinction and further severe population decline.

The IRSG says the hen harrier, once widespread throughout the country, is now Ireland’s rarest declining breeding bird species due to habitat loss and has suffered a 50% decline in numbers over the last 40 years.

The groups want the plan retracted as they believe it will mean the hen harrier will be forced to breed in unsuitable areas. 

There are currently six Special Protection Areas (SPA) designated for the protection of the hen harrier. But the groups claim that the plan would include large-scale commercial conifer forestry in these areas.

This type of land is the main threat to the rare ground-nesting bird as it replaces the upland bog and marginal farmland on which it depends. 

Elaine McGoff, Natural Environment Officer for An Taisce said:

It is extremely disappointing to see a draft document with no apparent conservation objectives set, no targets defined, no deliverables, and no explanation or way of measuring how proposed actions will yield any immediate, short or long-term positive effects for the hen harrier. 

A premature critique 

However, the Department said that it believes the groups’ critique to be premature as draft plans are currently being considered following consultation with a committee “which includes representatives from a broad range of relevant bodies and sectors, including the groups referenced”. 

According to a Department spokesperson, the six SPAs for hen harriers included large areas of forestry at the time they were designated, as the birds bred there at the time. 

“It was expected that their number would reduce as the forest aged and became less suitable – there has been negligible or no planting in the SPAs for years.”

But the groups have also accused the Department of ignoring the “science” as they say over 52% of the land in hen harrier SPAs has been lost to forestry, and that there are now more hen harrier outside of these protected areas than inside.

In response to that claim, the department spokesperson said the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the departments involved “take all scientific information into consideration”.

‘Blueprint for the continued destruction’

Following the department’s remarks, Pádraic Fogarty campaign officer for IWT said its point about the criticism being premature is “nonsense as this plan has been in the works for five years”. 

“The National Parks and Wildlife Service has presented a draft hen harrier Threat Response Plan that is not a conservation plan, but a blueprint for the continued destruction of our protected sites and the extinction of the hen harrier,” he said.

“In the Department’s response, it clearly acknowledges that plantations are bad for the birds, and the point we are making is that should be no more of them.”

The IRSG said that if proposals are not fully retracted then its next steps would be to pursue the option of a legal challenge to the plan through the Directorate-General for Environment of the European Commission.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
7
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel