TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Maternal death rate ‘up to four times higher than CSO figures’

A report by a HSE-endorsed body on maternal deaths says our maternal death rate is significantly higher than official figures show.

Image: PondPond via Shutterstock

IRELAND’S RATE of maternal deaths is still among the lowest in the world – but is up to four times higher than may be suggested by figures from the Central Statistics Office, a new report has claimed.

A triennial report from the Maternal Death Enquiry (MDE), which aims to apply international standards to figures for maternal deaths in the UK and Ireland, says there were 25 maternal deaths in the three years between 2009 and 2011.

In the same period, the CSO’s figures for deaths in ‘pregnancy, childbirth or puerperium’ (the period following childbirth) show that only six women had died in the same period – with three deaths in 2009, one in 2010 and two in 2011.

Of the 25 maternal deaths suggested by the MDE, six are classified as direct maternal deaths and thirteen as indirect maternal deaths, while the remaining six are attributed to ‘coincidental causes’.

When the third category is discounted, MDE believes Ireland’s maternal death rate for 2009 and 2010 is about 8.0 per 100,000 maternities – twice the CSO’s official figure for 2009.

Of the six deaths which came directly as as a result of maternity, three were caused by a pulmonary embolism, one by an amniotic fluid embolism, one by a uterine rupture, and one who suffered the failure of multiple organs as a result of HELLP syndrome, which is similar to pre-eclampsia.

MDE said it was encouraged to see that there were no deaths attributable to haemorrhage, complications from anaesthetic or hypertensive disease, which are all longstanding and more common causes of maternal deaths.

However, the presence of deaths as a result of various types of thrombosis posed a concern, it said.

Of the 13 indirect deaths, five were caused by cardiovascular disease and two by suicide. Two died from the H1N1 (‘swine flu’) strain of influenza, two from epilepsy, two from chronic and obstructive pulmonary disease, and one from excessive bleeding from esophageal varices.

Two of the six women who died coincidentally to maternity died of metastatic cancer, two from substance abuse, one from lymphoma and one died in a traffic accident.

Though non-Irish women account for a quarter of all Irish maternities, MDE Ireland’s report said they accounted for 40 per cent of the deaths identified in its 2009-2011 report – a similar figure to the previous report in for 2006-2008.

The report makes six recommendations, one of which is the inclusion of a question on pregnancy status at the death on a coroner’s death certificate.

The report also recommends considering the founding of a perinatal psychiatry mother-and-baby unit in Ireland.

Read: Birth rate falls, but Irish women remain Europe’s most fertile

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • What a horrible picture to use.

    Reply
  • Also doesn’t take into account the number of pregnant Irish women who travel to Britain, when the have complicated pregnancies which may lead to them having a termination.
    These are then recorded as British statistics.

    Some women ( such as the women A, B and C who took the case to the European court of justice) have had to travel as they knew they would be refused a termination in Ireland , even though they had serious underlying medical problems .

    An Irish solution to an Irish problem, and an Irish interpretation of the data .

    Reply
    • Joan please read the article again the CEMAC enquiry is done in the UK and Ireland it looks at morbidity and mortality of pregnancy childbirth and post partum reports causes and nationality of each case all maternity units in the UK and Ireland report to it it is over a three year period and is quite extensive so all facts are published accordingly. It is not as you say an Irish solution to an Irish problem.

      Reply
    • There are two things here.

      One is that this survey is bringing Irish figures into line with International ones to which they are compared in things like the WHO report. This report has been widely and falsely cited in support of the contention that Ireland is the ‘safest place in the world to give birth’, although the Irish data used has been for some time not really comparable to that from other countries. The fact that the data was possibly flawed was noted in previus WHO reports – but those using the stat for their own purposes ignored that.

      So, this new data makes Irish data easier to compare with international norms. It leaves us in a good position in that league table (if you want to call it that) of maternal deaths but reflects are more realistic (and significantly higher) level of maternal death than was previously reported using CSO figures.

      The second point is that each year women travel abroad to have a termination because their pregnancy presents a serious threat to their health – but not an immediate threat to their life – and thus termination is not legally available here. If these women did not have the safety valve of taking a plane to the UK, it is quite possible that our maternal death rate would be higher than it is. That is the part that could be called an ‘Irish solution to an Irish problem’.

      Reply
    • Just to clarify it is not a survey it’s an enquiry into the deaths.

      Reply
  • Unsurprising that vested interests have been spinning our maternal death rate figure…

    P.

    Reply
    • Do you and the green thumb people realise the MDE Ireland is fully funded by the HSE? The same HSE that everybody seems to accuse of cover-ups and lies. Do you suddenly doubt the figures now?

      Reply
  • Looking forward to anti choice waffle on this one……

    Reply
  • Journal, that is an inappropriate picture to use in an article about maternal death.

    Reply
  • You can’t argue with the facts no matter who writes the article,

    Reply
  • Hi Gavin,
    its a shame that you present a partisan view of the facts in this story. As with most stories, the devil is in the detail, which you fail to refer to.
    The 2 official bodies report statistics differently rather than the state conspiracy theory that you propose.
    Poor & irresponsible reporting but hey it will catch the public eye and sell u some copy…

    Reply
    • Read the article on the Independent more factual better written also.

      Reply
    • Hi Cian (and Cliodhna), I don’t mean to sound glib or dismissive, but what details/facts have been omitted? If the report can be made more complete or reflective by including extra detail I’m happy to do so – I’m not in the game of deliberately trying to get people to think one way.

      Reply
    • To be honest Gavan I felt personally the article in the independent was better written but I feel people interpreted your article incorrectly. I have attended a confidential enquiry and they go into a lot of detail on the maternal deaths and how we can learn and improve on care a lot of deaths are missed because coroners do not always include the puerperal period in their findings. You glossed over the report the article in the independent was more in depth I apologise if I offended you.

      Reply
  • Apologies its Gavan.

    Reply

Add New Comment