TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

NATO “has no intention of intervening in Iran”

The US and other leading Western governments believe that Iran is intending to develop a nuclear arsenal. Iran has warned the US not to set them on “a collision course”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen speaks during the monthly NATO media briefing in Brussels yesterday
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen speaks during the monthly NATO media briefing in Brussels yesterday
Image: AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert

NATO HAS NO intention of intervening in Iran, the alliance’s top official has said.

The US and other leading Western governments believe that Iran is intending to develop a nuclear arsenal, and Tehran’s failure to suspend its nuclear activities has already led to several sets of UN sanctions.

Today, Iran warned the US not to set the two countries on a collision course over the nuclear programme in Tehran, the Guardian reports.

The paper also said that the UK was putting together contingency plans that would involve joingin American forces in a possible campaign against Iran.

Iran maintains its nuclear program is exclusively civilian, aimed only at producing electricity.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly trying to persuade his Cabinet to authorise a strike.

Israel successfully tested a missile believed capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to Iran on Wednesday.

Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said NATO supports political and diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear issue and urged Iran to comply with UN resolutions and stop its uranium enrichment programs.

However, he declined to comment on reports that Israeli air force jets conducted drills last week at a NATO air base in Italy.

Yesterday, Italian Defence Ministry spokesman Capt Emiliano Biasco confirmed that an exercise involving Israel and other countries was held at Decimomannu in late October. He declined to give more details.

NATO cooperates closely with Israel as part of a group of friendly nations in the region, known as the Mediterranean Dialogue.

Fogh Rasmussen visited the Jewish state earlier this year.

Tensions in the Middle East have peaked just after Turkey — a NATO member and Iran’s neighbour — agreed in September to host an early warning radar as part of a planned NATO missile defense system aimed at countering a possible threat from Iranian missiles.

Iran has blamed Israel and the United States for disruptions in its nuclear program, including the mysterious assassinations of a string of Iranian nuclear scientists and a computer virus that wiped out some of Iran’snuclear centrifuges.

Tehran has also insisted that the international community deal with the issue of Israel’s own nuclear weapons.

Meanwhile, a new poll has shown that Israelis are evenly divided over whether their country should carry out a military strike against Iran’s nuclear program.

Forty-one per cent of those questioned by the Dialog polling institute said they would back an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

A similar number — 39 per cent — oppose such an attack while 20 per cent were undecided.

- Additional reporting by AP

Read: Iran rejects America’s ‘virtual embassy’ plan>

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • That would be some can of worms to crack open

    Reply
  • A little hypocritical that the yanks are so sensitive to any sovreign nation wanting 1000th the atomic weapons they control,maybe in irans case it’s a little understandable,policeman of the world an all that,but if you think how difficult and how long Nato took to overcome the libyian “lightweights” it boggles the mind in comparisson to firstly the fanatacism of the iranians and secondly the iranian military is nothing to be sniffed at.just goes to show, where there’s a “well” there’s a way ; ) thank christ the north koreans have no oil!

    Reply
  • So israel can test nuking Iran, but Iran cannot have a deterent. Sounds fair to me.

    Reply
  • If anyone is going to strike at alleged nuclear programme, it will be Israel. They did it in the past to Iraq. Perhaps the US and others would be quite happy for this to be the case but then again they may prefer that it does not because of the problems that could follow.

    Bad enough that Israel has nuclear weapons without anyone else in the Middle East getting them. Yes I am aware that Israel doesn’t acknowledge that it has nuclear weapons.

    Reply
    • RDX862 04/11/11 #

      Iraq is closer and it was one target, the Iranians have their nuclear facilities spread out over hundreds of miles apart. They specifically set up their program with the view that it would be attacked so they tried to set it up in a way that they could recover quickly. Israel has to weigh is it worth it to attack if it only sets them back a few years. The Americans could do more damage but are they really going to risk it with them pulling out of Iraq and trying to get Afghanistan under control?

      Reply
    • In fairness Israel hasn’t threatened to “wipe them off the face of the earth”.

      Reply
    • @mcnultys

      He actually said “this regime must be removed from the pages of time” quite different from what you’ve been spooned-fed on CNN.

      Reply
    • Si Mon 05/11/11 #

      It is against international law (morally too I would say) to attack a nuclear facility, particularly one in close proximity to the population. But then again when does Israel or the US abide by international laws?

      Also, Iran has never said they would wipe anyone off the face of the earth. Learn some Farsi, translate it and then make a comment rather than listening to the mainstream media!

      Reply
  • why can I not think of anything but Dr. Strangelove when reading the article

    Reply
  • Israel will do Americas dirty work and that is why they get the blank cheques for arms and any international infringements they dream up. They undoubtedly have the missile range (they are American rockets). The world is probably better off without Iran having nuclear capabilities in honesty, but you are never going to view your own nation as being unworthy of such power, especially when you have a theocracy driven by the one “true prophet”. Alhamdulillah!

    Reply
  • RDX862 04/11/11 #

    Who do they need a deterrent from? They are not even a legitimate regime. US or Israel is never going to invade Iran. 20-30 years of Iranian nuclear program and Israeli cabinet is still split about being capable of striking them. The US has relied on sanctions for 30 years when dealing with Iran. What does that tell you? Storming the embassy and holding Americans as hostages for months. Supporting terrorist groups that killed 241 US Marines in Lebanon. Supporting and arming groups in Iraq and Afghanistan. You really think America would not have invaded Iran already if they thought they could? Maybe if Iraq had smoothly Bush would have considered it but no way will America ever invade Iran. They don’t need nuclear weapons and all it will do is set off an arms race in the Middle East. It is almost as stupid as the North Koreans going nuclear when the main threat to them is from within just like Iran.

    Reply

Add New Comment