TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Poll: Do you support a boycott of Mauritius?

A travel agent in Donegal is no longer selling holidays to Mauritius and some are calling for a boycott of the Indian Ocean island. What do you think?

Port Louis, Mauritius
Port Louis, Mauritius
Image: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia

FOLLOWING THE ACQUITTAL of two men who were on trial for the murder of Michaela McAreavey and the printing of graphic photographs of her body in a Mauritian newspaper there have been calls for a boycott of the country.

A travel agent in Donegal has dropped the Indian Ocean island from its list of holiday destinations with the owner of Liberty Travel in Donegal, Carolyn Davis, saying that she would not have “the stomach” to offer it as a holiday destination. Last week Fine Gael MEP Seán Kelly called for a boycott of the island before rowing back on those comments amid claims authorities were to reopen an investigation.

But the publication of the images of Michaela’s body in the ‘Sunday Times’ newspaper has caused outrage and although the paper has apologised, there are calls from some for the country to be boycotted until there is an outcome to the case.

So today we’d like to know do you support a boycott of Mauritius?


Poll Results:





Read: Mauritian Sunday Times apologises for Michaela photos

Read: Irish investigation into Michaela murder not ruled out

Read: Mauritian government condemns “outrageous” photos of Michaela crime scene

Read next:

Comments (132 Comments)

  • By that reasoning should be fairly cheap to go to Syria.Have you booked?

    Reply
  • I’m boycotting due to lack of money and not able to go to Tropical Islands for holidays :(

    Reply
  • This whole thing is getting ridiculous now tbh. People know the story.

    If you don’t think it’s safe don’t go, but this all out boycott talk is way over the top and could potentially ruin alot of families lives over there if it spread beyond this country which I sincerely doubt it will but still.

    Ever go tubing in Laos? Ever go to the full moon party in Thailand? Ever get forced into bribing cops in South America?

    All those places are more dangerous and worth boycotting and care far less for you than Mauritius. A botched robbery attempt ends up being a high profile murder case, police are shown to be incompetent, and a rag tabloid behaves like a rag tabloid and now the whole country has become our mortal enemy. Ridiculous

    Reply
  • A lot of tourists have been assaulted, raped, and murdered in Ireland over the years. Our own country has a dysfunctional and ineffective Justice & policing system so we should put our focus and energy into reforming that before we start boycotting country’s we know very little about. Remember the case of Swiss student Manuela Riedo in Galway the slime who raped and strangled her and who had a history of violent offences was caught and sentenced for his crimes but when he committed the crime he was out on bail for yet another serious crime!, had our justice system dealt with this sicko properly years before, Manuela may still be alive.

    Reply
  • I support the idea of looking for the real killers but cant get away from thinking that some people are disappointed that ‘the defendants got off with it’. They were tried and found Not Guilty. You have to respect that. My own feeling is that there was a mad clamour to find people to pin this crime on, regardless of whether or not they were guilty. I support the idea of revisiting the case and trying to finds the people who carried out the murder. I do not support the people who seem to imply that the defendants got away with it and were guilty.

    Reply
    • That’s what i’ve been saying.

      On this topic on another site i got this in response;

      “yeah yous are so right on with your dumb #$%$ love everyone #$%$ comments, the police and the lawyers were in on this and dumb #$%$ know it all like yous would believe anything bar the truth. life and get springs to mind if yous have the brains to get one that is.”

      And not long after that from the same person;

      “like lying by saying the police beat a confession out of you but by some miracle you had no bruising to prove this, yeah ill use my brain more in a day than you will ever use yours in 10 lifetimes. the likes of you sicken me more than criminals because you look for excuses as to why they didnt do it. do us a favour go to the airport and emigrate. you wont be missed.”

      Now i never said they didn’t do it, i said there was NO EVIDENCE to safely say they did it.

      Some people just don’t like having an actual discussion with what is known about the case using what *facts* are currently available.

      Reply
  • Best boycott holidays in Ireland. How many people have been murdered here? The poor Italian boy who was left in a wheelchair with brain damage did not get justice.

    Reply
  • Brian 17/07/12 #

    This has gone beyond the beyond now. I wonder how many of those calling for a boycott because ‘that backward country is clearly corrupt, etc’ have checked the Corruption Perceptions Index recently? For 2011, Mauritius is ranked joint 46th, which while far from perfect, doesn’t exactly put the place up there with the likes of Russia (143) , Kenya (154) and Venezuela (172) to name just a few.

    The best way I can put it this. Imagine a young woman from England had been murdered in a foreign country and the trial had been a farce and, to add insult to injury, pictures of her dead body were splashed across a newspaper. There would be outrage and rightly so. However, supposing the Daily Mail or Daily Express decided to start one of their famous ‘campaigns’ to boycott the country. I’m sure many, many people in Ireland would be aghast at the idea, dismissing it as a classic ‘Little Englander’ mentality. Well that’s what we have here folks.

    A lot of this is down to pople simply latching onto a cause, not because they’re emotionally involved in it, but because it’s seen as the ‘right’ thing to do. People can’t think for themselves anymore. Any amount of reasonable sense here would show that this is something that has gone terribly wrong for the McAreavy and Harte families but it’s far from the end of it for them. The course of justice has not run yet. People need to realise that before they start throwing around stupid, idiotic calls for boycotts.

    Reply
    • I have to say Brian I agree with you totally, I was going to write the same but you got there first, the typical Irish attitude comes out as soon as it happens to someone Irish, typical childish behaviour, if they are gonna start boycotting countries due to corrupt governments, police forces and mockery justice systems they should start with their own country cause I can tell you now its just the same!

      Reply
  • Barry 17/07/12 #

    Why should a whole nation suffer because of a few bad apples?

    if we were in their situation they’d be out cry if another country tried to boycott us…I’m sure we’d also pull the racist card out when complaining also.

    Reply
    • I’m from Mauritius and I support your boycott whether or not it extends to textile and sugar, I think other countries should show solidarity and join in. I boycott Mauritian hotels and sugar myself and make sure I don’t support any sweatshops broadly. A lot of the textile industry is immigrant workforce from China by the by.

      How would a whole nation suffer because you’re boycotting key capitalist ventures of the country? Like I said elsewhere they own most of the land without the nation’s consent, they abuse natural resources, and together with our government they create difficult situations which cause people to -have- to work in those industries. They’d work in all textile too if the conditions weren’t inhumane or the wages too low. I don’t think that there is welfare but disability welfare is under €40 a month according to my recent inquiry. That doesn’t get one far.

      I guess some of the big money has to trickle down to the average mauritian eventually, if at all, but as this issue has revealed the major issues with Mauritian institutions which they keep denying. I think part of the blame should also fall on the hotel/s because you’d expect some luxurious resort to make sure they compensate in a country with huge issues, with extra security, reliable staffing and any assistance a victim would need such as flipping great legal assistance after one’s wife got brutally killed. That would have prevented any undue arrest I imagine.

      It isn’t and there’s no need to turn this into a racist issue, we’re calling for a boycott until there is no more ineptitude. I don’t foresee that happening in the near future but maybe with enough pressure on them those who’ve had the cake with the whole bakery, while the majority subsist on crumbs, will change their ways.

      Reply
  • Imagine the indignation if the Swiss and French decided to boycott Ireland as a holiday destination as a result of their nationals being murdered here. What knee-jerk populist nonsense. The Journal would do better to stop always pandering to the lowest common denominator.

    Reply
    • Hi Carl,

      Not sure what your issue is here but we’re running a poll because people are talking about it. Whether that is right or wrong is not something for us to judge but the idea of the poll is to vox pop on an issue that has been raised in the national conversation in recent days and that is what we’re doing in this case.

      I don’t see how running a poll is TheJournal.ie “pandering to the lowest common denominator”.

      Hugh

      Reply
    • It wasn’t the murder that has people wanting to boycott as far as I know, it was the farce that followed, got to agree with thejournal here.

      Reply
    • Irish people didn’t celebrate after the trials involving foreign nationals here. The Irish prosecutors didn’t try dirty the names of the victims during the trials. The Irish media didn’t print photos of the victims on the front page of their news papers after the trials.

      Reply
    • It’s nothing to do with the fact an Irish national was murdered is the way it was dealt with

      Reply
    • @ Hugh if that is the case then why no poll on the John Terry case?? You wouldn’t even let anyone comment. Seems strange.

      Reply
    • There’s a very simple reason we didn’t allow people to comment on that Noel. It was an active court case which carries a number of legal dangers in terms of what can be said about it while the case is active.

      Reply
    • That makes no sense at all seeing as you allowed comments on this case in Mauritius. Also, you didn’t allow comments after the case. Still seems strange.

      Reply
    • Noel, this can only mean one thing. ThJournal.ie acts as Mauritian government.*facepalm*.

      Reply
    • Noel, we allowed comments after the court case ended in Mauritius. Up until then comments were closed because of the danger of being in contempt of court.

      As for not allowing comments on the Terry court case stories after it ended, I was not aware of this. I suggest that if this is the case you take it up with our sports desk sport@thescore.ie as they were handling the posting of stories about the Terry case.

      Reply
    • “the poll is to vox pop on an issue that has been raised in the national conversation”

      What’s the national conversation and how does it get started, I find myself wondering!

      The media drives and feeds this jingoistic tosh.

      Reply
    • If the Journal was pandering to the lowest common denominator, then the column preceding the poll would have read as something holistically more biased. Picture something along the lines of the Indo or the Star etc. etc. Something slanting the ‘evil nature’ of Mauritians. Personally I agree that the idea of a boycott on Mauritius for these reasons is inane and ridiculous, and that is why I hit “NO” on the poll above. I also think that it is a knee-jerk reaction to plaster the Journal as the purveyor of pandering, populist nonsense when all they did was off several objective paragraphs followed by a vox-pop barometer.

      Reply
    • Hugh you’ve stooped to our level! just right the stories and leave the bickering to use – I’d like to know the journalist writing the piece is absolutely neutral and free from opinion.

      Reply
    • * write

      Reply
  • Always wanted to go to Mauritius as I went to college with a girl from there. Can’t afford to. It’s not like I live in the land of “Saints and Scholars”. My sympathy to the Harte/McAreavey family. I cannot even try to imagine what they are going through and the lack of justice.

    Reply
  • Boycotting an entire country based on one admittedly disgraceful incident is a very immature over reaction. Far better to engage with the authorities over there and apply public & political pressure for a more professional investigation and resolution. Throwing our rattles out of the pram won’t achieve anything.

    Reply
  • Lowest common denominator poll ever. Shame on journal.ie for jumping on the xenophobic “hysteria bandwagon” as Tony Stanley above put it. There are so many implicit judgements in the poll that are at least xenophobic, and at worst, racist – why on earth would a person even think of boycotting a whole country over the result of a jury trial in that country unless prejudice of some sort was involved?

    Reply
  • Not sure if I’d say I’m boycotting it, but I wouldn’t feel safe bringing my family anywhere with the police and judicial system Mauritius seems to have.

    Ditto for Portugal after the McCann case.

    I appreciate one bad story is not sufficient evidence to distrust an entire country, but I’m going on holidays to relax, not to prove a point. Easier to just avoid the place.

    Reply
  • What if the same thing happened in the UK or the United States? Would there still be an outcry to boycott those countries? Ridiculous stuff…….Typical Ireland.

    Reply
  • Two wrongs don’t make a right. Irish police messed up the Sophie Tuscan du Plantier case the french didn’t boycott us. The British judicial system messed up on the Birmingham 6, Guilford 4 etc.The Mauritian authorities have questions to answer but no reason to punish a group of island people dependent on tourist money. Reaction is understandable but nevertheless not justified.

    Reply
  • What’s the issue regarding acquittal? The men were proven innocent, the murderer is still at large and the Mauritian police are still searching. Do people want innocent men jailed?

    Reply
    • By the looks of it, people do.

      I honestly have no idea if they killed her or not, but like it or not, the evidence just was not there to convict them, hence the verdict.

      People may not like the verdict, but trials are supposed to be judged on facts, not on public opinion, thank god.

      If people want to blame anyone, blame the authorities for botching the job in the first place.

      Reply
    • Scarr 17/07/12 #

      I don’t think anyone had any issue with the acquittal on here Liam, at least not that I’ve noticed. Keep stirring though.

      Reply
  • Karen 17/07/12 #

    I agree, boycotting an entire nation is pointless, this is a tragedy and a nightmare that the families of Michaela are still living. A little perspective is needed, yes the authorities made a mess of the investigation, I am encouraged by reports that the Irish government might assist with an investigation. Get some perspective peeps, a woman was murdered and the people responsible deserve to be punished, not the entire nation.

    Reply
  • You can’t Boycott countries you can Boycott people as we proved in Ireland. Here’s a question for this Publication. Will you run a Poll on Boycotting Germany if two people from Berlin Killed her?

    Reply
  • Mauritius is a beautiful country and the people are honest and hospitable. One of the best holidays I was ever on. I would never boycott this country and would return again and again finance permitting. The irish people wanting a boycott are a bunch of mob rule sheeple with limited IQ!

    Reply
  • If all those people are serious and honest about their intention to boycott Mauritius over the McAreavey courtcase I presume they’ll all be encouraging the French to boycott Ireland over Sophie Toscon du Plantier. Or would it be unjust to boycott a country over the actions of a tiny few?

    Reply
  • Come on people stop this nonsense, what Mauritius boycott you speak, this is not a local grocery boycott, that could be reasonably done, how many people can afford / wanted to go there anyways? 1% or 2% of the nation? Would that be more than 500 people from while country? I doubt it.

    Reply
    • 1% is closer to 50,000. 2% 100,000. (SORRY FOR TROLLING). I agree with your point tho. A boycott would have little impact and it is also a very childish response.

      Reply
    • itchyarse yeah thanks for correction my % did not work very well lol was in rush but glad you agree with my point :)

      Reply
    • An estimated 3,000 Irish go there each year.Average price for 10 nights for a couple is around €3000 and sometimes without the flight included!!! An idyllic place going by the photos and if I had a chance to go in the morning I’d be straight on the plane!You don’t stop going places because there are good people who face injustice and bad people who roam free…you would’nt leave your front door if that was the case!Boycotting an Island with over 1 million people on it because of one callous murderer is about as sensible as it sounds.Ridiculous!

      Reply
  • Rob 17/07/12 #

    eh has anyone even begun to think about South East Asia??? Thailand?? Cambodia??

    Are we alll still sure we don’t believe in travelling to countries with dodgy police force and judicial systems???

    Reply
  • Boycotting Mauritius is a ridiculous idea. It makes no sense to paint a nation with the same brush of a select few of their nationals! As someone who has been to the island, it is an amazing tourism destination and every national that I encountered were lovely and very welcoming.
    Let’s not forget that other countries have had individuals murdered in our country, we wouldnt want them to boycott Ireland so that our tourism industry would suffer more than it is already

    Reply
  • It’s an unbelievably stupid call to make. It just goes, once again, to expose how small minded and parochial Irish politicians are that they would make such a silly call on the back of a tragic death to gain some public favour.

    The incident was tragic and the Dept of Foreign Affairs should continue to engage with the Mauritian authorities to see that justice is served, but the idea of a boycott of the country or of sending over members of our own police force, when they are so badly needed here, is ridiculous.

    Reply
  • No, definitely not for this reason. There are other reasons to not to holiday in Mauritius. Other reasons include that that local workers are paid a pittance for working in the tourism industry. It’s no wonder that they are tempted by Westerners leaving the iPhones and wallets stuffed with cash thrown around rooms. Doesn’t not justify theft but it’s unsurprising.

    The other reason not to go to Mauritius is the fishing industry based there that it is plundering the Indian ocean. Their Government have allowed European boats in to over-fish and impoverish local fishermen.

    Reply
  • A lot of tourists have been assaulted, raped, and murdered in Ireland over the years. Our own country has a dysfunctional and ineffective Justice & policing system so we should put our focus and energy into reforming that before we start boycotting country’s we know very little about. Remember the case of Swiss student Manuela Riedo in Galway the slime who raped and strangled her and who had a history of violent offences was caught and sentenced for his crimes but when he committed the crime he was out on bail for yet another serious crime!, had our justice system dealt with this sicko properly years before, Manuela may still be alive.

    Reply
  • Idiotic to boycott a country because of an incident like this, as horrific as it is

    Reply
  • Perfect comment to make about Syria, you see pictures of adults and children blown to pieces in there newspapers everyday but you dont see anyone crying about that! Typical Irish attitude, if it happens to any other nation nobody cares as soon as its an Irish person theres uproar and its a disgrace, bunch of bleeding hypocrites in this country!

    Reply
  • Its not exactly like Mauritius is a vital trading partner with Ireland, Its not like calling a boycott with the UK or France or Germany. To be honest before this tragedy I had only heard of Mauritius because the Dodo went extinct there

    Reply
  • Of course not! Why should we punish the people because of the incompetence of their police and media? To vote yes to this poll question is to betray an authoritarian mindset not dissimilar to the mindset of the North Korean regime where the extended family up to 3 generations can be detained in detention camps indefinitely (sometimes for life) because of the misconduct of one member of the family.

    Reply
  • nice to see that the journalists of this site are as bad as the other media in this country and flogging the life out of this tragedy because it is cheap to do and needs little research or expense and they do not have the imagination or skills to find originalnews stories.
    quiet obvious nobody gives a damm about the families involved in the actual tragedy how might like a rest from all this circus

    Reply
  • Richard 17/07/12 #

    I don’t buy for an instant the contention that this kind of poll question ought to be asked because this is currently a topic in the ‘national conversation’ and any such question is therefore justified. Such a contention ignores the capacity of media institutions -such as the Journal- to determine and influence what constitutes the ‘national conversation’. This is achieved not least through polls that suggest that a) this is indeed what people are talking about, and b) this is the way they ought to talk about it, with a simple yes-or-no question as the proper starting point.

    The effect of these polls is to reinforce the idea that what they address are matters of true public importance, by contrast with other matters, and this is the way you should talk about it. An example of such other matters, habitually excluded from polls such as these, would be the real and severe deficiencies in the Irish State’s capacity to secure a just existence for those who depend on its protection, and what people ought to do about it. But such matters require a level of public engagement and deliberation that polls such as these simply militate against.

    Reply
  • Blame a whole country for the failings of a few people. If that was the case i reckon the only place u could go on holiday would be the north and south pole. Stupid poll and typical that it eminatted out of a stupid fine gaeler in the first place.

    Reply
  • If we boycotted every country where their was an injustice in the legal system then we’d only be able to go to the moon. We act like murders rapes and robberies of non nationals doesn’t happen in Ireland. Terrible what happened but less of the self righteous bullshite please

    Reply
  • Following any incident of this nature the local authorities, aware of the risk to tourism, will up security. So safety concerns shouldn’t be such a factor.

    Following the trial, if the two accused had been found guilty after the shambolic and badly presented prosecution case then we would have some concerns over the quality of justice there.

    Following the disintegration of the police case and the evidence of torture being used the government, being aware of the fall out from European governments which may threaten the aid they get from the EU, will be keeping a tight leash on them lest they cause more bad publicity.

    Some people will vote with their feet and keep clear, this will keep prices down as people compete for tourist revenue.

    So it’s safer, it’s under more scrutiny and it’s cheaper. Ideal time to go.

    Reply
  • Put it like this, I’m not boycotting it specifically, but I’ve ruled it out as a holiday / honeymoon destination.

    Reply
  • Hugh, ridiculous pole! You admit you only did it cos people are “talking about it”! So you’re just jumping on the hysteria bandwagon for the sake of it!

    Most tropical holiday hot spots ate as corrupt and dangerous as Mauritius, it Ireland for that matter! What happened there could happen in any popular holiday hotspot!

    Stop adding to the hysteria for the sake of a few pointless articles playing on people’s fear, that’s what church is for!

    Reply
    • Hi Tony,

      If you’re talking about the poll then I am afraid I have to disagree. Yes people are talking about it which is generally a good reason to run a poll on an issue to quantify the views in a way that is not scientific but is interesting.

      Thanks,

      Hugh

      Reply
    • I think it might be an exercise in hyperbole to say that this is adding to the hysteria or playing off people’s fear. It is a forum like this where the views can be expressed by readers and the public that allow the debate, if there really is one, to take shape. Given a quick look at the results so far, it would seem that people have spoken: there should be no boycott. Simple. This was not a biased or heavily slanted piece, idealising one side of the vote.

      I just can’t see where in the article there is the promotion of fear or hysteria. If anything, the piece is calm and collected – presenting information upon which a reader can form an opinion based on critical engagement with the writing and its points. Thankfully the writing, as I’ve said, is predominantly objective, meaning we can form an opinion easily if we think for half a moment. If this was a more tabloid raggish paper, well, a) we wouldn’t be here, and b) the polling would probably reflect the fear and hysteria whipped up in the narrative of the article.

      Reply
  • no

    Reply
    • Thats very harsh…what about the french girl that was killed in cork a few years ago..what happen was horrible but pls dont paint the country black cos of 1 individaul….

      Reply
    • Doubt it would make a jot of difference…I mean how many of us go there on holidays? It’s not like it’s Spain or Portugal…

      Reply
    • People like to forget about all the foreigners that are attacked, raped and murdered here, but yet the second something happens to Irish abroad they are up in arms, acting like Ireland is so perfect.

      Reply
    • I think this is a little more than just crime in a country. People accept that that happens.

      In this case, a botched investigation occurred – followed by a trial that should never gone ahead which only added to the immense loss already suffered.

      And then photos get leaked which could jeaprodise any further investigation.

      I get what people are saying, I understand that there are more people in Mauritius than just those who published the newspaper and botched the investigation – but I still voted no. I just think the sequence of events are so intensely insulting to the victims to even consider going there ever.

      I guess more than anything, if I were to look at it and other similar locations I’d choose a different one – not so much boycott but it will always stick in my mind as that place that made such a balls of this whole situation.

      Reply
    • Oops. I mean I voted yes for the reasons outlined above.

      Reply
    • Very disappointing Larry!

      Reply
    • It’s a shame that the debate on this is focussing on one particular case and country. People are referring to alleged corruption in Mauritius as a rationale for boycott. All year round people go on holidays to countries that have endemic corruption (Greece, anyone?). People normally couldn’t care less, but let’s all hop on the righteous indignation bandwagon only when it suits us….

      Reply
    • No is right, this botched case was caused because the police were under such pressure to come up with suspects because of a fear of loosing the tourist trade!!

      Reply
    • Tourists and visitors get robbed, attacked and sadly murdered in all countries, ours, as we know, is no exception. That’s a sad fact of life. All things being equal would we, or any other country, have handled this case differently? Yes. As there was a certain amount of media attention the police would have been “told” to get it right from the start, we know in Mauritius they didn’t, and made mistakes from the start.
      Comparisons have been made to the murder of Sophie Tucson Du Plantier in 1996 but her body wasn’t discovered untill the following day and it was a mystery whereas the murder of Michaela McAreavey in Mauritius should have been easier to solve. When she entered her room she used a card key, common in hotels the world over now, this recordered her entery and the time in a central computer. It also recordered the suspects entry 2 minutes previously. What happened from then was a fiasco, evidence wasn’t gathered properly, the crime scent not closed, the suspects allowed back in to comtaminate it. What came to trial should never have done so, both lawyers were allowed to showboat. At one point in the trial John McAreavey’s sister Claire had to ask the people in the gallery to show some respect and stop laughing, could you see that happening here, in the UK or the USA during a murder trial?When the suspects were inevitably found not guilty there was a mass party, thousands of people spilled onto the streets and fireworks celebrated the victory. Oh and they assured us they’d find the murderer… eventually. We just had to have confidence in them. Then somehow the police crime scene photos of Michaela’s body end up on the front page of a Sunday newspaper in Mauritius, to “highlight Michaela’s horrible massacre” was the feeble excuse.
      If the police in Mauritius were just incompetent, fair enough, it happens. But it wasn’t just the police, although they were incredibly incompetent, someone else, presumably the DPP had to sign off on their case and allow the prosecution to go ahead knowing it was a shambles. The trial itself was like something from a B movie, with the subsequent false assurances and platitudes that the real killer would soon be caught afterwards. We then had to learn that only after international outrage did the police raid the offices of the Mauritian Sunday Times, there was no mention of how the crime scene photos got onto the front page.
      We’re told Mauritius is a very safe place and serious crime is very rare there, but when it has happened justice should be seen to be done and it hasn’t in this case. The impression we’re left with in the Murder of Michaela McAreavey on the tiny island of Mauritius is that the authorities are breathtakingly incompetent, totally corrupt and it comes from the top down. The message it sends is that we want foreigners money, not their problems.
      Would I boycott Mauritius, I have never been there and will probably never have the opportunity to go, but their economy also produces vast amounts of sugar, textiles and clothing. I would rather not buy sugar from Mauritius or clothes that are made there. I may never go there, but we all use sugar and wear clothes.

      Reply
  • Let boycott travelling to the moon ! Oh wait I can’t afford to go there either

    Reply
  • What exactly would a boycott mean? Are there a lot of goods that are made in Mauritius sold in Ireland? So we boycott those imports. How many Irish people actually go on holiday or are planning on a holiday to Mauritius?

    Reply
  • Boycott Mauritius? Don’t be so bloody ridiculous!

    Reply
  • And are you some sort of crusader? let me guess you watched the kony video and now your an activist?All countries care more for there own, why don’t you talk to many Irish people in red cross serving in war torn countries and call them a hypocrite, or give out to the Irish government for being one of the only countries on course to commit .7% in aid to countries in need.
    You are one of the worst types of hypocrites, giving out about the people of Ireland who do nothing to help people in need while you sit at a desk doing nothing to help people in need.
    ya thick.

    Reply
  • Get real folks , its a rich mans paradise and i’m sure they will not be cancelling their holidays. Like it or not they were found not guilty and in a way having a defense Lawyer say he loved the Irish did not help the case. The local papers should not have published pictures of the remains,very insensitive of the families feelings and very unprofessional.

    Reply
  • I love my country but I hate this small-mindedness! How many tourists have been murdered here???? And how many countries have called for a boycott on our tourism? This is Holy Catholic Ireland. Well congratulations tourist operator in Donegal, on managing to undo our image worldwide!

    Reply
  • It’s the silly season!! Even tho our country tetters on the brink of economic and social ruin ( the increasing gap bet the rich and poor spells disaster), the media (and the government in their tails, believing there are votes in it) are obsessing.
    A newly wed bride is murdered on her honeymoon and the media circus loses the run of itself and publishes prurient pictures. A tragedy that this ridiculous boycott call only heightens.
    Is all the attention focused on this matter a support to the bereft? Will a boycott help the bereaved or is it a publicity stunt?
    If the answer is yes , then we should boycott all countries where Irish citizens have been killed and as per other comments, other nations will need to boycott us.
    Sadly murder is a human act from which no land is immune and the search for justice is a hit and miss and medias everywhere have one goal- selling copy.
    As a nation we have experienced in our recent history the ruinous consequences of being tarnished/ blamed and even punished collectively because of the actions of a few. Can we not apply the lessons of our history to this case?

    Reply
  • Silly survey!
    This country hardly did a good job investigating the murder of the French lady in Cork or even many of the murders of our own citizens/nationals murdered by so called (self-styled) Republicans/Nationalists.

    Reply
  • For the boycott afficionados, I would propose to boycott RTE, Tommy Gorman, various red tops and various broad sheet newspapers. I’d argue that their inexplicable blanket coverage of this trial has hugely contributed to the circus that was this very trial. Culminating in ‘those’ pictures. Don’t get me wrong, of course it is very sad for those directly involved, but to have each and every detail published and analysed to death. No restraint nor respect for a grieving family.

    Reply
  • - A panel of 9 juries have found both accused NOT GUILTY in the ratio of 9-0. Wud it be fair to blame the juries who decided as such depending on the evidence produced before them by the counsels from both side. There are many factors involved before the stage is reached for the juries to decide.

    - Full credits must be given here to the Defence counsels who defended both their clients to their best interests. They did a brilliant job indeed! The counsels from representing the Director of Public Presecutor (DPP) have failed to satisfy the juries “beyond reasonable doubt” that these two accused were the murderers.

    - True it is that there have been a lot of discrepancies in the way the investigations have been carried out, resulting in the ambiguity in the evidence produced in Court. But the question that surfaces is WHY there have been such loopholes?? The speculations can be so varied and can be viewed subjectively as well as objectively.

    - BUT the Government is taking actions and not sitting idle – further investigations will be done and by a new crew of officers. After the meeting with the ambassador of Ireland with the Prime Minister of Mauritius, the Ambassador was rather pleased and the “Scotland Yard” will be called to be continue the investigations anew.

    - The actions and concerned being taken by the Government of Mauritius cannot be ignored completely and a whole country be blamed for the wrong doings of a certain “BAD PERSON”. This concept of Boycott Mauritius is not reasonable

    - The culprit will soon be caught!

    Reply
  • Think about the family hotels trying to make an honest living.

    Reply
  • Personally I don’t think either of the two-accused men killed Michaela McAreavey. It would be WRONG to boycott Maritious. I’d be interested to hear, what people on this forum think about, who killed Michaela?

    Reply
  • Joeh 17/07/12 #

    Well this guy is from donegal and about as ignorant as you can get. He probably doesn’t sell any holidays anyway to there and is just looking for attention . Talk about branding a woke destination for something 2 guys were aquiited of because there was no evidence

    Reply
  • Some of you are taking this far too personal. The Irish “Justice” system is far from perfect, just ask the DuPlantier Family, I don’t hear an knee jerk outcry from potential French tourists to boycott this “Saintly Isle”.

    We also know too well that a certain element within the Gardai do not think twice before beating you over the head for peacefully demonstrating, because they can.

    I would remind you also of Abbeylara and there are plenty more where they came from.

    We didn’t hear of any government ministers “Heartbreak” for those.

    So get down from this bandwagon and back to reality.

    Respect to that jury as they were not going to let rage influence their verdict.

    Reply
  • The defendants were cleared because the Mauritian Jury found it more likely than not that the suspect was tortured into making his confession.
    That speaks volumes about the Mauritian people’s view of their own Police Force. For that reason I would not even consider going on holiday to the place, or any other country that tortures prisoners.

    Reply
  • That’s a fine Catholic, Christian comment!

    Reply
  • pjbrowne 17/07/12 #

    cheap publicly stunt by travel company if you ask me up blaming the whole island.the know well the media will pick up on the story.why don’t we leave the diplomats do there job now there getting paid enough to do it

    Reply
  • I would never consider it as a viable holiday destination after what’s happened. I don’t know of that’s considered boycotting….

    Reply
  • Well thats obvious ya thick! Im talking about other countries that don’t give a damn like ours

    Reply
  • Yes will never go there now…! I couldn’t stomach the place.

    Reply
  • Just go to Thailand same price flights

    Reply
  • While I don’t support a boycott, its a question of feeling safe. Would you feel safe in a country where we know there is a culture of petty crime, the police are a shambles, the justice system is a pantomime and at least some of the media’s morals is questionable? I wouldn’t feel safe there so I wont be going.

    Reply
  • would love to be in a position to boycott, guess we Will have to do with a yet weekend in bettystown

    Reply
  • Ash Nish 24/07/12 #

    Mauritius has so much to offer, come and experience unparalleled holidays over there :)

    Reply
  • @ Aaron I bet the woman and children are crying…..Sorry I’ll see myself out.

    Reply
  • I personally wouldn’t go there not that I could afford it. Who in their right mind would book into legends now?

    Reply
  • The reason I agree to the boycott is not because of the acquittal, moreso because of the reasons for it. The cops did a sham job. They didn’t fingerprint the purse/wallet, they just went, grabbed and apparently totured. While this men and I do feel that they killed that innocent women, without just cause of evidence, the men walked. They walked because the police were corrupt in there procedures. Because of this, guilty men walked free.

    That is why I call to boycott. If you cannot trust those who are supposed to protect the innocent, they why would you offer it as a ‘holiday’ destination. It’s not a safe place to the tourist. In Ireland, with the Cork killing, at least the Gardai did their job to a high standard and the same could not be said here.

    Reply
  • Been to mauritius years ago, and said I’d never go back. So, it’s not a specific boycott for this.

    Reply
  • Very good point Damian!! But i would like to teach the newspapers or whoever gave them the photo’s a lesson.

    Reply
  • Whatever about a boycott I think it’s true that Mauritius got a lot of very bad publicity from this case and the following investigation etc. Mauritius is a beautiful tropical island and I think for the next few years at least if an Irish person is looking to go to some beautiful tropical place, all other things being equal, they’ll go somewhere other than Mauritius because of the latent negative image they’ll have. There are plenty of places in the world where you can go that looks like a windows desktop background that you haven’t heard such tragic tales about (although that doesn’t mean there aren’t any).

    Also, I think the results of the poll were interesting, as I was expecting an overreaction and about 90% of people voting yes (sorry for misjudging you Journal readers).

    Reply
    • P Wurple 17/07/12 #

      A tropical island where you are served hand and foot by the poor. I am very uncomfortable with sitting around in luxury while there is poverty over the wall. The resorts are run by huge american corporates, very little goes to the locals. It’s not everyone’s ideal holiday.

      I agree a boycott is silly, but I wouldn’t be talking the place up either.

      Reply
  • Anyone who supports this should be sent to Mauritius on a one way flight….f*cking tabloid brained idiots

    Reply
  • mariem 17/07/12 #

    Why not conduct a poll on why almost all the comments on this issue are from males. Could it be to do with seeking revenge.

    Reply
  • Okay guys, now alot of people have been murdered in Ireland, alot of innocent women have gone missing, but there only difference between here and mauritius, is that they published photos of the dead Michaela, and not a single newspaper in Ireland published a photo of the dead Sophie Toscan de Plantier, when she was lying on the ground, and I think that there is an outrcy, because the papers in mauritius published photos of the murdered Michaela dead. I know that the french could have boycotted Ireland, knowing that one of their own was murdered, but did any of us see anyone in Ireland, celebrating Manuela’s death, no we were giving our condolences to the parents of Manuel Riedo, and to the family of Sophie Toscan de Plantier, but the people in the court in mauritius, did not say their condolences to the family of Michaela McAreavey. I wouldn’t go to mauritius, even someone payed me, and couldn’t afford to anyway, as I would say it it very expensive to stay there.

    Reply
  • another link on facebook like the last one
    Read all the comments
    Protect the honeymooners

    https://www.facebook.com/justiceformichaela

    Reply
  • HORRENDOUS CRIME IN ITSEL BY MAURITIOUS COURT AND PRESS. HOW MUCH POWER DO IRISH HAVE TO GET OTHER NATIONS TO JOIN IN BOYCOTT.? HOW MANY IRISH VISIT THERE YEARLY. KENNETH TIERNEY.

    Reply
  • I think the shift to the ‘boycott’ scenario is a good indication of the lack of real ideas available to tackle this situation and its problems.

    Reply

Add New Comment