TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Power, payments, politicians and planning: the Mahon Tribunal in numbers

How much did the report cost per page? How many times does it mention ‘corruption’? And who opposed setting it up?

44 - The number of the house on Beresford Avenue in which Bertie Ahern now lives, after a house was bequeathed to him in a Will in 1996.
44 - The number of the house on Beresford Avenue in which Bertie Ahern now lives, after a house was bequeathed to him in a Will in 1996.
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

THE FINAL REPORT of the Mahon Tribunal was a long time in coming, with years of hearings and hundreds of thousands of pages of evidence considered by a mammoth legal team.

Here, to try and break down the impact of the Tribunal, is a selection of numbers relating to its operation and findings.

5,280 – The number of days between the decision of Dáil Éireann to establish a tribunal examining ‘certain planning matters and payments’. The Dáil passed its motion to establish the tribunal on October 7, 1997.

5 – The number of TDs who voted against establishing the Tribunal. The Socialist Party (Joe Higgins), Green Party (John Gormley, Trevor Sargent), Sinn Féin (Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin) and independent TD Tony Gregory voted against the motion establishing it. The motion itself was put down by Bertie Ahen, the newly-elected Taoiseach.

5 – The number of reports published by the Tribunal. The four interim reports discussed the tribunal’s forthcoming work,  the findings relating to Ray Burke and George Redmond.

3,720 – The number of pages in the fifth and final report published on Thursday. The report, a 56 MB download (available here), is 41 times larger than the capacity of a formatted floppy disk, which was a popular method of file-saving when the Tribunal was established.

917 – The total number of days of public hearings held by the Tribunal over its 14 years. The final day of public hearings was in December 2008; the Tribunal has, since then, been compiling its findings.

437 – The total number of witnesses who have been called to give evidence at the Tribunal. They include developers, TDs, other councillors, PR officers and journalists.

99 – The number of days for which Frank Dunlop gave evidence to the Tribunal. He was, by far, its most regular witness – though was described in the final report as being a troublesome and unreliable one.

€247 million – The total (estimated) possible cost of the tribunal, based on estimates from Judge Alan Mahon and the Comptroller and Auditor General. They believe the State’s bill for witnesses’ legal fees could reach €147 million, on top of the €100 million in operational and legal fees that the Tribunal has already run up in its 14 years.

€75,535 - The potential cost, per page, of the final report – dividing the maximum €247 million cost by the 3,270 pages.

€30 million – The amount set aside by the Department of Public Expenditure to cover the costs of any legal bills for which the State is liable. That’s for this year – the Department explains that the other costs could only be incurred in further years when people submit their legal bills.

€5.59 million - The amount paid to the highest-earning member of the Tribunal’s in-house legal team, Patricia Dillon SC. She worked on the Tribunal for over ten years. Two other counsels, Patrick Quinn and Desmond O’Neill, earned over €5 million each for their work.

35 – The total number of barristers, solicitors and paralegal workers who have worked on the Tribunal.

€32,000 – The one-off briefing fee paid to Senior Counsels working on the Tribunal. Junior counsels were paid €21,000.

€2,250 – The pay for senior counsels for each day of work on the Tribunal. Junior counsels earned €1,500 per day. These rates were increased in 2002; before then, daily fees were set at €1,714 and €1,143 for senior and junior counsels respectively.

£165,214.50 - The total amount of lodgements to accounts controlled by Bertie Ahern for which the Tribunal rejected Ahern’s explanation.

$0 – The amount charged by the FBI to perform a forensic analysis on the redacted diaries of Frank Dunlop.

11 – The number of councillors against whom findings of corruption have previously been made, on foot of tribunal business. Only six were named due to various legal restrictions; three were from Fianna Fáil, one each from Fine Gael and Labour, and one independent.

3 – The number of times Liam Lawlor was jailed for contempt of court, for refusing to follow High Court orders to co-operate with the Tribunal. On the third such instance, he was temporarily released to attend a Dáil debate calling for his resignation as a TD.

5 – The number of senior Fianna Fáil figures who the report says knew of Tom Gilmartin’s £50,000 donation to Pádraig Flynn – solicited as a donation to Fianna Fáil, but which Flynn kept for himself. These figures included Ahern, who knew of the donation in 1989, but who did not raise queries about it for almost a decade afterward.

977 – The number of times the words ‘corrupt’ or ‘corruption’ (or variants of them) appear in the Tribunal’s final report.

11 – The number of hours between the publication of the final report, shortly before 10am last night, and the announcement from Fianna Fáil’s officer board that it would propose the expulsion of Bertie Ahern, Pádraig Flynn and three other councillors.

In full: TheJournal.ie’s coverage of the Mahon Tribunal >

More: Check out our other In Numbers pieces >

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • As per Fintan O’ Toole in the IT this morning 900,000 Irish citizens voted for FF knowing they were corrupt.
    240 million euro is the price you pay. Oh and a collapsed economy and a property market in negative equity and emigration (again) and unemployment and a banking crisis and the IMF and….

    Reply
  • The cost of all the tribunals has been 1 billion yet the government have recovered 3 billion so lets start another one. The Oisin Quinns of this world need to be stopped before that get into government.

    Reply
  • You forgot the most important number… 4million + pissed off, disillusioned, and heart broken Irish people

    Reply
  • And two times the same speech was rolled out for FF, Bertie said the first one Michèal the second ,” no corruption will be tolerated! ” and so the story never ends.

    Reply
  • OSnoidaghs print cartridges would come in handy now

    Reply
  • Sad thing is morons in this country will still vote for FF.

    Reply
    • And FG and Labour, who though not as bad as FF, are still badly tainted as the tribunal’s findings show. And I am sure everyone around the country is aware of similar tales to Dublin city council in their own locality which have never been investigated.As long as those three parties exist and the upper echelons of the civil service remain ensconced there is little hope for this country.

      Reply
  • The current government with Labour being in power are as crooked as FF Oisin Quinn a Dublin City Councillor was recently found to have breached 4 codes of ethics by the Ethics committee on by lobbying his fellow councillors to decide in his favour for planning on one of his property development sites in Mount Street. He is just serving his apprenticeship in politics to qualify him to take over from uncle Raoire for the bigger return for his effort.
    We should at least investigate this before a tribunal is needed. The head of the Ethics committee needs to be brought to task and investigated as he saw little wrong with breaking the rules.

    Reply
  • Crime does pay in Ireland?

    Reply
  • Just a little bit ironic, don’t ya think, that Bertie was brought down by the very tribunal he set up.The teflon Taoiseach is now the Velcro Taoiseach…everything sticks…

    Reply
  • They are all in the same bed.When you lie down with wolves,you come up with fleas

    Reply
  • I am more concerned with what is happening this week – there are still people up to their necks in corruption and running the country. I would be afraid to name names as I don’t want threatening phone calls from Labour HQ.

    Reply
  • What year is Bertie’s car in the drive way ??

    Reply
  • The plural of counsel is counsel, not counsels.

    Reply
  • The Sinn Fein councillors seem to be the only ones in Dublin City Council who have NOT been caught with their fingers in the till. They also behave admirably regarding planning issues.

    Reply
  • 247 million is a small price to pay for a measure which is a heavy blow against the nepotism cronyism graft and many other types of corruption which have marked the recent history of the republic of Ireland. Is Ahern guilty or not guilty. I think here an analysis of the independence of the tribunal would have been much more to the point. It is reassuring to see the principal ..nobody is above the law.. confirmed.
    If the fees for legal services are ever to be brought into line with other European countries then an independent body will be needed to instigate legislation. Everybody in Ireland knows that legal costs in the republic are exorbitant and are a drag on economic activity.
    A reform of the legal system in Ireland could perhaps begin with a reform of the system of transfer registration of property which is archaic unnecessarily complicated even chaotic and out of date.
    regards
    Gerard Ryan

    Reply
    • Legal fees in this country are actually lower than you’d think. If you consider jurisdictions that operate differently, you see an “hourly” charge for services (take the US for example) and an up front payment (retainer). These things simply don’t exist here. Legal fees paid by the state for non-tribunal work are very low in fact. Was the tribunal pay high? Of course – but those are over now.

      So what about other legal fees? Well I want to know why you think those should be regulated? It’s private transaction, not paid for by the state. Should the state then regulate how much plumbers and other privately employed individuals get paid? Seems very odd to suggest that the government legislates pay for one private group and not all of them doesn’t it? Super nanny state begins there.

      Reply
    • Exactly Oisin.

      The problem is that people who use legal services simply do not shop around for better costs. They take whatever Barrister their Solicitor recommends – its almost always someone that Solicitor knows and ha sa relationship with. Theres very little real competition so no way to start a price war for services. I can guarantee you a customer will find a Counsel who will do the same work for half the price if only he/she shops around and insists on their Solicitor providing estimates from a variety of practitioners. THAT is the way to seriously effect change in legal costs. The clients dont do it though.

      Reply

Add New Comment