TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Column: Households aren’t the only ones hit by negative equity – it’s crippling businesses

During the boom it was cheaper for businesses to buy property than to rent it – but that’s causing huge problems now, writes Peter Faulkner.

Peter Faulkner

THERE HAS BEEN much focus on the plight of those trapped in negative equity in the residential property market in Ireland. There have been many calls for measures to be introduced by the banks and government to ease this burden for which there is no medium or even, perhaps, long-term hope of repayment. When the loan size is so much greater than the value of the asset, many have simply walked away and sent the keys of the property by post to the lender. During the last property crash in the USA this was so prevalent it became known as ‘Jingle Mail!’.

It has happened here with cars too. In recent years, as many of our immigrant workers returned home due to the downturn in employment here, they simply left their low-cost leased cars in the airport parking lots and flew home. These parking lots became the first place the finance companies looked to when seeking to repossess these vehicles for non payment of rentals. In most cases the amounts outstanding were significantly greater that the market value of the vehicles themselves; it was yet more negative equity.

In both cases above, the credit rating of the person who walked away is destroyed. In the USA, they have a simple form of personal bankruptcy that allows people to start over with a new mortgage on a new property after about 2 years. Car jingle mailers are going to another jurisdiction and probably could not care less as their credit rating at home will be unaffected.

‘During the boom, it was cheaper to buy a commercial property than to rent it’

Negative equity is also a serious issue for many private Irish businesses. While the plight of those caught in boom time-priced property leases has been well rehearsed, the same cannot be said about regular businesses trapped in negative equity with commercial property loans. I am not talking about property developers or investors but rather the businesses that use the property to house their business activities. They may be limited companies or indeed self employed sole traders or even partnerships.

During the boom, with low interest rates and high rents, it was cheaper to buy a commercial property than to rent it. Commercial property prices have fallen significantly –  more steeply than residential properties in Ireland – and as many companies face cashflow difficulties they become unable to service these loans and are stuck in a negative equity trap. The outstanding loans are much more than the value of the property, for which there is probably no buyer at any price!  To make the problem even worse, personal guarantees were typically demanded from the owners by the financial instituions too.

You would need the neck of Pee Flynn to ask a bank to lend you money to pay your taxes

There is however a business group who are even worse off –  let’s call them commercial property user pension owners. Slick advisors and brokers packaged schemes where the new property would be bundled into the proprietors new fangled hybrid self-administered pension scheme and they would charge their own business a rent. The rent would cover the interest and capital repayments and at the end of the day, you would own the building tax free. The business would tax relief on the rental payments; in other words, happy days all round.

Fast forward a couple of years and these asset only pension schemes are in serious deficit and along comes the outrageous new pension fund levy –  and they only take cash! And there ain’t any. Try asking a bank to lend you money to pay any kind of taxes, you would have to have the neck of Pee Flynn and you would get about as much credence.

Small business owner managers are just ordinary folk with all the usual financial demands on them to keep family and home together, put food on the table, deal with utility bills and education costs, as well as deal with a mortgage that would reflect the cross section of Irish mortgage profiles, a significant percentage of which are in negative equity.

Whatever comes in the delayed personal insolvency legislation, it should address the two headed monster that could be called ‘Jingle Jingle Mail’. These small businesses employ not just the owners but many others too. SMEs, the lifeblood of the economy and our way to salvation? We shall see.

Peter Faulkner is chairman and owner of Faulkner Packaging, which was founded on Friday 14th September 1860. He lives in Dalkey and has three adult children. He is a former chairman of the SFA and was one of the founders of ISME. He was a member of the government Taskforce on Small Business. His sites include www.discountpackaging.iewww.snazzybags.com, www.snazzybags.co.uk,  www.faulkner.iewww.alububble.iewww.95kpabags.com, plus a bunch of micro sites.

Read more columns by Peter Faulkner on TheJournal.ie>

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • If the government invested one tenth the money and incentives they normally lavish on potential foreign inward investors on such small local businesses, the gains in long term sustainable employment would be huge.

    Reply
  • Interesting article and the plight of small businesses should be highlighted

    However the article does not make any attempt to state what it feels the new insolvency bill should include to alleviate the plight of small businesses in negative equity.

    If the solution is to be some sort of debt forgiveness, then I feel the state ( taxpayer) should have some claim on the assets of the business if ( hopefully ) they ever return to profitability in the future, or in future profits of the business. Would small businesses accept that ?

    I feel the article also glossed over the ” tax relief” benefits that small businesses who bought commercial property received ! In fact I found the statement ” happy days’ to be very irritating. Happy days for whom ? Not the state who lost out on tax revenue, not the PAYE worker.
    It was “tax relief” schemes such as this which helped to fuel the the property boom that was such a part of our Celtic Tiger Madness. They were encouraged by the then Government and seized upon by “Small Business”.

    Some analysis , and understanding of how much damage all this did to our economy would have been helpful.

    For the record I think debt forgiveness of some kind is the only way forward, for commercial and domestic negative equity, but I would not on any terms and without some accountability .

    Reply
  • Joan
    Joan
    Your points are well made. There are no tax breaks on commercial property for the typical small business and indeed these types of property purchases would have attracted stamp duty at the higher rate. The only tax issue is in relation to the pension contributions and pensions are only tax deferments, as tax is payable once the pension reaches maturity and benefit is paid to the pensioner. When rents, which are tax deductable, were higher than the mortgage payments, it is arguable that more tax was paid by the businesses.
    I am but a business owner manager, the path to resolving such an issue is beyond my capability, my contribution is merely to higlight the issue in light of pending Insolvency legislation.
    I totally agree with your point that nobody should expect debt forgiveness and then expect to walk away with the balance of the assets. Most people I know in this situation would be massively relieved to be able to just end up being able to make a modest living and avoid 12 years as a bankrupt.
    The pension levy, especially in these cases, was simply another kick in the teeth to those already on the floor.

    Peter

    Reply
    • Peter
      Peter
      Your humility is touching ;0)

      Your capabilities and those of others in small business are necessary if proper solutions are gong to be found.

      You can’t expect somebody else to sort out your current “mess” if you are not willing to contribute, and even do a little soul searching.( Instead you only want to “highlight” your problems)

      Ireland I hope WILL NOT be returning to the way things were. As we recover we have to try to understand what went wrong, and learn from it, and evolve into a better version of our former selves.

      I work for a small business, I want to see things improve, I want solutions to be found, so that I have a job and am not worried all the time I will be let go. .

      Reply
    • Joan
      That you think I might have some influence in such matters is touching. For once this problem is not one that impacts upon me personally, but I am aware of many who are in serious trouble with it, they dare not speak out.
      The fate and interests of small business owners and their employees are largely the same.

      Peter

      Reply
  • There are so many variations of the problem outlined in this article all with the same root cause. While the construction inductry was the main driver of the boom it had the effect of “lifting all boats” so businesses that were marginally profitable become more profitable and so on. Businesses expanded to meet this new demand and as a result bought at the top of the market and moved into properties that were affordable given the profile of the business at the time but not so affordable now or the business which was and is profitable having moved into property holdings or a new businesses that it knew nothing about. The construction sector imploded and the tide went out for everyone which has now left businesses struggling either because there business has collapsed or businesses that are still inherently profitable but have been left with a millstone that they cannot pay back on. If action is not taken many of these businesses will remain “zombie” businesses for ever more as while they can just about get by and maybe pay something towards the interest outstanding on the loans the banks will not move to close them down aas they will have to book an even greater loss and be left with an unrealisable asset.

    There are restucturing solutions out there for some cases but it will need everyone to play their part

    Reply
  • eek sorry thought that hadn’t poster the first time

    still maybe it’s worth saying twice!!!

    Reply
  • time to reflect is important but not as important as re checking the facts builders bankers & solicitors were all too busy so first step start by rechecking every step

    Reply
  • Grow up

    Reply
  • Businesses are being “crippled” by poor cashflow – not negative equity. If property prices never fell then the businesses would still be in trouble. You can be in negative equity and have good cashflow and profitability.

    Reply
  • Peter
    Peter
    Your humility is touching ;0)

    If solutions are to be found, you and other small businesses will have to be part of the process.

    Nobody should expect somebody else to sort out their mess, while all they do is sit on the sidelines and “highlight” what they want fixed. A little soul searching, and some uncomfortable moments will be necessary but that is how we will evolve into a better version of what went before. It is in nobody’s interest for us to return to the way things were, and start another boom bust cycle.

    I work for a small business ( employee ) and I want a better future for small business so I don’t have to worry I will be let go.

    Reply

Add New Comment