TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Column: How many votes does it take for a woman to get elected?

The answer is surprisingly few. Niamh Gallagher explains why she’s working to encourage everyday women to run for office.

Niamh Gallagher

THERE’S A MOMENT each time during Women for Election’s Inspire Programme where jaws have dropped and the gasps have been audible.

That’s the moment where the gathered women realise the actual number of votes it takes to get elected. The shock comes because the number in some cases is so low. We can see the women thinking that between friends, family, neighbours, colleagues, former colleagues, and fellow members of the local sports club or Tidy Towns Committee that the number of people they need to support them isn’t really that high.

Yet this is information, the fabled ‘numbers’ that remains such a mystery to those outside the political system. At Inspire, Women for Election’s campaign expert breaks it down for the participants – pointing to the actual number of votes needed to get elected to a town or borough council (which is where most people start their political careers), how to identify that vote, and how unnecessary universal appeal is a multi-seat constituency.

A stark example cites TDs in the current Dáil who got elected on five per cent of the vote – meaning 95 or so out of every hundred in who voted in their constituencies did not vote for these TDs. These are the type of figures that really resonate.

Of course, getting even these votes is the hard part for any candidate. But for women there are particular challenges. International research shows that it is the ‘five C’s’ that hinder women entering politics: confidence, cash, culture, candidate selection and childcare. Women for Election, in our initial Inspire programme, want to encourage women to at least think about entering political life. Using this international research along with our
own, we set about providing women with practical tools and information that might transform their mind set.

‘Women have every chance of getting elected – if they can get onto the ticket’

We decided to focus initially on confidence, campaigns and communication skills. Confidence because we wanted women who were already active, committed and passionate about issues and their communities to see that they had it within themselves to go forward; campaigns because we wanted to demystify the process and show how to read the numbers, identify the voters and build a team; and communications so women could see how to transfer the issues they were passionate about into well-communicated messages.

So far we have run Inspire Programmes in Dublin, Cork and Galway (which brought together women from not only Galway but Mayo, Clare, Sligo, Leitrim, Cavan and Westmeath). On July 7 due to incredible demand we will be back in Dublin again.

Some have asked why we are focusing on women and our answer is clear. In the current Dáil we have the best representation of women ever – yet only 15 per cent of TDs are female. In the last General Election just 86 of the 566 candidates were women – also 15 per cent.

So it seems evident that women have every chance of getting elected if they can get on to the ticket. That is where Women for Election come in. We believe in a balanced participation of women and men in political life. We are the only non-partisan organisation working solely on identifying and supporting women to commit to public life. In the past, parties have commissioned training for women on an ad-hoc basis without significant long-term impact.

‘The cheers are incredible to see’

As an organisation Women for Election feel very strongly about the fact that we are very strictly non-partisan. No ifs, buts or maybes. We make it very clear at the beginning of every programme we run; this is not the place to discuss Government policy, party politics or electoral reform. We have had members of every party and none at our programmes, women who have canvassed for candidates and women who have never even considered joining a political party. We have received and are incredibly grateful for the
support from female politicians of every persuasion, a growing number of whom have spoken at our events about their personal journey providing inspiration to the gathered women.

Women for Election is only part of a solution to a larger problem. There is under-representation in politics among all minority groups in society. Yet just because you cannot fix the whole problem doesn’t mean you shouldn’t attempt to play your part. It has been really encouraging to see what has happened during Inspire programmes. Women have come together, shared learning and experiences, received valuable training and information and at the end of each day made commitments to themselves and others.

Some commitments have been small steps, like promising to seek out more information, or take a leadership role in whatever community group, sports club or association they are already a member of. Other commitments have been more profound. At the end of every Inspire we have had a small number of women announce that their mind is made up – they are going to do what it takes to run for election.

The cheers they get from every woman in the room - hopefully some of whom will be running against them – are incredible to see.

This is only the start of the political journey for these women and we hope they will be joined by many more. Women for Election will be there to support them all.

Niamh Gallagher is the co-founder of Women for Election. Anyone interested in finding out more about the INSPIRE Programme to be held in Dublin on July 7 can email inspire@womenforelection.ie.  Further information about Women for Election is available at womenforelection.ie.

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • This headline reads like the start of a bad joke.

    Reply
  • I’m always a bit weary of people voting for other people on the basis of their gender rather than their policies.

    If the right man with the right policies is a woman by all means vote for her.

    If the policies are wrong … the gender doesn’t surmount the policy.

    Reply
  • Positive discrimination has always worked well for the TD’s son.

    Reply
    • I think that you are mixing up nepotism with positive discrimination. This whole idea of co-opting sons and daughters into seats goes against the whole idea of democracy. Having read a bit more through the Women for Election website I see that they are in favor of quotas which is something that I am totally against as this is discrimination based on gender. If I based a decision based on gender I would be lynched but it seems it’s OK for women to do it. So where is the equality in that?

      This sort of program has great merits but is falls at the quota hurdle. How can advocate equality when you want to be selected on an unequal basis. Just as I would have no time for a candidate based solely on family connections or co-opting, likewise I would have no time for someone based on their gender. In fact I would have more respect for someone who fought against the status quo and based on their abilities and merits got selected without a quota. Politics is a dirty, hard nosed business and you need to be tough as nails to succeed in it. If you can’t get on the ticket on your own merits then what hope have you surviving when the going gets really tough?

      Reply
    • I may be wrong, but I don’t believe this organisation as a whole promotes quotas, although some of its individual members may be. I think it’s a great idea. Most of the hurdles getting women into politics would certainly not be solved by quotas, only solved by having more of a supportive culture and engaging in concerns like childcare. This is tackling the root in a way quotas do not, and I certainly think it’s a smart idea.

      Reply
    • Nick, it says in their solution section ” to bring about real change a combination of hard measures (quotas) and additional supports”. I’m all for more support for women getting into politics but totally against quotas. Seeking equality through inequality is totally contradictory and that goes for all genders, groups or any other people who feel that they are under represented in government.

      Reply
    • I’m opposed to quotas because I think they’re a bit of a whitewash. If being a TD is a position where you cannot spend time with your family and do the job, I think that’s a problem. I don’t know about you, but I want people representing me who also have to deal with work/life balance. Do I think in a representative democracy we all benefit from having a broader selection of people making decisions? Absolutely. But getting a broader selection in using quotas, I think, mask the reality that TDs are quite remote from the day to day lives of most people. That is really the root of the problem and until that’s solved, we’re obviously only going to get a certain type of TD.

      Reply
    • Or daughter.

      Reply
  • Great to see this sort of thing helping to get a better representation in Government. I would be interested to know though what their views on so called “positive discrimination” are whereby parties are forced to select a certain amount of women candidates based solely on their gender and not necessarily on their abilities. Personally I vote for who can best do the job and not whether they are male or female. I dare say that there are more than a few male politicians who will be looking over their shoulders from now on as women have shown in the past that they are just as capable as men and more.

    Reply
  • “We are the only non-partisan organisation working solely on identifying and supporting women to commit to public life”.

    If you only support women, how are you non-partisan? I saw this same nonsense during the last election, one female candidate after another knocking on my door and their policies were exactly the same “MORE STUFF FOR WOMEN COS WOMEN ARE VICTIMS”. When a female candidate knocks on my door and has any interest in representing the MEN in the constituency, I’ll think about voting for her.

    Reply
    • Do really you not think society benefits from having a broader class of people making decisions? I don’t think they refuse to represent men (at least I hope not) but that it’s a good thing to have more varied perspectives.

      Reply
  • I don’t know about anyone else, but i’d rather get a job or position on the basis of my ability to do the job and not on my gender.

    And is is bad that i expect women to run for politics based on their ability to do the job and not just because of their gender? I mean isn’t having a quota do a dis-service to women in politics? And what if a party can’t get sufficient female numbers to run? Why should they be fined because of a lack in female numbers through no fault of their own?

    Reply
  • This organisation is about as non-partisan as I am. Their “non-partisanship” is there to see on their home page. Yes to Nice, Yes to Lisbon, etc,. i.e. once you’re running for election to maintain the status quo all is good. Anyway, what is wrong with being subjective? A subjective organisation that stands up for women’s interests would note that the parties in power are attacking women consistently through cuts in welfare allowances, lack of provision of childcare, etc,.

    Complete joke of an article, these people are pretending to be something they’re not.

    Reply
  • I don’t think they want people to vote for women on the basis of their gender. It is simply a question of gross under-representation. How can we say that a field of candidates represents the most capable when half the local population are excluded? Ideally, gender should not be an issue at all but until that ideal is reached, any initiative that encourages and normalises women’s participation in politics can only be a good thing.

    Reply
    • “half the local population are excluded”, They aren’t though, unless you are saying that all male politicians are incapable of representing the views of women. I’m sure you aren’t because that would make you something of a sexist.

      Reply
    • If that’s the case then we don’t need quota’s and should be encouraging more women to get into politics. And the whole point of fining parties who don’t have enough to fill the qouta is stupid. I mean what if they dont find enough women to fill the quota? Should they still be fined?

      And don’t you think giving them a quota does more of a dis-service? What next, they’re given a quota to fill with muslims, foreigners and other minorities?

      Reply
  • Fagan's 29/06/12 #

    If more women join political parties then it will make a massive difference. Increased no’s of females is quiet a new thing, that is going to take time to feed true, even though most parties do have a fast track approach for strong candidates of the female configuration.

    Reply
  • Hu hoh !nnI had my comment from earlier pinged, first one today that I know of !nnOh well, thats free speech for younn

    Reply

Add New Comment