TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Russian flotilla headed for Syria enters Mediterranean

Russia has denied that the deployment of the warships is linked to the escalating conflict in Syria.

Image: Ivan Sekretarev/AP/Press Association Images

A Russian naval flotilla of warships destined for the Syrian port of Tartus has entered the Mediterranean, Russia’s defence ministry said Tuesday.

“The Russian ships today passed the Strait of Gibraltar and entered the Mediterranean at 1200 GMT,” said a defence ministry spokesman, quoted by Itar-Tass agency.

Led by the Admiral Chabanenko anti-submarine destroyer, the three landing craft left their home port of Severomorsk in the Arctic Circle earlier this month. They are due to be joined in the Mediterranean by the Russian patrol ship Yaroslav Mudry as well as an assistance vessel.

The ships will perform “planned military manoeuvres”, said the ministry. Earlier in the month a military source said the ships would be topping up on supplies of fuel, water and foodstuffs.

Russia has denied that the deployment is linked to the escalating conflict in Syria.

- © AFP, 2012

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (91 Comments)

  • Russia wants to hold onto their naval base in Tartus which is their only outlet to the Meditteranean. They can see Assad is about to fall so they have to move fast.

    Reply
    • Move fast for what? They aren’t invading. This is nothing more than a political statement – the same statement the US is making by what analysts describe as “overcrowding” the Gulf with its naval flotilla, which includes aircraft carriers. Interesting that there is so much commentary when Russia does something. I wonder is that because the very article we’re reading is from a Western agency…

      Reply
    • I know they are not invading. They are making sure that in the post-Assad Syria, ‘what they have they hold’.

      Reply
    • Daithi has made a lot of valid points above, but I think you’re spot on with your analysis Eamonn.

      Reply
  • The Russians are just flexing their military muscle which is just what the Americans have done in the past I just hope this action doesn’t escalate to further lives being lost in the future

    Reply
  • Nowt, one assumes, to do with the shipment of Russian military helicopters to Syria stopped last month in the North Sea:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9336170/US-enlists-Britains-help-to-stop-ship-carrying-Russian-attack-helicopters-to-Syria.html

    Reply
    • @robin well Robin did you support the murder of Iraqi women , children and men Iraq ? Everyone knows now that it was based on lies and propaganda. They sprayed enough depleted uranium to keep them all lit up for hundreds of years , and these are the same group of war mongers who are now telling us more lies and the same propaganda…..i will ask again do you support the murder of 500,000 Iraqi’s on a pack of lies ?

      Reply
    • Presuming destroyers are not capable of carrying helicopters, then I would say no, nowt to do with the shipment of helicopters…

      Reply
    • @Johnnathan – thanks for your kind and helpful comments. FYI, I was out on the streets protesting the US + UK invasion of Iraq. I’m very sorry if this doesn’t fit your one-bit worldview.

      @Daithi – the Admiral Chabanenko is an Удалой-II class destroyer, capable of carrying at least one helicopter, as anybody who dropped by the Чабаненко on its visit to Dublin Port last year no doubt noticed. The report here notes that there are at least five other military vessels in the flotilla.

      Reply
    • Twenty helicopters in total, one helicopter per destroyer. It’s not adding up for me…

      Reply
    • Apologies, its actually three helicopters. Hardly worth talking about in the scheme of things. You’d think it was a ballistic missile with the way its reported on.

      Reply
    • @robin that is good to hear Robin so why are supporting murderers ? I mean they committed murder and destroyed the country for no reason other than oil and and a base to attack Iran……i applaud you for protesting the Iraq war but why are you supporting the same group of war mongers now ? I just do not get it at all i am sorry.

      Reply
    • @Jonathan, you are accusing everyone of supporting the war in Iraq when nobody even mentioned it in the first place, what did you do by the way? Were you defending Fallujah with your camán, or were you just bashing away on a keyboard then as well

      Reply
    • @You Reacted Ha Ha!………well i think it is pretty relevant because we were told a bunch of lies about the WMD’S and so forth….but i take it back you are right , i am just a crazed looney tune spouting nonsense about something that actually happened…..sorry for telling the truth !!

      Reply
  • Whatever side your for the fact that two military superpowers with large nuclear capabilities have their armed forced moving closer to each other is always worrying. The chances of something going wrong are so much greater.

    Reply
    • The Russians are in talks with the Americans – it won’t happen. As the article rightly states, these are scheduled maneuverers.

      Reply
    • Thanks Daithi I would however worry about the chances of an accident. The Middle East is always a battleground for both sides and will remain so as long as there is oil. Its still the old spheres of influence crap from the 50′s. Funny thing is all its produced so far is dictatorships and radical islamicists with moderates squeezed in between. Gunboat diplomacy on both sides still alive and well. By the way maybe the US could dispatch a few boats to the Gulf of Mexico as well given the human rights situation and Mr.Putin could look into the situation at home and in Chechnya too. Let he without sin and all that,…

      Reply
  • Some good comments here. I’d point out that nobody is basing the US or anyone, just questioning the media narrative on this conflict. That is a fair criticism to make.

    Reply
  • Good auld Russians – always on the right side of history and always helping save lives – oh wait……

    Reply
  • If you go to the middle east even with your best county jersey on knocking back pints of the black stuff and A kiss me I’m irish hat on they will view you as a westerner because we live in western society we are westerners

    Reply
  • Thanks Daithi, I did not know that.

    Reply
  • Wow. US bashing again. Why don’t you just say “The USA won’t go in because there is no oil”. Ya know, the usual rhetoric posted on here that has no factual basis.

    The facts are that Syria is killing its people and Russia appears to be helping while EVERYONE is standing by and watching.

    Reply
    • Not bashing anyone , is it not a fact that the Iraq war was based on a pack of lies ? I mean have you got some mental block or something ? People were murdered in their beds on a pack of lies…what do you not get about this ?

      Reply
    • Factual basis or sloganeering?

      The US won’t go in for many reasons, but will not remove the possibility of dropping bombs from a high altitude.

      The US won’t go in because it would be much more innovative to furnish shady and faceless Islamic extremists with weapons and equipment through their NATO allies.

      That fact is, there is more to this conflict than what your typical media outlets would have you believe.

      Reply
    • The US won’t go in because it’s an election year.. That’s a fact. Votes win over the innocents in an election year.

      Reply
    • Like you and the whole world stood by when hundreds of thousands of Iraqi’s were murdered ? Dude are you serious ?

      Reply
    • The ironic thing is, America will most likely feel the need to go in the very day it faces up to the fact that it has helped arm, fund and train the next generation of Al Qaeda.

      Reply
    • @Daithi. Actually, most arms dealers get their weapons from Russia. It’s arms dealers who then supply these rebels. So, you have Russia supplying both factions, making a mint in the process. We’re not talking about the US here, it’s Russia that has created this problem and is doing absolutely nothing about it.

      Reply
    • Actually, no. The FSA and god knows whoever else, are being supplied by Qatar, Turkey, Jordan and others. The FSA admit this, the SNC admit this, sources in aforementioned countries admit this and I would say the world’s intelligence community agree with this. With all of that in mind, I would say that you’re attempting to lay the blame with Russia on a conflict which is weighted heavily against the Syrian state.

      Reply
    • I totally agree with you Andrew…the usual band of anti western…anti Israel and pro Hezbollah lefties that would sell their own families to be PC….same usual nonsense about bad USA/western world and the cute cuddly islamofanatics and how badly they’re treated…if you love these looneys so much go live with them

      Reply
    • Marc, you should know by now that the rebels in Syria consist of a large amount of the cuddly Islamofacists you refer too. Are you as confused as Netanyahu?

      Reply
    • Derek 25/07/12 #

      @Marc Anthony come out and simply admit that your a Muslim hating brainwashed Israeli mouth piece.
      You drag anti Isreali diatribe into anything you can and then proceed to label people discussing a different matter.
      Your obviously back on the pay roll again.

      Reply
  • If that’s directed at me.. If Americans want to vote in muppets who continue their foreign policy no amount of peace loving hippies is going to change it.n

    Reply
  • The head of the Syrian opposition was photographed at the recent Bilderberg meeting. From that alone tells you who’s financing the rebels. The buck stops with whoever set the wheels in motion on this travesty and u will find out by knowing who gains the most from Assad falling.

    Reply
  • About the depleted uranium in Iraq. Depleted weapons have been a major boon for some of these weapon companies. What a way to dispose of nuclear waste. Get paid to handle this waste and then drop over some other country. Agent Orange is still causing abnormally high birth defects in Vietnam.

    Reply
  • for all the morons and zombies out there…….take a good look at south america and what the CIA sponsored down there….death squads, removing democratically elected presidents, murder of elected presidents..it goes on and on and the zombies just keep lapping it up like a bunch of morons..destroy a country on a pack of lies , no problem bad intelligence….lets move on to the next country and tell the people the same lies again, i mean you could not make this stuff up !! Happy Democracy everyone !!

    Reply
  • Well with all the US, GERMAN, FRENCH, BRITISH warships in the Persian Gulf what is the problem with Russian warships going in ? I mean what is good of the goose is good for the gander……

    Reply
  • Countries should be allowed to develop or change direction on their own without outside or foreign influence.

    Busy body world police.

    Reply
  • Daithi, I find it ironic you use the word “clarity” in one of your comments.

    Reply
    • I’m not surprised Declan. We wouldn’t want clarity, would we. God forbid anyone discuss a biased news article in an effort to make discussion and separate rubbish from facts.

      Reply
    • Dairhi, yes we would do need clarity but you ain’t giving it. Btw Russia was the soviet union, the soviet union was Russia therefore it invaded Afghanistan in 1980. Stop rewriting history. Were you born when it happened. Ask the east Europeans what they think?

      Reply
  • Couple of news outlets today have reported that PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES ( mercenaries ) are arming and training so-called Rebels…..that is old news now to be honest they have been there since last year or even longer planning this whole false rebellion…..it would be interesting to find out who is actually paying these private armies, i am sure the same suspects….i do not have mention them you know who they are.

    Reply
  • Ireland is in the west we are westerners so I don’t really get what you mean

    Reply
  • I cannot figure out why the US wants change in Syria before it takes Iran out. Was Syria supporting Irans new decree of taking payments for oil in any means payable besides US dollars? Petrodollars is the force driving US. If countries started paying for oil in other currencies then hyperinflation would hit the US. Syria should have the right to defend itself from these terrorists. If the US came here and started arming those Cork boys looking for regime change damn right I’d defend myself!

    Reply
    • America is allied with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Salafists and Al Qaeda hate Iran more than Israel and the US does on sectarian grounds. For America, it is better in the short term to see Islamist fundamentalists in power than the current Syrian government who is allied to Iran.

      This will benefit in the short term but when Syria becomes a sandbox for Al Qaeda – then it won’t be so pretty.

      The big losers in what effectively is a proxy war is the Israelis and Iranians. Israel will have another hostile frontier and Iran will lose its ally. Syria meanwhile, will be the cease to be one of the sole surviving secular states and replaced probably with a culture shock – shariah or close to it.

      Reply
  • Public opinion would not have let the US , UK, FRANCE……to invade Syria directly after the complete lies of the Iraq war so now their strategy has changed to arming terrorists to create the illusion of a rebellion and then get their propaganda in place to back up their strategy , as we all have seen fake videos , fake fires using tyres and then filming a mile away and calling it government attacks, why can they not show any footage of actual real fire ? I have never seen so many “unverified” reports in my lifetime it seems journalism has taken a break and “might” or “could be ” journalism has taken it’s place…..

    Reply
    • I agree with some of what you say Johnathan some in the media are prob feeding us horses**t but saying that have you ever looked at RT Russia Today. It has to be the most pro Putin anti west channel i have ever seen. I used to be glued to it but its just turned into a Russia version of Fox news complete rubbish, My point is that its not just the western media talking pony.

      Reply
    • I agree Irish Mule. Reliable sources are not readily available, but for some it is just trendy to regurgitate the CNN mantra.

      I had faith in Al Jazeera at one point, but not since the number of resignations because of editorial totalitarianism regarding this conflict.

      Reply
    • mattoid 25/07/12 #

      @Johnnathan
      If you had been following this conflict from its very early days (when the west was generally ignoring it) you would have seen some truly horrific videos on youtube showing the way the Syrian regime was treating its own people – beatings, murders etc..
      These were not produced by some western propaganda outlet but by ordinary people in the streets filming with mobile phones etc., often from behind blinds or through cracks in doors because they would have been summarily executed themselves if they had been caught filming.
      Many of these have now been removed from youtube due to their gruesome nature, but it might be an education to you if you saw them (if you could stomach it that is).

      Reply
    • I was in Homs last october.there was a lot of random gunfire and explosions.i saw little carnage or building damage.most of the damage could have been done with rocks.a nice place with friendly people.pity about the fighting

      Reply
  • Ye all off your heads who would you rather have the power anti west or pro west remember were you live before ya answer and it’s easy for you sitting in your bubble that was provided for by the west you hate so much you are blind to the pain that these people go tru under these criminals. this world some one has to have the power just the way it works and the way human nature is. As for iraq I know people who have lived there and believe what you want but they say it’s a much better place now. So stick that in your anti west (provided for by the west) pipe and smoke it

    Reply
  • Is it going to be a start of third world war?

    Reply
  • @mattoid not too sure what you mean mattoid ? Salvador Allende was the democratically elected president of Chile and was ousted in a CIA sponsored coup and i am sure you have heard of Augusto Pinochet ? His last words were “someday the people will walk free in streets again” and he shot himself while there was jet fighters overhead bombing the presidential residence……the rest is history…..people were lined up and shot and this was a CIA backed coup…….

    Reply
    • mattoid 26/07/12 #

      The point is pretty simple really – for all its faults democracy is a much better system than living under a dictatorship, (as Pinochet’s brutal regime demonstrated).

      Reply
  • Daithi, you really are a expert on what’s happening in Syria aren’t you. I’m surprised the UN has not given you a call on what to do. Though I’m sure Assad will thank you for your support.

    Reply
  • mick k 24/07/12 #

    Let’s blame the Catholics!

    Reply

Add New Comment