TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

One-in-four second-level teachers on less than full hours

The Teachers’ Union of Ireland has said that “increasing casualisation” of the profession is making it more difficult for teachers to secure full hours.

Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

THE “INCREASING CASUALISATION” of the teaching profession has led to less hours for teachers, a union has claimed.

The Teachers’ Union of Ireland (TUI) has warned that increasing casualisation “is making it more and more difficult for teachers to secure full hours and permanency”.

The union said it believes that the “uncertain nature of employment will ultimately force the best young graduates to emigrate to teach in other jurisdictions or to consider more secure employment options”.

Salary

TUI said today that over a quarter of its members at second level earn a salary based on less than full hours.

TUI Deputy General Secretary Annette Dolan said:

Where once second level teachers applied for permanent jobs, now they apply for hours. Regrettably, it has become the norm in recent times for young teachers to start out on small numbers of hours with no guarantee of their services being retained the following year.

She added that the union is worried that the best young graduates will begin to see teaching as a career choice where there is no real level of security, and that some may consider other career choices because of this.

Permanency

The TUI said that for people  entering the teaching profession after a training period of five years,  it estimates that it takes an average of a further five years to secure a level of permanency.

Even then, this is often on small numbers of hours that see them earning considerably less than the average industrial wage.

Up to this they typically work on short-term contracts on part-time hours covering for teachers on leave of absence “with no guarantee that they will be retained by their school in the following year”, said the TUI.

The TUI said that “their struggle to meet basic financial commitments is a very real one” and that there is a misconception that all teaching jobs are full-time and secure.

The cut to guidance counselling provision will see the equivalent of a further 700 full-time teaching posts taken out of the second level system in  September, said the union.

It concluded that it is seeking that a system be put in place whereby teachers after a certain number of years on fixed term contracts get full time permanent jobs rather than remaining on Contracts of Indefinite Duration (CIDS) on less than full hours.

It is also urging the Government to commit to insulating the education system from further cutbacks with appropriate investment.

Read: VIDEO: Teacher of the Year criticises the “injustice” of system and “teacher-bashing”>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • Maybe if the Education dept stopped the practice of re-hiring retired teachers to cover sick/leave posts these young qualified teachers would have a better chance.

    Reply
    • @ Niall nothing stopping you heading to college for four years or longer to train….

      Reply
    • Spot on! It’s time that shower of reality dodgers had to deal with life issues like the rest of us!

      Reply
    • Gerry, fair play – I worked in private industry for nearly 13 years before being made redundant and started college immediately – on a teaching course in UL.

      Teaching is not the cushy job that people think. Unfortunately, the short sighted think that good teaching is measured only by contact hours. If people think it is a cushy job, there’s nothing stopping you going to college, getting the qualifications and then we’ll see how cushy you think it is.

      And before anyone thinks I got any support from their tax: no more than an 18 year old school leaver (i.e. I got grant and as my first time in college, fees were also paid). No back to education allowance etc.

      Reply
  • 20 hours a week, mostly spent managing students that are unwilling to learn which results in the “good” students suffering. From the outside it looks a piece of piss. It’s a tough job, with very little thanks for what they contribute to people’s lives.

    Reply
    • The union have a nerve to complain! After all it was themselves who negotiated this situation! They allowed new recruits to be treated like this,so as to protect their long serving members! Pathetic shortsightedness!!

      Reply
  • I would fall in to this 25% category. It is clear that most people who perceive teaching as 22 hour week job are very much misinformed. I arrive in in work each day at 8:30am and the soonest I leave the building is 4pm but, to be honest getting away that early would be a rarity. During my “free” classes and I use that term very loosely. I can be engaged in a variety of activities which, can range from the obvious i.e organising classes and correcting to the less obvious, such as coaching the debate team or organising a hurling match for the senior team. I might be setting up the hall for a open evening or a presentation night. Perhaps preparing for the parent teacher meetings that we now have outside school times or one of the several school organisational meetings we must attend during the year again, outside school time. I could go on and on, those who teach will know what I mean , those who do not may or may or may not. I won’t even start about prep work that goes on after the school day finishes.

    I went to University for five years, as well as my Degree and H-dip I have a Masters Degree in Economics. I could do something else, but i don’t want to. I love my job. I work hard and i find it a very rewarding profession. I have a contract for 85% of full hours. However don’t let this percentage mislead you I still in spend the same amount of time in my work place as someone at 100%. I just happen to get paid less. This isn’t my schools fault, it’s just the system that the school must work within.

    Holidays: Yes they are great and I do deserves them. Get over it. We get paid for 9 months of the year this payment just happens to be spread over 12 months. You could probably take 3 months holidays in the summer if you were willing to take an additional 25% pay cut…think about it.

    I’m not here to complain about how much I get paid, of course I’d like to be paid more who wouldn’t? I’m not here to complain about how much work I do, its the career I have chosen. What I want to do is suggest to anyone who thinks its such a soft job and they’d love to do it, to change their profession and give it a go and see how easy they think it is. In fact maybe they could just get a little more information on what they perceive to be a handy number. In return when I get to the point of complaining so much about my career choice I’ll pick something more suitable for me..deal?

    Reply
  • Welcome to our world! Before you say it, even if the full time hours look like a stroll in the park i.e. 22 class hours a week, please remember the amount of attendant preparation, design and organisational work that goes into every class….based on the assumption that all teachers prepare for their classes. Yes the holidays are good, but not that good, when one considers what you are contracting your life away to do – remain in a tightly-controlled, and ever-depreciating modest income profession, where you are constantly being pushed to deliver results in a system that barely pays your rent.

    And even if you achieve markedly higher-than-average results, there is no bonus package, no promotion and no kickback. Either you’re in it for the sake of learning and teaching, or you’re in the wrong place.

    Reply
  • If a newly qualified teacher does manage to secure a full time job, after their degree and H-Dip, they will get paid roughly the same as an entry level cleaner in the HSE (which is €9000 below the average industrial wage). Full figures and more here: http://www.morestresslesssuccess.ie/2012/04/want-to-be-teacher-why-bother.html

    Reply
    • I mean no disrespect to HSE cleaners when making that comparison. It’s just teachers must have a degree and post graduate and will spend thousands on tuition fees an other costs at university before taking up a position.

      Reply
  • I spent visited a friend whose husband is a teacher. To say it was an eye-opener was an understatement. Between correcting exercises for the days’ classes and preparing future lessons (to say nothing of organising his department) he only put in an appearance in the evenings except for dinner.
    Take unto account school trips and other extracurricular activities (courses during holidays) and I’d say a teacher’s life was pretty full of work.

    Reply
  • ?If a doctor, lawyer, or dentist had 40 people in his office at one time, all of whom had different needs, and some of whom didn’t want to be there and were causing trouble, and the doctor, lawyer, or dentist, without assistance, had to treat them all with professional excellence for nine months, then he might have some conception of the classroom teacher’s job.??
    Donald Quinn?

    Reply
  • A lot of jobs have become casual hour s over the past few years . People have to ”ring in” to their place of employment to get their hours for the week or even on a day to day basis…. The unions are a pathetic shower of wimps. The employers will not be happy til they have people queuing at the work doors/ gates and picking and choosing as they did 100 years ago . Ridiculous and heartless.

    Reply
  • Less than full time hours???? Can they work less hours than they already do!!!

    Reply
  • Teachers unions protecting stone age work practices!

    Reply

Add New Comment