TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Vatican visitors propose Church reforms to deal with abuse fallout

An Apostolic Visitation sent by Pope Benedict XVI suggests reforming admissions to seminaries, and organisation of dioceses.

Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin, Cardinal Sean Brady and papal nuncio to Ireland Archbishop Charles Brown during a press conference in Maynooth this morning.
Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin, Cardinal Sean Brady and papal nuncio to Ireland Archbishop Charles Brown during a press conference in Maynooth this morning.
Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire

A DELEGATION of high-ranking Catholic officials sent to Ireland by Pope Benedict to deal with the aftermath of successive abuse scandals has proposed a series of reforms to tackle the Church’s difficulty.

The findings of the Apostolic Visitation, led by the Archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, propose imposing new restrictions on admission to seminaries, and including new child protection classes in the academic programme for trainee priests.

The Visitation has also proposed reforming the structure of Ireland’s 26 Church dioceses “and their ability to respond adequately to the challenges of the New Evangelisation”.

A summary of their findings, issued this morning by Vatican Radio, also outlines the need for a new focus on the role of lay people in the affairs of the Church, and the need to harness “new Ecclesial movements” (such as the World Youth Day event) to better reach the young generation.

The ‘Visitators’, as they are termed by the Holy See, also observed what they termed a “certain tendency” – which they said was widespread but not dominant – for priests to hold opinions which conflicted with those of the Magisterium, the Catholic Church’s teaching authority.

They stressed that dissent from the formal teachings of the Church were “not the authentic path towards renewal”.

Other proposals included the need for the Irish Catholic community “to make its voice heard in the media” and to establish a “proper relationship” with people who were active in the media, “for the sake of making known the truth of the Gospel and the Church’s life”.

‘Progressive steps’

The visit, which kicked off in November 2010, saw inspections of all four of the country’s archdioceses as well as seminaries in Maynooth, Milltown, Belfast and the Pontifical Irish College in Rome, and a number of other religious institutes.

This had allowed the visitors to see “just how much the shortcomings of the past gave rise to an inadequate understanding of and reaction to the terrible phenomenon of the abuse of minors, not least on the part of various Bishops and Religious Superiors.”

With a great sense of pain and shame, it must be acknowledged that within the Christian community innocent young people were abused by clerics and Religious to whose care they had been entrusted, while those who should have exercised vigilance often failed to do so effectively.

Visitors echoed the Pope’s words that “wounds have been inflicted on Christ’s body” by the actions of some abusive clerics, with abusers required to seek forgiveness from both God and from their victims.

They concluded, however, that the Church’s more recent guidelines for safeguarding children in the Church were now being followed, with “progressive steps” taken towards creating greater awareness of the problem of abuse, and to ensure that the “tragedy” of the abuse of minors would not be repeated.

“”The Visitators were struck by the efforts made throughout the country by Bishops, priests, Religious and lay persons to implement the Guidelines and to create safe environments,” their report said.

‘Unjustly tainted’

The report had elsewhere noted the frustrations of well-intended members of religious orders, who had felt “unjustly tainted” by events which had “also opened many wounds within the Irish Catholic community”.

By the same token, however, the visitors said the Church’s difficulties had “brought to light the continuing vitality of the Irish people’s faith”, noting how many bishops, priests and religious lived out their vocations to continue serving the Christian community. This was one of the “signs of hope” they had noted, they said.

The Holy See acknowledged the attention and care shown to victims of abuse, in legal and financial terms as well as in the offering of spiritual and psychological assistance.

Meetings between survivors of abuse and the Visitators had helped the Church to better understand the various aspects of their problems, and the Church inspectorate added that the wellbeing of victims was “of paramount concern for the Church”.

There was, however, a need to reorganise Ireland’s ecclesiastical tribunals – an internal canon justice system – so that outstanding cases could be dealt with more quickly.

Read: Irish Catholic bishops “make heartfelt pleas for forgiveness” >

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • Eggers 20/03/12 #

    What will ensure the death of the church is that they believe that the revelations of the last decade have damaged them. It is not, it is more profound than that, the damage goes back decades, pulpit bullying and roaring about us all being evil and going to burn in hell. The fear and control they had over people. The child abuse reports just broke the back of it,brought the collapse forward, that’s all.

    The church needs to undergo a complete and radical reform, on the scale of the reformation, otherwise it will not last here.

    However the people in charge are put there by the old school and will not be able to see this need so it will be reduced to a very very small org in another 10-15 years.

    Reply
  • This exercise is nothing more than a cynical ploy to brush some muck under the impending red carpet that will be ceremoniously rolled out to welcome the eucheristic congress thingy that’s coming up in the hope that those that wave and cheer will feel that there’s some substance to their delusions.

    Reply
  • There are a couple parts of that which jump out at me and strike me as quite telling.

    “For the further improvement of the seminaries, it has been proposed …. to ensure that the seminary buildings be exclusively for seminarians of the local Church and those preparing them for the priesthood, to ensure a well-founded priestly identity”

    What is that about? You ensure a well-founded identity by separating people from the world and making sure they only mix with eachother?

    ” the Visitators also encountered a certain tendency … among priests, Religious and laity, to hold theological opinions at variance with the teachings of the Magisterium, this serious situation requires particular attention … It must be stressed that dissent from the fundamental teachings of the Church is not the authentic path towards renewal”

    Dissent will not be tolerated. Where have I heard that before? Nowhere where things worked out well, that’s for sure.

    Reply
    • These points struck me too. It is like they want to go back to the past in order to avoid the problems of the past. Makes zero sense…

      Reply
    • Maynooth is the target there.
      Seminarians mix daily with Lay students and that’s affects the moulding process.

      Reply
    • Having a separate building doesn’t mean that you’re separated from the world. I live in my own dwelling, but I’m still in the world. I can see the sense behind this move- there is a bit of a difference between young people who are ultimately hoping to choose marriage and those who choose to become priests. As for dissent- a lot of dissent seems to centre on core beliefs that are tied up with basic human dignity such as the belief in the essential value of human life from conception to death. I would hate to see the day when these rights would be infringed in any way.

      Reply
    • Or the belief that there should be women priests, or that priests be allowed to marry, or that contraception is ok, or that missing mass on Sunday because you are busy won’t condemn you to hell, or that gay people should be accepted as a full members of the church without being required to remain celibate, or any number of other rules that people who profess to be Catholic – be they priests, religious or laypeople – ignore, break or disagree with all the time, because they are archaic and ridiculous in normal society.

      Reply
    • You disagree with certain areas of Church teaching, Katherine. Other Catholics may have problems with others issues such as the Catholic Church’s teaching on social justice or war or the death penalty. Some have problems the theology of the eucharist or the Trinity. If everyone picks and chooses, where is the subjective truth on any matter? You view some “rules” as archaic and ridiculous while others view them as progressive and life-changing.

      Reply
  • Brave move my arse. You want the nation to pat them on the back? They raped, beat and abused thousands, hid behind an office block full of lawyers and hoped it would all just go away. They were forced into coming to terms with their indiscretions, they didn’t come willingly to the table. You certainly have a weird notion of what it is to be brave.

    They might consider paying the outstanding €200,000,000 they agreed to contribute to the victim compensation fund. Bertie gave them a nice “little” discount on that particular bill, with the taxpayer funding the difference, and the difference is in the hundreds of millions.

    Yet we have a nation of folk like you chompin at the bit yet again to roll out the red carpet for another delegation of fucking window dressers.

    Pay what you owe. Pointy hat delegations are not worth shit till you do.

    Reply
    • Excellent comment it should hurt in their pocket but that’s what they are always protecting ‘it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of an needle than a filthy rich unaccountable church to get into heaven’ ‘Sell what you have give it to your countless victims then you can say you follow Jesus ‘

      Reply
  • Says a lot that they need classes to teach them that it’s wrong to hurt children.

    Reply
  • Who cares about the church anymore? Nobody wants anything to do with the scum that they are. I’m just surprised that the criminals have not gone after them as they hate bulky child molesters.

    Reply
  • Does anyone other than practising catholics actually give two ****s about what these ‘Visitators’ have to say? The catholic church in Ireland is a disgrace and a dysfunctional and sinister cult that has abused it’s position in society and is now totally discredited with no right whatsoever to preach about morality when they themselves have shown so little understanding of what it means. As far as the victims are concerned the (and I laughed at this bit) “unjustly tainted” orders should pay up or shut up, this visitation is just another episode in feeling sorry for themselves. Trying to be the victims instead of the perpetrators, they must think the Irish people are complete idiots. They need to start planning for the day when their churches will be turned into apartments and their priests ‘moved on’ to the various third world cesspits where child abuse is easy to hide and superstitious beliefs are still in vogue. The sooner the better!

    Reply
    • Better not be too premature in planning to turn the churches into apartments. There are loads of vocations in the developing world so we might have priests from Africa or Asia coming to Ireland to re-evangelise the Irish.

      Reply
    • No thanks, we have enough witch doctors here already in the form of our own black clad fairytale peddlers! Anyway after the disgusting behaviour of the catholic church in Ireland it’ll take a lot more than a bunch of desperate brainwashed kids from the Congo or some other third world cesspit to “re-evangelise the Irish”. I think most people have realised what a load of old cobblers religion really is and have moved on with their lives and left the diehards to it.

      Reply
  • They should just go away.

    Reply
  • Apostolic Visitation. WTF?

    Reply
  • Maybe Maria it is because Cardinal Timothy Dolan already showed his true colors to us priest abuse survivors. See he said this after he screamed how he felt betrayed because New York passed a same sex marriage law:

    In response to New York seeking to end the one year statue of limitations against child abuse:

    Dolan also explained that he wanted to keep the statute of limitations for child sex abuse victims to one-year, because if the church gets sued, “The perpetrators don’t suffer. There’s no burden on them. What suffers are the services and the ministries of the apostolates that we’re doing now. Because where does the money come from? So the bishops of 30 years ago that allegedly may have reassigned abusers, they don’t suffer. They’re dead. So the people that suffer are those who are being served right now by the church. We feel that’s a terribly unjust burden.”

    So it is sensationalism to make the conclusion that Dolan does not give two damn about the terrible unjust burden and suffering we priest abuse survivors have gone through……just what would happen to the church….and his sorry butt if they did away with the s.o.l. against this evil crime?

    Answer me this. I am willing to bet that when you heard about the Penn State case you were screaming for all of them, Sandusky and anyone who covered it up be prosecuted and sent to prison. What is the difference between demanding people like Dolan, Law, Benedict, Leveda, Mahony, Rigali, and the rest being subject to the same? Because they are leaders of your church they should be exempt from prosecution for their crimes against children?????

    Reply
  • And what more are they expected to do? A great and brave move by the church. They do so much good in the world and this is another example.

    Reply
    • How is this doing good? Theyre (midly) correcting a huge criminal ring of paedophiles! And you know what this “good” what does it involve? Preaching poverty while sitting on thrones? Preaching Charity while having your own perfume made for you in your finest Gucci? Stopping condoms in many AIDS/HIV stricken countries? Blatent discrimination of homosexuals? Yeah, theyre really divine…

      Reply
    • “What more?”

      How about grovel and beg for forgiveness from the people of Ireland?
      How about stop asking the people to assist in paying the compensation to child abuse victims of this church?
      How about the church giving up more of the land and property owned here and paying back abuse victims?
      How about actually coming out and admitting wrong doing rather than having statements worded to sound half hearted?

      How about telling the truth?!

      And stop mincing the words to sound like it was a misunderstanding when it is plainly clear to see that the problems this church perpetuated were not a misunderstanding but a complete and purposeful cover up that goes right to the top.

      Reply
  • I wonder how many have actually read the details of the proposed reforms? It seems there’s the usual vitriolic reaction without any attempt to evaluate the information with an open mind. RTE have wheeled out the usual suspects with some silly people totally twisting what was actually said. Was just listening to Liveline and you’d swear the seminarians in Maynooth were going to be locked up behind a brick wall with no further contact with the outside world. Total sensationalism!

    Reply

Add New Comment