Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Fine Gael leader Simon Harris and Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin Alamy Stock Photo

Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael pause talks for Christmas after making 'progress' today

They plan to meet again in January to resume discussing a potential Programme for Government.

FIANNA FÁIL AND Fine Gael have parked government formation talks for Christmas, planning to meet again in the New Year after making “progress” in meetings today.

The two parties, which secured 48 and 38 seats in November’s election respectively, are angling to get back into Government together with the support of Independents or a smaller party.

After a series of talks over the weeks since the election, the parties have confirmed that they made progress on various issues in talks today and have concluded for the Christmas break.

They plan to meet again in January to resume discussing a potential Programme for Government.

They also intend to continue engaging with the Social Democrats and Independents as they look to gather enough numbers for a majority in the Dáil.

The most likely outcome currently appears to be that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael will go back into Government together with the support of a group of Independents after both parties backed Independent TD Verona Murphy as their pick for Ceann Comhairle.

Murphy, a member of a newly-formed grouping of Independents called the Regional Group, was elected as Ceann Comhairle on Wednesday during the 34 Dáil’s first sitting.

The Labour Party had also engaged in discussions but has ruled out entering an agreement with Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, citing a “policy gulf”.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
89 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute eoin carroll
    Favourite eoin carroll
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:06 PM

    If nobody gets tested I think the numbers will go way down

    170
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Claude Saulnier
    Favourite Claude Saulnier
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:26 PM

    @eoin carroll: you mean like in Jan-Feb?

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry
    Favourite Barry
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:04 PM

    The people that share this nonsense stuff on social media are the same people that used to forward chain emails

    83
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Egan
    Favourite John Egan
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 10:36 PM

    Did ye’s not just prove it correct? 15-20% positivity rate between March to June despite 3 times less tests. If we had tested what we’re testing now (approx 80,000) with that positivity rate, we would have had between 12,000-17,000 cases. And only 60 of today’s cases were community transmitted, can ye’s do some proper fact check-in and find out how many of our deaths was from nursing homes?

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lorraine Mac Rory
    Favourite Lorraine Mac Rory
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 10:52 PM

    @John Egan: that’s the point…. the more u test the lower the positivity rate (hopefully). our positivity rate going up at the moment even while testing is increasing is a worry.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Karl Mc Cauley
    Favourite Karl Mc Cauley
    Report
    Oct 7th 2020, 12:04 AM

    @Lorraine Mac Rory: positively rate in north is 14.6%.

    5
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Macca Attack
    Favourite Macca Attack
    Report
    Oct 7th 2020, 6:28 AM

    @Karl Mc Cauley: it’s not. It’s less than 4%

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Claude Saulnier
    Favourite Claude Saulnier
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:25 PM

    It’s an article I have to admit I find as clear as mud. Can someone please rewrite it with figures and give us a clear answer?

    58
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Domhnall O'Sullivan
    Favourite Domhnall O'Sullivan
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 10:16 PM

    if that’s meant to be done kind of debunk it’s left me even more dubious of their approach to testing… and worse still how they interpret those test results.. strange stuff..

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute AMC2K
    Favourite AMC2K
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:36 PM

    I stopped reading after the headline.

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ed o brien
    Favourite ed o brien
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:46 PM

    So numbers have surged in the past few weeks. Same across Europe.

    Wonder what changed at the start if September??

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Franny Ando
    Favourite Franny Ando
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 10:46 PM

    @ed o brien: schools.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Billy Big Baws
    Favourite Billy Big Baws
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 9:05 PM

    A Noble Spirit Embiggens The Smallest Man.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute JusticeForJoe
    Favourite JusticeForJoe
    Report
    Oct 6th 2020, 11:08 PM

    @Billy Big Baws: Embiggens. Hmm. I never heard that word until I moved to Springfield

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Damo
    Favourite Damo
    Report
    Oct 7th 2020, 7:23 AM

    Fact check? They are comparing 2 periods were the amount of testing was vastly different, the criteria for getting a test was vastly different and the capability for track and trace was vastly different. Add the amazing assertion that if you think more tests means more positive you think like Donald Trump.
    Terrible article, poorly written, impossible to come to any conclusions based on the information given.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieran Hayes
    Favourite Kieran Hayes
    Report
    Oct 7th 2020, 1:00 PM

    No mention of false positive rate, good luck and thanks

    7
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds