Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION has opened up an investigation into Google over the rules it imposes on phone makers using Android.
Roughly 80% of smartphones used in Europe run on Android but the European Commission (EC) is taking issue with some of the company’s practices.
The EC has sent a Statement of Objections to Google regarding the conditions it places on phone makers using the operating system, saying it kills competition.
“Based on our investigation so far, we believe that Google’s behaviour denies consumers a wider choice of mobile apps and services and stands in the way of innovation by other players,” said EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager.
The specific claims made against Google include:
Google has already released a statement rejecting the claims saying its “partner agreements are entirely voluntary” and that the revenue generated by its apps and services via Android are what helps fund it and keep it free.
We take these concerns seriously but we also believe that our business model keeps manufacturers’ costs low and their flexibility high, while giving consumers unprecedented control of their mobile devices.
While Android is free for manufacturers to use, it’s costly to develop, improve, keep secure, and defend against patent suits. We provide Android for free, and offset our costs through the revenue we generate on our Google apps and services we distribute via Android.
Looking to the past
As for what happens now, it’s worth looking at what happened with Microsoft and Internet Explorer back in 2009 as a possible example. The company used its dominant position as the leading desktop software to push Internet Explorer and therefore become the dominant player in the web browser market.
After losing a court case in 2010 and being fined €860 million overall, it was then required to include a web browser choice screen. This showed Windows XP, Vista and 7 users 11 different browsers they could install including Internet Explorer. This case eventually led to another EU case looking into Google’s search engine practices.
While the fine was huge, the EU didn’t feel that would be enough to stem anti-competitive behaviour among companies. The then EU competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia said that the commission would look for negotiated settlements that would change businesses’ plans instead of just fining them.
That will likely be the approach for this Android case. Google might be able to absorb the costs a fine would bring, but with the focus on cutting down the practice outright, it would look to ensure users get a choice of browser and search option the first time they start up a smartphone.
One part of the problem is how most Android smartphones tend to double up on similar apps. The agreement with Android is you include these apps as standard and are free to add your own afterwards, which is why you end up with two photo apps, two messaging apps, two calendar apps and so on.
The other part concerns Google’s statement which mentions how it’s free but costly to develop. Depending on the compromises made over the next few months, it could end up limiting revenue streams and cause it to look for money elsewhere.
One of the benefits of Android is it doesn’t cost phone makers anything to modify, developing software from scratch is a major cost for any company, and helps keep the overall cost of their phones down.
If Google has to find other ways to fund it, or follow Apple’s example and charge developers an annual fee for publishing apps, then that could have an impact on the type of apps released. If it gets manufacturers to pay for it in some form, that cost could be passed down to consumers through smartphone prices.
Google has three months to respond to the claims.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
While it’s a bit anticompetive the alternative is phones filled with bloatware you can’t uninstall. I specifically bought a Nexus phone so I wouldn’t have to deal with any of that
Superior products destroys competition: Declared unfair.
You can disable bloatware from the application manager menu in settings, it’s removes all app data and the app from your apps drawer.
Google search is great. Hate bing
Android services are excellent – long may the abuse continue! :-)
I’ve done hundreds of Windows installs and I’ve never once seen that browser selection screen.
Were they all installs within an enterprise setup?
If so there may be a policy in place to suppress that browser selection screen on startup.
it was an update, but if I ever ran windows update I just disabled it so it would never install it.
The Almighty GOOG are like Microsoft in the 90′s and early 2000s
As a footnote, where does this leave Juncker ‘s abject pleading, wherein he admits unnecessary interference in citizens’ lives. This is action for the sake of action. We are drowning in unnecessary legislation because our ‘legislatures’ must have fodder to justify their existence. Away with superfluous legislation, let us rather concentrate on what is actually necessary.
Quite right why have choice or fair markets better just to have one supplier.
Ultimately, this seems to be down to them *completely* ignoring that Android is an open source operating system which it is, Amazon made their own version of Android from AOSP to create their own app store, services etc. Device makers and carriers choose to create devices that use Google’s services, by being part of the Android handset alliance which they are free to leave at anytime and create their own version of Android if they so wish to do so, but don’t as they prefer to use Google Play services and apps which make their phones better for no extra cost. If Google/Android were to lose this case, it’ll create major headaches for consumers and phone manufacturers alike. Generally speaking, the European Commission make great calls, but this seems screams ‘we’ve been lobbied by companies that dislike Android’s dominance’.
You seemed to have missed a good chunk of the article. Google seem to be preventing the manufacturers from using alternate OS. As in only use Android or we won’t let you. ( this blocks other OS’s. ) and is not good.
Also forcing them to use chrome and Google search is not good for competition. So they cans trip them out and let the customer decide
Brian Apple do they same
No apple manufacture there own stuff and don’t tie in other companies into the same exclusivity contracts, also as the article says 80% of devices use android.
In fairness there isn’t many OS’s available,
While we are at it, why don’t we punish Germany for being too economicaly successful as well. They seem to have conditions attached to all european countries.
Bing is a nuisance & can’t beat mighty Google!
How are apple getting away so?
They are most likely paying the commission backhanders to keep them at bay, I may be proved wrong and they are targeted next, but I doubt it.
80% v 20%, do they are not abusing there dominant position. Also they are not forcing other manufacturers to only use their products. Google are saying to HTC, Samsung that they can only use Android provided they don’t release phones using Windows 10 etc
@Brian, Why are HTC (as an example) offering phones with Windows then, if Google is preventing them from doing so?
Larissa , that’s a job for Googles defence lawyers. Not a randomer like me ;)
Fair enough :)
There’s enough bloatware on phones already with this decision by the EU phones will be full of more crap that know body wants
have your say