Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Healthcare workers have voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action (file photo) Shutterstock/PeopleImages.com - Yuri A

Healthcare workers vote overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action amid 'staffing crisis'

Unions will discuss the outcome of the ballot in the coming weeks and may decide to take strike action.

LAST UPDATE | 27 Nov 2024

HEALTHCARE WORKERS HAVE voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action over concerns about a “staffing crisis” in the sector.

Thousands of nurses, midwives and other hospital workers employed by the Health Service Executive (HSE), such as healthcare assistants, paramedics and maintenance workers, were balloted. 

Workers employed in so-called Section 38 hospitals also voted in the ballot; these are voluntary hospitals which receive funding from the HSE.

As previously reported by The Journal, healthcare workers have consistently raised concerns about thousands of vacant roles.

A freeze on recruiting staff was lifted by the HSE in July, however managers said roles that were vacant at the end of last year are now deemed ‘non-existent’ and can’t be filled. 

Members of the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation (INMO), United and Fórsa have all backed industrial action, it was confirmed today. Over 90% of members of each union voted in favour of the motion. 

The unions will now meet to discuss the outcome of the ballot and consider their next steps. The industrial action could include strikes. In this scenario, unions are required to provide a minimum of three weeks’ notice to employers.

‘No choice but to take action’

Responding to the result of the ballot, Ashley Connolly, the head of Fórsa’s Health & Welfare division, said continuing employment restrictions are putting patient services under enormous strain.

“Waiting lists continue to grow, and it’s having a damaging effect on the morale of our members who continue to deliver services. They cannot operate indefinitely in circumstances where demand outstrips capacity.”

“The HSE and the Department of Health need to wake up to that challenge. It can’t continue this way,” Connolly said.

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said the “staffing crisis” means “workers are relentlessly overstretched while patients are not getting the service they need”.

Our members have no choice but to take action in defence of patient safety and their own working conditions.

INMO President Caroline Gourley said nurses and midwives are “no longer willing to accept pausing the hiring of much-needed safety critical staff in a weak attempt to balance the books”.

“All autonomy has been stripped from directors of nursing and midwifery to recruit additional nurses and midwives, yet they are the ones who are expected to ensure a safe service.

“We cannot wait any longer, patients deserve a properly staffed health service that is not constantly dogged by crisis after crisis.”

The INMO said over 2,000 nursing and midwifery posts were left unfilled in the public health system at the end of 2023. Many other roles in the wider healthcare sector also remain vacant.

A number of protests have taken place outside hospitals around the country to date, including one in Portlaoise today and another outside St Vincent’s Hospital in Dublin.

A spokesperson for the HSE said the organisation “will consider the results of the union ballots” once it receives “detail on the type of action proposed”.

The spokesperson added that the HSE engages “with all trade unions to resolve issues, and will continue to do so, utilising the industrial relations mechanisms of the state, should it be required”.

The Journal has asked the Department of Health for comment.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
59 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute AnthonyK
    Favourite AnthonyK
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 1:52 PM

    A precedence has been set with this. Well meaning as it is. Will not other survivors of state ineffectiveness want something similar.

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ben wu
    Favourite ben wu
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 2:02 PM

    @AnthonyK: At a risk of sounding controversial, I think this should have been dealt with under some form of compensation or redress rather than some blanket thing.
    That it doesn’t preclude future settlements is an odd thing.
    However, I’m more onboard with the Gov actually doing something rather than nothing for those people it’s completely failed.

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall English
    Favourite Niall English
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 2:00 PM

    maybe hold tony hoolahan to account? no, no, that would be too much to expect of this snide government.

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 2:03 PM

    @Niall English: What specifically should he be held to account for?

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ....
    Favourite ....
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 2:07 PM

    Are they going to do this for all individuals who have been failed by the state (and how is that defined)? There’s plenty of people who have suffered, including Stardust victims, people who can’t get or afford homes.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 2:06 PM

    The amount of misinformation out there around what happened with cervical check is mind-blowing. The way some people talk you’d swear that the testing service actually gave people cancer.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian D'Arcy
    Favourite Brian D'Arcy
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 4:58 PM

    @Jason Memail: Quite the opposite, it didn’t tell them that they had cancer so they didn’t receive the treatment they needed, in a nutshell

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Oct 2nd 2024, 12:37 AM

    @Brian D’Arcy: That’s absolutely false, and part of the misinformation that’s common on this subject. 1) These women received tests from cervical check which told them that cancer cells were not present. 2) These women subsequently developed cancer, and a review of their original tests was carried out. 3) The reviews showed that the earlier tests missed what may have been cancerous cells, with these reviews aided by the fact that the reviewers knew what they were looking for, since the patients had developed cancer.

    1
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Oct 2nd 2024, 12:37 AM

    @Jason Memail: 4) The decision was made, and this is the real crux of the issue, not to go back and tell those women that the earlier tests missed the potentially cancerous cells, mainly because what good would it do? They now had cancer and knowing an earlier test missed it wouldn’t change that. 5) Overall, the suggestion that cervical check didn’t tell these people they had cancer is demonstrably false, because the only reason the reviews were carried out on the initial tests is because they had cancer, which they knew about. 6) Going back and checking original tests when something like this happens is standard practice, and the right thing to do in order to improve future testing, but

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Oct 2nd 2024, 12:37 AM

    @Jason Memail: 7) you can argue whether or not it was the right decision not to inform people about what the earlier tests missed, but it would not and could not have changed the fact that they now, sadly, had cancer, and 8) Knowing that an earlier test missed something could not have allowed them to start treatment earlier, because it’s in the oast. 9) If you want to know the specifics of it, I’d suggest checking out care2much on Twitter, who has written some incredibly detailed threads on the subject.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute silvery moon
    Favourite silvery moon
    Report
    Oct 1st 2024, 4:59 PM

    While this is welcome and like one commentor said that it should have been done with compensation.
    As a survivor of the industrial state/religious run institutions we never got compensation we were give an “Award” as if we won something, we cannot get enhanced medical cards that the survivors from the mother and baby home were afforded, we cannot get a contributary pension even though we had to work in these institutions, we now get another slap in the face by being excluded from theses tax benefits. I live in a council house and am grateful for that, I live with my ill husband and disabled totally dependant 23 year old son was told that I can purchase the house for a minimum of between 60 and 80 thousand euro, cannot get a mortgage as my husband is 70 as the cut off is 69 and we’ve have no where to go to help buy the house so our disabled son would have a roof over his head if anything happened to us.

    6
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds