Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A SURVEY HAS found that many of us check social networking websites such as Facebook and Twitter while away on holiday.
A survey of over 200 people, 69 per cent of whom were women aged between 18 and 55, by Hotels.com has revealed that three-quarters of people (75 per cent) spend at least a few minutes per day while away on holidays checking their Facebook and Twitter to find out what’s going on at home.
An overwhelming 99 per cent of the Irish holidaymakers surveyed admit to logging on to one or more social networking sites while on holiday.
Facebook is the most popular choice with nine-out-of-ten people saying they check their Facebook profile while away followed by just over half of people (51 per cent) who admit to tweeting and 7 per cent who say they check their LinkedIn.
Those surveyed said that the main reason for checking their social networking profiles was to keep an eye on what was going on with their friends back home (51 per cent).
Others identify more devious reasons such as 15 per cent of those who say they log on to make family and friends jealous of where they are and 10 per cent who said boredom is a reason for logging on.
Around 53 per cent of holidaymakers said that uploading pictures is their favourite holiday activity followed by updating their status (49 per cent) and checking in (44 per cent) on Facebook.
Other findings from the survey included:
Another finding was that just under half of those questioned (48 per cent) said that on an average one week holiday they spend up to an hour of that week on Facebook and Twitter.
Over one in four (28 per cent) say the spend up to two hours on social networking.
Poll: Do you use social networking websites like Twitter or Facebook while on holiday?
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Senator Barrett received more votes than most TD’s (he is one of the university senators). The Seanad is the only way we can possibly elect non pothole fillers to Parliament and that’s why I’m voting No.
Ok Eric..valid point..BUT what do they actually do once they are in our parliamentary system?
In relation to the Promisory Note leglislation earlier this year, senators who were against it said that they were powerless in the Seanad to prevent it going through!
At the recent debate in The Seanad on its possible abolotion..the chair had to suspend proceedings as there wasnt the minimum qouta of senators in the chamber to be able to continue the debate!!! Those 2 facts are enough for me to vote a big Yes
Non-pothole fillers? I suggest you follow @senhealyeames on Twitter and see what she’s up to. Oh, look – filling local potholes! Seriously. And she defends it when called on it, too.
A Senator – unelected and on a handsome salary and pension from the public purse – doesn’t want his quango abolished. I’m shocked!
He was elected!
No Christopher… not be the general public he wasn’t.
But elected by who–those lucky enough in our society who can afford a University education.
He was elected – maybe not in the most representative manner possible – but he still received more votes than Enda Kenny!
Nonsense–Enda Kenny was elected by the representatives of many thousands of voters who voted for them in the General Election–are you opposed to democracy?
Its sad that the Senators are now coming out saying how important the Seanad is. It unquestionably needs proper reform but I hope that it is now not too little too late.
The question I ask myself is why does Enda want it abolished and I keep coming back to the belief in my mind that it was an election promise, one that he saw it as a money saving, headline grabber at a time when we were all clamoring after such bolsters to add to the whip to beat down FF. One that he bit his teeth into and like hard treacle, is hard to let go of.
Yes the Seanad is about as toothless as a gummy bear and that is because their power has been allowed to be eroded by wanton failed politicians looking for a temporary shelter to either keep themselves in or out of the minds of the party leaders for re-election or to settle whilst feathering their pension entitlements.
FG’s claims that it will save €20m is totally bogus because every one currently in the Seanad is eligible for a STATE pension so the only savings will be on expenses..which was cumulative total of €1,961,674 in 2012. ( The 166 members of Dáil Éireann received over €7.2 million in the same period) They share the same facilities as the members of the Dáil so no savings there.
Now €2m is a lot of money…could that be saved through better efficiencies of the whole political spectrum? I am sure it can.
They claim that other ( mainly Nordic) countries thrive on a unicameral system ( one house) but they keep failing to mention that those countries have a very powerful local government system. Which here has been again historically toothless and also is currently being eroded by central government to produce efficiencies and or just plain financial cut backs.
Agian I ask myself…why if he sees the Seanad as a democratic dinosaur, why not, whilst it is there, look at the many reports filed over past years into reforming the house into one that is effective and untainted by party whips? My personal view is that he is comfortable in the knowledge that any legislation he, and his other 3 members of the EMC, propose will be unopposed because of the size of the current majority his chief whip can deliver. Power is an aphrodisiac.
Even the recent Dáil reforms announced were only effective in time management which again was forced and not passed through the Oireachtas Dáil Reform Committee.
I will be voting no in the referendum and I know that TD Shane Ross and simultaneously a member of the Seanad, will propose a reform bill the next working day after the referendum.
A second House that is independently voted in and independently free from the Whip and has the power to change/ refuse bills is the only way, in my opinion, to stop this country sliding into an Oligarchy.
Once the Seanad has been abolished the way back will be almost impossible.
Why is Shane Ross so exercised about Seanad reform now? He was a Senator for years and is on record as having opposed reform. Seems a bit like his admiration of Anglo Irish Bank and then his volte face when the s*** hit the fan.
The main reason that the numbers have shifted Sean? It’s not because we suddenly care about the Seanad. It’s because public opinion is automatically going against whatever that ignorant wannabe Enda Kenny wants us to do.
So when was the last time the Seanad defeated a bill? Oh, wait, it can’t.
So when was the last time the Seanad delayed a bill for 90 days? That long, eh?
Seán, your problem isn’t the abolition of the Seanad causing “group think”, your problem is with the whip system.
I know people with no votes for the Seanad elections, and I know people with two votes. Hardly democratic, is it? I’d rather have a single house rather than a second, self-selecting, elitist talking shop.
The Seanad is too disconnected from society to deserve to endure. It is like a back office for cosseted political insiders.
Let the Seanad do what the constitution of this country requires it to do. If it is broken then fix it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. No less a person than the Mr.Kenny himself in a radio interview during last week stated that “the Dail has hijacked the Seanad”. There it is, straight from the horse’s mouth: The Dail has hijacked the Seanad. If we need common electoral representation in the Seanad then let’s have it. This whole debacle smacks to me of political opportunism. Why waste a good crisis are the words which spring to mind. I am not affiliated to any political party and have no particular political agenda in including this comment. As a citizen I will be voting for retention of the Seanad (albeit a reformed entity) in the belief that we simply must have [1] some bulwark against the almost dictatorial power of the current executive who existence owes more to a massive protest vote against the last administration and a lack of alternatives at the last general election rather that to any past proven national administrative ability and [2] to ensure ongoing prospective protection against similar arrogant and political undertakings reneging administrative groupings in the future. The Seanad was incorporated as an essential part of the houses of the Oireachtas for very good reason. Why throw the baby out with the bathwater on a politically opportunistic whim. My advice: Vote NO for Seanad abolition in the forthcoming Referendum.
Seanad.
Politics.
Blah blah zzzzzzzzz.
Who cares today?
Come on The Dubs!!!
This state is disfunctional. It needs to be rebuilt from top to bottom. Abolish the Senate and that’s the end of the reform: a few Dail committees full of the same party whipped tired politicians doesn’t cut it. We need a new constitution, and no that joke of a convention doesn’t cut it either, and a new political system.
What a load of utter nonsense this poor man talks.
This is a chance for people power get rid of them then they might realise people can be powerful and not go running to the special groups. 60 odd redundancies is what we need in the political class . The shock of seen that close down might set them thinking
Voting No doesn’t give any guarantee that the Seanad will be reformed.
I’m voting Yes. We don’t need the Seanad. We elect TDs and a government to make decisions. Why would we then want a Seand in place which could potentially block legislation being put through by the Dail. It would simply slow everything down and nothing would get done. I guess people are always suspicious of a government bringing in legislation that would have an effect on themselves and I would like to know what else is coming downstream to replace the Seanad – committees, etc.
have your say