We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
IT EMERGED EARLIER today that two errors were found in the code responsible for calculating the grades of this year’s Leaving Cert students.
The errors are estimated to have impacted the grades of approximately 6,500 students.
Education Minister Norma Foley said that those who received a higher grade “will not be affected in any way” and that those who were marked down “will have their proper grade restored”.
What happened?
This afternoon, Taoiseach Michéal Martin told the Dáil that two errors were identified in the Calculated Grades system. Students received their grades on 7 September.
At 4pm, Minister Norma Foley made a formal announcement and said she was informed of the first error last Wednesday.
She said that 7,200 Leaving Cert grades have been affected by the two errors found in the same part of the coding used to implement the standardisation process.
The first error was in one line of code programmed by private company Polymetrika. It affected the way in which student’s Junior Cycle grades were included in the calculation.
It showed that instead of including Junior Cycle English, Irish, maths and the student’s two best subjects in the calculation, the three core subjects and the student’s two weakest subjects were instead counted.
When the department examined this error, it spotted a second issue contained in the same section of code programmed by Polymetrika.
This error showed that the Junior Cycle results for Civic, Social and Political Education (CSPE), supposed to be discounted in the grading system, were instead included in the calculation.
As a result, some students received a higher grade than they should have, while others received a lower grade.
Those who received a higher grade “will not be affected in any way” and those who were marked down “will have their proper grade restored”, Minister Foley said.
The process is still ongoing so it is not fully know how many students will receive higher grades, however Foley said it is likely to be around 6,500.
What happens next?
The coding errors have been corrected and re-run through the model.
ETS Educational Testing Service has been hired by the department to review relevant aspects of the coding. This is expected to take a number of days.
Once this is completed the department will contact all students to advise them that they will receive a higher grade or grades, or to inform them that they have not been impacted by the error.
Will students receive new CAO offers if their points increase?
The department will send a corrected file of student results to the CAO so it can work with higher education institutions to determine if a student is due a new offer. The department has said “everything possible” will be done to facilitate their admission.
Any student who would have been entitled to a different offer will receive this offer or a deferred offer as soon as practicable after the updating of results.
The department has said this is in line with the practice that occurs in the appeals process every year.
Minister Foley said it is hoped that, similar to the usual appeals process, the majority of new CAO offers can be taken up in this academic year, though some may have to be taken up next year.
“Last year there were 17,000 appeals, of which 6,000 upgrades were received. And of that 6,000 upgrades, 300 CAO higher preference offers were made,” she said.
And all of those higher preference offers were made within the academic year bar three. I would be hopeful and we will certainly do all in our power to ensure that, if at all possible, we could reach that level of achievement this year as well.
The department has put in place a dedicated helpline and email address to answer queries from students. The helpline number is 01 8892199 and the email address is LC2020@education.gov.ie .
The helpline will be open today until 7pm today and tomorrow from 10am-5pm.
When the results are published on the portal detailed information on this process will be available for students on gov.ie/LeavingCertificate.
Sorry, but 50k lines of code is just ridiculously big for a calculation tool. No idea why you would need that.
I’ve worked on massive projects / systems that have required less code.
Why did they outsource this to Canada when Ireland is apparently so tech savvy ?
@Daragh Curtis: exactly.
@Daragh Curtis: Was it outsourced? It just looks like the company produces software that you can use under licence from them, I don’t think they tailor it, I think that’s up to the person/team in house. There seems to be missing information around this ‘code’. In fairness to the coders, this is exactly what you get when you rush a product to market without developing and staging it correctly for bugs or code misinterpretations. Like it really does sounds as simple as someone saying 1,2,3,4 and the receiving person picking it up as 1,3,4,2 and putting it into code. All that been said, I can imagine that the cost of the tribunal, court cases, taskforces, workgroups, junior ministers, outsourced investigations that will now be assigned to investigate this will cost ten times the price of the software if developed and invested in properly from the start.
@Dave.: I do 100% agree with rushing software. I’ve been in that position myself many times and mistakes happen. You are 100%. I would however hazard to point out though – that testing this software SHOULD have picked this up – so while I understand the plight of the developer (as in the actual coders) I am not convinced the company as a whole did a good job – because they released a substandard product. Unit testing would have picked this up very quickly.
–
Also quick one , during the interview , it was noted that this was not an Off the shelf product , nor was it Out of the Box. It was built from scratch specific for the grades system – so it is 100% customisable (in fact was explicitly built for the sole purpose of the Irish grading process).
Is this a wee bit of a mountain out of a molehill? It was a serious mistake but this system was never going to be perfect. How many people realistically would’ve received vastly different offers proportionally? It’s definitely an upsetting time for this affected but in the grand scheme of things this was a long way from the worst outcome.
@Shane Russell: easy to say if you are not affected.
@Shane Russell: About 6000 pupils apparently.
Foley out!!!
Leaving Cert Algorithm – a serious and basic error by ‘people’ involved in the software design, coding and testing – not the fault of an ‘algorithm’ as the minister suggests!!!
Looks like those awarding contracts, managing software projects and coding and testing the algorithms are not qualified to do so … employ some software engineers.
@Neuville-Kepler62F:
Excellent comment!
Deserves a C++.
Any surprise here? No. It’s the civil service.
No Consequence due to the 1927 Ministerial Act. The minister is responsible for all acts and the people who were negligent are not.
These civil servants would not last a week in the private sector
The Minister should not resign. The civil servants should resign. Yeah right.
This place……
@Kieran Brennan: What place? Where exactly are you? We cannot fully appreciate your comment until we know your location.
@sean o’dhubhghaill: a guard wouldn’t ask me that… Creep
Foley must be sacked immediately she should not be given the chance to resign. When you consider Calleary was forced out for having a pint. She has to go.
This make shift Government is an absolute joke !!
@Sinead Ni Coscraigh: Explain?
The Monochrome Minister!
FUBAR
Should be aloud get there chosen course
have your say