We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Nick Buckles said he could not disagree with one MP's description of his company's affairs as a 'humiliating shambles'. PA Wire
London 2012

London 2012: Head of security firm admits 'humiliating shambles'

The head of security firm G4S admits his company will be thousands of staff short – and will need government help.

THE HEAD of private security giant G4S has admitted the company’s failure to provide enough guards for the London Olympics was “a humiliating shambles”, as he faced a grilling from MPs.

Chief executive Nick Buckles said he expected the company would eventually be able to supply 7,000 of the 10,000 staff it had promised. An extra 3,500 troops have already been drafted in by the British government to plug the gap.

But he insisted he would not resign over the scandal and said G4S, one of the world’s biggest security firms, would still claim its £57 million (€72 million) management fee for the Olympics contract.

Asked by one member of parliament’s Home Affairs Select Committee whether it was a “humiliating shambles” for G4S, with the Olympics just 10 days away, Buckles replied: “I cannot disagree with you.”

He also admitted that the firm had taken on the Olympics contract to boost its reputation rather than for profit, but agreed when the committee suggested that reputation was now “in tatters”.

His company would not be bidding to provide security at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, he added.

However, amid mounting pressure for him to quit his £830,000-a-year job, Buckles insisted he was the “best person” to see the London contract through.

The staffing shortfall only came to his attention on July 3, Buckles said, adding: “Day by day we started to realise that the pipeline and the people we thought we were going to be able to deliver we couldn’t.”

Newly-discovered problem

Buckles said G4S, which has £600 million of private sector contracts with the British government, only raised the problem with ministers on July 11 when it was sure it would not be able to fulfil the agreed quota.

“We have a significant manpower shortage against the plan. Clearly that shortage is going to manifest itself from this day forward until the Games,” he said.

Buckles said G4S currently had 4,200 people working and that the “minimum we can deliver” by the start of the Games on July 27 was 7,000. But when asked whether he could guarantee they would all turn up he said “I can’t, no.”

G4S shares slid by 6.20 per cent to 238.82p on London’s FTSE 100, which closed down 0.59 per cent at 5,629.09. The firm’s shares also suffered heavy falls yesterday.

It emerged yesterday that in addition to the military support at least eight police forces have had to deploy extra officers at Olympic venues across Britain – reportedly after employees of G4S failed to turn up to work.

The company is set to lose up to £50 million for failing to meet the obligations of its £284 million Olympics contract.

But London 2012 chairman Sebastian Coe insisted that Games security would not be affected by the G4S shortfall, pointing out that “the numbers haven’t really changed”.

“It’s really simply about the mix of security on the park,” he said. ”At this very moment our teams are working alongside G4S to ensure that they deliver as many of those guards as they possibly can.”

- © AFP, 2012

Read:‘s profiles of Ireland’s Olympic team >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.