Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE WIFE OF one of the first firefighters to die following the Chernobyl disaster has alleged that she never gave TV producers the right to tell their story.
Lyudmila Ignatenko, whose husband Vasily was one of the first responders to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on 26 April 1986, was one of the central characters in this year’s HBO/Sky series Chernobyl.
During the series, Lyudmila is seen watching her husband leave for the power plant on the night of the disaster, and later caring for him in a Moscow hospital, before he succumbed to radiation poisoning in less than three weeks.
It is later revealed that Lyudmila, who was pregnant at the time of the disaster, lost her baby just hours after it was born.
In a new interview with BBC, Lyuidmila said she was “hurt and uneasy” when she discovered that her character would be depicted in the Emmy-winning series.
“I think the film company behaved very badly by not meeting me,” she said.
“There was a phone call from Moscow. [The producers] said they were filming in Latvia and Kiev and wanted to contact me but couldn’t.”
She describes being offered a $3,000 payment after the series was filmed, which she believed was a hoax.
“I told them that nobody pays money for nothing, and hung up. Of course I thought it was fake, some sort of fraud.”
Lyudmila also told BBC that she has had to go into hiding because of the attention that the series has brought her.
“There were people hounding me at my flat,” she said. “It got to the point where journalists would jam open the door with their foot and try to record interviews with me.”
She also describes being criticised for killing her baby because of the radiation it received while she cared for her husband in hospital.
“They were asking why I had been at my husband’s bedside knowing that I was pregnant at the time,” she said.
“But tell me, how could I leave him? I thought my baby was safe inside me. We didn’t know anything about radiation then.”
In a statement, HBO and Sky rejected Lyudmila’s claim that they did not contact her before or during the filming of the series, saying they were fully committed to depicting all events with “utmost sensitivity”.
“The production team, via local representatives, had multiple exchanges with Lyudmilla Ignatenko before, during, and after filming,” they said.
“At no point during these exchanges did she express that she did not wish her story or that of her husband, Vasily, to be included.
“The filmmakers made every effort to depict their story, and that of everyone affected by this tragedy, with authenticity and respect.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Two cheeks of the same ar%%hole. All those years pretending to be someone else.
It’s like being 12th on a panel of 12 for a public sector job…if absolutely nobody else wants this job your our man so congratulations!
@Dan The Man: Still get paid the same!
A rigged voting system, people do not understand the process. This is how the crooks keep creeping back in.
@Basildon Joe: an open and democratic voting system, that only an absolute moron would fail to understand.
@Johnny Wilson: I don’t think you understand the implications here.
@Basildon Joe: the system has been explained ad nauseum in the media all week
@Basildon Joe: Please explain these “Implications” to me. I am fascinated.
@Dave G Doe: replying to yourself using another account ,creep ⚠️
@Johnny Wilson: it’s the best democratic and open system. But if your elected on the twelfth count then you’re scraped by.
@Basildon Joe: you and your various other IDs use misinformation to deliver sow doubt about our democratic system. Harming one of the pillars of civic society is pretty traitorous IMO.
@Name: Agreed. His manipulation of these comments sections (as Basildon Joe and Dave G Doe in this thread) is an affront to free speech, and the Journal ought to do something about it, but won’t.
@Basildon Joe: how braind dead are you?
So ff fg again why don’t they just rename and become one party instead at this stage
@John Reynolds: It’s the same reason corporations collect (buy up) brands.
Proctor and Gamble own both Tide and Ariel.
They aim to get your custom no matter what you buy.
For the elucidation of Professors Gail McElroy and Michael Gallagher a candidate who eventually meets the quota still scapes through, no matter how valid their electon.
These are clearly two different things.
@ItWasLikeThatWhenIGotHere: If there are 4 seats up for grabs in a constituency then why not the top 4 in the vote get elected. It would save so much time on 15th and 16th counts. The way it is now plays into the bigger parties hands. Why do we need to reach a quota? It’s not real democracy.
So in essence, I have more than one vote.
@AnthonyK: no you don’t. Your vote will only be used once. Maybe it’ll be for your 1st preference maybe it’ll be your 8th who knows.
If you get in on first or twentieth count, makes no difference. You in. That PR system. Better than first past the post single seat constituencies. Remember Thatcher got huge majority with 33% of the votes..
have your say