We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
MICHEÁL MARTIN HAS said that he is “absolutely committed” to serve as Taoiseach until November 2027, as he described the draft programme for government as “ambitious”.
Martin is expected to be appointed Taoiseach once plans are finalised betwen Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Regional Independents Group this week.
Negotiating teams hope to have the details ironed out this week to enable Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin to be voted in as Taoiseach on 22 January, when the Dáil sits again.
According to a draft programme for government released today, Micheál Martin will serve as Taoiseach for the first three years of the new government, with Simon Harris taking the helm for the final two years of the term.
When asked about the three-year stint as Taoiseach this evening, Martin said his “intentions were to serve out the term fully”.
“I’m absolutely committed to serving up the term, because there’s an agenda of change,” Martin told RTÉ’s Six One News.
“I will work every day of those three years to do what I can to get this programme for government delivered to make life better for people,” he added.
“When you put yourself forward as leader of a party for Dáil elections, you want to be Taoiseach,” Martin said.
“I know there was a lot of speculation beforew the election, which frustrated me a bit because I want to be Taoiseach.”
Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Regional Independents Group agreed today to a draft programme for Government after five weeks of negotiations, which Martin described as “very strong”.
The draft programme includes plans for the formation of a new transport police, a cut in childcare costs to €200 per month per child and a new social welfare payment to support people with cost of disability.
Martin said that the “fundamental objective” of the draft programme is the delivery of public service reform to “enable delivery of more houses faster for people”.
He added that the draft programme also features a “continued focus” on climate and biodiversity, as well as disability care, childare costs and a “helath-led approach” to drug use.
Sinn Féin TD Pearse Doherty said the incoming government’s draft programme is “nothing more than a copy and paste job” from five years ago.
Doherty accused Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Regional Independents of lacking the ambition and the big ideas required to address issues in health, housing and the cost of living.
“Today’s draft programme does nothing other than reinforce our view that this government made up of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Michael Lowry-led independents is the worst possible outcome for this country,” Doherty said.
“This is a tired and stale document that is completely devoid of the ambition and big ideas our people need and deserve.
“It will not lay a glove on dealing with the crises we see in housing, health and the cost of living.
Doherty added that the commitments made in the draft programme are “devoid of realistic or serious timelines for delivery”, citing the lack of an opening date for the National Children’s Hospital.
He said that Sinn Féin will “fight them tooth and nail”.
“This Programme for Government is further proof that this country sorely needs a dramatic change in direction, and in the new Dáil term we will keep working towards making that a reality.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Strange, I would have thought more people would feel the government are doing far too much on climate, considering it all seems to do is tax, tax, tax and more tax.
And in Eamo’s case, just opening his mouth.
The government policy of green taxes will drive people away from a green way of life. There must be a better way that is based on actual green policies, like planting trees, more wild folage, etc. If farmers cut fields in circles, not squares, then more wild follage and cost nothing.
@did you every wonder: what do you mean cost nothing? Reduced land usage will mean farms will not be able to produce as much food meaning reduced supply, meaning it will cost more. With the addition of reducing food security. I’m not sure if your suggestion was serious or just Poe’s law.
@John K: We have enough farm land in Ireland to feed us all provided our population stabilises.
I’ve seen many farmers in my area that removed trees & ditches for no real gain. Nature loses out and the livestock loses shelter. These kind of practices should be stopped.
As for co2 reduction I think that’s going to need new technology. No one realistically wants to cut back very much on consumption.
@John K: Farmers have been paid to take land out of use.
Might as well use it for “Green” purposes, if possible and if it would make a difference.
The carbon footprint of an individual is the biggest load of codswallop big industry foisted onto people to shift the blame to the consumer while they burn the planet alive for profit.
@InTheHead: Ah, tarring the great unwashed with the same brush… That’s what our betters are good at. Taxing by equalling all actions and behaviours is wrong.
We need two cars, living rural and bus ‘schedules’ don’t match working our changing working hours and days. Neither do neighbours’ match ours, so no car pooling.
We don’t need two holidays abroad, we’ve been holidaying locally for the last 24 years.
Got PV installed last autumn, have micro generated 2MW since and, according to the app’s data breakdown, have ‘saved’ just over 3t of CO2.
Tax the “want have”s and not the “must have”s.
Lower taxes on Irish products and services and hike them up on (unnecessary) imports, especially those that should or could be avoided (see South American beef, biomass or peat imports).
The climate is changing, I think it’s getting colder
: Like the other Earth sciences of biology and geology, climate covers many research areas. One topic is Ireland’s maritime climate, which will not change as it sits in the Atlantic.
Those who imagine that climate can be railroaded into one definition of long-term weather and nothing else deserve to be manipulated into believing human control of climate is possible. The more considerate commenters, otoh, go to ground zero for all scientific method modelling where experimental predictions are meant to scale up or clockwork solar system modelling.
“Rule III. The qualities of bodies which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever.” Isaac Newton
Society has been victims to this for centuries.
@Max: Not all parts of the planet will experience climate change in the same way.
The pole is warming at a much faster rate than the average.
Which means that other parts of the planet must be experience less than average. And climate change can result in some places being cooler that “normal” at any given time of year.
The people of Delhi are not enjoying the warmth they have been experiencing recently.
The Govt isn’t doing enough to incentivize people or bring people with them. The Irish people have always shown they are willing & environmentally conscious. Green Party ironically have turned more people off than brought people with them. We recycle everything, compost bin in action, reduced use of plastic & reduced our energy use by 25% over 2 years before the increases in energy prices. Since the smart meter was installed, they are saying our Energy usage has increased by 30%, the meter is faulty & I have proven this but the CRU dismissed my complaint. I would say there are thousands of homes been fleeced. Not enough Recycling Centres nationwide either & Retrofit grants are unaffordable for two people working, those who sit on their holes are rewarded. You try but you get punished here.
@SV3tN8M4: Might I ask how you have proven the Smart Meter is faulty?
They have been in touch with me about installing one of these.
(Which would not be of any benefit to me anyway, as far as I can make out.)
We should see a big reduction in hot air after polling day.
They will bring in more taxes.
I would have thought the people felt the opposite. We’ll see now if the green party will lose heavily in the election.
The first line of defence will be that it is a European decision for this and that… And nothing can be done about this… Bla bla blah
By the way more taxes on the way…
Election time. Don’t miss the opportunity to send a message people
@Dominic Leleu: you’d have thought that they’d promise tax cuts coming election time… tax cuts and spending increases, as usual.
These will be coming in the next Budget though, to kick in a couple of weeks before GE day.
The aviation industry estimates that it will take between $1.45 trillion and $3.2 trillion in capital development to increase the share of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) in the fuel market to 65%. The world’s two largest aircraft lessors, bankers, and airline executives met in Dublin recently. They stated that governments would need to invest massive sums of taxpayers’ money for this to happen, so they want the taxpayer to pay for it.
The airline industry has never paid tax on aviation fuel, unlike other industries that are heavily taxed for the fuel they use and the rest of us who put fuel in our cars to drive to work, so maybe it’s time for the like of the very wealthy Data Centers and Aviation industry to do the heavy lifting and give the rest of us a break, we have done enough.
Probably the most meaningless pointless survey ever.
The wording of the question was clumsy, it was a which eye is your favourite type of question. Green is an ideology that will bring us back to Victoria times.
Taxing People to death Won’t fix it!!!
The “carbon footprint” idea was sponsored by fossil fuel companies to create the false narrative that individual people are responsible for climate change through their choices as consumers. The same handful of multinational corporations are responsible for most of the world’s emissions. This isn’t a conspiracy theory, these are all perfectly widely known and understood facts that you can easily verify with a quick google search.
The only solution to climate change is policy and legislation to curb industry. I don’t see how Irish people are responsible for that.
Get real. Stop driving, well improve public transport, and seriously improve it. Give up flying, we live on an island ffs. Give up meat, meat is one of the most nutrient dense foods, plus it’s delicious.
Everyone needs to play there part, I understand that, but in the grand scheme of things, the world isn’t actually worried about what Ireland is doing about climate change as its effect will be minimal.
Majority?
When was the survey?, was the whole population asked?
No!
I’m so proud of this Government,for all that they do for us people, and for the environment . We need to fall onto line and believe in them more and more …
The usual tripe about farming spouted on here. Easily known most of the green tds are urban, most probably think food magically appears on the shelves everyday. Farmers worldwide are subject to extremely biased carbon regulations where all their offsets, land, hedgegrows, trees,have been handed over to big industry to offset their footprints. You also can’t export your carbon with your produce like industrial processes can i.e Germany export a car to Ireland carbon goes with, same with Saudi and it’s oil. That’s the reason why Germany and France were so eager to get mercusor over the line carbon free beef from South America according to the rules they made this lowering their carbon footprint, absolute load of cobblers. Ireland’s carbon footprint is highly inflated due to these rules seeing as we import almost all consumer goods, we are being lied to on a grand scale and a lot of Muppets on here swallow it hook line and sinker
There must be an actual physical circuit/pathway in the human brain that leads to othering responsibility for the ills of the tribe/society. Think of the number of times you will read comments, or hear people say, that it is ‘them’, not ‘me’ (or whatever ‘us’ the ‘me’ identifies with) that is at fault. It appears to be a way of avoiding personal responsibility, while retaining self-justification that should have come from taking personal responsibility. Basically a quick way of churning emotion through the body. Emotion frequently being a convenient way of side-stepping reason.
@Numinous20111: The enlightenment subculture or ‘Age of Reason’ tried to obliterate the perceptive faculties from research, so now it is all mental this or mental that without the ability to affirm or reject conclusions using the higher faculties of head and heart.
Many of you could learn from a genuine researcher like Pascal who had the perceptive/reasoning balance and, by doing so, raise the standard of consideration in society from the current abysmally low standard.
Stupid mathematicians mistake intuition for hypothesis when Pascal means the perceptive faculties.
Cut meat and milk production by 50%. How many bottles of milk or piece of meat are thrown away every day?
Many. So much pollution for creating garbage.
The Greens and other government parties have been using the Climate agenda as a means to further direct support to business interests at the cost to the people.
A report recently on Reuters showed that just 57 enterprises were responsible for 80% of CO2 emissions since 2016.
Another on NPR showed that Natural Gas is as dirty as coal, due to the enormous methane leaks primarily at wells.
Yet another by the Guardian showed that recycling plastics is a scam, a scam dreamed up by the plastics industry, a scam that is harmful to the environment, a scam that the government now us paying for.
We have a government – including the Greens – supporting the proliferation of Data Centers, at great cost to the environment, at great cost to us.
If the government was really interested in Climate and Environmental issues, then it would have policies that would actually reduce harms. Instead its policies encourage these harms, while the people pay the cost.
If the government had any interest in Climate Change and the Environment it should be putting the burden of recycling onto the producers of waste, not to consumer who has no choice. The producers would then have a very big incentive to reduce such waste.
The government should put costs of plastic packaging onto the producers, creating an incentive to use alternatives.
If the government had any interest in Climate Change and the Environment it should be giving grants to householders to implement RE solutions where that grant aid is NOT tied to specific business interests.
If the government had any interest in Climate Change and the Environment it should never have approved Data Centers, and a halt to this is imperative. These result in the consumption of fossil fuels, no matter how the PR spins it. They result in an enormous increase in Ireland’s energy consumption.
And the benefits are miniscule.
If the government had any interest in Climate Change and the Environment…
Having spoken about clockwork solar system modelling often enough as the root of all experimental modelling, including climate change modelling, it is probably best to demonstrate why it is an assault on the eyes and mind.
https://astro.dur.ac.uk/~ams/users/solar_year.gif
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210922.html
That is RA/Dec modelling, where the planet’s divisor pivots off the Earth’s equator, and the planet has a 90-degree inclination to the orbital plane.
It would be less offensive if they manipulated imaging to show a flat Earth, yet this comes from the same modelling community that insists humanity must control the weather by controlling human behaviour.
The changes in the seasons are due to the motions of the Earth and not the Sun.
@Gerald Kelleher: You believe in a MODEL, the heliocentric spinning ball in a vacuum MODEL that does not exist in reality. We observe the sun moving, we do not observe earth moving.
@Science: the sun doesn’t move, the earth rotates around the sun.
@john dowdall:
It is always a privilege to work with the original perspectives.
Copernicis thus speaks of “sunrise” and “sunset,” of the “rising and setting” of the stars, of changes in the obliquity of the ecliptic and of variations in the equinoctial points, of the mean motion, and variations in the motion of the sun, and so on. All these things really relate to the Earth, but since we are fixed to the Earth and, consequently, share in its every motion, we cannot discover them in the Earth directly and are obliged to refer them to the heavenly bodies in which they make their appearance to us. Hence, we name them as if they took place where they appear to us to take place, and from this one may see how natural it is to accommodate things to our customary way of seeing them.” Galileo
@Science: I see the anarchy of experimental theorists and an exceptionally compliant society. The RA/Dec descriptions allied with manipulating imaging of the Earth from space are meant to be devastating to all but the most indifferent.
The last time a dangerous academic modelling conviction so enslaved a society was Victorian natural selection and the imperatives attached to it.
“Nature is cruel; therefore, we are also entitled to be cruel. When I send the flower of German youth into the steel hail of the next war without feeling the slightest regret over the precious German blood that is being spilt, should I not also have the right to eliminate millions of an inferior race that multiplies like vermin?” Hitler
@john dowdall: the Sun actually moves through space, at about 200 km/s. But from our perspective you’re right, the Earth rotates around the Sun. And Science said “we observe” the Sun moving. Which is correct, relative to our position on our planet.
@Jerry LeFrog: You have an Einsteinian mind.
(Einstein made use of “thought experiments” in which the point of view of the observer played a large and central role.)
@john dowdall: You OBSERVE the sun moving, every day of your life. You have NEVER OBSERVED the earth moving. There is no evidence that earth is moving.
@ItWasLikeThatWhenIGotHere: “thought experiment” aka imagination land, that’s what Gerald’s heliocentric spinning ball in a vacuum bendy space time model is based on, not on observations of physical reality.
The Government is just taxing which does very little for the environment, what about enforcing nature-related laws to protect areas of conservation; build a decent public transport infrastructure not only in Dublin; and incentivize farmers to use less harmful approaches instead of using this land to produce meat and dairy products for export?
Bet they’re doing enough for asylum seekers though.
We will never reach the targets set as, since the base year, we have had a lot of energy intensive industries added e.g. data centres and a large increase in the general population. By all means help increase biodiversity in the country and reduce pollution as this would improve the lives of the people living here.
Basically, this article tells us that the vast majority haven’t the interest/education to inform themselves, and don’t want to do anything anyway.
We are an apathetic country.
Copernicus and Galileo knew the original framework, which was Ptolemy’s. In this framework, the Sun moved directly through the background stars and defined the ecliptic or orbital plane of the Earth.
https://astro.dur.ac.uk/~ams/users/sun_ecliptic.gif
“Moreover, we see the other five planets also retrograde at times and stationary at either end [of the regression]. And whereas the Sun always advances along its own direct path, they wander in various ways, straying sometimes to the south and sometimes to the north; that is why they are called “planets” [wanderers]. Copernicus
Clockwork solar system modelling by Newton put the Sun in a wandering motion, and many astronomical interpretations and conclusions were lost due to that vandalism.
Kepler gauged the motions of Earth and Mars against the background stars.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Kepler_Mars_retrograde.jpg
“Copernicus, by attributing a single annual motion to the earth, entirely rids the planets of these extremely intricate spirals, leading the individual planets into their respective orbits, quite bare and very nearly circular. In the period of time shown in the diagram, Mars traverses one and the same orbit as many times as the ‘garlands’ you see looped towards the centre, with one extra, making nine times, while at the same time, the Earth repeats its circle sixteen times ” Kepler Astronomia Nova 1609
This is how an astronomical hypothesis, using the Ptolemaic framework, was converted in a moving Earth in a Sun-centred system.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say