#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 9°C Tuesday 28 September 2021
Advertisement

Closing speeches conclude in trial of man accused of murdering Nadine Lott

Details on the “appalling and dreadful” injuries to the young mother’s face were given in court today.

Image: Nadine Lott

Updated Jul 30th 2021, 7:51 PM

A MAN ON trial accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend Nadine Lott inflicted “the most appalling and dreadful blunt trauma injuries” to the beauty therapist’s face, which separated the flesh from the underlying structures, a prosecution barrister has told a jury at the Central Criminal Court.

John O’Kelly SC, prosecuting, today gave his closing speech in the trial of Daniel Murtagh and insisted that this was a case of murder and “nothing short of murder”. “There is the clearest intent, just look at what the accused didn’t do and what he never tried to do, he never raised a hand to get Nadine any kind of help,” he stressed.

However, defence counsel Brendan Grehan SC, for Murtagh, submitted that his client’s intent was the “main battleground” in the case and asked the jury to consider his level of intoxication that night. Murtagh maintained that the “bloodbath” would never have happened “but for the drink and drugs” he had consumed that night, said Grehan.

Murtagh (34), of Melrose Grove, Bawnogue, Clondalkin, Dublin 22 has pleaded not guilty to murder but guilty to the manslaughter of his 30-year-old ex-partner Nadine Lott at her apartment in St Mary’s Court, Arklow, Co Wicklow on December 17, 2019.

The jury has heard that Ms Lott suffered “severe blunt force trauma” and stab injuries at the hands of her former partner “in a sustained and violent attack” in her Arklow home. They have heard evidence that the injuries to Nadine Lott were so serious that she never regained consciousness and died three days later in St Vincent’s Hospital in Dublin.

An intensive care nurse at the hospital has told the jury that Ms Lott was “completely unrecognisable” and that she had never seen anybody so badly injured. A paramedic who attended to Ms Lott at her home told the jury that the call will “haunt” him for the rest of his career and was one of the most “horrendous scenes” he had ever walked into. The garda who telephoned ambulance control informed them that Ms Lott had been “beaten to a pulp”.

The beauty therapist died after suffering “traumatic head, neck and chest injuries” and her brain was swollen following a “sustained and violent attack” in her Arklow home. Chief State Pathologist Dr Linda Mulligan gave evidence that the blunt force injuries were caused by hands, fists or feet and the use of a blunt weapon could not be ruled out.

Eyewitness

Addressing the jury today, O’Kelly said the deceased’s neighbour, Amela Kulenovic, demonstrated “great courage” going into Nadine’s apartment that night while the “terrifying” attack was “ongoing” and saw the accused “exerting his weight and putting tremendous pressure” on her as she lay on the ground. “She saw the appalling scene of Nadine being murdered by Mr Murtagh,” he added.

Eyewitness Kulenovic told gardaí that Murtagh had made a “growling noise” and was “vicious with rage” as he inflicted blows on his ex-partner “like a wild animal”. She told the jury of finding the accused “in a crouched position” on top of Ms Lott, where he was “inflicting a lot of force” on the beauty therapist and had his hands around her neck and shoulders.

Referring to Murtagh, O’Kelly said the accused insisted that he assaulted Nadine in the sitting room but denied ever taking part in any kind of assault in the kitchen. The side of the dresser in the kitchen was covered in blood and the blood-staining “was much more intense” along the bottom of the skirting board, he said.

At the very least, the barrister said, the accused was “certainly’ in the kitchen that night as his fingerprint was found on part of the dresser, whilst the attack was still taking place or still ongoing. Otherwise, counsel said, “his fingerprint” could not have been in the deceased’s blood.

Nadine, he said, was found lying in the kitchen in a state of unconsciousness, a state she never recovered from as she never regained consciousness.

The lawyer drew the jury’s attention to the 64 individual injuries found by the pathologist on Nadine’s body. “They consisted of the most appalling blunt trauma injuries to her face that had separated the flesh from the underlying structures, they were so dreadful,” he continued. He said her lower jawline was fractured in two places, she had severe brain injury and a stabbing injury was inflicted above her Adam’s apple, behind her jawline and into her mouth.

Recalling the accused’s initial interviews, O’Kelly said he told gardaí that he remembered nothing and “gradually got to the point” where he admitted hitting her a slap after she went for him because he was drinking and smoking in her apartment. There was another suggestion that Nadine took a cigarette out of his mouth so he slapped her and she fell to the ground, he said. The accused expanded on this account, he said, until he was prepared to say he gave Nadine five or six slaps and some of the latter ones were delivered with “more force”.

It was only in the fourth and final interview, counsel stressed, where the accused described repeatedly “beating downwards on this helpless woman” with his fists, who lay injured on the ground. Murtagh kept saying that he only used his hands until he finally admitted holding a charger in his fist and wrapping a wire around his hand “to protect it” as he “viciously beat down” on Nadine who was incapable of defending herself, he said.

O’Kelly told the jurors that the accused had inflicted a “vicious and sustained attack” on Nadine, which according to him [the accused] was fuelled by anger, drink, drugs and jealousy.

Whatsapp messages

Outlining the background to the case, counsel noted that Nadine had the “dreadful misfortune” of meeting Murtagh when she was on a working visa in Australia in 2012. In 2016, the couple tried to get an apartment together back home, he said, but the accused did not turn up at the last minute, which brought about the end of their relationship.

Counsel went on to tell the jury that the accused certainly wanted something with Nadine in 2019 and told gardaí that she was his girlfriend and his “wife to be”. “This was coming from his head, look at the WhatsApp exchanges; they are clear and unequivocal. She makes it clear that she wants nothing more to do with him on that level,” he argued. Just because they fell for each other in Australia, he somehow thought he had the right to control her life and say who she was to go out with, he continued.

The jury has heard that just under two weeks before Nadine’s former partner killed her she told him in text messages not to “threaten” her and that “nothing is ever going to happen between us again, I want to make that clear”.

Counsel suggested to the jury that beating a defenceless person and putting them in a coma from which they don’t recover can “never be justified on any basis whether it’s drink, drugs or some perverse archaic male view of control which they have over their partners”.

O’Kelly submitted that the accused was very determined to get out of Nadine’s apartment quickly on the night and “did not raise a hand to help the woman whom he said he loved”. He left her in “an appalling state” where he knew she was dead or very close to it and did nothing, he added.

Instead, the barrister said, he drove “through the countryside” from Arklow to Laragh “popping pills”, playing loud music and not thinking of the person he had “just destroyed”. “He is thinking of himself, this is all about him,” he said, adding that the first time he saw a paramedic that morning he told them that he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

In summary, O’Kelly said that this was a case of murder and “nothing short of murder”. “There is the clearest intent, just look at what he didn’t do and what he never tried to do, he never raised a hand to get her any kind of help,” he concluded.

Defence closing speech

In his closing speech, defence counsel Brendan Grehan SC called the case “tragic and awful” and said it was “difficult for all involved”, particularly for the Lott family.

The barrister said he made no apologies for representing Murtagh as that was his job and what he must do. The “main battleground” in the case, Grehan said, was Murtagh’s intent and he submitted that the jury had got a “fairly unvarnished insight” into the accused’s mindset.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

Counsel suggested to the jury that it was very understandable if they had incredible sympathy for the deceased and her family and it was “entirely understandable” if they had “incredible antipathy” for the accused for what he did and later demonstrated at interview. However, he told the jurors that antipathy and sympathy had no place in their deliberations.

Grehan pointed to the accused’s assertion that he only used his hands when he assaulted Nadine and denied ever using a weapon to stab her. Instead, the accused beat Nadine with his fists which can cause splits in the skin, something the lawyer submitted was not “an attractive position”. “You can do more harm if you happen to be a bit of a boxer in the past, though the accused insists he didn’t hit as hard as he could have,” he added.

The barrister submitted that the “preponderance” of the evidence suggested that Nadine suffered a violent assault with his fists rather than with a weapon, which he called significant in terms of the evidence which the jury had to consider.

He said if somebody uses a weapon to attack someone then it is very easy to see an intent for murder, whereas Murtagh had been invited for Christmas dinner, believed he was making up with Nadine and called her his future wife. He submitted that his client maintained the event had “happened out of the blue” and he had “no recollection” of doing “appalling damage” to Nadine with his hands.

Mr Grehan said his client’s position was that “this would never have happened but for the drink and drugs” and asked the jury to consider his level of intoxication that night.

Despite being repeatedly pressed by gardaí, the accused maintained he had not assaulted Nadine in the kitchen and she was still breathing and conscious when he left, he said. “He can not shed any light as to how she ended up in the kitchen,” he continued.

The other curiosity in the case, Grehan said, was that his client had no recollection of seeing “the brave” Ms Kulenovic in the sitting room that night. “Perhaps intoxication is the only explanation why he can’t remember these things,” he added.

Referring to his client’s utterances in his garda interviews, Grehan called them unvarnished, at times crude and unfiltered through any prism of political correctness. He also said they were insensitive and that the accused’s demonstrations of how he punched Nadine with the cigarette charger from the tyre pump was “almost revolting”.

He said his client was pitiful of himself and delusional in his thinking believing that he and Nadine had a future together and she could be his possible wife.

In addition, Grehan said the accused insisted that he did not intend to kill or seriously injure Nadine and told gardaí that “if he did want to kill her he would have”.

Addressing the issue of intoxication, Grehan said the prosecution had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had the specific intent despite any issue of intoxication to kill or cause serious injury to Nadine, which was at total variance to what the accused said in terms of his future with the deceased. “If you are left with any reasonable doubt you cannot convict of murder and must convict of manslaughter,” he said.

Mr Justice Michael MacGrath will begin charging the jury of seven men and five women on Tuesday before they commence their deliberations.

About the author:

Alison O'Riordan

Read next:

COMMENTS