LAST UPDATE | 20 Apr 2023
A COMPLAINANT IN the trial of a former sports coach accused of 266 counts of indecent and sexual assault has said a wooded area where the man tied him to a tree was a “torture place”.
The 72-year-old Waterford man, who can’t be named for legal reasons, has pleaded not guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to counts of indecently and sexually assaulting five boys in locations in Waterford, Cork, and Kilkenny on dates between 1978 and 1993.
The court has heard that the five complainants are now men in their 40s and 50s. Two of them are brothers.
The court has heard they came into contact with the complainant when they were boys or teenagers in various ways, including as a sports coach and family friend.
It is the State’s case that inappropriate sexual contact took place between the accused man and the boys, which included exposing himself, fondling, masturbation, handcuffing, urination and defecation.
The fifth complainant, now aged 56, told Paul Greene SC, prosecuting, today that he joined a sports team coached by the man when he was around the age of 12.
He said the contact began with the man rubbing his leg, which progressed to include tying him with twine and handcuffs and touching his genital area. The man also took naked photos of the boy in locations including the man’s car and home.
The complainant said the man would take him to a wooden area, which he said was the “worst” and described it as the “torture place”.
The complainant said the incidents continued on a weekly basis until he was 15. He said he received money from the man. The complainant said he persuaded his father to allow him to move schools.
The witness denied a suggestion from John Peart SC, defending, that he had no involvement with the accused man.
Peart put it to the complainant that he was “getting on the bandwagon” and had “given evidence of what you knew happened to other people”.
The complainant said he could only speak about what happened to him. He said there is “nothing in this for me”, and he wanted to get it “out of my head after all these years”.
The witness also rejected Peart’s suggestion that he made up a story about being tied up in the woods. Peart put it to the man that he told the jury he was burnt with a cigarette to make the story “more believable”.
The complainant said he is “not a liar” and had “told the truth”.
In earlier evidence, the fourth complainant, now aged 52, told Mr Greene he first met the accused man when he started playing sports aged around seven years old.
On his ninth birthday, the complainant said he and another boy went to the man’s office. The complainant said the man got him to sit on a chair and then used twine to tie his hands.
The man cut him free after a few minutes and then dropped the complainant home, the man said. The complainant agreed with prosecuting counsel that he knew about a “money situation” before this incident.
“We would have got cans of beer off him the odd time. I had a fair idea what was going to happen,” he said.
The complainant said he returned to the office a few times, and the defendant would “put his hands down your pants” and fondle his penis.
He said he went to places regularly with the accused man, including beaches, wooded areas and laybys. These outings often took place after matches, the witness said, adding that the man would provide alcohol “most of the time”.
He said nothing would happen if there was a group of players in the car, but “if you were last to be dropped home”, there could be inappropriate sexual contact. The complainant said this started when he was nine or ten years old.
As he got older, he said the accused man started to bring him to wooden areas. He said the man would also bring him to his home, where he would be handcuffed naked to a bed.
The complainant confirmed there was “money and cans” involved in these interactions.
Peart put it to the complainant that the jury had already heard his client would go drinking on Sunday nights and couldn’t have been with him on his birthday.
The complainant said he remembers it happening on his birthday. He also reiterated in his evidence that he received money from the man.
Peart put it to the complainant that he was making up the allegations as questions would have been asked about large amounts of money. The complainant denied Peart’s contention and said he spent the money.
The complainant told Peart it was “not true” that he was over 15 when the sexual acts with the man started. The witness accepted that he engaged in sexual acts for money after the age of 15.
The trial continues on Monday before Judge Martin Nolan and a jury.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say