TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Sunday 20 May, 2018
Advertisement

China and Russia veto UN bringing Syria to court for war crimes

The Security Council wants to bring the crisis to the International Criminal Court for investigation of possible war crimes.

UN Syria The U.N. Security Council vote on referring the Syrian crisis to the International Criminal Court Source: AP/Press Association Images

CHINA AND RUSSIA vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution today to refer Syria to the International Criminal Court for crimes committed by both sides in the three-year civil war.

Western powers pressed for the resolution in the face of mounting atrocities in Syria, including chemical attacks, systematic torture, barrel bombings and blocked aid access.

‘Paralysing’

It was the fourth time China and Russia have blocked Western resolutions on the conflict, paralysing Security Council efforts to end a war estimated to have killed more than 160,000 people.

The 13 other members of the Security Council voted in favor and Western powers rounded on China and Russia for protecting not just the Syrian regime but also opposition “terrorist groups.”

“Our grandchildren will ask us years from now how we could have failed to bring justice to people living in hell on earth,” said US ambassador Samantha Power.

The victims of the Assad regime’s industrial killing machine and the victims of terrorist attacks deserve more than to have more dead counted.

Moscow is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s closest ally, and has provided him with diplomatic cover throughout the crisis.

Beijing generally aligns with the Russian position.

“It is disgraceful that they have yet again vetoed the Security Council’s efforts to take action on human rights violations in Syria,” said British ambassador Mark Lyall Grant.

Countries who sponsored the text

The text, drawn up by France, was co-sponsored by 60 countries, including members of the European Union, Japan, South Korea and several African states.

Syria is not a signatory to the International Criminal Court so only the Security Council can decide whether to refer war crimes or crimes against humanity on its territory to the court.

It did the same for Darfur in 2005 and Libya in 2011.

UN Syria Syrian activist Quasi Zakarya, center, stands at the request of U.S. Ambassador Samantha Powers as she addressed the U.N. Security Council Source: AP/Press Association Images

French ambassador Gerard Araud said before the expected veto it “would be an insult to millions of suffering Syrians.”

Western powers said they would continue to document atrocities and press for justice.

Security Council ‘must unite’

Writing in The Wall Street Journal today, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the Security Council “must unite.”

Holding the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity accountable for their actions is a way of obtaining justice for the victims.

Jan Eliasson, deputy secretary general of the United Nations, told the Security Council before the vote that the chamber’s more than three years of disagreement was deeply damaging.

“If members of the Council continue to be unable to agree on a measures that could provide some accountability for the ongoing crimes, the credibility of this body and of the entire organization will continue to suffer,” he said.

But the Russian veto had never been in doubt.

Peace talks have been locked in stalemate since February and international mediator Lakhdar Brahimi has resigned.

Western diplomats say China is embarrassed but was reluctant to oppose Russia again after abstaining from a resolution denouncing the separatist referendum in Crimea in March.

London-based rights group Amnesty International accused China and Russia of displaying “chilling disregard” for the countless victims in Syria.

- © AFP, 2014

Read: Eamon Gilmore calls for support on UN Syria, but Russia’s already said no>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

AFP

Read next:

COMMENTS (52)

This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

Leave a commentcancel

 

Trending Tags