Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

12 post-war assembly lines you’re glad you don’t work on

After World War II, mass manufacturing needed tough bodies and minds to pump up production.

EARLIER THIS WEEK, it emerged that we might be all working well beyond the age of 68 by the year 2028.

The OECD report recommended that pensionable age should be linked to life expectancy (and it’s thought that we will all be living longer in 15 years’ time).

Those with particularly stressful or physical jobs might be concerned about this potential of working arduous jobs for longer. This set of photographs, gathered from the PA Images archive, show a time of post-World War II industrial activity when increased consumer demand led to labour-intensive mass production. Monotony and the chances of ending up with a bad back seem to be the order of the day:

Back-breaking fridge fixing
1 / 12
  • Back-breaking fridge fixing

    Matsushita Electric Appliances Company Totsuka factory in Japan in 1965. (AP Photo/Nobuyuki Masaki)
  • Communal yawning break on transistor radio assembly line

    '“Stop working, take a deep breath, one, two, three, four,'” says a loud speaker. Then, you'’ll see such a '“mass yawning'” aimed at increasing production at the factory of Mitsumi Electric Company on the outskirts of Tokyo, Japan in 1963. (AP Photo)
  • So. Many. Minis.

    Assembly line at the Austin Works in Longbridge, near Birmingham, England. (Sport and General/S&G Barratts/EMPICS Archive)
  • Injecting eggs with flu virus

    Using a special machine to inoculate each egg with live virus of the new Asiatic flu strain, lab workers at Eli Lilly and Company in Greenfield, Indiana, USA in 1957, in the first step in producing vaccine. (AP Photo)
  • Reeling silk thread from worm cocoons

    This worker at Eymesford, Kent had to reel individual silk strands from thousands of silkworm cocoons floating in hot water. (Barratts/S&G Barratts/EMPICS Archive)
  • Rolling rubber for balloons

    Big marker balloons designed to warn away aircraft from neutral zones being manufactured at the Fujikura Rubber Works in Tokyo in 1951. Japanese workers fashion the balloon on the floor of the factory as they ready it for shipment. (AP Photo)
  • Something fishy

    Slicing and cleaning herring for 'rollmops'. a traditional German hangover remedy, in a fish factory in Cuxhaven, Germany in 1951. (AP Photo/Henry Brueggemann)
  • Splitting bamboo for fans

    Fiddly work - splitting a piece of bamboo to create the structure of fans at this fan factory at Marugame on Shikoku Island. (AP Photo)
  • Eye-straining glove-making

    Another industry on the island of Shikoku was glove manufacture, where thousands of cheap gloves were turned out everyday for local and foreign markets. This is 1950. (AP Photo/Charles Gorry)
  • Mind the glass

    Making cathode ray tubes at the EMI factory at Hayes, Hillingdon, England for use in televisions in 1949. (Barratts/S&G Barratts/EMPICS Archive)
  • What time is it?

    A worker checks every single clock face being manufactured at Smiths Ltd in 1948. (Barratts/S&G Barratts/EMPICS Archive)
  • Washing day

    A long assembly line of electric washing machines at a US factory at Cicero, Illinois on August 27, 1945. (AP Photo)

Column: 5 ways to get a career that makes you happy>

Pensions timebomb: Let’s link pension age to life expectancy says expert>

OECD report recommends mandatory pensions for private workers>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 16 comments
Close
16 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gucky
    Favourite Gucky
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 6:43 AM

    Complex mix of factors? Eh not really, the fact that women take on caring responsibility of children and/or elderly parents, so women either work part time and/or take career breaks and this is not recognised by society or the government as ‘working” so therefore no contributions.
    I have taken career breaks and work part time due to the above, I know my pension will be effected but I will always choose my family and their needs, plus I am contributing towards society by providing unpaid care.
    I could be dead by the time I can retire!

    259
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Baylon
    Favourite Sean Baylon
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:33 AM

    @Gucky: nail on the head here – my wife chooses to stay home and mind our children (not that we could afford childcare anyway) but I still think we would choose this anyway – all the government does is give you a measly 1500 per year tax credit for this and doesn’t recognize the work that goes into raising and taking care of the family – how about a better tax credit/ tax break for those spouses that want to contribute on their spouses behalf? All they seem to talk about is how they can get women back to “work” – equality should be there for those that choose to work and those that decide to stay at home.

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Grainne Tallon
    Favourite Grainne Tallon
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:57 AM

    @Gucky: And also the group in the study would have been affected by the Marriage bar – only lifted in the 70′s. Meaning a lot of them would of had to leave work once married, further hampering their potential to work and earn a pension. Horrible to think how they have been treated, forced out of work and also no provisions made to support them.

    53
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute sVRCsaSg
    Favourite sVRCsaSg
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 9:07 AM

    @Grainne Tallon: good point, I didn’t even think about that. A better analysis would be to analyse the current pension provisions of the current workforce if that’s the demographic that the laws are to effect.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute lorcmulv
    Favourite lorcmulv
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 9:54 AM

    @Sean Baylon: are you seriously saying that those that decide to work should get the same pension as those that decide to stay at home – with your logic the Jobseeker’s Allowance should be same average wage as those that go out to work

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Baylon
    Favourite Sean Baylon
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 10:20 AM

    @lorcmulv: that isn’t what I said at all – I said that people who’s partners work should be allowed to contribute on their behalf as they are “working” in the home.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Craic_a_tower
    Favourite Craic_a_tower
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 10:24 AM

    @Sean Baylon: 2 people work the same hours and one is specialised and earns 90k but the other 45k. Should they get the same pension? 2 people work different hours one earns 90k and the other 45k. Should they get the same pension? It doesn’t matter about gender or why the person works less hours. Simply some people pay more into their pension.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sirius
    Favourite Sirius
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 6:54 AM

    I’m not at all shocked by this. Women with children tend to not stay in the workforce as long as men over the course of their lives, as such, they get a lesser pension, usually just the state pension. Hardly a groundbreaking story.

    124
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Dooley
    Favourite Mark Dooley
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:33 AM

    So men who worked between 1965 and 2010 earned more pension than women in the same period?! They also earned more income. Women in the same period traditionally stayed home more. How is this news and why is the data 10 years out of date?

    69
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seriously stunned
    Favourite Seriously stunned
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:23 AM

    But there’s three different categories in retirement isnt there? Men women and politicians.

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute William Kelly
    Favourite William Kelly
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 7:31 AM

    It is incorrect to conclude that there is no gender variance in the average state pension actually awarded.
    The averaging of contributions over lifetime employments does reduce the actual, particularly for women, whose employment contributions are reduced by periods of domestic commitment.
    Another factor is involuntary contract employment, whereby the state allowed widespread abuses by employers, to recategorise previously insure able jobs as self employment.
    The recent announcement by a lady minister to redress these discriminations is limited in scope by age & records constraints, & does not offer equity universally. Unfortunately, The headline pronouncements do not reveal the continuing limitations to the rectification of these pension reductions.

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Craic_a_tower
    Favourite Craic_a_tower
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 10:09 AM

    I work with a number of job sharers who chose to work less hours because they wanted to spend time with their children. They are able to do this because their partners work full time. As a result they will have less pension contributions than their partner. Gender doesn’t come into it they simply earned less in paid employment which was their choice.
    Every job sharer I know does no overtime and expect other team members to because they don’t have kids or they have a partner. This is not equality

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Darren Forde
    Favourite Darren Forde
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:27 AM

    Don’t have baby’s basically

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dara O'Brien
    Favourite Dara O'Brien
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 8:09 AM

    Women also tend to be much more risk averse when it comes to finances. They are far less likely to invest money, preferring to keep it in deposit accounts – thus becoming poorer over time.

    By the way, I’m not saying this is the main cause but it’s a large contributor.

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieran Feely
    Favourite Kieran Feely
    Report
    Sep 11th 2019, 10:07 AM

    Total household income is a much better indicator of economic well-being!

    12
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds