TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Archbishop suggests investigation into Magdalene Laundries

Diarmuid Martin has said that there were “questions still to be answered” in relation to the abuse scandal.

Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall

ARCHBISHOP DIARMUID MARTIN has suggested that investigations be launched into Magdalene Launderies and mother-and-baby homes in Ireland.

Speaking at the Magill Summer School on the issue of abuse scandals at industrial schools, Martin said there were “questions still to be answered”.

“Perhaps new forms of research-based investigation might better address such issues as the Magdalene Laundries or the quality of care in some mother-and-baby homes and other institutions,” he said.

The Archbishop said that although there may be “no great interest in establishing new and costly investigations into the further aspects of the abuse scandal” in today’s economic climate, he believed there were instances in which the public interest would be served by investigation:

Even if no further Commissions are likely, this does not mean that men and women of courage and conviction should not continue to seek other ways to shed the light of discernment on how the presence of the Church in serving the most deprived went wrong, and allow the truth to emerge.
The fact that thousands of children were abused within the Church of Jesus Christ in Ireland is a scar that the Church will bear within it for generations to come. There is no way that it can be put aside.

Martin said that, when looking to the future of the Catholic Church in Ireland, a thorough examination of the past was needed so an understanding of what had gone wrong could be reached: “In the Archdiocese of Dublin we have published figures which showed that 84 per cent of the allegations the diocese received over a fifty year period referred to events which took place in a twenty-five-year period from the late 1960’s to the 1980’s.”

“The number of allegations relating to the successive years is greatly reduced,” he continued. “We have to try to understand better what happened to produce such an explosion of abuse at a particular point of time and how such a horrendous situation was not recognised for what it was.”

Despite the investigations already undertaken, Martin said, the deeper roots of the abuse crisis and the Church’s response needed to be considered.

“I do not accept that is enough to say that it happened in different times and people reacted as best they could in the context of the day,” he said. ”It has been said to me – even by fellow bishops – that I would have acted in the same way as they did at the time. I cannot say that I would not have done so.”

Schools

Martin said the move to reduce the number of schools under control of the Catholic Church was something he respected and shared – but added there were also clear indications that a large number of Irish parents favoured an system of education with a “robust dimension” of religious education.

“It is true, of course, that people should not in anyway be forced into attending Catholic schools or taking part in religious practises in schools,” Martin said, however he added that secularisation did not mean “removing religion from society”:

“A mature secularist or even a mature atheist should be one who is open to deep dialogue with the culture of belief and of believers. The choice – on both sides – is between dialogue and intolerance.”

Marriage

While conceding there were many changes in how marriage and the family “are lived out at a given time”, Martin said that marriage was “not a simple social construct which can be changed at will”.

“For the Church… there is something unique in the complementarity of man and woman in the human situation and life-long commitment is an essential dimension of the Church’s understanding of marriage.”

Read: Corruption and the Catholic Church up for discussion at MacGill Summer School>

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • mcbab 25/07/12 #

    Archbishop Martin is the most Christian person in the catholic church bar none. The man shows courage by speaking from his own heart irregardless of what the Vatican or indeed his own fellow priests may say. I am speaking as a non believer by the way but can’t help but admire him.

    Reply
  • The church was paid by the state to provide these places for pregnant girls. Most of the adoptions, illegal or legal, were organised by the state and assisted by the religious orders.
    Whoever pays the piper plays the tune!

    Reply
  • About time there was an investigation into this disgrace

    Reply
  • Nothing changes “at will” but things do change.Maybe they would understand this one better if they got married and had a unique and complementary life time commitment .

    Reply
    • I’m not too sure that being married imparts some great wisdom that’s not accessible to the unmarried. Plenty of psychiatrists, psychologists, counsellors and therapists are single yet people value their advise and professional expertise.

      Reply
  • Secularism, Sir, is the only guarantee that freedom of religious worship for ALL religions will prevail. It also guarantees freedom FROM religion. nAnyway, good luck to the man. He seems to be the only member of the church hierarchy willing to openly discuss these subjects and admit it all really did happen. Methinks, however, that a strong note of censure will be winging its way from the Vatican.

    Reply
    • It’s not really. In fact, extreme secularists seek to remove any public signs of religious practice which is really not an indication of an attempt to embrace religious freedom. Don’t think there’ll be any censure from the Vatican. Why should there be?

      Reply
  • Costly investigation? I didn’t realise the RCC was having to pinch the pennies these days. Poor lads, they’ll be forced to sell off one of their priceless works of art one of these days.

    Reply
  • bob 25/07/12 #

    can the church just go away,far far away please

    Reply
  • He couldn’t give a crap about the laundries his last statement just proves what his real agenda is. But it’s interesting that he had to mention the laundries to get a news story covered.n

    Reply

Add New Comment