TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Communications Clinic says Savage knew nothing of Mission to Prey account

Terry Prone, a director at Communications Clinic, told TheJournal.ie that client-confidentiality meant her husband was unaware of the PR firm’s work for the Irish Missionaries Union.

Image: Laura Hutton / Photocall Ireland

THE COMMUNICATIONS CLINIC was hired by the Irish Missionaries Union ahead of the broadcast of the controversial Mission to Prey programme which libelled Fr Kevin Reynolds last May but the PR firm has said that Tom Savage – one of its directors and the chairman of the RTÉ board – knew nothing of the account.

Another of the company’s directors, Terry Prone, told TheJournal.ie that Savage would have known nothing of the IMU contract because of client confidentiality.

Earlier today, Broadsheet.ie put together a timeline of events which highlighted that Savage, who is married to Prone, claimed he did not find out about the legal troubles over Mission to Prey until September 2011 – three months after Fr Reynolds started his legal challenge and four months after his own company was employed by the IMU to deal with the fallout.

An IMU document entitled Strategic Plan 2011-2014 which was published on May 16 – six days before the broadcast – shows how the organisation planned for the episode of Prime Time Investigates which defamed the priest.

At the time, the Sunday Business Post revealed that the Communications Clinic was hired by the IMU to “manage the fallout from an RTÉ Prime Time documentary, to be screened this week, about allegations of sexual abuse by Irish priests in Africa”.

Savage told an Oireachtas committee last week that there was no clash of conflict from him being on the board of RTÉ and working for the Communications Clinic. He also said that that he was not aware of any issues arising from the programme until a meeting in September 2011.

A number of politicians have called for Savage to resign from the board with TD Mattie McGrath calling his position ‘untenable’ and Senator John Whelan accusing him of ‘spin doctoring’.

More: Call for RTÉ Director General to resign>

Read: “Your position is untenable” – TDs criticise RTE heads over Mission to Prey>

Earlier: Senator joins call for resignation of RTÉ chairman>

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Let’s get this straight. Tom Savage and Terry Prone formed, run, own and operate the Communications Clinic along with their son Anton Savage and Terry never told Tom that the Irish Missionaries Union were one of their clients? The priests in good fairth hired the Communicatons Clinic to represent their best interests in the event of any fallout from the then impending broadcast of the infamous ‘Mission to Prey’ Prime Time Investigates programme last May. Tom has assured us all and the Minister for Communicatoins, Pat Rabbitte that the first he knew of any problem or serous issues with the programme were September. Yeah Right!!
    It’s high time that Mr Savage seriously considered his position as Chair of the RTE Authority before he inflicts any further reputational damage to the State broadcaster. You cannot serve a string of political, clerical and corporate clients as well as the best public interest or public service broadcasting in terms of its independence and impartiality. This was an accident waiting to happen. Tom Savage, I’m sure is an honorable and honest man, but he was an inappropriate appointment for the post of heading up RTE due to his glaring conflict of interests due to the nature of his PR and spindoctoring business in the whole realm of news and current affairs.
    The public interest and the best interests of RTE must now be put before that of Tom Savage and the Communications Clinic once and for all. I rest my case.

    Reply
    • John Whelan but you are doing job keeping this issue alive. I am sure given the silence at Cabinet, it must be a thankless task. The media in general have not pursued your line with any great enthusiasm but Ireland is a small country. Too small and too controlled by elites to know what is in its best interest at times.

      Reply
    • That and as the above poster said, I still don’t understand why in the name of God they say client privacy privilege withheld the info from being known by Tom Savage. Ah, it’s him and his wifes business. Either he is grossly incompetent in running his private business, which would make one would wonder how he could run a public service broadcaster or he covered up a major conflict of interest, both make his role within RTE seriously questionable surely?

      Reply
    • Thank you John. We depend on our elected representatives to keep this matter open as Minister Rabbitte and indeed the mainstream media (including RTE) are not inclined to do so. I find it very difficult to believe that Mr Savage did not know of his wife’s involvement as she has been quoted in at least one newspaper article as saying that he is the only person she talks to (apart from RTE and most media outlets presumably). I am extremely concerned about the fact that this was not disclosed by him prior to the Oireachtas Committee meeting. It is hard to understand as well why the mainstream media did not pick up on this given that it was covered in a Sunday Business Post article. There is a pattern of odd behaviour on the part of the mainstream media re. the Communications Clinic generally. I don’t think this story should be allowed to die a death – I feel that this new information merits a question being asked in the Oireachtas at the very least.

      Reply
  • I’m sorry – client confidentiality would be relevant – though somewhat unbelievable – if TCC was a Terry Prone vehicle only.

    Is Mr Savage saying that the IMU retained Terry in her own right rather than through the Communications Clinic. I find that rather hard to believe and if this is in fact the case the very least he could do is show us the contract.

    The fact of the matter is that Mr Savage is described on the RTE website as “current chairman” of TCC and Terry Prone’s PR work is (as far as I am aware) done through the vehicle of TCC, of which she is a director.

    In the circumstances I can’t see how client confidentiality could apply since as a director of TCC Mr Savage would be entitled – and indeed arguably obliged – to know what was going on in the company.

    Perhaps Mr Savage and Ms Prone would like to explain this, because, frankly, I’m perplexed at how ‘client confidentiality’ could possibly apply here.

    Reply
  • I wrote to Pat Rabbitte (Minister for the Communications Clinic) last November to highlight the clear conflict of interest Mr.Savage has by being both Chairman of the RTE Board and once of their service providers.
    Apart from not believing a word out of Mrs.Savage’s mouth, client confidentiality would not be an issue internally within an organisation (managers always know who’s on their books) and given Mr.Savage’s clerical past he would have been once of TCC’s best assets for dealing with IMU (if not the point of contact).

    Reply
  • Spin doctors, like lobbyists, should be obliged to list their clients. Irish society, government funding, pool of quangos, political and media circles are too small.

    Reply
  • Reply
  • Ah here, I’m all for fair play and innocent until proven guilty and all that, but does Mrs.Prone think we came down in the last shower or what? I think if you looked up the meaning of “conflict of interest” , I am pretty confident, the example would be pretty much exactly what happened in this instance!

    Reply
  • How would the BBC deal with this affair? Rabbite is obviously content to sit on his hands. How government changes politicians.

    Reply
  • Unbelievable, no I mean unbelievable!

    Reply
  • Only in Ireland, Strange how Pat Rabbitte met with the board of RTE, no heads rolled, then RTE offer Inda a free speech on National TV. Nothing in it, pure conspiracy theory on my part ;)

    Reply
  • Tom savage’s appearance before the committee last week was pure spin. He pulled the heartstrings talking about his clerical background. Terry needs to spend less time buying shoes and cook him the odd meal.

    Reply
  • alan 29/05/12 #

    when in a hole….

    Reply
  • It bates Banagher !
    Who is fooling who ?
    Let’s see how Minister Rabbitte deals with this ? Another early morning coffee and doughnuts or swift decisive action in the public interest .

    Would’nt it be great to see some real accountability in this republic ? I hope we have learned from the debacle with the FAS chairman some years ago !
    History would hardly repeat itself

    Reply
    • Rabbite was one of the loudest hounds of any misdeeds of the last government but he is a poodle now kennelled with FG. Shocking let down. Labour should be glad someone like John Whelan is confronting the Establishment. No one else is.

      Reply
  • The Irish Times dealt with this issue this morning.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0530/1224316916330.html

    Reply

Add New Comment