TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

EBS workers call off strike over ’13th month’ payment

Staff at the building society were due to walk out tomorrrow, but have agreed to LRC talks with management.

Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

WORKERS AT STATE-owned building society EBS have called off a strike that was due to be held tomorrow over a payment, which staff say is owed to them from December.

The Unite union, which represents 300 workers at the institution, has now agreed to meet with company management tomorrow. However, the union said the strike has not been cancelled but deferred by a week, pending the outcome of the talks.

Staff were due to walk out in a dispute over the so-called ’13th month’ payment which was usually received in December. This is not performance-related, but is considered a bonus by the Government – meaning it cannot be paid under the terms of the government’s takeover of AIB.

According to Unite, management at the firm were still able to receive the payment but lower-paid employees were not.

This evening the union welcomed the LRC talks. “We have agreed to meet at the Labour Relations Commission and will hopefully make progress towards resolving this issue,” said Colm Quinlan, regional officer with Unite.

More: EBS staff to hold second strike over ’13th month’ payment>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (55 Comments)

  • Jesus, I’ve read through every comment on here, how hard is it to grasp, these employees had an arrangement where their yearly salary was broken up into 13 equal payments rather that the tradition 12 payments in a year, their employers, the government decided that they would call the 13th payment a bonus and therefore under the No bonus to banking sector ruling, meant that these employees are been deprived of their wages and not a bonus as others would like us to believe.

    Also, the sooner people realise that these employees are more than likely on the lowest pay scale in the banking sector, and can no way be associated to these bankers who crippled our country, the better. I personally don’t think it’s fair to label all people working in the banking sector the same.

    I don’t work in a bank by the way, my only connection to any bank is they own the deeds on my house.

    Reply
  • damian 25/01/12 #

    How many articles have there been on the journal on this subject? and we still have shout first, read later morons spouting off uninformed opinions!

    They get paid every 4 weeks. 52 / 4 = ????? That’s right! You guessed it! 13!

    It just happens that they have 13 pay days rather than some companies that have 12. It’s the same wage that they get paid. Its not a bonus. It’s their salary. The government are basically refusing to pay them for 4 weeks of work that they’ve already done, which is a disgrace.

    All those people mouthing off! Would you work 4 weeks for free? And don’t give me any of that “lucky to have a job” rubbish!

    FYI. I don’t work for them. I work in the private sector.

    Reply
    • leave the name calling aside damian!!!!!! take a chill pill im jus having my opinion and AGAIN as im gunna point out in the article it states – This is not performance-related, but is considered a bonus by the Government – meaning it cannot be paid under the terms of the government’s takeover of AIB. WEVE ALL TAKE CUTS THAT THE GOVERMENT HAVE PUT ON US AND WE DONT LIKE IT BUT YOU DONT SEE ME PICKETING OUTSIDE MY JOB!!!!!

      Reply
    • @Laura. The staff here have taken the cuts as everyone has such as USC, Increased PRSI and reduced tax credits. If you dont agree with this the you might agree to pay back your employer 4 weeks pay as thats what you are asking the staff to do here. Just because they working in banking does not meen these workers deserve to be treated badly. Again its an annual salary of X amount divided by 13.

      Reply
    • hang on a sec Laura….you seem to be good at quoting some of the facts about this case….but not all

      EBS reported in their Annual Accounts for 2010 that NO bonuses were paid…and the 13th month was paid..proving that EBS did not consider the payment as a bonus…nor did the Dept of Finance otherwise they would not have allowed it to be paid in 2010, EBS was in state ownership then through a Special Share the Minister of Finance held giving him a 51% share holding in the former building society.

      It is considered a bonus by the government because it is under a heading “Christmas Bonus”, but the payment was calculated as a 13th month and actually formed part of the staff wages. PTSB run the exact scheme as EBS,however in staff contacts there its referred as “Annual Payment”…this was paid as normal to staff at Christmas.

      Im not going to slag you off or anything,Im taking the assumption you may not have considered or known the above facts, but you cannot in all honestly expect people to work for free, its easy to say people do it all the time as work experience but christ you think people on no more then a wage of 30k who have financial commitments just like anyone else can afford to work for free or have a portion of their wages cut off. Staff in EBS have had pension contributions doubled to 10% of their salary, pay freeze since 2008, staff who’s contracts were based on salary and bonus payments are only getting half their wage also, so its unfair of you to say they have not taken cuts . If your employer stopped a portion of your wage with no notice, after you were told you would be paid as normal, and you see colleagues getting the exact same payment made to them, whether you like to think it or not you would take a stand…your only human. Best of luck to all EBS workers…you have my full support!

      Reply
    • damian 25/01/12 #

      I wasn’t singling out you in particular Laura. You just happen to be one of hundreds of contributors that replied without knowing the facts and somehow tried to defend your incorrect assumption with “rabble, rabble, government, rabble, bonus, work for free, rabble, rabble, rabble”….

      Reply
    • Laura
      really ! I cannot believe that you can be so silly !
      There are 52 weeks in the year and yes there are 12 months
      BUT they get paid on the same date each month
      so for handiness sake they divided 52 by 4 = 13 (a lot of companies pay this method)
      and they get the 13th month on the same day in the 12th month
      It is not a bonus . it is their entitlement .
      Please please read the piece again . ignore what the government are saying , (they are proven liars) think of the workers .They are ordinary people,who are being railroaded.
      There is nobody name calling .
      I can not understand why you can not see what every body else sees. It is not a bonus .
      It was not a cut in pay .They have already taken their pay cuts like you did .This is their wage !
      You have a job so you too are lucky!
      Would you give up four weeks of your pay ?

      Reply
  • Some people obviously aren’t very good at math. 4wks * 12 payments = 48 wks pay for a 52wk year. The 13th payment is part of their basic pay (4*13=52). It’s not a bonus, despite the attempts of FG/Lab to pass it off as such in the Dail.

    Reply
  • @Laura, the government considered it to be the correct thing to do today when they paid 1.25 billion to the unsecured bondholders. Read over your comments re the same above then tell me if you still believe that what the government ‘ consider’ to be correct really can be called so, therefore defended as vehemently as you have in previous posts?

    Reply
  • Laura! This is not about you and whatever cuts you had to take! This is about workers who have been wronged by unscrupulous bosses. No matter how you try and defend it! They’ve been well and truly shafted! And if they’re prepared to do whatever it takes to get justice, then I send them my best wishes. Maybe you should do the same!!

    Reply
  • This is part of there wages they paid 13 months the managers got there why not the ordinary workers

    Reply
  • jimbo 25/01/12 #

    Are they for real a bonus from the government get the bloody boat and get over it.
    the rest of the decent taxpayers in this country did not get a bonus why should use.

    Reply
    • It’s not a bonus. Their salary is divided up into 13 months of payment rather than 12 months. This is done by a lot of companies so that you get your salary delivered when you need it more rather than at the end of each month. It’s not a big difference but this is the way they operate. So their 13th month payment isn’t a bonus, it’s a 13th of their annual salary that they never received.

      Reply
    • agreeed jimbo :)

      Reply
  • I almost feel sorry for Laura & Jimbo – they should hook up! Actually on second thoughts perhaps not.

    Reply
    • jimbo 26/01/12 #

      why is that brian??
      do you work for a bank or are you a bondholder.
      this is a paycut the rest of the country had to accept it so should they now get a life and play blind date elsewhere.

      Reply
    • Ah…..so it’s a pay cut now? Step away from your blind hatred of all things bank related and see it for what it is. Cynical exploitation of the lowest paid workers in that sector who are people just like you and me!
      And no I don’t work for a bank and definitely not a bondholder!

      Reply
  • Seems logical toto me that this IS part of the normal wages of the staff & that they should be paid it .

    but

    I’ll bet that if they were paid it in the first place some of their ‘supporters’ on here would be the same ones whinging about how the fools in government paid the greedy staff in the state owned bank a months wages as a bonus

    Reply
  • i suggest u go back and the read the paragraph where it says This is not performance-related, but is considered a bonus by the Government – meaning it cannot be paid under the terms of the government’s takeover of AIB.the country is in a recession because if the bankers we paid out over 1billion today we dont need the goverment paying out anymore bonuses

    Reply
    • jimbo 25/01/12 #

      it makes you laugh dont it…..

      Reply
    • ya it does make me laugh je im happy just to see my wages n the bank on a friday morning never mind a bonus lol

      Reply
    • Ordinary staff were screwed over. Management weren’t. Welcome to the new Ireland.

      Reply
    • Laura, it’s been explained now a few times on here that this payment is not performance related, is not a bonus and is part of their salaries in that their annual salary is divided by 13 and they are paid 2/13 of their annual salary in december. What will it take to make you understand? You were asked also would you work 4 weeks for free which you did not answer? Why them and not you? Because they work for a state controlled bank? It’s not them that screwed us all over, they’re ordinary workers like the rest of us. It really upsets me and I think a lot of other people when you take into account all your red thumbs, when we don’t all show empathy with each other and stand behind each other in these horrible difficult times! I was going to put my last sentence in CAPS but I think it’s really childish and rude to shout when you want to make a point …. :p

      Reply
    • i hit cap lock by mistake wasnt shouting anythng!!!!!!!ur the one been childish what will it take for u to understand that its a considered bonus by the goverment…oh and yes id wwork for free people do it for work experience the whole time :P

      Reply
    • considered by the government does not make it right for the government to keep it from the staff this is their wages and no-one is expected to work for nothing

      Reply
    • We wouldn’t be having this education lesson if AIB had informed the front line workers during the year about what they were planning to do, but they only told management who got to change their contracts so they got their 4 weeks pay amalgamated into their wage for the last few months and didn’t then receive it in a lump sum in December like the front line staff expected they would- because they only found out about this rule change days before their December wage payment.
      Fuck AIB and the Govt calling it a bonus for it is not one. The 13 month wage system has been around a long time in many areas not just in the banking sector.
      These folk got shafted and people spewing the same old “lucky to have a job” crap are only playing into the hands of what AIB and the DoF want you to think. Wise up, they have zero problem shafting ANY of us and divided opinions is not where we should be on this but united.

      Reply
    • Exactly Damhsa. They were badly shafted by their union tho. Bloody disgrace. They should have looked after them and made sure they weren’t screwed. Useless!

      Reply
  • jimbo 25/01/12 #

    NEIL KETTLES
    IF you believe any of that and think its a broken down salary you need to wake up

    Reply
    • Annual Salary (for example purposes only) – €30k a year:

      €30k with payments at the end of each month, means a take home of €2500 before tax with no bonus.
      €30k with payments every 4 weeks (52 weeks in a year, therefore 13 payments) means a take home of €2308 every month, with an extra in December, meaning in December you take home €4615.

      You’re still getting paid the same amount €30k, but you get more in December which looks like a bonus and acts like a bonus, but is not a bonus. If their “13th month” isn’t paid, they’ll be taking 8% involuntary pay cut. Which isn’t a lot, but some of these people might not be earning a lot, but it’s still their salary and they’re entitled to it.

      Reply
  • The management had the option to have their wages paid over 13 months, whereas the regular staff didn’t get the option. Therefore the management’s 13th month payment is part of their wages and not a bonus, while regular staff’s 13th month payment remains a bonus, hence not receiving it. At least they don’t work for Ulster Bank….

    Reply
  • total disgrace they should be lucky they have a full time well paid job i got nothing off my employer for christmas im jus thankful i have a job that pays a wage….ive take cuts they should too

    Reply
  • jimbo 25/01/12 #

    Ahh plenty of EBS thumbs i see…

    Reply
  • What planet are you on??? Even the first story published on here this payment was referred to as “bonus” and when they got hold of all facts story and title was amended…you are going by on what the EBS and Management who got their 13th month payment paid are releasing in to he media not the facts. In order to turn the public against the staff and show lack of support hoping it will discourage the strikes to continue.
    Laura so anyone who is lucky enough to have a job today if they turn up to work tomorrow and they get told hey this month no pay – we should all smile and be grateful to have jobs…we might be hungry, broke and unable to pay our bills but its all good cos we have Jobs???
    So any of the families this affects to who are barely making ends meet and are struggling as it is to be told Christmas week they are not getting their payment is ok by you…
    No one is stupid enough to expect a BONUS to be paid and if you are not going to paid your salary and are going to work for free there are companies that would be more deserving of their voluntary work and no i don’t work for EBS.

    Reply
  • jimbo 25/01/12 #

    lunar months? i get it yeah they are away with the fairys on the moon
    be it that management got paid and staff did not they are still paid by the government,owned by the government and we all know the goverment is corrupt.
    Who got the massive cheque today?
    ENOUGH SAID!

    Reply
    • Sounds like you’re backtracking now jimbo!! Trying to change the subject and all that eh??

      Reply
    • How nice it must be to have such a simple viewpoint for the state we are in, blah blah bankers blah blah blah bonus blah blah blah. Do you hear anything else at all? There are bondholders, bond vultures (some of who we paid today), management, foreign banks, ECB and IMF and then there are 290 or 300 workers who make anything from 24-30k pa being shafted, and this you find a problem with?
      Lucky to have a job and all that hot air speech- would you prefer they contribute nothing and we all pay them the dole instead? At least they get up and go to work and deal with you and me behind the till and serve us daily and it’s these who you are chastising?

      Reply
  • jimbo 25/01/12 #

    eh that would be a NO neil…

    Reply
  • jimbo 26/01/12 #

    @rommel
    i have my own company i dont fall into that (your) sector good day.

    Reply

Add New Comment