TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Ireland and EU to sign controversial ACTA treaty tomorrow

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement has come under fire after suggestions it could limit online freedoms.

Image: LaMenta3 via Flickr

IRELAND IS TO sign a controversial international agreement tomorrow which promises a major international crackdown on the trade of counterfeit goods – and illegal internet filesharing.

Irish representatives will sign the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) at a ceremony tomorrow – as will representatives from each of the other 26 European Union member states, and the EU itself.

Once the agreement is signed, it can then be formally ratified and adopted into law once it has been cleared by the European Parliament. The treaty will be signed tomorrow in Tokyo by Ireland’s ambassador to Japan, John Neary.

Although the treaty is primarily aimed at stopping the trade of counterfeited physical goods, it contains provisions which demand that participating countries offer equal protection and enforcement procedures against digital copyright infringement.

The deal – which is unrelated to the controversial ‘Irish SOPA’ legislation – has been criticised by many, including the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, for its potential impact on privacy and freedom of expression.

Specifically, it sees member states agree to allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) disclose a user’s information to a copyright holder, where the latter has a sufficient claim that the user is breaching their copyright.

No circumventing

It also says member states will have to offer “effective legal remedies” to ensure that anti-theft measures – such as the Digital Rights Management (DRM) protection on purchased music files – cannot be circumvented.

The clause could potentially mean that Apple, for example, would have to disable its MP3 recording facility in iTunes – because it could be used to remove the DRM protections from a piece of music purchased through its iTunes store.

Other critics of the treaty suggest that it will forbid the distribution of cheap generic drugs – because they would infringe the copyright of pharmaceutical companies whose research led to their discovery.

A European Commission spokesman said ACTA would not create new intellectual property rights, but would merely serve to enforce existing ones – and would not lead to constant monitoring of internet traffic.

Michele Neylon of Carlow-based internet hosting company Blacknight said the treaty could force internet hosts to deal directly with orders issued by copyright holders, instead of being able to ensure that such orders were handed down by a court.

“If we’ve been given a court order, fine – there’s no discussion, a judge has made a decision – but that’s not what happens, you don’t get your day in court.”

Neylon said it was a matter of “basic economics” that companies like his could not run up significant legal fees, ensuring that court procedures were followed, when those legal fees vastly exceeded the money it received to host sites in the first place.

He added that the current Irish legal situation, where there is no formal definition of ‘fair use’, meant even the likes of personal blogs could be subject to takedown orders if they included a company’s logo without permission, for example.

$200bn industry

The agreement is aimed at clamping down on the trade of counterfeit consumer and electronic goods, which the OECD believes was worth some $200 billion in 2007 – the equivalent of around 2 per cent of all legal trade worldwide that year.

All Irish government Departments will have to confirm that Ireland has the legal means to implement ACTA before it can be formally adopted.

A government spokesperson said, however, that Ireland did not expect to have to amend its current legislation – believing that the provisions of the deal were already accounted for in Irish law.

She added that negotiations on the deal had included representatives from the Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation and members from Ireland’s permanent representation at the EU in Brussels.

News of ACTA being ratified by Poland earlier this week drew the wrath of Anonymous and another group called Polish Underground, which attacked the websites of many government departments in protest at Poland’s signature of the treaty.

The United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Morocco – all of which took part in negotiating the treaty – signed up to ACTA in October of last year.

The European Union and Switzerland said at the time that they would offer their support for the treaty and would sign it as soon as was practicable.

Other interested countries can sign up to the deal before May 2013.

In full: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, ACTA (PDF) >

Read: Hackers take down Polish government websites in ACTA attack

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (113 Comments)

  • Kick these bastards out. Rise, revolt and rebel. Stop buying CDs, DVDs and other media in protest. Fuck the music industry and the restrictions it insists. Time to topple these corporate greedy m***********s once and for all. Irish people don’t want this

    Reply
  • “Allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) disclose a user’s information to a copyright holder”. Surely this is an invasion of privacy?

    Reply
    • Correct. Also EU law prevents ISP’s from being obliged to carry out surveillance on internet users.

      Reply
    • So which one takes precedence? One law says it’s okay but another says it isn’t? Which is more valid. The EU law or this one?

      Reply
    • They are trying to be complimentary rather than conflicting. It’s not that one says it’s ok to spy and the other doesn’t. The EU directives say it’s OK for member states to take action against copyright infringement such as blocking an “offender”, but they can’t compel ISP’s to carry out the surveillance. ISP’s may volunteer to disclose info!!!! Third parties may also monitor, just as they (IRMA) did in the Eircom and UPC cases.

      The precedent for blocking was laid down in the SABAM v Scarlet (Tiscali Belgium) case recently. But these cases can turn around precedent very quickly…. It’s the wild west out there at the moment because so much of the law is untested and up in the air.

      Reply
    • This one will become European law. Even though it was penned by the Americans.

      Reply
    • darren, “The Law” is printed on paper and available in banks… oh wait.. they are all closed… well you can find it in the politicians wallets in all sorts of denominations.

      Reply
    • @John International treaties always take precedence over domestic or EU law.

      Reply
  • And so it begins. First its restrictions on downloads then on to deciding its best that they tell us what we can view or watch on the Internet I hope they get hacked to fuck until they back down and piss off. This is the first stage of Internet restrictions that will make it not worth going online.

    Reply
  • so its all downhill from here so.

    Reply
  • You can’t deny we’re leaving in very strange times right now, this stuff is insane. We’re being hit from all sides. It’s all a little too Orwellian.

    Reply
    • Read ‘The Shock Doctrine’ by Naomi Klein. Governments take advantage of crises by flooding in unfavourable laws or start unpopular wars while the people are still in shock. Think 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq. They are taking advantage of the financial crises and since everyone isn’t arsed to do anything about it they’ll keep pushing us to the end of our teather until we snap. Still waiting for the snap………..

      Reply
    • Where are you leaving and when?

      Reply
    • Daniel, then why the fuck do my anti large government comments are welcomed so poorly? None of you are ever satisfied with your government with the exception when everyone is riding on a government created bubble wave. Do people understand that the government does not bring prosperity, only individuals do?

      Reply
    • On the button daniel. Shock doctrine is being implemented across Europe as we speak. Death by a thousand shocks. The fact is people are waking up to the fact that our elected governments dont serve us only the super rich capitalists and the truth is coming out through the internet. These online censorship bills are all to do with quelling these unrests but as Noam Chomsky says they have been found out and the end is near for them.

      Reply
    • Daniel R I love you. Yes. And the worst thing is they don’t even have to kill the ones who speak out because everyone is either so feckin scared of rocking the boat or so accepting of their inability to cause change that they just plod along like ants. They erode our civil liberties under the guise of dealing with criminals but they know they can use them on us too. And because of the fear they generate they get away with it. But even when we know it the human survival gene will probably just go along with it. Unless you’re right Derek Durkin but the apathy is rampant. Sad again

      Reply
  • what a depressing place we live in.

    Reply
  • These restrictions just keep on coming. There is no end to them. People are tired of everything this government( and the last) has put in front of them. They have bent over and dropped their pants at every given moment europe has asked. The people will rise up. A riot is coming. It is inevitable.

    Reply
    • id love to believe ya but as a nation we are hopeless at doin anythin for ourselves.

      Reply
    • And I though that Begrudgy wanted more government. Dear Begrudgy, can you grasp that there is no large government that is good. Ask the government to do less, shrink their size, lower taxes and stupid regulation and we might have a hope

      Reply
    • And then what, Dave, give the power to international corporations instead?

      Having government is not the problem. In a democracy we voted these people in and their job is to work for the betterment of all of us. Obviously that doesn’t seem to be happening all too often and the current model is fecked. But disbanding or “shrinking” government and handing more power over to private, often international, capitalist interests is exactly what doesn’t need to happen.

      Reply
    • Dear Michael, can you comprehend that the big bad international corporations have ZERO power? Can you grasp that the large corporations only become “powerful” when they are doled out special privileges, special licences, special tax brackets by the STATE? There is nothing easier in a free world than to put a big bad company out of business, because no company can force you to give them your money, except in situations where the state is protecting them as a certain monopoly. Is it really so hard to understand that? Companies can not use force, but the state can. It’s not rocket science. If the sheep would only use their brain cells a bit more they would grasp that the do-gooders are there to only make it look like they are “working” for you.

      Reply
    • Sorry Dave, I’m afraid you have lost me there a bit. Not sure what your point is.

      Corporations have no power unless it’s granted to them by government? OK. But you’re suggesting shrinking or disbanding government and replacing it with what?

      Government by definition should have us, the people, as their primary concern. Private business has, again by definition, only their personal profits — and that of their shareholders — as their concern. I don’t see how that’s a better deal. The problem I’m seeing again and again is that the lines are so blurred, private interests end up leading the way. It’s that imbalance which needs to be fixed.

      I’d love to think (idealist maybe?) that the recent SOPA protests have shown that the public *can* exercise their collective voice. With the Internet we have the tools to really fix things and create a better democracy and a government that works for us. Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater in the meantime.

      Reply
    • @Dave
      I don’t recognise your description of the world in which corporations are benevolent powerless entities only concerned with productivity. No one gets “doled out” power. They buy it.

      Seems like you’ve been asleep for the last while if you’ve not noticed the huge backlash against corporate money in politics especially in the US. If your thesis is true then why, in the last number of years, was one of the mantras of those running for power saying “We’ll take corporate money out of politics”. That’s something you’re obviously refusing to recognise.

      The implication is that corporations would be OK if it weren’t for greedy corrupt government giving them that power and luring them into some kind of moral wasteland.

      That idea would be risible if the truth weren’t so insidious.

      Reply
    • Government’s job is to protect your life, your liberty, your property and to protect the state’s borders from an invasion. Simples! However, now your government’s job seems to be to take everything away from you (liberty and money) and to provide you with everything you “need” (a human farm). Less government doesn’t mean no government, it simply means less. Simples!

      Reply
    • Plus, Michael, you are a touch naive. Yes, business has the shareholder profits as their primary objective. The question is – where do they get those profits from? The point is, they have to make or do something that you are freely, without any force willing to pay for. So, the more profitable a business is, the more good it does for the people because of the simple fact that the people are freely giving their hard earned money to that business. The only danger with large business is when the state gets involved. I’ll give you an example – say, the state “approves” only 1 telecommunications company and “supervises” its actions through a do-gooder committee. Essentially, you wouldn’t even have a clue if they could possibly do a better service for less money and they can pretty much bend you over and shove it in and all that under the “supervising” eye of the “watchful” government. Seriously, is it that hard? Maybe you should read The Road to Serfdom.

      Reply
    • But all my money doesn’t go to government. It goes to private corporations to provide overpriced fuel, exorbitant insurance and criminally oppressive mortgage payments. Govt takes 20% and corporations take the rest.

      Money is power my friend, and most of it goes into private hands. Now those same private hands in the music and movies industry want to say who can and can’t have the right to communicate on the internet by criminalising the way we use it instead of coming up with a solution that sees an equitable outcome for all – not just the power brokers.

      Simpler…

      Reply
    • I fully agree they’re doing a bad job of it. I just don’t agree that less government, more private business, is the solution.

      I think “small government” is a term made up so that privatising essential services — healthcare, education, defence — starts to sound reasonable. It’s not. Our voice might not be getting through at the moment but destroying the only one we *even potentially* have, is a bad solution.

      Also — “they have to make or do something that you are freely, without any force willing to pay for” — I believe that is hugely naive. Substituting democratic votes with a “vote-with-your-wallet” system. The ability to pay ( = to vote, in your system) for these services is not evenly distributed in the slightest. This is *exactly* why massive private corporations have the ability to influence SOPA and ACTA type laws to protect their ageing, downright archaic, business models at the detriment to everyone else in society.

      Just because I’ve bought a lot of CD’s in the 90′s does not mean I grant Universal and EMI more of a voice in policy making than I have, 10 – 20 years later. But I “freely, without any force” gave them that money in exchange for goods so it seems, in your world, they’re entitled to that extra voice?

      Reply
    • we dont need to do a thing the internet will defend its self this is another example of powers uniting and using crime as an excuse to mess with our constitutional rights but theirs enough companys that have a firm grasp over the net who are already united and unlikely to be bought out or even passively allowing this abuse of power to take place

      Reply
    • There’s nothing wrong in reducing the size of Govt. There are far too many “law makers” and people working in back offices proposing ideas and laws and restrictions to the politicians who are advised on them and go about getting them enacted in the Dail,
      Reducing the power of the Govt. does not mean handing anything over to private interests or corporations. Just lifting the nanny state we have been herded into where to get anything done requires jumping through endless loops and when we have objections to what our leaders are doing there’s too much of a divide or gap between us and them to feel we can stand up and be heard to oppose it.
      Less bureaucracy would be a great start which strangles progression, coupled with leaders with an actual clue and a spine and we could be on to a winner.

      Reply
    • Dave, I like the cut of your jib. It surprises me that a logical sensible suggestion that less government is a goods thing would attract a majority of red thumbs.

      Reply
  • The Internet should be free from political interference, whats going on here is some international thinktank told the governments the possible future use of the Internet, money and profit is to be made and to stop people from getting entertainment for free they need new laws to restrict the peoples means to access it through piracy, the Internet is not only for tv shows and movies its a enormous tool to the development of the human race, and because of these grossly unsuitable leaders that don’t have the foresight to see this we might lose the most valuable tool since the invention of the printing press to money and greed. Its a very sad day if this gets passed into law.

    Reply
  • This’ll just speed up darknet development and push people toward proper anonymity on the net.

    Reply
  • Downhill indeed. Pity it wasn’t downfall.

    Reply
  • What I would like to know is how ACTA affects fair use of content e.g. making backups of CD’s for personal use?

    The internet has been so successful thanks to it’s inherent openness. Any threat to that such as ACTA should be stopped.

    Reply
  • We make headway on one issue and then they go ahead with another.

    Reply
  • We need to start some fires.

    Reply
  • B7584 25/01/12 #

    Next up is an internet licence, something seperate to the current proposed ‘Media’ charge.Mark my words. Sadly.

    Reply
    • Emma 25/01/12 #

      Afaik they tried that already by proposing that a tv license would cover internet access. Ofc nothing from stopping them from trying to introduce it again -.-

      Reply
  • B7584 25/01/12 #

    When is the revolt?

    Reply
  • This is just shite. WWWWI has started.

    Reply
  • I think we may be too late to stop ACTA. Our inept/corrupt government is signing away our online freedom tomorrow. Just like Poland did last week. This one snuck in under the radar because its just too strange for the common person on the street to comprehend. By the time they figure out just how much damage its going to do it will be far too late.

    Reply
  • Most important is to ensure complete and free access to all information on the web, and the right to freely distribute information on the web,
    Criminal gangs who use the web to sell counterfeit products, including medicine, and to defraud ordinary people of money must be prosecuted .
    People who make a living by creating intellectual property , artists, writers , etc. Must have their right to make a living protected.
    Laws should only be enacted after a free and open debate by the people who will be subject to the law.

    Reply
  • legacy 25/01/12 #

    boards (dot) ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056527994
    all info there emails phone numbers
    thumbs up so people can get emailing/calling

    Reply
  • Time to setup stop ACTA signs.

    Reply
  • I hope America don’t pass SOPA or whatever. I’m part Irish and I hate to hear this. I’m praying. Government shouldn’t pass stuff like this just because big corps. tell them to. Whatever, It’s all about the money in the end.

    Reply
  • Unfortunately we need to start to get our heads around the idea that if we want to end this system its not possible through the current electoral system which only let’s us choose one of two corporate/bank owned political parties. Ultimately marching and sitting in is not going to scare them. We need to start preparing. We need to work on ensuring our police and armed services are loyal to the people as eventually this slow creeping fascist system will be right in your face and they can only do it by bullying and force. This will get violent throughout Europe and we have no means to protect ourselves from our own law enforcement and military. When push comes to shove we need to rely on our own family and friends in service being loyal to us. Ask them now what decision they will make when the time comes so they are less likely to follow illegal orders. They system will try belittle all descent as tree hugging spongers or even terrorists. Don’t be fooled. Support those people who are awake to what’s happening. Make no mistake the war has already started between the fascist elite ruling class and us, its just violent yet.. Very interesting times we are living in….

    Reply
    • There’s a good article on truthdig about how the occupy movement is planning to do this, but how it has to be a non-violent movement, at least until they have enough power, they don’t have that at the moment, but they’re making progress. The question is will they make enough progress fast enough.

      http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/thank_you_for_standing_up_20120123/

      This is as much of a reason that Ireland needs to default as any, it’ll be painful for everyone, but that’s the key – painful for EVERYONE; it would do a lot to start taking them down.

      Reply
  • Connor 25/01/12 #

    Governments of the world GET YOUR HANDS OFF MY INTERNET DAMMIT!!

    Reply
  • One door closes another door opens ….

    Reply
  • Why is a European agreement being signed in Tokyo by the ambassador there? Is he the only one who knows how to write his name?

    Reply
  • how can this possibly solve anything? no, it can’t.

    Reply
  • i have my own compositions published on youtube and various creative commons pages available for free download by anyone.
    if this law affects youtube and the way i promote my name and compositions, who can i take to court for it? who is responsible?

    Reply
  • There is ways to counter act this. Start online petitions to boycott certain companies globally. Once the markets see this watch them crumble. Great to see them brought down by their own devices. Its a tall order but it can be done. But it has to be quick otherwise the petition will probably be censored.

    Reply
  • oh my fucking god! Fucking hope all EU goverment sites get fucking taken down!!!! I swear it just seems to be take take take at the fucking moment!!! This makes me so angery!!!!

    Reply
  • Ardo Ci 25/01/12 #

    This is the beginning of the death knell for the Internet, for freedom and for truth.
    Yes, there are plenty of people downloading and exchanging but there only a handful doing it on an industrial scale. They can be easily dealt with without the drawbacks inherent in these draconian measures.
    At the same time I am left bereft to understand how on the one hand you’re told it’s illegal to download a film and yet they a) give away films in newspapers and b) provide you with machines for copying.
    The war has now truly started between the powers and the people. It’s the last stage in the road to world totalitarianism.

    Reply
  • We need a world without ISP!

    Reply
  • deaghlan 25/01/12 #

    is this serious -_-

    Reply
  • As the public we should stand up for ourselfs and and listen to people that know nothing about the internet and what the capabilities are so what if copyright copyright is only there because people are greedy copyright prevents people from taking an idea and enhancing it.We can stand for ouselfs we don’t need people telling us what to do.

    Reply
  • inb4shitstorm

    Reply
  • skull 26/01/12 #

    http://bit.ly/A9w7xs SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST ACTA!!!

    European Parlament will get this petition(s) (cuz there are many) sent to them showing how we the people don’t wanna fuck with.

    We still stand a chance to stop this insanity for good. European Parlament already voted ACTA down one in 2010 and if they do it again, the bill is dead for good! http://bit.ly/A9w7xs SIGN THIS IF YOU WANT YOUR INTERNET TO STAY FREE AND UNCENSORED!

    Thanks

    Reply
  • So, when do we start the riots and burning of government officials, im game when im done homework :D

    Reply
  • Contact your constituency’s Labour/ Blueshirt TDs.
    Most of them genuinely have no idea that there’s even opposition to this in their own constituencies. They’re under the impression that it’s a small fringe grouping (Anonymous) that’s opposed to it!!
    Don’t complain about nothing being done unless you’ve at least tried representative democracy the way it was designed to be; you let your local rep you’re annoyed, they try to appease you so you’ll vote for them next time…

    (Cue rant from loon telling me that lighting bins on fire is a better option)

    Reply
  • Its all because EU and the world is in crisis and they need to get money from somewhere, because big corporations took millions of Euro, Dollar loans and never payed them back, and now, we normal people have to pay for all of this.
    Politicians who signed this ACTA, prooly didnt read the text with the small fonts, or they are completely noobs to the internet and have no idea what they are doing.

    Reply
  • The internet. A great place once upon a time.
    Like Mosney!

    Reply
  • Contact Ambassador Neary directly and stop him signing ACTA at tokyoembassy@dfa.ie

    Reply
  • While i have to say file sharing has become a bit of the norm these days and seems acceptable, its ultimately and sadly against the law, we all knew that. So it should come as no surprise that eventually they’d find a way to stop it.

    I’m a little more concerned that generic over the counter drugs may slip into a nasty loophole here and all of a sudden be considered counterfeit to a copyrighted product. Where would that end? Would stores like Aldi be in breech of counterfeit laws in reproducing crisps like “okey dokeys” instead of hunky doreys, or cola or any other product.

    Reply
    • The shit is about to hit the fan people. Stop, drop and roll, the only advice available when the world is burning around us! On a slightly related note, I made sure to do all my song downloading tonight! Go me!

      Reply
  • Over 41,000 thousand views! Must be a new record for the Journal. Mite be interesting if the Journal compiled the Top 10 Most Viewed Stories? Apologies if this has been done before. Its too late now to stop acta so lets STOP SOPA!

    Reply
  • Samuel 27/01/12 #

    Google have their EU headquarters in Dublin, they have to leave or stuff like g+ and sites and YouTube could be gone

    Reply
  • this is such bullshit all of this is!!! freedom of speech ??? fucka sapa acta and all that bullshit its all going to end in a worse way soon… ;(

    Reply
  • this is just some cheap porno, the government cant take advantage of us like this, then leave us feeling raw and dirty…. they shouldnt and arent able to do this against the people

    Reply
  • It will still be the wild west out there. For the general public you can’t be prosecuted unless they kick down your door and witness you, whilst in the act of some copyright infringement and unplug your connection. Everything is deniable, hence no judges or Computer savvy people prosecuted. Only people brought to justice used many servers and gained large profits that made them traceable from money trail. Start using different search engines and sites for more freedom and less predictability.

    Reply
  • they can’t control something that big its in possible it’ll just go back to the way it was in the 90s with p2p like napster and mIRC so all I can say is fuck it I’ve signed the fourm and gave the TDs the finger I’m done

    Reply
  • Cant wait till the hackers shut down the whole web…

    Reply
  • Ah well, it was fun living here. We’re moving country should this be brought in.

    Reply
  • Do it like the english and RIIIIIIIOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTT!

    Reply
  • Might I suggest everyone spends 5 minutes looking at this great Video on ACTA which explains everything in terms we can all understand? A far as I understand Seán Sherlocks legislation does pretty much the same thing here in Ireland. Not that it matters when ACTA comes into force.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8Xg_C2YmG0

    Reply
  • wkater 27/01/12 #

    But it’s totally not about governments, it’s about the big corporations that rule the world. Governments can do little against their will.

    Reply
  • http://stopsopaireland.com/ < Sign this Petition everyone. Its time we stood up to this shower in Dail Eireann before it sinks this economy

    Reply
  • i beleive this bill will be pased witch is a very bad thing for millions of users on the internet but what the government dont reolise is the shit stur will be over whelming. hackers around the eu and america will mess with everything the government is using. i belive if you dont want to pirete music movies etc or look you as discusting as it is child porn then DONT its free will not the web sites fault. STOP ACTA

    Reply
  • The certain sites will be those that question authority… Those that tell you what they are up to… They are trying to put the cat back in bag and it might just give them rabies. They are telling you its about music and movies but its really about control as people are quickly walking up to the realization that the whores in the corporate media are constantly trying to fill us with BS propaganda and keep you in the dark… This time the cat won’t go back in as its got nine life’s and its turning on them…

    Reply
  • What is ACTA? – by Anonymous

    Reply
  • God stop making making chains that are making one big prisons every working class citizens are going to have so little happiness and freedom of speech the whole government should be all sacked
    and let the working class take over as those rich snobs have no bleeding clue how the noble worker bee working class functions before at work and living they are not numbers how long must it be before things are justified
    What more do they want from hard working people that have done nothing but work to the bone both psychically and mentally
    why its it hell on earth when it should be more heaven on earth
    life is too short to waste on such thorns it it should be feathers to comfort the souls of the living.

    Reply
  • What can I say such sheer waste of time and money , we needs jobs not a social bodyguard over Internet, I welcome this so called monitoring as I still believe not going change the fact the way I go about my Internet , yes file sharing will be knocked , mega video rapid share ect ect , still going be using static ip or gateways to endless blacklisted returns , where all decrypted , still not have any effect on how computer hackers will work this day of ages , Christ annoynoums is going run shit , people will find ways , its in are nature to adapt , so google and Firefox get monitored , so we use a different means of search engine . ACTA not only Ireland but its world wide , so not going be taking lightly. SOPA just a waste of time really is when looks at it , so I hope they vote it and waste there beloved time , cause at end day we as computing generations well find even better ways to torrent and download and share music , I just find funny that ITUNES is getting a bit of a battern to this , and monitor emails over songs lyrics if so bring it on , I’ll send it in binary or some other means AHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Reply
  • the internet was created for education purposes WE FUCKED IT UP

    Reply
  • Someone please explain to me exactly what this is about? From my understanding I will no longer be able to download music and movies and certain sites are being shut down? I read most of the comments, but no one has clearly defined what will happen when this law becomes legally enforceable. Seems retarded thus far…

    Reply
    • hopefully this will help explain ACTA a bit better for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caxMySWj_qE

      Reply
    • Effects of ACTA:
      - many Radio and TV stations will be shot down cuz they arent using copyrighted music, schools will be shut down cuz they dont have money for the copyrighted softwares.
      - by using copyrighted music in ur YouTube videos u will get arrested, for example a mother post a video with her baby dancing on LadyGaga song, because the song is copyrighted she will be sued and have to pay crazy amount of money.
      - DJ’s who are remixing copyrighted songs, will go to prison.
      - YouTube, Facebook, Twitter… will be all shot down after some time, cuz they wont be able to handle the pressure.
      - and so on, just google what are the consequences of it, and check this clip
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8Xg_C2YmG0
      And u think that the artists will benefit from this… ur wrong, only the owner of the companies will make more.

      Reply
  • So if you don’t illegally download from the web, how does this affect you?

    Reply

Add New Comment