TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Longford council calls for change in prostitution laws

Longford is the second county council to pass a motion proposing the government outlaw paying for sex.

File photo
File photo
Image: Paul Barker / PA

LONGFORD COUNTY COUNCIL has passed a motion supporting a change in the law making it an offence to pay for sex.

The motion was passed at a council meeting on Wednesday night making Longford County Council the second in recent weeks to call for such a change.

Leitrim County Council passed a similar motion last month and the Immigrant Council of Ireland said it hopes other councils will follow suit in the coming months.

Denise Charlton of the Immigrant Council of Ireland said she welcomed the council’s decision which comes as a government review of the laws on prostitution is under way.

“It could not be more timely as it coincides with the first opportunity in years to change the law and help put people traffickers, pimps and other criminals out of business,” she said.

The Immigrant Council of Ireland is one of 50 partners which form the ‘Turn off the Red Light Campaign’ preparing submissions for government asking that payment for sex be outlawed in line with measures being taken in other European States.

“We have examined the experience abroad and firmly believe that the only way to end a sex trade and end the threats, abuse and violence against women is to target supply,” Charlton said.

“Public and political support is vital if we are to secure legal change which is why the actions of the County Councils in Longford and Leitrim are so important. We will continue to ask other local authorities to also show their support in the coming weeks.”

The window to bring about change is short with a deadline of 31 August for written submissions with oral hearings to follow.

Chartlon said: “It is time now for others to follow the lead of Leitrim and Longford and join us in ensuring we Turn Off the Red Light.”

Read: Leitrim first council to call for ban on buying sex
Read: Government urged to make paying for sex illegal in Ireland

Read next:

Comments (49 Comments)

  • That’s jail for a lot of Longford men so.

    Reply
  • franco 20/07/12 #

    Longford the new Amsterdam .

    Reply
  • More shite from the ICI. Thgey have been very vocal in the last few months, must be coming up to Government funding time. These are the people who only a few weeks ago highlighted the case of a 16 year old boy who had been trafficked here and in fairness he is doing well but with the support of tax payers money. Of course no questions asked as to how he got here or who brought him. The same people who have a program to integrate new arrivals, which is fair enough but it’s for children who are trafficked here without their parents. Again no questions asked. The same people who want an open door policy which actually facilitates this sort of activity and encourages it. If your application for residency is turned down don’t worry the ICI will show you how to use or legal system to challenge the deportation order right up to the Supreme Court and it won’t cost you a thing. Sure the millions that it costs each year will be picked up by the tax payer.

    They want to end the sex trade! Are they serious? You could find sex workers in Saudi Arabia and they don’t just fine you for sex outside marriage! They want to stop something that has being going on since the dawn of man, it’s even mentioned in the Bible.

    To be honest if I was a trafficker Ireland would be my country of choice, I mean look how easy it is. Open door policy, no fingerprint scanners, no tracking of people. Long delays in processing and if someone disappears no-one cares because they assume that they have used NI as a way to get into the UK. Best of all if you disagree in any way with these people you are branded a racist and we wouldn’t want that now would we?

    Reply
    • Actually, most of the serious research into this issue shows that is it strong rather than weak border controls that encourage trafficking – because they make it all but impossible for people to migrate without turning to traffickers for assistance. Criminalising the purchase of sex would do absolutely nothing to address this fundamental fact and thus would have no impact on the numbers of people trafficked.

      Reply
    • I agree with you Wendy, you just have to look at the US/Mexico border and the “coyote’s” that prey on the crosser’s there. What I was trying to get across is that in terms of sex trafficking Ireland is a soft target because it is easy to get into. Why would a trafficker try to use Denmark which has the toughest immigration laws in the EU and the expense that goes with it when the can just toddle into Ireland and from here NI, the UK and into the EU.

      As you say, the criminalising of the purchase of sex will do nothing to stop trafficking, all it will do is drive the trade underground. If people want to combat trafficking it’s border’s they should be watching and not beds.

      Reply
    • “because they make it all but impossible for people to migrate without turning to traffickers for assistance”

      In the same way that locked doors make it impossible for people to appropriate your TV without turning to burglary?

      Reply
  • Better off to legalise prostitution. Sex workers could then have legitimate employment rights.

    New Zealand’s experience: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/29/gender.law

    Reply
    • Do you want your sister and mother doing it, be it legal or otherwise, Tomy Iona? A simple Yes/No answer without qualification will suffice for the purpose of this illustrative exercise.

      Reply
    • Andrew,

      You are drawing irrational conclusions.

      Reply
    • While a yes/no answer may suffice it would only serve to satisfy your desire to have someone contradict themselves in a reasonable debate.

      I will answer: No, I would not like my 65 year old mother working as a sex worker. No, I would not like my non-existent sister to be a sex worker.

      However, if a relation or friend of mine were in the sex trade I would rather that trade to be legalised in order to afford them the right to a safer workplace.

      If you actually read something and try to understand the issues rather than remain determined to stick to your agenda, as evidenced in many other threads, you might actually learn something.

      Reply
    • @ Tomy. Why would you not like your mother on the game?

      Reply
    • Trying to lead again Andrew?

      I wouldn’t like my mother being a sex worker because I don’t want to acknowledge that my mother has ever had sex….. ever….

      Would you like to think that way about your mother? Is that really where we’re headed?

      I know what you’re hoping for though – you’re hoping that I’d say that I wouldn’t want her getting infected with anything, raped, beaten etc. And, no, I wouldn’t want that for any sex worker. However, criminalisation contributes to these dangers.

      Reply
    • @Tomy. So if your mam was guaranteed safety, and you could exercise the necessary intellectual side-step of ignoring the sexual aspect of your mother (understandable) you’d be fine with your mam working as a prostitute? I have that right, yes?

      Reply
  • There’s two very separate issues here – human trafficking and prostitution. County Councils are not known as bastions of intellectual prowess and if previous experience is anything to go by they’ll just as easily give a yea or nay to something on the basis of the quality of the wine at lunch. Human trafficking happens in areas outside of the sex trade. This has all the classic Irish hallmarks of rushing towards legislation without proper research and debate.

    Reply
  • The Turn of the Red Light campaign is asking that payments for sex be banned “in line with measures being taken in other European countries”.

    What other European countries are those? Sweden, Norway and Iceland. That’s hardly a groundswell of support for this kind of law.

    Also Michelle Hennessy’s article is biased as she fails to canvas an opinion from the rival Turn Off The Blue campaign which campaigns to decriminalize the adult sex work industry and de-stigmatize it and which campaigns for the human, legal, civil, labour, health and safety rights of all adult sex workers on a par with all other workers.

    The Turn Off The Red Light campaign, and its constituent organizations such as Ruhama and the Immigrant Council of Ireland, are not interested in talking to sex workers because they do not accept that they have a legitimate voice. They consider all sex work to be rape and torture. They conflate all sex work with trafficking. They are authoritarians who seek to ban organized prostitution across the country in much the same way as Frank Duff and his Legion of Mary successfully campaigned to close down the Monto red light district in Dublin in the 1920s.

    Reply
    • Careful now Paul, don’t be slagging off the article. Michelle, I think its is beautiful writing from a beautiful lady and I will not have it slagged off. As the wise and wondeful Lemmy from Motorhead eloquently put it ‘Don’t let the b*****ds grind you down’

      Reply
    • If Michelle wrote a Turn Off The Blue Light campaign friendly article, the b*****d would pay her a compliment.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 20/07/12 #

      Agree with a lot of that Paul. Prohibition has been an out and out failure. Prostitution could not become more common that it already is.

      Reply
    • Just read an article in a Danish newspaper on criminalisation in Norway. Apparently it is one of the very few made in a country that has criminalised clients of prostitutes. Its conclusion was that the numbers in prostitution have risen, the number of assaults on prostitutes has risen and prositutes have grown less trustful of the police and less likely to report assaults. Overall it concludes that the change has brought no benefits and more disadvantages to working prostitutes. It also mentions the reluctance of Swedish authorities to release data in regard to their own experience due to the politicisation of the issue. The Danish govt is considering a similar ban but many feel it may decide against it on foot of this report.
      Source: Weekendavisen, Copenhagen.

      Reply
  • The last few days have seen local councils being immensely pro-active. First Cork’s call for legalising gay marriage and now Longford looking to eliminate this debasing ‘profession.’ Wonder what’s next?

    Reply
  • Ruhama are duping councils with their feminist propaganda again.

    Criminalizing the buyer would entail gender profiling and give one gender preference over another resulting in inequality, polarization and drive the business further underground. Can’t the TORL see this?

    Reply
  • jrbmc 20/07/12 #

    Let’s not beat around the bush it will drive it further underground, it’s also possible that rapes and attacks will rise , and do you think that it’s only the low life that pay for sex??? , far from it….it’s the well to do that decide which brothel gets closed and which says open or should I call them the Gentleman’s Club.

    Reply
  • Can’t help but read these poems @matt black why not put these on a poetry thread .

    Reply
  • Personally, I think the current laws function properly. As Henry Ford once said, if it works don’t fix it.

    Reply
  • I looked up the political party composition of Leitrim and Longford county councils on electionireland.org . Leitrim: Fianna Fail 10 seats, Fine Gael 8 seats, “others” 2 seats; Longford: Fine Gael 11 seats, Fianna Fail 8 seats, “others” 2 seats. Says it all.

    Reply
  • All these types of suggestions are based on the nonsensical religious beliefs of members of intellectual free zones.

    Reply
  • Men that have to pay for it aren’t men. They’re sad pathetic little creatures with more money than self respect.

    Reply
  • Prostitutes in Sweden pay taxes and can claim state benefits including sick days and also take parental leave. So on one hand the Government there are happy to take taxes off the seller, but the purchaser is criminalised. Are TORL suggesting the Irish Government do the same here?

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-05/sweden-s-tax-paying-prostitutes-win-right-to-paid-sick-leave.html

    If it was a straightforward matter Alan Shatter would not have initiated a consultation process which will include a conference in the autumn.

    This process enables everyone to have their say, it’s no use just slagging off the NGO’s and their one-sided arguments here on theJournal.ie, if you want to have your voice heard you should make a submission.

    Reply
  • EM 20/07/12 #

    Am I missing something?

    “We have examined the experience abroad and firmly believe that the only way to end a sex trade and end the threats, abuse and violence against women is to target supply,”

    Does that mean they have ended the sex trades in these other countries who implemented the same measures? Name me one country where they have ended the sex trade?

    I fully support actions which will end trafficing, abuse & violence against women but these actions won’t make a blind bit of difference in my opinion.
    It’s time we started to come up with some new ideas in how to tackle these issues…sadly our local governments are as clueless & incompetent as our national government.

    Reply
  • When I was young and had no sense
    In far-off Mandalay
    I lost my heart to a Burmese girl
    As lovely as the day.

    Her skin was gold, her hair was jet,
    Her teeth were ivory;
    I said, “for twenty silver pieces,
    Maiden, sleep with me”.

    She looked at me, so pure, so sad,
    The loveliest thing alive,
    And in her lisping, virgin voice,
    Stood out for twenty-five.

    Reply
  • There’s a lot of professional criminals involved in running Ireland’s sex-trade. ‘Independent’ hookers are subjected to violence by pimps. Pimps are also behind campaigns to give the sex-trade a main-stream, legitimate image. http://www.dilloninvestigates.com/index_files/McCormick_pimp_prostitution.htm

    Reply
    • In your article, you assert that the Turn Off The Blue Light campaign claims that only 2 people were convicted of brothel keeping offences. This is not true. A month previous to your article, the Turn Off The Blue light campaign completed research over a 3 year period from 2008 through to July 27th 2011 that shows that 55 people were convicted of brothel keeping offenses, 52 of whom appear to be sex workers themselves. Over 90% were women in the 25 to 44 years old age bracket.

      http://www.turnoffthebluelight.ie/information/brothel-keepers/2/

      Reply
  • Longford brazzzers I’d rather a Nigerian aids victim

    Reply

Add New Comment