TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Luas drivers to serve notice of industrial action

The drivers are to serve the Luas operator with notice of industrial action after holding a ballot yesterday.

Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

LUAS DRIVERS ARE to serve notice of industrial action over a dispute concerning conditions.

The drivers, who are members of the trade union Siptu, yesterday balloted for industrial action in the hopes of securing more favourable working conditions. They will later serve operator Veolia Transdev Ireland with their three week’s notice, RTÉ reports.

The workers are protesting over rostering and also the company’s decision to let staff go after they finish up 12 month contracts.

The drivers rejected a Labour Court recommendation a number of weeks ago, reports the Irish Times.

Read: Two hospitalised after Luas tram collides with refuse truck>

Read next:

Comments (39 Comments)

  • The last time tram workers went on strike in Dublin it didn’t end too well.

    Reply
  • majority if jobs in private sector these days are being offered on a contact basis, if done one process themselves they may get full time job but for majority these days reality is jumping from one contract to another and will only get worse once employers are asked to pay sick pay, contacts are the way employers have of working around this

    Reply
    • I agree Steve, you can see that employers are growing towards a project approach, recruiting expertise for when they need it.
      This is cost saving as they don’t have to pay sick leave, holidays and other perks or simply not paying a salary while the expertise isn’t required at that stage.

      Reply
    • I don’t think you can describe this particular case as being “project based”

      Reply
    • ‘growing towards a project approach’ is a sophisticated way of saying ‘treat labour like any other resource, divest yourself of it when it becomes too costly or inconvenient’, the only problem is that individual workers then become the responsibility of the government between contracts, while business leaders hypocritically bemoan the largesse of the state

      Reply
    • Tomy: I realise its stretching it a bit, but from the operators view it is a project. They have the license only for so long before they need to re-tender.
      I admin, that the only reason they do this to the drivers is so they can reduce the costs.

      Dietrich: Despite the negatives, I think project orientated management is the future. My kids won’t know permanent jobs, unless they are part of the core organisation.

      Reply
  • Fair play to them. I would never back the likes of bord an mona etc but these guys having the threat of being out of work after 12 months just so the employer won’t have to give you any entitlements is a disgrace. Reminds me of Braun in Carlow years ago, three month contracts and then a week off only to be rehired if you brown nosed the line managers.Disgraceful

    Reply
  • 12 month contract, it does exactly what is says on the tin

    Reply
    • Every contract is a short term contract. No-one can promise you a job for life. If you do the job well, they might let you go, if you do the job badly, they might keep you. If they have reduced business anything can happen. C’est la vie.

      We are the cogs in a big corporate machine – there’s nothing wrong with that – is there?

      Someone mentioned here that the union had supported it in the first place. What has changed then?

      Seems to me that the unions in Ireland might be a tad over-powerful. Is it government by the people or by the unions in Ireland? They both seem equallly well-paid!

      Reply
  • Don’t know why people are calling 12 month contracts a disgrace. Try week to week contracts like people in my job are on …. see how much life planning that gets you. Tell you what – let Luas hire three times the amount of staff it has now to fix the rostering problem and give them all permanent contracts immediately with full perks. And let you the passenger pay for all that in the tripled price of your ticket. How does that sound ?

    Reply
    • Boom

      Reply
    • Labour Relations Commission is a joke if employers break a recommendation they are pilloried by the unions but when it’s vice versa sure let’s have a strike.the reason for the 12 month contract issue is that terminating a contract is much more difficult with a three tier warning system on any issue except gross misconduct,example three warnings for persistent lateness but if their is another problem then you have to start from scratch this means getting rid of an incompetent employee can take a considerable period of time and in a unionised environment even longer.I agree with employee’s rights but when employers are seeking flexibility in a tight financial environment there is the promlem.Once a contract reaches 12months and one day all of the above applies.

      Reply
  • Nappy 20/09/12 #

    if they are only giving them 12 month contracts this time i would agree with them

    Reply
  • Rostering? The luas stops at 12 midnight ffs!!! …any other country it would be running to 4am. Then Sundays they come every 10/15mins…only in lazy Ireland.. I agree on 12 month contract is disgrace but rostering are you kidding me..what a handy job.

    Reply
    • We don’t know anything about their rostering. The Luas runs seven days a week, and nineteen hours a day on weekdays. I fail to see what your grievance about the Luas schedule – which i actually happen to agree with – has to do with this issue?

      Reply
    • Dave 20/09/12 #

      What a stupid comment! How the staff are rostered has nothing to do with the bloody timetable for god sake! Its not the drivers who decide at what time tye service ends! And to my knowledge, the tube certainly does not operate til 4am or any other system in Europe!

      Reply
    • trains run long into the night in Berlin

      Reply
  • Siptu and Impact allowed the introduction of short contracts years ago. No sympathy. The employer has broken no law here. These workers signed the contract, and now what SIPTU doing battle for them I am sick to my back teeth with the unions constantly holding some company or public service to ransom, fu$king up everyone else’s day. SIPTU management should be jailed for the disruption they cause several times a year.

    Reply
  • That seems like a bit of an extreme comment Cian! Care to elaborate?

    Reply
  • That’s why it is called a 12month contract. If they had a problem with it they shouldn’t have taken the contract at the start

    Reply
    • Unions like SIPTU allowed all this 12 month contract nonsense to evolve in the first place. Now they are going through the motions of being upset.

      Reply
    • So take what the bosses give you or stagnate on the dole? If they dont fight for proper conditions the next crowd will have to take the same crap. There is no fair exchange, there is no option for jobseekers to refuse crap contracts when companies like Veolia have massive capital reserves, massive contracts and a massive pool of labour to choose from. Bargaining individually is fine when you’re in senior management and can afford to turn down offers and know you wont have to starve because of it, collective action is the only option when you dont have that economic power.

      Reply
  • SIPTU is a cancer.

    Reply
  • AT least it won’t effect those of us outside Dublin.

    Reply
  • They should consider themselves lucky to be in a job.

    Reply
  • And cue the public/private sector fight and the usual gumph about Unions. Ah, the old reliable comments on the Journal

    Reply
  • When the poor are breaking into your houses for food you will have no one to blame but yourselves you self serving morons

    Reply

Add New Comment