TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Terms of Reference for government’s Magdalene fund published

Judge John Quirke will make recommendations on the criteria for the help the government can give to Magdalene Laundries survivors.

The site of the former Magdalene Laundry on Sean MacDermott Street in Dublin.
The site of the former Magdalene Laundry on Sean MacDermott Street in Dublin.
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

THE TERMS OF Reference for the process that will lead to the establishment of a fund for Magdalene Laundries survivors have been published.

In a speech in the Dáil this evening, An Taoiseach Enda Kenny said that the Government has asked the President of the Law Reform Commission Judge John Quirke to undertake a three month review and to make recommendations as to the criteria that should be applied in assessing the help that the government can provide in areas including medical cards, psychological and counselling services and other welfare needs.

When Judge Quirk reports back – the time frame having been set at three months – the fund to assist women will be established.

The Terms of Reference for Mr Justice Quirke are:

Mr Justice Quirke will, taking into account the findings of the “Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee to establish the facts of State involvement with the Magdalene Laundries”, be asked to do the following:

(i) to advise on the establishment of an ex gratia Scheme (to operate on a non-adverserial basis) including identifying the criteria and factors to be taken into account to facilitate the early establishment and effective conduct of an ex gratia Scheme for the benefit of those women who were admitted to and worked in a Magdalene Laundry and in the Laundry operated in the Training Centre at Stanhope Street, Dublin, taking into account criteria determined to be relevant, including work undertaken and other matters as considered appropriate, to contribute to a healing and reconciliation process;

(ii) to examine how best to operate (as part of that Scheme) an ex gratia Fund, of a sum sufficient to meet the recommendations of Mr Justice Quirke, the nature and amount of ex gratia payments to be made out of the Fund and on the determination of applications for payment in an effective and timely manner that ensures the monies in the Fund are directed only to the benefit of eligible applicants and not on legal fees and expenses.

(iii) to examine how the Government might best provide supports (including health services such as medical cards, mental health services and counselling services and other welfare needs) as part of the Scheme for women who require such supports as a result of their experiences in the Laundries.

(iv) to consider the approach to be taken in circumstances in which a payment has already been made by the Redress Board by way of redress to a former resident of an industrial school, where such payment included a sum specifically due to the direct transfer of that person from an industrial school to a relevant Laundry and their time or part of their time spent in a Laundry or Laundries.

(v) to examine the effect, if any, of the making of an ex gratia payment to a person who is resident in the UK and how best the making of any such payment should be structured so as not to adversely affect their existing entitlements to benefits and supports.

(vi) to advise as to what steps or measures are appropriate to ensure that ex gratia payments or supports or assistance provided are dis-regarded for the purposes of determining entitlement of Social Welfare payments and/or income tax liability.

(vii) to report back to Government within three months with recommendations.

Read: Kenny “deeply regrets and apologises unreservedly” to Magdalene women in emotional speech>

VIDEO: Enda Kenny issues formal State apology to Magdalene survivors>

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • Happy is a strong word. I think its a land mark day but the state allowed the destruction of lives. Whats greedy? Back Pay , pension and compensation for a abuse would be a start, I would think!

    Reply
  • Correction. The government is not providing help, the state is. Most of the current cabinet were in government while some of these slave houses were in operation. They should be ashamed, not given any credit.

    Reply
  • The Irish Psychiatric Profession should also apologise to Magdalene victims.

    The Psychiatric profession colluded with the Catholic Church in incarcerating thousands of innocent Irish Women and Men for ” unacceptable, deviant behaviour” – ie. being a Single Mother or being a Homosexual in the Fifties and Sixties. Many lives were ruined by these guys ordering Lobotomies, Freezing Insulin Baths and Electric Shock Treatments on many healthy people.

    When will the media scrutinise the numerous abuses by Consultant Psychiatrists ? We know of several cases involving these so called pillars of the Community locking innocent people up in return for large cash payments . They remain above the Law and when they get a diagnosis wrong, the unfortunate patient has no opportunity for redress. They intimidate and bully. Have any of these arrogant elitists ever apologised for the sins committed in the name of their professional research ?

    We now know, thanks to great work, by the late Mary Rafferty that these abuses were/are still happening recently in Waterford and other Institutions. Doctor Dennis Lane O’ Kelly has been named in the excellent RTE documentary, ‘Behind the Walls’. Yet those who knew about this and other abuses are still employed by the HSE. Do these experts on all aspects of human nature really expect us to believe that they knew nothing about the sexual abuse of vulnerable people being instigated by one of their colleagues, Dr. Lane O’ Kelly ?

    Reply
  • What a insult, 250,000 he must be joking that like 25 euro for each of the 10,000 slaves the State used for free labour over the years, speach and tears me arse, a cunning hypocrite if this is the case

    Reply
  • Can our country afford to give compensation? I hope people are happy with an apology and don’t get greedy.

    Reply
    • Not a question of greed. If you did a day’s work you would probably like to be paid for it. You would probably expect that your employer would pay his portion of PRSI. This didn’t happen in this case which meant that these women couldn’t claim any benefits or pensions. Some couldn’t even get a birth cert.
      I hope the government will expect the church to pay their share of this compensation as the church has always been very keen on the idea of restitution for wrongs committed. I wonder will they be so keen now that this concept applies to themselves?

      Reply
    • If greedy is getting paid what you’re entitled to by law then I’m fine with that.
      We don’t do slave labour in Ireland, these women don’t deserve to be put in line with every other creditor, they should be the first to be paid what they’re due as a matter of utmost urgency, they should then be assured that no matter what happens economically they will always have whatever supports the state provides in the coming months.
      The measure of a society is how it treats its weakest, it’s poorest, it’s most vulnerable and not at it’s wealthiest and most well off, but at its poorest, at its least well off. Ireland has a pretty damning record in this respect, but now it is being given a chance to right some of its’ wrongs, it will never nullify or negate or remove or displace the suffering these women have gone through in their lives, and the best you can say is you hope nobody gets greedy?!
      Get greedy, it’s about time somebody stood up for themselves against this state and its dark past, and got some restitution for their suffering.
      Greedy. Easy know you’ve never suffered at the hands of the state in as profound a manner as these women.

      Reply
    • When Jack is locked up against his will and forced to scour the public’s clothes and bedding on 10-hour shifts in obnoxious conditions for 10, 15 or twenty years just because he is a (possibly) good-looking man, then perhaps he might take a different stance, if he can hack it all, that is.

      Reply
    • It sounds like you want me to suffer Michelle. Don’t get personal.
      When I was watching primetime last night people kept on talking about money and compensation. Money won’t change what happened in the past. I just hate seeing dollar signs in people’s eyes. Maybe if I suffered I might be seeing dollar signs too.

      Reply
  • I keep thinking of the musical Evita set in Argentina and the line goes ” And the money keeps moving in from outer space” money money money money money just keeps rolling in ………

    Reply
    • Jack our government gives 638 million of taxpayers money to Africa every year and €7 million to Libya this year so surely 250,000 in compensation is small change in their eyes. And where is the church in all this?

      Reply

Add New Comment