TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Explainer: What is happening in Mali?

It is almost three weeks since French and Malian troops began a battle to wrest back the north of the country from Islamist rebels.

Malian soldiers man a checkpoint outside Sevare on Sunday
Malian soldiers man a checkpoint outside Sevare on Sunday
Image: AP Photo/Jerome Delay

IT IS ALMOST three weeks since France first intervened in an intense military battle over Islamist control of parts of Mali.

French and Malian troops have seized six towns since they launched their offensive on 11 January, trying to win back the huge northern part of the country which has been controlled by rebels since April 2012.

The former French colony, which gained its independence in June 1960, asked France for help on 10 January after the Islamists captured a key town and warned that they planned to push further south towards the capital in a bid to gain control of more of the vast, landlocked country.

Here’s a timeline of what’s happened since then:

January 10:

- Islamists capture the government-held central town of Konna and say they will push farther south. Mali’s interim president Dioncounda Traore asks France for help.

- Witnesses say foreign troops and weapons have begun arriving by transport plane at an army base in Sevare, just 70 kilometres south of Konna.

January 11:

- With French support, Malian government troops launch an offensive against Islamist rebels.

- French President Francois Hollande confirms French troops are actively supporting the offensive.

January 12:

- French Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian announces the death of a French helicopter pilot.

France Mali Fighting

French soldiers sing the national anthem at a military base in southern France before their deployment to Mali (AP Photo/Claude Paris)

January 13:

- French airstrikes target Islamist bases in the northern regions of Gao and Kidal, killing more than 60 rebels.

- Hollande says the intervention has stopped a southward rebel advance seen as threatening the capital Bamako. Algeria has authorised French warplanes to use its airspace for bombing raids on Mali, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says.

January 14:

- Rebels abandon key northern bases. Residents in the towns of Gao, Douentza and Timbuktu report all Islamists have fled, though a rebel spokesman calls it a “tactical retreat.” However, Islamists seize the town of Diabaly in government-held territory, 400 kilometres north of the capital. They vow to “strike at the heart of France.”

- Ethnic-Tuareg separatists say they are ready to support France by taking on Islamist rebels on the ground.

January 15

- France engages for the first time ground troops to retake Diabaly. Hundreds of soldiers from France and Mali head to the town, which witnesses say is bombarded by French fighter planes. Le Drian says the Malian army has not regained control of Konna, after the Malian army announced on January 12 that they had taken the town.

- Speaking in Dubai, Hollande says the French intervention has three objectives — “ending terrorists attacks,” as well as “securing Bamako where we have thousands of citizens and help Mali to restore its territorial integrity.”

- Some 2,500 French troops are to be deployed for Operation Serval.

Mali Fighting

A Malian soldier gestures at journalists to leave the area of a French air strike (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)

January 16

- French troops battle rebels in Diabaly. Le Drian says the western zone where Diabaly lies is home to “the toughest, most fanatical and best-organised groups.”

- Islamist fighters claim to have taken 41 foreigners hostage in a retaliatory attack in neighbouring Algeria.

January 17

- French warplanes continue to pound Islamist militant targets in Mali around Diabaly. West African forces arrive in Mali to help the French-led intervention.

- Confusion abounds over the fate of the hostages being held in the gas field compound in Algeria

January 18

- French troops seize Konna, a key city in the central region of Mali, from the rebels.

- Hundreds of hostages are freed by militants holding them at the Algerian gas facility but many remain unaccounted for.

January 21

- Algeria says at least 37 foreigners were killed in the hostage situation at the gas compound.

- The French and Mali troops take control of Diabaly as Islamists flee after sustained French air strikes.

January 25

- There is a split among the rebels as Ansar Dine, which helped to seize control of parts of the north of the country, says it has broken away from its al Qaeda allies and wants a truce.

January 27

- The French-led troops seize the eastern town of Gao, another rebel stronghold and the biggest of the six towns seized by troops since the offensive began, after fighting on Saturday.

- Around 20 air strikes are carried out by French warplanes.  France confirms it has deployed 2,900 troops.

January 28

- French and Malian troops surround the fabled city of Timbuktu in a lighting advance against the rebels.

Additional reporting by Christine Bohan

- © AFP, 2013

Read: French-led troops surround fabled Timbuktu >

Read: Mali conflict: Islamists offer hostage talks amid French offensive >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (47 Comments)

  • Timbuktu always seemed a long way away

    Reply
  • Very good point Mark. I lived for two years in different parts of Africa, mainly among black Africans and never had any trouble there. At the moment the west extracts substantially more wealth from Africa in the form of mineral wealth, high intrest rates on loans etc than it gives in aid.( which mostly ends up in the pockets of corrupt politicians)

    Reply
  • moron

    Reply
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUAFCXCZ6MI
    another view of things is always helpful.

    Reply
  • B Lowe 28/01/13 #

    That’s a good question.
    Well we know France is not in Mali solely to stop ‘Islamists’ as it supported Islamists in Gaddafis overthrow and it currently supports ‘Islamists’ in Aleppo, Syria. So that argument on its own is non sensical.
    A more appropriate question would be what national interests is France out to enforce in Mali.
    Well, from that more realistic point of view it is in Mali to secure Uranium deposits and protection its Uranium mines in North Eastern Algeria. Anyone willing to delve will see the securement of Uranium supply is a stated national interest of the French.
    It’s handy that they have a military dictatorship in charge in Mali. This dictatorship has extended martial law for a few more months. However, in mainstream media outlets this military dictatorship is being referred to as the legimate government of Mali which is more corporate propaganda.

    Reply
    • Dario Fo 28/01/13 #

      Maybe the esprit de corps of The Leigon is slipping and they need a break from square bashing.

      Reply
    • B Lowe, why don’t you tell the French about zero point energy? Then they would not need the uranium.

      Reply
    • But the mines that France source their uranium from are in Niger and not Mali. And if supply was somehow restricted they could easily source it from Australia and Canada who are friendly countries and among the top producers in the world. Not everything is a conspiracy theory!

      Reply
    • And also consider that buying it from Australia and Canada would probably work out a lot cheaper than going to war. It’s not like oil where the demand is absolutely sky high.

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      And whilst the current government is there as a result of a coup (which happened because of the incumbent governments refusal to face up to the growing problem of invading islamists) there is a written commitment to democratic elections at the earliest opportunity – not exactly a dictatorship as most people understand it. If you want to see a true military dictatorship look no further than your buddy Assad – when did he or his father ever commit to democratic elections during the last 40 years?

      Reply
    • Always with a smart answer.

      Reply
  • A lot has to do with the Algerian government infiltrating and fomenting islamist militias to launch false flag attacks within and outside algeria under the guise of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, in order to get arms and cash from the US to help them combat terrorism.
    The thought of the Tuareg seeking independence from Mali could have had repercussions for Algeria which is why clandestine elements of the Algerian government backed Islamists to take over the Tuareg insurrection which sidelined them and eroded their credibility due to their now perceived association with these islamists.
    But things appear to have escalated beyond the control of the Algerians to become a serious crisis for all regional players.

    Reply
  • Fools 28/01/13 #

    Africans are just war on the brains. Not a stable country in Africa.

    Reply
    • What a vile comment, Abby.

      Reply
    • Very Good Point Abby.

      Reply
    • In fairness Botswana has been a very stable parliamentary democracy since its independence.

      Reply
    • That’s true. In fact Botswana only formed a military in the 70s in direct response to SA soldiers constantly violating their territory!

      Reply
    • Abby, it was that attitude that made Africa unstable. It was also the excuse used for slavery, dictatorships and juntas.
      Africa has been abused, raped and pillaged by the western powers, more so then any other continent.
      And because it did so poorly, it was colonised and indoctrinated by christian missions; forcing them to accept western law, western drawn borders, western political systems, western philosophy and religion.
      Guess what: it didn’t work and still doesn’t work.

      Reply
    • Abby, why don’t you look back at your comments earlier on Israel? You contradict yourself. Also go buy yourself a dictionary and learn to spell.

      Reply
    • Jill :D 28/01/13 #

      Well that sounded extremely racis Abby. Oh wait, that’s because it is an extremely racist thing to say. It’s 2013 for Christ sake.

      Reply
    • Jill :D 28/01/13 #

      racist *

      Reply
    • Abby, remember your words here. Some day you will come to regret saying such things. You have some growing up to do.

      Reply
    • @Abby:
      Like a simple minded territorial tribal monkey you are. Go eat a banana in your racially exclusive tree.

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      Whilst Abby could have made her point a bit better, she is absolutely right that rural South Africa is one of the most dangerous places in the world for a white person to live.
      Its not well publicised but if you research it you will see for yourself. There have been literally thousands of racially motivated murders of white people.
      Unfortunately anti-white racism doesn’t take the form of name-calling and discrimination, it takes place generally with the blade of a machete or with petrol and matches.

      Reply
    • Mattoid, perhaps you should look into the living conditions of black farm workers and compare those to the white farmers. Apartheid is alive and well n those areas.

      Reply
    • @mattoid, There’s a lot of anti-white racism in Africa right now, violent too. I hate that sh!t. It just feels like Abby is a supporter of the polar opposite, pro-white racism, judging by her comments.

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      @Mark
      I wouldn’t doubt that, but whats your point? Do you think that justifies a white farmer being hacked to pieces in his bed, or his wife being murdered by having a broken bottle thrust into her vagina?

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      There is a white genocide going on there that has been largely ignored by the rest of the world (and which is actively encouraged by certain extremist black politicians).

      Reply
    • Mattoid; you really have a flair for the dramatic, don’t you? Violence is never good and doesn’t solve anything. That said, as the white farmers refuse to do anything to assist their black workers, do nothing to share their wealth, it is hard to feel sorry for hem.
      As long as they keep holding on to the riches they’ve earned over he backs of others and prefer to build higher walls to separate them, rather then decent housing and facilities for their workers I think I know where I’ll put the blame.
      And a genocide? More black people die than white farmers by the violence you describe because of illness and malnutrition!

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      Flair for the dramatic??
      No Mark, just a dose of cold hard reality. Sorry if you don’t like it but that is what is actually happening on the ground.
      Please try and bring yourself up to speed on this subject – you could do worse than googling “white genocide south africa” for starters.
      I’m not here to defend white farmers, apportion blame or condone the way black labourers have been / are being treated, I’m just pointing out the facts of what is happening there each and every day.

      Reply
    • Just because I draw a different conclusion doesn’t mean I’m not aware of the facts.
      As I said, it’s hard to feel sorry for a group that systematically abuses another to gain more wealth without wanting to improve the circumstances of their labourers. At present wealth is still predominantly in the ands of the whites and they have no intention to share any of it. And in areas of great inequality, criminality soars.
      Next to this, black people are equally victims of the same crimes, it’s hardly a race thing. I don’t hear you about that despite you apparently being all so knowledgeable, how come?

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      I wasn’t aware that I had drawn any conclusions, other than that rural South Africa is an extremely dangerous place for a white person to live.

      Reply
    • Yawn

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/01/13 #

      Stay with it Mark – you can do it if you concentrate hard enough…

      Reply
  • Why are all of islam’s borders bloody….??
    Why are they filled with so much HATE…??
    Who the HELL is this ‘ allah ‘….??
    Hell, – now there’s a clue…..

    Reply
    • Pls mind the way you talk must of this peaple they are not real muslim they are just spoiling the image of islam.

      Reply
    • Sorry to bust your bubble, Ibraheem, but muhammad was a warmonger, who slaughtered, looted, raped and tortured his way across the middl-east.
      One of his most disgusting acts was to have full sexual intercourse with a little 9yo. girl, when he was 54yo.
      muhammad was a very bad man, & his koran and hadiths are filled with revenge, hatred, & violence.
      Everybody is finally waking up to these facts.
      The death of islam may be just around the corner…

      Reply
  • It’s about France,s uranium supply. France gets 80% of its electricity from nuclear power. They get a substantial amount of uranium from a mine in Mali. Can’t have that falling into fundamentalist hands now Pierre can we.?

    Reply
  • Mali….. Don’t they sell a lot of Gold? To China etc?

    Reply
  • You mean like keeping the Irish west of the Shannon

    Reply

Add New Comment