TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Palestinians certain to win UN recognition as a state

Israel and the United States have warned UN recognition could delay hopes of achieving an independent Palestinian homeland through peace talks.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, right, shakes hands with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at U.N. headquarters Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2012.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, right, shakes hands with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at U.N. headquarters Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2012.
Image: AP Photo/Frank Franklin II

THE PALESTINIANS ARE certain to win UN recognition as a state today in a General Assembly vote that Israel and the United States warn could delay hopes of achieving an independent Palestinian homeland through peace talks with Israel.

The United States, Israel’s closest ally, mounted an aggressive campaign to head off the General Assembly vote, which the Palestinians view as a historic step in their quest for global recognition.

With most of the 193 General Assembly member states sympathetic to the Palestinians, the vote is certain to succeed. Several key countries, including France, have recently announced they would support the move to elevate the Palestinians from the status of UN observer to nonmember observer state. However, a country’s vote in favour of the status change does not automatically imply its individual recognition of a Palestine state, something that must be done bilaterally.

The Palestinians say they need UN recognition of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, the lands Israel captured in 1967, to be able to resume negotiations with Israel. The non-member observer state status could also open the way for possible war crimes charges against the Jewish state at the International Criminal Court.

Personal appeal

In a last-ditch move Wednesday, US Deputy Secretary of State William Burns made a personal appeal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas promising that President Barack Obama would re-engage as a mediator in 2013 if Abbas abandoned the effort to seek statehood. But the Palestinian leader refused, said Abbas aide Saeb Erekat.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday the recognition of an independent state of Palestine in the UN General Assembly will not advance the Palestinians’ quest for a homeland. He said the Palestinians will not win a state until they recognise Israel as the Jewish homeland, declare an end to their conflict with the Jewish state and agree to security arrangements that protect Israel.

For Abbas, the UN bid is crucial if he wants to maintain his leadership and relevance, especially following the recent conflict between his Hamas rivals in Gaza and Israel. The conflict saw the Islamic militant group claim victory and raise its standing in the Arab world, while Abbas’ Fatah movement was sidelined and marginalised.

The Palestinians chose the “International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People” for the vote. Before it takes place, there will be a morning of speeches by supporters focusing on the rights of the Palestinians. Abbas is scheduled to speak at that meeting, and again in the afternoon when he will present the case for Palestinian statehood in the General Assembly.

‘Meaningful negotiations’

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Wednesday that the UN vote will not fulfil the goal of independent Palestinian and Israeli states living side by side in peace, which the US strongly supports because that requires direct negotiations.

“We need an environment conducive to that,” she told reporters in Washington. “And we’ve urged both parties to refrain from actions that might in any way make a return to meaningful negotiations that focus on getting to a resolution more difficult.”

The US Congress has threatened financial sanctions if the Palestinians improve their status at the United Nations.

Ahead of the vote, Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch filed an amendment to a defence bill Wednesday that would eliminate funding for the United Nations if the General Assembly changes Palestine’s status.

“Increasing the Palestinians’ role in the United Nations is absolutely the wrong approach, especially in light of recent military developments in the Middle East,” he said in a statement. “Israel is one of America’s closest allies, and any movement to strengthen one of its fiercest enemies must not be tolerated.”

Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev said that by going to the UN, the Palestinians violate “both the spirit and the word of signed agreements to solve issues through negotiations,” which broke down four years ago.

But Israeli officials appeared to back away from threats of drastic measures if the Palestinians get UN approval, with officials suggesting the government would take steps only if the Palestinians use their new status to act against Israel.

Regev, meanwhile, affirmed that Israel is willing to resume talks without preconditions.

Hopes of new talks without preconditions

UN diplomats said they will be listening closely to Abbas’ speech to the General Assembly on Thursday afternoon before the vote to see if he makes an offer of fresh negotiations with no strings, which could lead to new talks. The Palestinians have been demanding a freeze on Israeli settlements as a precondition.

As a sign of the importance Israel attaches to the vote, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman flew to New York and was scheduled to meet Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon before the vote. Israel’s UN Ambassador Ron Prosor had been scheduled to speak in the General Assembly after Abbas, but it appears Lieberman may now make Israel’s case opposing the resolution.

Unlike the Security Council, there are no vetoes in the General Assembly. The world body is dominated by countries sympathetic to the Palestinian cause and the resolution to raise its status from an observer to a nonmember observer state only requires a majority vote for approval. To date, 132 countries — over two-thirds of the UN member states — have recognised the state of Palestine.

The Palestinians have been courting Western nations, especially the Europeans, seen as critical to enhancing their international standing. A number have announced they will vote “yes” including France, Spain, Norway, Denmark and Switzerland. Those opposed or abstaining include the US, Israel, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands and Australia.

A high vote could boost Abbas’ standing.

“If there is a poor turnout, a poor vote, the radicals gain,” said India’s UN Ambassador Hardeep Singh Puri.

The Palestinians turned to the General Assembly after the United States announced it would veto their bid last fall for full UN membership until there is a peace deal with Israel.

Following last year’s move by the Palestinians to join the UN cultural agency UNESCO, the United States withheld funds from the organisation, which amount to 22 percent of its budget. The US also withheld money from the Palestinians.

Read: Ireland likely to vote for increased Palestinian role at UN>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (43 Comments)

  • Typical Israeli/U.S doublethink and threat: don’t go for recognition as a state by the U.N. because that might impede your aim of being a state.
    All the while the REAL things that are crushing Palestinian aspirations toward statehood are the gradual ethnic cleansing of the West bank, and the besieging of Gaza.
    All carried out at the point of American manufactured (and supplied) armaments.
    I wish the Palestinians every success.

    Reply
    • The Palestinians are either treated as Israeli citizens with equal participation in the Israeli “democracy” or they have a right to sovereignty and self determination. The U.S. and Israel are putting a bar on an obvious democratic mandate that the Palestinians have to self determination, the good news is Palestinians have so much more to achieve through international political engagement then firing imported rockets at the citizens of Goliath military state. Hopefully UN support will lead a Palestinians out of support of terrorism and towards non violent actions. The fact that the U.S. and Israel are advising them not to do it is clearly sufficient grounds to do it considering the complete lack of respect that either the U.S. or Israel has ever shown to them. The Idea that the U.S. or Israel can lecture the Palestinians on what is best for them is farcical. I hope they can achieve sovereignty, self determination and dignity for their people through the establishment of an internationally recognised democratic state, the U.S. will not be judged well by history in seeking to prevent such a process. I am confident that privately alot of U.S. politicians feel less than proud of their involvement in this charade.

      Reply
    • Economicoply, I think you nailed it in one go there, good post. The Palestinians will never be given equal citizenship status in Israel, it is set up as a Jewish state and nothing else will be acceptable to the Israelis; Ze’ev Jabotinsky once went as far as saying that the Arab minority would be on an equal footing with its Jewish counterpart…as long as it remains firmly in the minority!. Furthermore, the ideals of Theodore Herzl et al who began the whole movement are still very much alive today: Israel is to expand and take as much land as it can by whatever means necessary, at whatever cost to the Arabs or anyone else. Helps when you have the backing of the U.S. Agree with you 100% that the UN is by far the better route than firing rockets, that’s why Israel and the U.S. are so against it – it’s not as easy to condemn democracy!

      Reply
    • Absolutely!! the bottom line is that no matter what the Palestinians do the US/Israel alliance will condemn it. The last thing Israel wants is peace – if that happens the US won’t provide money for their nuclear weapons program, and they won’t be able to continue stealing Palestinian land using “terrorist” activities as a cover. I hope that both the Palestinians & Israelis manage to bring those responsible for crimes against Humanity to the ICC. But that won’t be comfortable for the US. The rule of law and the writing of history is normally for the victor – but this war isn’t over yet.

      Reply
  • Will this recognition be on a par with that afforded to the Vatican?

    Reply
  • Theyd want to do it quick before isreal builds settlements on all palestinian land

    Reply
    • This was being blocked by the US!? The ‘land of the free’… ‘the custodian of world democracy’ !?? Tut

      Reply
    • M J Rosenberg, former AIPIC employee:

      In other words, Israel would have to accede to the demand for Palestinian rights or be “painted by former friends as an apartheid state.”

      Except that would never happen. Israel will never voluntarily give Palestinians democratic rights and it does not have to because U.S. policy, dictated by AIPAC, will never hold Israel to the rules it applies every where else. If Israel absorbs all the territories and denies the people who live there voting rights, 90% of Congress will support that position. So would President Obama. So would Al Franken, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Elizabeth Warren. Of course the Republicans would too. In fact, I have written the statement liberal Democrats would use in defending Israel’s position of not permitting Palestinians to exercise their rights.

      [i]We firmly reject the United Nations call on Israel to extend the vote to Israel’s five million Palestinian citizens. We would remind the United Nations that for Israel to grant voting rights to this group would end Israel’s standing as the world’s only Jewish democracy. Democracy is an elastic concept. What applies to Brazil or Germany or even the United States does not necessarily apply to Israel, located as it is in a very dangerous neighborhood. If nothing else, the Holocaust taught us that. We also reject calls to link aid to Israel to its compliance with the United Nations resolution calling on Israel to grant voting rights. We oppose that idea just as we applaud our government’s use of the veto to block its passage. No, we will stand with the people of democratic Israel as it continues its struggle for peace and democracy for all.[/i]

      Reply
    • Comparisons between Irish republicanism & Hamas / Hizbollah are nonsensical. Neither the Old IRA or the Provo IRA had the goal of the complete destruction of Britain or the eradication of every Protestant in Ireland. These are the goals of Islamic groups in Palestine. Hopefully, this might encourage them to trade in their bombs for the ballot box as happened here & both Israelis & Palestinians can look forward to a peaceful coexistence.

      Reply
  • Good stuff, about time UN

    Reply
  • This type of thinking and action by the US and Israel only succeeds in driving Palestinians into the arms of Hamas and other radical groups. US policy in the Middle East is typified by hypocrisy, ignorance, short term self interest and a complete lack of the application of the ideals laid out in their beloved constitution. It is Israel that appears to want the destruction of the Palestinian state not the other way around.

    Reply
    • Hamas and other radical groups ? Do you not have to become “radical” as the media spin it or is it just fighting for the place you live when your country is being taken over mile by mile ?
      Ireland is less than 100 years old as a country won freedom by “radicals” or “terroists” as they would be called nowadays… the victor writes the history

      Reply
    • It’s a clever rouse.. They say Palestinians want to destroy Israel – because to them Israel covers both Israeli and Palestinian territory.. To have to sacrifice any of that land = destruction..

      They’re not technically destroying the Palestinian state as they have done and continue to do everything in their power to ensure Palestine never gets recognised..

      Reply
    • From that report, I find the following interesting;
      “The assembly approved the upgrade despite threats by the United States and Israel to punish the Palestinians by withholding funds for the West Bank government. U.N. envoys said Israel might avoid harsh retaliation as long as the Palestinians did not seek to join the International Criminal Court.”

      They might avoid harsh retaliation if the Palestinians do not seek to bring them to justice.. Sounds like the school yard bully saying “I won’t kill you if you don’t tell the teacher”..

      Reply
  • Israel & the US warn….

    Tough shit Israel the people have spoken.

    Reply
  • Recognise Palestine. Free Gaza

    Reply
  • “Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev said that by going to the UN, the Palestinians violate “both the spirit and the word of signed agreements to solve issues through negotiations,” which broke down four years ago.” So the Palestinians should just sit in the Gaza ghetto and the west Bank (getting nicely bombed evry couple of years), and wait in the hope that Israel decides to give them an official recognition of their own land, while more and more Israelis are planted on to the little land that’s left!! Nice one Mr Regev! Yes, Israel has a right to security in the region; it is armed to it’s teeth in nuclear weapons, what has it got to loose by engaging with the UN and recognising a Palestinian state?

    Reply
  • It’s largely symbolic. I’d have to disagree with Jason’s take on it. The Palestinian’s are applying for observer status. It tried and failed at the UN Security Council last year for full membership. Despite a lot of press reports to the contrary, it doesn’t mean Palestine would become an internationally recognised state any more than it already is. It won’t have a vote at the UN General Assembly or elsewhere. Full text of the final draft resolution is here: http://un-report.blogspot.ie/2012/11/unga-palestinian-final-draft-resolution.html

    Reply
    • It will still piss the Israeli’s off though!

      Reply
    • It might but a lot of their protests are just bluster. To be honest, because this is just a legal/diplomatic game, it only serves to act as a distraction for practical measures and the real need for a deal that would benefit ordinary Palestinians and Israelis.

      It could even be argued that both sides will be happy with this outcome. From a Palestinian perspective, they ‘win’ the vote and achieve observer status – no real impact but politically good for Abbas as it makes him and Fatah seem relevant. And as far as the Israelis are concerned, the Palestinians sought member state status last year and didn’t get it and now are settling for ‘observer status’ i.e. much less than what they looked for last year.

      Reply
  • “Israel is one of America’s closest allies, and any movement to strengthen one of its fiercest enemies must not be tolerated.” So the Palestinian people are one of Israel’s fiercest enemies? Surely by recognising Palestine as an independent state, it would alienate the likes of Hamas, give people hope and leave the door open for a more democratic, transparent government?

    Reply
  • good news

    Reply
  • Joe Shaw 29/11/12 #

    The Nazi’s killed more in the region of 16,315,000 victims overall, not just the 6,000,00 Jews. Most people forget that though…

    Reply
  • ECP 29/11/12 #

    History is written by the winners and sung by the losers – Ciaran Brennan (artist) I wish the Palestinian people the recognition they deserve, it is overdue. Good Luck!

    Reply
  • mart_n 29/11/12 #

    Does anyone know what time the vote takes place at, and also whether or not the preceeding discussion will be streamed online?

    Thanks in advance

    Reply
  • The hypocrisy of the united states is beyond a joke , how can they be taken seriously .

    Reply
  • Why is it when people compare the way Isreal treats palastinions to the way Nazi’s treated Jews everyone hops on the old “how can you compare killing 6 million to killing 50 ect” leave out the killing aspect of what the germans did and then compare the antics of the Isreali’s. segmenting people because of religious beliefs, confiscating and forcefuly moving people because of there religious beliefs, confining people under armed military guard because they are not jewish or Isreali citizens, forced evictions to aquire new land for the jewish fatherland ect. A native population forced to live under a military embargo and denied basic human rights by a country that cry’s persecution everytime someone mentions the word Nazi.

    Reply
  • United Nations?
    Yeah right!

    Reply
  • The UN is toothless and whatever it decides means nothing because history has shown that they all talk and no action.

    Reply
  • Hopefully the Palestinians understand that such recognition requires responsibility on their part.

    Reply
    • The same responsibility that their neighbouring sovereign state shows while killing hundreds of innocent children and women over the past few years???

      Reply
    • Stephen, are you on glue???
      I know this might sound simplistic/callous, but the kill ratio between Israel and those whose land they besiege and illegally settle their people on is consistently 25-30 to 1. Yet you speak of Palestinian responsibility????
      Please.

      Reply
  • What changes would this new UN status mean?

    Reply
  • Are you REALLY comparing the actions of Israel to the Nazis? Really. I know that there is a lot of nonsense about Israel quoted on The Journal, but any intelligent person could not compare the murder of 6 million civilians to 150 or so people killed in Gaza, whom even Hamas admit that 2/3rds were their militants. Seriously man!

    Reply

Add New Comment