TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Poll: Should Ireland give up its neutrality?

Ireland’s neutrality has always been an important factor in elections but is it a good thing?

In 2002, Fianna Fáil said voting Yes to the Nice Treaty would ensure neutrality.
In 2002, Fianna Fáil said voting Yes to the Nice Treaty would ensure neutrality.
Image: Haydn West/PA Archive/Press Association Images

JUNIOR MINISTER Lucinda Creighton has called it “narcissistic”, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin has admitted it is a “difficult tightrope to walk” and former Attorney General Peter Sutherland believes integration with Europe’s foreign policy and security should be deeper but Ireland’s neutrality has always been part of the country’s makeup.

Sutherland has gone has far as describing our neutrality as being “sacrosanct” since the country’s official non-participation in World War II.

But as Ireland attempts to take a greater role in European and global affairs, this neutrality could obstruct progress.

Yesterday, NATO’s Secretary-General said that Ireland would be “warmly welcomed” if it got involved in more of the military alliance’s future projects. He also said the nation shares NATO’s values and is a “very important partner”. During the visit, he made it clear that the door is open for Ireland to join the group but that would require forfeiting neutrality.

POLL: Should Ireland give up its neutrality?


Poll Results:





Read next:

Comments (181 Comments)

  • Didn’t we give this up already when we allowed the US to land in Shannon airport? If the al qaeda asked to land would we have said yes? I seriously doubt that!

    Therefore in my mind, we’ve picked sides a long time ago.

    Reply
    • we have never been neutral anyway – would take a referendum – so whats the big deal with US (a partner under nato PFP and an ally) using Shannon?

      Reply
    • We sent a letter of condolences to the Germans after WWII in fairness. Or so the legend has it.

      Reply
    • Didn’t dev called in person to the German embassy ? I could be wrong

      Reply
    • The letter of condolence to Germany was a follow on to the letter of condolence to America several weeks earlier of the death of President FDR. It was about not picking sides. Even though covert support was always with the Allies.

      Reply
    • Al queida tend to land their planes into buildings.shannon wouldn’t be of much use to them

      Reply
    • As bad as that is, that did make me laugh.

      http://www.explosm.net/comics/1018/

      Reply
    • we were never neutral, the weather report that facilitated the d-day landings came from belmullet

      Reply
    • “What’s the big deal using Shannon”? are you thick?

      it’s used for rendition flights and torture of people who have not been charged with any crime

      ffs, if Ross is the type of person who cheer-leads ending neutrality then I think most right minded people should know where they stand

      Reply
    • rendition flights are an issue of themselves. not every flight into or out of shannon is a rendition flight, whether or not i support joining NATO does not mean I support rendition flights into shannon ffs. its not as black or white as you make it out to be.

      Reply
    • “an issue unto themselves” – except that the country responsible for these flights, the US, is practically in charge of NATO

      your logic is cat

      Reply
    • I wonder what percentage of those captured actually weren’t involved in terrorism or insurgency.
      I wonder how many lives have been saved by rendition flights and extraction of information from the detainees.
      I wonder if these figures were put out would the majority of people support or protest against them.

      Reply
    • Unsurprising in the least that you are in favour of torturing innocents for “the greater good”

      There is always another way, and in this case it’s rather simple: don’t poke your nose into countries where you don’t belong and you won’t have people trying to blow themselves up to take revenge on you, hence no need for torture to protect your country.

      Reply
    • Maybe someone should’ve said that to OBL prior to 9-11-2001
      HE targeted the US, im sure it goes tit for tat a long way back and yes the US is deeply involved in the affairs of many other countries, nobody is denying that, but personally if it saves one irish life at the rendition of a citizen of another country, I would choose it. But thats me, im sure, based on the comments Ive read here, that im in the minority. Anyway we have bigger fish to fry in ireland and like I said, increasing defence via NATO plus a kick in development, production and manufacturing in the arms industry would greatly benefit every citizen of ireland.

      Reply
    • You’re on sick puppy

      torture is grand with you

      boosting the arms industry (i.e creating weapons that kill people in other countries) is grand if it brings a few poxy jobs to Ireland

      Reply
    • It would create more than a few poxy jobs.

      we already have an arms industry, its quite lucrative. be foolish not to expand all areas of industry but we seem to have exhausted most other industries already.

      Maybe we can start exporting people like you so you can help where it really matters? you can work directly with the terrorists that we are trying to rid the world of, or their victims? Id warrant far more people day each day due to the likes of the taliban and other terrorist groups than do due to a misplaced bomb by nato.

      Reply
    • The Irish people were not asked about US military landings at Shannon. In fact numerous polls show that the people opposed this. The government may have picked “sides” but the people are entitled to a say.

      Reply
    • He called in person to the American embassy to offer condolences on the death of FDR. Hitler died less than a month later, so Dev was obliged to offer condolences to Germany, in order to maintain the appearance of neutrality. Ireland may have been and is officially neutral officially, in practice we are anything but. The poll question should be more on the lines of “Should we admit that we are not neutral or should we become neutral?”

      Reply
    • We didn’t even appear to be neutral. If German airmen crashed in Ireland they were handed over to the British. We also sent fire engines to Belfast to fight fires caused by German bombs, and lets not forget the thousands of Irishmen who fought on the Allies side. At least they were brave enough to stand up to fascist thugs even if their government wasn’t.

      Reply
    • All those that either think we should “get rid of our neutrality” or that we are neutral should look at the number of thumbs up Richard has got for his comment. Possibly the most this week.

      As for Ross Mg Gee, the big deal is that by Ireland allowing the US to use Shannon to transport troops, as a stopover for fuel and for internationally illegal renditions leading to torture we are facilitating the disgusting things they are doing. I would perfectly understand anyone considering us as collaborators. In short, tortured and murdered people is a big deal. And yes, it’s black and white. Allowing them to use out airports makes it a lot easier for the US to continue their terrorism.
      As for your percentages argument I suggest YOU go and see exactly how few people the US themselves have been charged with acts of terrorism (even with their kangaroo courts). How is their behaviour any different from the old witch trials? The Inquisiton? Are they all good?
      Actually, if Ross isn’t a troll or a Journal plant put in here to wind us up I’d be really worried!

      Reply
    • QUOTE: ” if Ross isn’t a troll or a Journal plant put in here to wind us up I’d be really worried”

      Em, I dont get this? Cant you see by all of my comments im in favor of joining NATO?

      Just because I am not of agreement with your skewed leftist at best “conspiracy theory” filled views doesn’t make me a troll.

      I represent, with my comments in favor of NATO, quite a sizable portion of the population – at least 18% (at last check ) not to mention how many of the 29% *ahem* “neutrals” – who in a typically Irish manner “dont know” although they can be forgiven due to the stupid ill-informed and amateur nature of the polls title.

      I come from a military (amongst other things) background and a military family with members who have served not only in the Irish defence forces but also in the british army, royal navy and US army in both world wars, iraq and afghanistan. That influences my opinions greatly.

      I however do not call people here with differing views to mine, trolls.

      It actually highlights your disbelief that, “Christ, an Irish man who doesn’t believe in sitting on the fence, in favor of NATO, who says we arent neutral, why cant he see the US foreign policies and military for the warmongering baby killers that they are?” and frankly, no I don’t.

      Whilst I don’t necessarily agree with all of US (and other members of NATO) heavy handed actions I can appreciate that they are willing and able to not only ensure the survival of their own interests, people and culture, but are willing to step in to other one sided wars and try to defend those of other cultures.

      No matter which country I name, be it Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, even here (rather embarrassingly as the EU stood idly by and scratched its arse) in Europe in the former Yugoslavia – it was US led missions and operations that tried to restore some sort of order or defend some way of life – not always the “right” crusade but nevertheless I have to admire their determination to actually make a f**king decision, something we Irish seem absolutely incapable of doing at best. im sure you will scream Oil or communism etc… I dont believe that’s the case in each one, im sure you do have a counter argument, then again, thanks to your democratic free speech, again defended by the irish constitution and law system and ultimately the Irish defence forces, you are entitled to your viewpoints, I am fully capable of disagreement and can publically deride you if I wish, but I dont for a second believe you’ve come out from under a bridge to give them to me. so you can – with all due respect – shove your troll comment where the sun dont shine – back under that bridge.

      Ireland could benefit from some of the

      Reply
  • There is a very widely-held misconception (I believe) prevalent in Ireland about what Irish neutrality actually means and how that differs from what ACTUAL neutrality in a pure sense is. People seem to think that our neutrality means we keep rigidly to a middle-ground in world affairs (ie. non-aligned) because we a ‘neutral’ (ie. non-beligerent). We don’t – and never did.

    Ireland is not a non-aligned country – we are very much aligned to the traditional NATO aims. We would have joined NATO long ago only for the fact that the UK was a member and that would have given tacit recognition to the ‘occupation’ of the north. We always aligned ourselves very closely with the original WWII allies and the subsequent NATO organisation, and even tried to sign an aggreement with the US, seperate to the UK. We had to do this based on the premise that, neutral or not, Shannon and Dublin airports would be first-strike targets of any inter-bloc conflict and secondly that we could never hope to have the military means to defend ourselves even against conventional attack for any length of time.

    We already train troops headed for Afghanistan, Shannon is available for any non-ordanance military flight stopovers, and we are ever-ready for UN mandated missions. We actually turned down membership of the Non-Aligned Movement to cement our alignment with the strategic military aims and requirements of the western bloc powers. Our ‘neutrality’ is legal smoke and mirrors, with no substance beyond popular opinion.

    In short – we like to wear our Che Guevara t-shirts, as long as we know NATO is minding the door.

    Reply
    • Very true, Ireland has relied on the Allies for its defence during WW2 and NATO during the cold war. We’re not truely neutral unless we can defend ourselves. The Swiss or the Swedes may not be able to do it but at least they attempt to do so.

      TBH, it’s to Irelands shame that we didn’t join the Allies in WW2.

      Reply
    • who defines neutrality?…. what if we don’t accept this definition?

      The legal nature of our ‘neutrality’ and how it compares to others is not the issue.

      A commitment to NATO, & it being funded by the Americans is something we don’t want.

      simple.

      Reply
  • hmm… I’m not taking any sides on this one.

    Reply
  • Our neutrality has always been a sham. We (rightly) favoured the Allies during WW2 and allow US airforces the use of Shannon. Let’s just stop pretending.

    Reply
  • Stephen 13/02/13 #

    I think Ross is trying to tell us something!!!

    Reply
  • I voted yes. Neutrality doesn’t mean pacifism. Neutrality means we have to keep our mouths shut, regardless of the immorality of a war or a regime. We see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil. We should be willing to stand up and say that what is going on in a certain state is wrong, or that a certain side in a war is wrong.

    This probably won’t make any difference in reality as we’re only a small country. However, we do punch above our weight in a lot of respects, and the size of the Irish diaspora in countries, means the position we take on certain issues may make a tiny difference.

    Secondly, it’s complete rubbish to say that we’re still neutral. Letting US planes land in Shannon on the way to bomb Iraq or invade Afghanistan? Facilitating rendition? In no way are we neutral.

    Reply
  • I doubt anyone outside of Ireland would care all that much.

    Reply
  • This poll is flawed, given it’s predicated on the assertion that we’re actually neutral now.

    Reply
    • Join NATO, let the US build a massive naval base down south and a training camp out west and let them pay for enlisting 100,000 Irish kids who can’t get a job. Jobs and training paid for by the US and European military.
      What’s the down side we give up something we don’t have?

      Reply
  • We spend less on defence than Luxembourg ! We have one of the largest maritime zones in the eu 132,000 kms and only have 8 ships to do it with. 3 of them 30 or more years old! Back a few years ago the army purchased new armoured personnel carriers and groups who support Ireland’s so called neutrality slammed it as ireland militarising cause we purchased 40 armoured personnel carriers at roughly one million a piece. The fact was the old personnel carriers we were using was out of date by 30 years offered no protection to the soldiers and the army couldn’t even get parts for them anymore didn’t form part of the debate. Ireland has been neutral. In WW2 we took a decision giving the state of the economy and army to stay out. But we did give vital weather information to the allies that without they could of not attempted the landing on D day. When allied airmen crash landed in Ireland they always made it over the border and so did there planes. Germans were arrested and spent the rest of the war in Ireland. The Axis embassies had there radio transmitter taken from them. We didn’t do that to the allies

    Reply
    • This is not the acts of a natural nation. We are in the Eu And we must play our part in the world. This does not mean we have to go and fight in every war but when our values and our democracy’s are threatened we should stand with our European friends and be counted!

      Reply
  • Ireland doesn’t have neutrality since the government let the Americans into Shannon and the Irish Army being part of the European Rapid Reaction Force

    Reply
    • This poll is a joke. we’ve never been neutral .. ever .. it would take a constitutional amendment – so US can land where they want. We are part of the EU rapid reaction force yes but still couldn’t go anywhere with it unless it was under the triple lock agreement. educate yourselves people.

      Reply
    • You’re absolutely right, Ireland is NOT neutral. We never signed The Hague convention and if we did we couldn’t allow US troops to use Shannon

      As an aside, being neutral would require us to spend a lot more on defence to enforce that neutrality

      Reply
  • People in Irleand talk about neutrality like it’s some sort of virtue in and of itself.

    Is being neutral on the issue of a kid being bullied in a playground virtuous? Is being neutral about genocide in rowanda virtuous? We’re quick to criticise other countries for invading other countries and quick to forget that the only reason we can afford to be “Neutral” is because so many other countries would run to our aid if we were ever attacked.

    Ireland’s stance on neutrality is an ivory tower stance.

    Reply
  • NEUTRAL!!! You made a funny

    Reply
  • Constitutionally Ireland is not a neutral country, this was merely a stance Ireland took during world war II. Based on this fact all arguments about neutrality obstructing progress are null and void.

    Maybe it’s time for Ireland to put the big boy pants on and actually invest in a proper military infrastructure. Not only would that create jobs through direct employment but also create jobs in spin off industry, thus aiding our (slow) economic recovery. Economically it makes sense but proper infrastructure would need to be put in place as it’s not necessarily there at the moment (my brother was in the irish army as are a few friends). The only obstruction there is, to progress, is the assumption that we are neutral. Fact of the matter is, we’re not neutral and should (in the highly unlikely scenario) we be attacked we don’t have the means to defend ourselves.

    Reply
    • well it is time for Ireland to put the big boy pants on but the investment in creating a “proper Military” simply is not there certainly if ireland wants to produce its own “items” eg armour cars, tanks, weapons systems, planes, ships. etc. almost all of these would be produced abroad there would be next to no increase in employment.

      Where are the arms manufacturers? the ship builders etc? simply put if ireland wanted to modernise and increase its military might etc. the only place to go would be the UK, US or Europe for the equipment.

      Reply
  • Nonsense poll — Article 28 (3) 1° of Bunreacht na hÉireann is quite clear that we can happily decalre/take part in war(s) if the Dáil so wishes, and just because the Dáil once voted to maintain a [sham] neutral stance with regard to WWII does not make us a “neutral” country now.

    Reply
  • What does neutrality really mean? In WWII it just meant we weren’t going to get invaded now a day it means nothing. Nuclear war doesn’t respect neutrality, terrorists don’t respect neutrality.

    What does neutrality really mean to us? We already send troops on peace keeping missions. We don’t have any “enemy” countries that would invade us and replace our government. We allow foreign countries to use Shannon to transport troops.

    It’s no more than a word these days!

    Reply
    • er in WWII i have no idea what it ment Germany certainly did not respect neutrality the benalux countries were neutral and look what happened there??? If Germany had really wanted to invade Ireland they would have and it would have been easy. if there had been an a German invasion Britain certainly would of counter invaded.

      Face facts Neutrality in war only matters if everyone else respects it or your big enough to fend off everyone. in Peace time its just words

      Reply
  • Richard 13/02/13 #

    All I know is I have no strong feelings one way or another. Also, if I die, tell my wife HELLO.

    Reply
  • Damocles 13/02/13 #

    Reading between the lines here is Ross suggesting that Ireland isn’t neutral?

    Reply
  • Ireland is only Neutral on paper. In reality our neutrality was so diluted by our membership of the EU that in more or less every way it no longer exists. by allowing Military Aircraft to land or over fly our airspace is a breach of neutrality . Also by taking Part in United Nations Peace Enforcing missions to various countries is also a breach. At one time I would have been a staunch supporter of Neutrality at all times But not so much now

    Reply
  • Neutrality is like your virginity: you’re better off getting it out of the way ASAP. Then you can get on and fully enjoy life. If you’re holding out for the “right” moment: you’ll just end up like some weird 40 year old virgin.

    Reply
  • Ireland needs to grow up and join the adults in NATO. This neutrality business is a coward ‘s cop out.

    Reply
  • It’s not about “giving up” anything. We did that a long time ago. It’s about solidarity with countries with which we have common cause and shared values. Depending on NATO to defend Europe but not getting involved is akin to going to a “bring a bottle” party and turning up with a bottle of tap water.

    Reply
  • Ah…neutrality…a red herring if ever there were one. Ireland is or never has been neutral. Non-aligned is more to the point…similar to Austria in fact. Sweden and Switzerland are neutral and have the independent capability to defend and protect their own sovereign territory. We do not and never did have this capability as a result of political decisions taken over the years. Our Defence Forces due to political oversight and budgetary constraints are not fit for purpose.
    Membership of NATO opens up a whole new whole of possibilities to the Defence Forces and the State (economical and political), something which should be seriously considered. Using neutrality as a political football by groups and political parties serving their own agenda will always result in the wrong decisions being taken and stifles any real debate on the subject as it used as a tool to intimidate the electorate. It’s a huge political hot potato. Time to grow up as a citizenry and take our place on the world stage…the UN is not this stage.

    Reply
  • We are not neutral anyway so why the poll?

    Reply
  • Lucinda Creighton or Micheal Martin may be outright against it or with or without guarded ambiguity but they will not be the ones dying in the ditch, they will not be the ones telling the parents that young Paddy or Sínead is a cripple or dead or shell shocked. Do either of them strike you as being people that care about others above their own careers?.

    Same with the 16% who voted yes to ending neutrality. Are you even capable of defending yourself from attack, ever even had to throw punches in self defense and here voting for people to go off and get shot. Cop on!

    Reply
    • I know at least one of those 16% is in fact a member of the defence forces. I personally think Ireland should, within its limited capabilities, play a bigger part in global security and shouldn’t be afraid to pick sides. To stand up with other nations and say something is wrong and something should be done about it. I’m not saying we should become a lapdog of the US and join in whatever illegal war or morally questionable adventure they embark on but sometimes Ireland should do something. Even if its just like in Mali where we will soon send 8 soldiers to train their military.

      Reply
    • How is anyone voting to get shot? And what is so morally superior about neutrality?

      If your neighbour is beating his kids do you pay yourself on the back for staying out of it?

      Reply
    • I voted yes to ending “neutrality”….not because I want ireland to go to war but because I would rather we be straight about things. A small country needs allies if we are not willing to spend the money ourselves on boosting our armed forces. As we are members of the EU for the foreseeable future, anything that threatens the EU is a threat to us equally so. Be that directly or indirectly. I know it would be Irish lives on the line but we should do our fair share and not hope other countries would aid us if needed.

      For what its worth before you ask, yes I would serve in a time of crisis if required or deemed eligible.

      Reply
    • How long does this country expect others to do our dirty work for us . The the Defence forces in this country are all volunteers and it is the career that they choose . The minister for foreign affairs condemned North Korea yesterday . Is this being neutral ? Being neutral means you can in force your own neutrality eg Switzerland. The only reason Ireland wishes to be neutral is so the government can withhold spending on the defence forces

      Reply
    • Lapdog? Yeah u just let the US and the other countries do the dirty work while you sit around and take up space and run their useless mouths.

      Reply
    • Cathy, did you read my comment or just get upset because I’m critical of the US? The US can keep its dirty work (and as often as not dirty is the apt word) but I do think Ireland should do more. I gave Mali as an example. But but there’s a lot going on in the world where the EU, UN and NATO can make a stand and Ireland should have the courage of its convictions. That DOESN’T mean blindly following the US (since they’re partial to lying bout WMDs, torture, breaching international law and supporting dodgy practices and regimes etc…)

      Reply
    • censored 13/02/13 #

      So you’re happy for American kids to die on our behalf as we shelter under their shield? Not to mention the fact that we are one of the lowest ranking countries in energy independence… Our “neutrality” is bogus. We’re not neutral. And anyway, if we were ever invaded we’d be crying for help pretty fast as we’re incapable of defending our “neutrality”. Need to face up to reality and support our allies.

      Reply
  • We remain Neutral, for financial gain and taking advantage of situations. Its out of date, change it and conscript any young people who have no job leaving school!

    Reply
  • The same sutherland that went with noonan to the builderbergs.

    Reply
  • We should ask the Germans….. They are telling us what to do about everything else!

    ;)

    Reply
  • Ireland is not NEUTRAL and never has been!

    Reply
  • Interesting piece by Sheila Flanagan in the examiner on the weekend. Basically saying who cares about our neutrality as long as its economically beneficial. I mean who cares what the US planes in Shannon did afterwards as long as it strengthened economic ties with the US. Think most people would agree…

    Reply
  • I assume the NATO cheerleaders here will be the first people to join the armed forces and go off to whatever country NATO gets involved in be it in the Middle East or Africa. I don’t see any need to get involved in an organisation that’s essentially a relic of the Cold War, Sweden, Finland, Austria and Malta don’t either.

    I also don’t see how recent NATO missions have “protected” Ireland, was there a country with an expansionist foreign policy I wasn’t aware of? Just today 10 civilians died in a NATO airstrike in Afghanistan, Irish membership would associate us with every single civilian death caused by NATO.

    I don’t believe Ireland is neutral or even non-aligned (membership of the EU is regarded as alignment by the Non-Aligned Movement) and I’d have no problem with Ireland independently supporting the African Union/French mission in Mali which is an example of the regional body asking for European help as opposed to NATO trundling in somewhere it isn’t wanted.

    Being a NATO member means you’re tied to the whim of the major countries, countries like Slovenia and Estonia don’t exactly have the same input as the UK or USA. The NATO model is totally archaic and outdated with the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact.

    Well that’s my tuppence worth, I’m probably losing this battle though NATO butter up Enda and we’ll probably be full scale members in 2/3 years. Lol. Aww well seems to be how things go round here these days.

    Reply
    • Very informative comment, a good alternative to NATO membership too, non neutral but still willing to have a more robust foreign policy? something I havent considered deeply in a while, would be a very good alternative to NATO membership but would require a far more robust foreign policy and department of defence.

      Reply
  • Oh and I love the way everyone fears the draft. The draft was never used in Ireland not even WW1 ! But if it was such a concern I’m sure the government could ban it to lay people’s fear aside !

    Reply
  • Our “neutrality” is in fact as much as an illusion as our “sovereignty”, when you get down to it. Don’t kid yourself that the government in Dublin is in control, things have moved on and we’ve been sold down the river. Anybody who knows what “democracy” and “republic” actually mean will already know that.
    http://www.thejournal.ie/fintan-otoole-four-angry-men-686781-Nov2012/

    Reply
  • Dont know why people are disliking my comments, apart from the fact that i may appear to be spamming you, but honestly Im just speaking the truth. we arent neutral and never have been, all ive suggested is that if we feel so strongly either for or against it then we should change the constitution. I sure hope you have deep pockets to afford the increase in defence expenditure that constitutional neutrality brings with it. we’ll have to be able to secure our own shores as we can no longer rely on other member states to step in as they currently would do.

    Reply
    • censored 13/02/13 #

      There is nothing in the constitution about neutrality.

      Nobody would step in to help us.

      We don’t have deep pockets, but I’m sure that will be consolation if we ever need to defend ourselves or take a hand in supporting those who are defending us by proxy.

      Reply
  • Aware as I am that Ireland is not and has never been ‘neutral’ in the true sense of the word, I feel that to give up the guise of neutrality would only lead to problems. We may allow US military flights, and align ourselves more with Nato than true neutrality, but at the same time we are not the recipients of terrorist attacks, be it because terrorists don’t see us as a threat, or because they don’t feel they have just cause to attack us. I hope that the day of a terrorist attack in Ireland never dawns, but I can’t say it won’t ever happen. Hopefully keeping our thin veil of neutrality will protect us in a world of ever increasing violence.

    Reply
    • Finally someone talking sense.

      Just look at the attack on Stockholm a few years back due to Sweden’s involvement in Afghanistan

      People who are saying “ah sure what difference would it make” need to get their heads examined

      Reply
    • Agreed. But there’s a broader point to make. Supporting US/EU militarism and imperialism would be wrong. That’s a good enough reason to oppose being part of it all, regardless of the risk of attacks on Ireland.

      Reply
    • we have had our share of terrorism on this island we have to be careful with K ÓL and his sinister sick buddies trying to reinvigorate the home grown type.

      Reply
    • we have to be careful of space cadets like you Andy who support Imperial state-terror

      Reply
    • And you support rendition of the internal type, except waterboarding is too soft for your menu of eyball plucking and hot pokers. And that is just for those that will not bow to the socialist mantra after treatment in the Gulag.

      Reply
    • Ok, so it’s not because you have a moral problem with joining NATO, it’s because you’re afraid of the consequences?

      Cowards. “The terrorists” you’re so afraid of have already beaten you because they are dictating your actions. Thank god people like that 12 year old from Afghanistan have more guts than you lot

      Reply
    • I suspect you mean Pakistan.

      Reply
    • Chuck you’ll see in an above post I’ve clearly said that it’s immoral for us to be involved in this

      Mars, if that is your real name. “hot pokers” lol, jog on will you!

      I always find it’s the fools with the anonymous facebook and twitter profiles who are most full of hot air

      Reply
    • K ÓL
      Foolish eh, I do not think so, you are a front for a dangerous terrorist organisation so I have to be careful, I do not want to end up like poor old Robert McCartney beaten with sewer rods and disembowelled in a back lane because that is how you and your sinister cronies think the hot air should be let out of people who do not agree with you and your twisted version of reality. So you jog on there Kerron, in your delusional Marxist fantasy of fixing the worlds wrongs.

      Reply
  • We arent constitutionally neutral anyway so how can we give it up! Take the poll down, im embarrassed that a national media company wouldnt understand this and would put up such an ill-informed article.

    What you should have polled is – should we have a referendum on neutrality and how would you vote.

    Reply
  • Nation of soft cowards anyway. Irish people don’t do anything and let spineless leaders walk all over them. Better of staying neutral and under the duvet.

    Reply
  • we havnt been neutral since american war planes were allowed stop over here on their way to bomb iraqi civilians

    Reply
    • we have never been neutral anyway – would take a referendum.

      Reply
    • Give it a rest, what a completely flawed one sided, idiotic statement, yes they may have fuelled up here but we didn’t tell them go to Iraq and kill civilians. Cop on.

      Reply
    • you seem to deliberately miss the point lisa, we may not have declared a ‘side’ in any conflict, but the act of friendly logistic support to one side in any war will naturally be treated like an act of aggression by the other, ‘the friend of my enemy is my enemy’, real neutrality would mean not allowing a warring faction support.

      Reply
    • I think you maybe misunderstanding the term neutrality RP, it means we don’t have a military allegiances with other countries, for example what happen in WW1. We sell them fuel and whiskey in Shannon, to not sell them these things could be seen as taking sides.

      Reply
    • So if a guy fills his car with petrol at topaz and he drives to a house where he kills someone then topaz in someway are responsible for that death. Is that what you’re saying?

      Reply
    • as would selling them and allowing respite in the country, either way we are not neutral, the policies of any warring country seems to be ‘if you are not with us you are against us’, this does not allow for neutrality and gwbush stated it in no uncertain terms, we didnt really have a choice but we arent neutral

      Reply
    • yes lisa, that is exactly the same thing, you show great understanding of the issue

      Reply
    • rp is correct.

      If we let Iraq fuel here, would we consider ourselves neutral?

      Reply
    • @RP, i know you are being sarcastic in your last comment there, but as a matter of fact it IS exactly the same situation, IF the driver of that car TOLD the topaz garage that he was on his way to commit murder, and bribed the garage attendant to let him refuel anyway

      Reply
    • Peasant, be grateful your not speaking German or Arabic.

      Reply
    • Yes Cathy, hitlers master plan was to have us all speaking German. In fact that’s where Saddam gotthe idea for his plan to invade Ireland and force us all to speak Arabic!

      Reply
    • Linda. What about the prisoners that we knew the Americans were bringing to Shannon Airport as a stopover that were going to be tortured?
      That sound neutral?
      Evil is done when good men stand back and do nothing.
      I think the question should be altered to ‘should we remain a people that continues to stick its head in the sand while the Govt does what it likes with absolutely no accountability’

      Reply
    • If the US wasnt fighting the islamists trying to contain that nonsense while people like u sat around whining in your beer, what do u think would happen? Don’t you have to go drive drunk in the country or something?

      Reply
    • @Gearóid Ó Murchadha amazing that the campaigns to bring home the troops in both the US and the UK are run by members of the forces or their family members and share the same sentiments as you have expressed here, some people prefer to follow the lies of aggressive war-mongering politicians or vested interest, profit motivated media, they like to have others create enemies for them, they think this conflict started on 11/9/01, I suggest reading the year 2000 edition of the lonely planet guide Central Asia (non politically oriented travel guide), it has a page devoted to describing how the USA wants to bring 2 oil pipelines through Afghanistan from Russia to the Persian Gulf, no coincidence then that they had to invade any countries that weren’t friendly on this route, gw-bush didnt even try to be discrete when he said ‘we will not let anyone stand in the way of our oil supply’

      Reply
    • Denis 13/02/13 #

      No American bomber has ever refuelled in Shannon on the way to any bombing mission.
      Try not to fall for the lefty propaganda all the time.

      Reply
    • split all the hairs you want denis, allowing bombless war planes to refuel on the way to or from conflict in any capacity is not a neutral action

      Reply
    • My dead granfather dead somewhere in the Ardens and his war mongering 3 kids and widow thank you so much for your infinite wisdom o great peasant!!!!!! Have a wonderful day!

      Reply
    • sorry your grandfather is dead, a victim of war? so you support war then?

      Reply
    • I don’t see how the courage and sacrifice of your grandfather in WWII makes bad US foreign policy today any better?!

      Reply
    • Yes i do, hope that pisses u off more. Me and my war mongering family! Kindly shove your condolences. I hope you’re enjoying your freedom to run your rotten mouth you filthy left wing freak! You should hang out with Obama! Then again I think he may have more sense than you.

      Reply
    • that is because bombers are based on aircraft cariers,

      Reply
    • What about when soviet planes were allowed to stop over on the way to Cuba back in the day?

      Reply
  • Yeah why not. Why wrap ourselves in a blanket while the others fight for our freedom? However at the moment we are doing just fine and our troops are doing a superb job peacekeeping for the UN and EU. And those complaining about US planes passing through Shannon, please just stop. You’d swear we were waging a war!

    Reply
  • I think we have given up our futures and our children’s futures for Europe.
    Isn’t that enough?
    They want more?

    Reply
  • phil 13/02/13 #

    We are not neutral. We just dont officially send troops to the front line. A major amount of Irishmen have died in others wars. The wild geese, the fighting 69th, even today in the Royal Irish Regiment has Irish citzens on the front line.
    The government should drop the act and join NATO. It we where attacked NATO would defend us and im sure there is military aid available to help boot our army.

    Reply
    • The wild geese left Ireland because it was under British rule at the time!
      The fighting 69th. are not members of our defence forces!
      About 400 Irishmen are in the british army! ….. That’s .00001% of our poulation.
      The whole point about neutrality is that if we are neutral then nobody attacks! …………. Who’s going to attack us? …..

      Reply
  • This slagging back and forth slagging each other is wanting me to ask a question do any of you people have a job

    Reply
  • Body bag anyone ? ……
    the problem for Michael D. as head of our defence forces is that he has directly contravened the constitution by allowing our forces to be deployed in Uganda and afghanistan ………..
    another problem is that the deployment of these troops renders lisbon 2 illegal as specific constitutional guarantees were given between lisbon 1 and lisbon 2 ……considering the McKenna and the McCrystal judgements this actually renders Lisbon 2 illegal …seeing as Lisbon 2 hands over our natural resources to E.U. control in 2014 then this is a good thing that Lisbon 2 is illegal!
    If we allow this to happen then all our oil and gas will be used up in some fake war in the midddle east or africa and we’ll have diddly squat except Bertie’s debt !
    Please wake up Ireland we’re being made total and complete fools out of …our constitutional property rights were, in my opinion, breached by Ray burke ..as a corrupt politician (mahon report) all his actions should be suspended and our oil and gas re-negotiated ..our neutrality copper-fastened ….we have enough oil and gas to establish our own currency ! …. the big picture is that “Paddy likes ” being made a complete and utter fool out of on the “train to Europe” …driven by Enda! …and anyone that thinks enda is surviving on 200,000 a year should remember that his fellow towns man couldn’t survive on 100,000 Euro years ago …

    Reply
  • The cabinet can vote to send troops over seas if the contingent is less then 12 people. In the case of Mali, Uganda/Somalia and Afghanistan all commitments are under 12 people.
    When it comes to large scale deployments however, and as i stated earlier, we have the same process of sending troops overseas as the UK and the US (with the added requirement that the mission is mandated by the UN) in that both houses of government and the executive must agree to the deployment.
    UNAMA is a UN mandated mission in Afghanistan under UN resolution 1401. It came to be in December 2002 following the US led invasion of Afghanistan. So, what ever your views of the initial invasion are, the current presence of troops, including those of the Irish, are sanctioned by the UN.
    NATO can be a huge force for good. Examples of this are the Balklands, where intervention by NATO forces ended genocide on an industrial scale and prevented further killings the likes of which the world had not seen since the Holocaust. I never hear people shout ‘Wolf’ over the US led invasion and liberation from tyranny of those countries.
    Its absence can lead to atrocities that can shake the world. Where was NATO during the Rwandan genocide? But then where was the UN, the African Union or the European Union? Lessons have been learnt since then of course and organisations have grown internationally such as the EU rapid reaction force and EU mandated missions such as Chad, Mali and Somalia.
    However mistakes are still being made . Arguments rightfully exist that some of its recent actions have not been completely without fault. But NATO’s own Sec Gen Anders Rasmussen recently stated that NATO is not the worlds policeman. And, I agree, Nor should it be. But in the absence of a world policeman working on behalf of global security, peace and the preservation of life in every country and on every continent then the closest thing we can ask for is that NATO can step in and do this job; for who else can?
    The question we have to ask ourselves, as a nation who claims to want global peace and prosperity, is whether we stand by on the outside of NATO shouting at every mistake, or get involved in NATO and change it for the better of both the Organisation, ourselves and our Globe.

    Reply
  • SeanR 13/02/13 #

    It’s odd that only 29% of poll respondents voted yes. Yet it seems the majority of commenters think we are not neutral in practice or should give it up. (My view too.)

    Reply
  • Article 29.9 ………..The State shall not adopt a decision taken by the European Council to establish a common defence persuant to Article 42 of the treaty of the European Union where the common defence would include the State ………….. Our soldiers as Irish citizens are members of our Nation and therefore the State!
    our soldiers in Afghanistan and Uganda are ,in my opinion, breaching this Article and the President as defender of the constitution and head of the armed forces is allowing the constitution to be broken ! ….
    Where’s David Hall when you need him?

    Reply
    • The cabinet can vote to send troops over seas if the contingent is less then 12 people. In the case of Mali, Uganda/Somalia and Afghanistan all commitments are under 12 people.
      When it comes to large scale deployments however, and as i stated earlier, we have the same process of sending troops overseas as the UK and the US (with the added requirement that the mission is mandated by the UN) in that both houses of government and the executive must agree to the deployment.
      UNAMA is a UN mandated mission in Afghanistan under UN resolution 1401. It came to be in December 2002 following the US led invasion of Afghanistan. So, what ever your views of the initial invasion are, the current presence of troops, including those of the Irish, are sanctioned by the UN.
      NATO can be a huge force for good. Examples of this are the Balklands, where intervention by NATO forces ended genocide on an industrial scale and prevented further killings the likes of which the world had not seen since the Holocaust. I never hear people shout ‘Wolf’ over the US led invasion and liberation from tyranny of those countries.
      Its absence can lead to atrocities that can shake the world. Where was NATO during the Rwandan genocide? But then where was the UN, the African Union or the European Union? Lessons have been learnt since then of course and organisations have grown internationally such as the EU rapid reaction force and EU mandated missions such as Chad, Mali and Somalia.
      However mistakes are still being made . Arguments rightfully exist that some of its recent actions have not been completely without fault. But NATO’s own Sec Gen Anders Rasmussen recently stated that NATO is not the worlds policeman. And, I agree, Nor should it be. But in the absence of a world policeman working on behalf of global security, peace and the preservation of life in every country and on every continent then the closest thing we can ask for is that NATO can step in and do this job; for who else can?
      The question we have to ask ourselves, as a nation who claims to want global peace and prosperity, is whether we stand by on the outside of NATO shouting at every mistake, or get involved in NATO and change it for the better of both the Organisation, ourselves and our Globe.

      Reply
  • so our kids fighting their wars is what they meant by ‘vote yes for jobs’

    Reply
  • We are NOT neutral. We adopted a neutral stance during WW II but that was for that specific conflict and was rescinded upon our joining the EU in ’72 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_%28international_relations%29#List_of_neutral_states )

    This poll is flawed because it asks if we should give up something we don’t have. You might as well ask us should we give up our colony on the dark side of the moon.

    I believe that as a mature nation it is our responsibility to help others less fortunate then our own. We do this presently via UN missions (Lebanon) and UN mandated missions (EU-Chad, EUTM in Uganda, Afghanistan and now possibly an EUTM to Mali). If we did take the step towards NATO membership then it would allow us to give aid to other countries without the need for a UN mandate and therefore make it easier to continue the work of peace throughout the globe.

    Reply
    • I’m sorry to disagree with you but there are several european treaties that are in law on the express legal understanding that we are neutral! To have the soldiers in service as you have pointed out means one of two things …. the european treaties are now deemed invalid or we bring our soldiers immediately! …. that’s the law , just because the government is breaking the law does not mean it’s o.k.! …in fact under article 9.3.of the irish constitution …this is enough to force the resignation of both the Government and the President !
      The game is simple if you want join the irish defence forces you may be asked to serve on peace -keeping U.N. backed missions ….. if one wants to go to war …then one join the British army , or the foreign legion!

      Reply
  • Considering there is alot of posturing going on right now Between China Japan North Korea South Korea Russia U.S i would not like to be eligible for a draft letter in my door if im not already .

    Reply
    • What a silly comment. what makes you think that if we became a NATO partner that there would be a draft? Irish forces are fully volunteer.

      Reply
    • There are plenty of neutral countries that operate obligatory military or civil service for young citizens and have a draft in place for times of crisis. I always wondered why so many irish people are against the idea of serving their country when the need is there.

      Besides Ireland is only neutral on paper. We couldn’t properly defend ourselves against most nations that could attack us. If you don’t have the ability to protect your neutrality, well sorry you don’t really have it.

      Reply
    • What age are ye lads and surely yere not that Gullible .

      Reply
    • You are assuming King Olaf – that we are a neutral country – when plainly we are not a neutral state like austria, sweden or finland.

      Reply
    • @Ross – I suppose the best way to describe it would that we are historically non-belligerent.

      Reply
    • King Olaf, can you point me toward the piece of paper on which it says Ireland is neutral?

      Reply
    • No I can’t because as Ross has pointed out many times now, that piece of paper doesn’t exist. I guess I am guilty of taking what Irish politicians have said about it for many years at face value. Shame on me.

      Reply
    • Oh i Forgot France Iran Israel .The world is at war its just unofficial yet.The level of Ignorance to what is going around the world is obscene.Nato wants Ireland to become unneutral now when their is a depression going on in Europe Currency Wars going on between China Japan Europe United States Russia Britain very volatile situation on the horizon and now noises about giving up our neutrality .Who is going to attack Ireland who.This is to bring Irish people mostly young males under the control of NATO who can draft them in to fight any wars they see fit to fight.NATO’S track record is’nt the best they are the strongarm of big business and Banks.Read a history book before more uninformed adults sign their children up for something the older wiser ha generations have let start through complete ignorance of what is really going on in the wider world..Just for once have the vision to see past the story of the day which leads to another story and before we know it our young lads are part of a sham European army that goes off to fight for Globalists and Bankers vested interests.Jesus.

      Reply
    • Hey Jack, I know this tree, its a bit lonely and could do with a hug…. where do you get this nato – draft – signing lives away – eu army – crap from? theres no draft and even if part of NATO we STILL couldnt go anywhere unless it was under the triple lock. dear lord above, below and beyond.

      Reply
    • Thats a nice tin foil hat you are wearing there jack.

      Reply
    • Its because of fools like ye our country is wrecked do you know that go away and inform yereselves .Recession Currency War War .Tin foil hat tree hugging the typical nonsense from sillybuggers.

      Reply
    • Because of fools like me eh?

      how in the name of jasus did you figure that one out?

      firstly im not a banker – you’ll find them heaped in with the developers and previous govts and finance ministers and irish bond holders.

      Ive not had the pleasure of working in any of these roles.

      secondly your comments are typical diatribe filled with rumours, whispers and general conspiracy theories.

      If we were part of NATO, it would mean more jobs for one thing.

      I personally would like to see the arms industry sector grow here as it was mean MANY more jobs in Ireland and more foreign investment. I also guess many unemployed people couldn’t care less whether they were making the ejection mechanism for the Browning .5 Heavy Machine Gun as opposed to Waterford Crystal vases so long as it meant there was a salary coming into a home.

      Im sure you wouldn’t like that now – but you are entitled to free speech, unlike many in the middle east, Syria or Mali or Ethiopia or other countries unlucky enough to not live in our kind of democracy, but next time you decided to comment, it wouldnt hurt to offer a small thanks and just remember that your right to free speech is enshrined in the constitution and protected ultimately by those who carry weapons in service to our state, ensuring that nobody else takes it away from you, whether you like it or not.

      Reply
    • The strength of our military is set by the government. IF we joined NATO that wouldn’t change (unless we were invaded which I’d doubt is in any way likely). As it is at the moment with ISAF, UNIFIL etc… Our contributions are limited, maybe by the defence forces size and capabilities? Yes we’re part of an EU battlegroup but what do we actually contribute? Maybe one company? And a battalion to Lebanon? And a few hundred more spread out around other missions (like a half dozen or so with ISAF)? It’s not that much. Your talk of the draft is silly scaremongering bull! There is enough real things to worry about without making stuff up!

      Reply
    • Ross Europe is Federalising and will have an army trust me lets not go back to the days of WW2 look whats happening the superpowers are squaring up to each other American warships all off the south china sea and Japan their is a currency war being fought between the U.S and China Japan Europe Russia its all leading to something and now when all this volatility appears Irish Neutrality gets served up to us starts with whispers first of course.NATO treaty are not worth the paper their printed on they have illegally attacked before whats to sat thgey will draft beak their treaty and go again big mistake leaving the door open to a globalist war machine .Learn from history it has a tendency to repeat itself.Not your fault country is wrecked i accept withdraw that staement but people really start to open their eyes.Gooday.

      Reply
    • Jesus Ross you sound like a millitary man .At ease soldier.

      Reply
    • Can’t really add anything more than what Ross said.

      But get over yourself jack. You lose all credibility in an argument when you start talking about NWO style conspiracy theories. I think that perhaps it is you who could do with reading up on things before mouthing off. I bet you most of your info has come from some looper making videos on YouTube rather than actual sources.

      Reply
    • You said that Too KING OLAF when you had no bother in Israel bombing the hell out of GAZA ye boys are a different breed and i except that i hope ye sign up so dont be shy when the time comes.Youtubes for music buddy.Typical the earth is flat it must be answer from a rock that just sits there and never thinks.

      Reply
    • Yes jack, a lot of people with views like yours get them from youtube videos rather than actual sources that can be referenced. Thats why you fly off the handle when people have different views to yours. You confuse your opinion with what is accepted as fact based upon research and reason.

      Reply
    • censored 13/02/13 #

      Jack, I think you’re the one who needs to educate yourself. See how long your high moral ground lasts in time of need. We’re managed to stay out of most conflicts in the last 100 years or so, but I’d say the Irish have plenty of history that should help them understand what happens when a stronger outsider gets interested. You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you (von clausewitz, a war monger)

      Reply
  • Dont think it will much of a difference.

    Reply
  • When did planes stop here on their way to bomb Iraqi civilians? Yet another ill-informed comment from an ill-informed person displaying a lack of interest in, or understanding of a subject. Quick the sky is falling in!!
    As a member of the UN we have to give aid to other UN contributing countries on their way to a UN mandated mission which Iraq and Afghanistan are.
    Ireland is not now nor has it ever been neutral. We have the same constitution on deploying armed forces abroad as most nations in that it requires agreement from the three echelons of government. (The Dail, Senad, President) We have the added prerequisite of the deployment having to be sanctioned by the UN. (Triple lock system).
    Our stance of neutrality during WW II was for a number of reasons. They were mainly economic and political. They were not due to us being a peace loving people. But if you want to be informed on modern activities of a nation through history observed trough rose tinted glasses then feel free. I’m sure Chu Cullain would be proud!
    The level of vocal ignorance amazes and scares me at the same time!!!

    Reply
  • That’s some image of cowen, considering the many years of FF sticking their fingers in their ears as the USA extradited prisoners to Egypt, often through shannon to received torture. We’re not a neutral country when we should be. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil is evil.

    Reply
  • Giving up our neutrality to have another seat for another political muppet at the top table of corrupt power??? You can be sure the Oireachtas will be fighting for places at the top of the queue for the job – PARASITES!!. And it will be vigorously supported by Dougal Maguire’s Fine Gael who ALREADY have MILITARY SERVICE FOR OUR CHILDREN in their agenda……… I say NO!

    Reply
  • Ill see your imaginary poll and raise you the non neutral constitution
    many people are asking to see it anyway.
    http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/attached_files/html%20files/Constitution%20of%20Ireland%20(Eng)Nov2004.htm

    Reply
  • Giving up neutrality would be morally wrong. It would engage our young men and women in the forces in illegal and wholly unlawful wars.

    Reply
  • I think we should declare war on the US, lose badly and get a Marshall plan or its 2013 equivalent to bail us out and rebuild our country.

    Once the US satellites take photos and see the number of ghost estates they will think that we have already been bombed and they will bomb some other country that has (or doesn’t have) WMDs.

    Reply
  • People are pointing to american planes landing at shannon as the first proof that ireland is not neutral, but it goes back further than that. Allowing german u-boats to refuel in cork and kerry, and turning the lights on during the blackout, to help guide german bombers to britain during the blitz wouldnt exactly show a strict neutrality either

    Reply
  • We do not have a large enough military to be anything other than neutral.

    Reply
  • Yes of course we should, first port of call would be invading South Armagh and Londonderry, toiceoidh at laethanta

    Reply
  • #Tag 13/02/13 #

    We have enough problems of our own before getting involved in any one else’s business.

    Reply
  • We are not neutral, we cannot afford to be. World war two ended in 1945 as did our neutrality.

    Reply

Add New Comment